|
On February 18 2018 16:45 zer0das wrote:I'm probably going to push through Hormuz since I have a mission for it and they're the weak link for the Asian area. And I will also probably simultaneously push through the Spice Islands. And then have Sweden cut through Russia. + Show Spoiler +I cut through Africa a lot faster than I thought I was going to. I've revoked at this point- only Austria didn't submit. The AI went Polish partition crazy between Brandenburg, Silesia, Austria, and Russia. Also, my conquistadors keep dying mega-prematurely so that's why North America and South America are under so much fog. ><
Yea a WC should be easy from here. Focus on the High development countries like the Ottomans and Russia so you won't have to truce brake them and use client states and you should be able to WC easily before 1820.
|
This should be a certain WC and even OF, release HRE vassals and multitask wars.
|
My emperor got +2 national revolt risk and -2 tolerance of the true faith... FML, +4 revolt risk nearly everywhere. Swear this game conspires against me sometimes. Had to stop conquering for two years to deal with the endless rebels this ended up spawning. Still on target for WC and One Faith, but good grief.
Didn't want to get rid of him because he got an event for +1% missionary strength until he dies. >_>
|
Just barely got my world conquest.
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/vSFFqAH.jpg)
I didn't get the French absolutism from a 5 admin leader... also didn't do Court and Country because I couldn't get above 1 unrest due to defender of the faith. Probably should have just "lost" a fake war. Ended up having to rush at the end, and had to no CB annex the last 5 countries. Didn't help my last 3-4 leaders had a mediocre admin stat. Learned a lot about late game management.
Didn't get one faith... probably could if I had managed things more carefully, but I'm just glad to get a World Conquest finished. Been trying since 2014 or so. :>
|
GZ. Worl conquest is a huge achievment for everyone playing this game. A stepping stone.
|
On February 23 2018 16:46 zer0das wrote:Just barely got my world conquest. I didn't get the French absolutism from a 5 admin leader... also didn't do Court and Country because I couldn't get above 1 unrest due to defender of the faith. Probably should have just "lost" a fake war. Ended up having to rush at the end, and had to no CB annex the last 5 countries. Didn't help my last 3-4 leaders had a mediocre admin stat. Learned a lot about late game management.
1.Court and Country- Just no CB someone, that is almost always enough.
2.What do you mean "had to no cb annex the last 5 countries" ?
|
I didn't have enough time or monarch points to properly core everything, so I full annexed the Ottomans, Ming, Yarkand, Delhi, and Tidor after declaring 4 wars at the same time (Delhi and Yarkand were both in one war). I suppose it was just truce breaking imperialism wars, not no cb. I could have no cbed someone earlier for Court and Country, but I was trying to one faith too, and I thought it would set behind my conversion rate too much. Probably should have just done Court and Country ASAP and offloaded more converting to vassals. But I didn't think it would be so difficult to get it to fire with -0.03 war exhaustion every month.
|
If you revoked, the final screenshot should be an HRE one tag instead of a WC. Need to feed everything to HRE vassals instead of coring yourself.
|
But as France my pride does not allow me to lift up the Germans as my equals. >_>
|
i wish id known they had made it so you couldnt do the culture swap 2-3 times into revoke strat before i set out and suffered thru playing lithuania, that would have been really nice
|
![[image loading]](https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/913541093112884135/48E027D1029CFBF39B92F0741906B1D1D10B963E/)
this should be a semi easy world conquest right?
What do i do about colonial nations at this point?
obviously PLC is an issue with their size, but shouldnt be a huge issue
|
There are some more Russian tags you can release. Also need a land bridge from capital to QQ front and Transoxiana front or else you'll have to core layer by layer. Other than that yea this should be safe but it won't be easy because vassal WCs are tedious. Set everyone to marches and send officer for bigger vassals so they get the military bonuses. Divert trade on everyone.
|
On March 11 2018 07:19 zulu_nation8 wrote:
There are some more Russian tags you can release. Also need a land bridge from capital to QQ front and Transoxiana front or else you'll have to core layer by layer. Other than that yea this should be safe but it won't be easy because vassal WCs are tedious. Set everyone to marches and send officer for bigger vassals so they get the military bonuses. Divert trade on everyone.
when i return provinces i dont get them as a vassal, if i revoke reform do i keep the IA to pass it again?
|
You can just release them from the diplomacy screen, should be able to release and feed beloozero, tver, pskov, etc. No need to revoke reform.
|
Looks like plenty of time to me. Just don't try to core too much, and busting down the European doors should be fairly easy. Might want to start chipping away at North/South America. I suspect it won't be too hard in your situation, because Aragon triumphed so that probably slowed down colonization of the New World quite a bit. Might want to vassalize or full annex Castile/Portugal quickly, as that will save a lot of effort later.
|
I'm gonna try breaking Marco's 1538 record
|
Totally unrelated question, but this is the best place i could think of to ask it:
Is there no HoI 4 Thread? I got the game on sale a few days ago, and wanted to talk about it a bit, but can't find a thread.
|
No there isn't. we talk about other paradox games in this thread though.
I don't have positive things to say about hoi 4.
|
On March 15 2018 09:05 Sermokala wrote:
No there isn't. we talk about other paradox games in this thread though.
I don't have positive things to say about hoi 4.
New expansion is quite well done imo, though it has far less replayability and variation as Eu4 its still not terrible
|
On March 15 2018 12:54 arb wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2018 09:05 Sermokala wrote:
No there isn't. we talk about other paradox games in this thread though.
I don't have positive things to say about hoi 4. New expansion is quite well done imo, though it has far less replayability and variation as Eu4 its still not terrible
I disagree. It has mobile game levels of depth and punish's any attempt at strategy. The expansions have focused on minor nations that people don't really play (not just my opinion they've released data on what nation people play what percent of the time) and the new expansion focus's on another boring part of the world thats ment to be the early game road bump for japan.
They can't even sell the game in china because it portrays china as a divided nation during WW2. Kaiserreich is at least worth the money buying the game but its a new low for the company and a bizarre development plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/YcZJP7X.jpg)
