EPTSid Meier's Civilization VI - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10167 Posts
 | ||
|
chocorush
696 Posts
| ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
Civ 6 seems to be hex-based. I like that | ||
|
ref4
2933 Posts
 | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On May 12 2016 03:03 Talin wrote: This. It looks so much cleaner too. It's absurd that we have had a number of turn based strategy games where you can't distinguish what anything on the map is without looking at icons. Presentation of game elements is what the map is for. The fact strategy games need an icon map on top of the actual map to tell us what everything on the map is is beyond absurd. This so much. I like the art style. I despise "realism". SC2 is more "realistic" and "gritty" than BW and it's complete mess in a big fight. BW had units with bright colors and I could easily tell which zerglings are whose even in a mass 200/200 all zergling fight. Minimalism is one thing I would love to happen in strategy games. I would love for developers to take a traffic sign approach to the art. Also, Civ games are normally a mess when they are first released but I find that each step has its own charm. The final version with all expansions released has way too many features. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Salazarz
Korea (South)2591 Posts
On May 12 2016 05:34 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Please tell me we will have a geographically correct Earth map this time, along with trade routes, religion, spies all at the launch of the game none of this add on crap. Along with differing art styles for buildings etc. But how are they going to make you pay 100$+ for the game if they did that? | ||
|
SweNgoS
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 12 2016 05:34 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Please tell me we will have a geographically correct Earth map this time, along with trade routes, religion, spies all at the launch of the game none of this add on crap. Along with differing art styles for buildings etc. No. Just like every Civ, some features will not make it into the initial release. Because game development doesn’t work by the “Please have the same number of bullet pointed features as the last game, +5 more.” Well it could, but god that shit would be stale as fuck. | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
On May 12 2016 04:37 xDaunt wrote: There are some pretty big changes coming to the game -- particularly with regards to city management: http://www.polygon.com/features/2016/5/11/11653620/civilization-6-release-date-preview looks nice | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
I get the impression these guys played a bunch of endless legend and wanted their cities to be that cool. I will be very happy if all cities are not built the same, with all the same upgrades. | ||
|
Kon-Tiki
United States402 Posts
On May 12 2016 02:31 Godwrath wrote: Well, knowing their record, i will start playing it when it has released 1-2 expansions. Civ IV was good before Warlords or BTS. | ||
|
MotherOfRunes
Germany2862 Posts
| ||
Valiver
Caldeum1977 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10167 Posts
That was more than a decade ago, times change. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
Then again, im not so hardcore that i build only 4 cities, take only the good policies, and play like a robot. Seems like the folks who complained the most were the "hardcore" civ players. Which kind of makes me laugh. Hardcore and civ in the same sentence. Oh the lulz. When we have an international multimillion dollar civ tourney, i think itll sound less stupid. | ||
| ||
