EPTSo yeah, you're probably going to need to claim it if you want priority on inheriting.
Europa Universalis IV - Page 209
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
So yeah, you're probably going to need to claim it if you want priority on inheriting. | ||
|
ZeroChrome
Canada1001 Posts
On July 02 2018 23:22 zer0das wrote: You haven't claimed their throne. There is a button just below the text box on the right. Presumably, Great Britain has claimed the throne bumping up their priority despite having lower development. So yeah, you're probably going to need to claim it if you want priority on inheriting. Great Britain claiming the throne when they're rivals and thus have no royal marriage...? I played further anyways and had to win the succession war and fight the entire HRE in a coalition afterwards but meh it was worth it I guess. The succession priority in this case made literally 0 sense. | ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Silvanel
Poland4672 Posts
| ||
|
Archeon
3250 Posts
There's loads of anti-blobbing, which could make make sustaining your empire more of a challenge and less of a "optimize the order in which you run over minor empires to achieve your WC 10 years earlier". I prefer the risk of failure over playing time attack. | ||
|
Silvanel
Poland4672 Posts
| ||
|
ZeroChrome
Canada1001 Posts
On September 13 2018 06:37 Archeon wrote: Tbh I kinda like the general direction, even though they really need to nerf humanist if they want to force players to play slower. There's loads of anti-blobbing, which could make make sustaining your empire more of a challenge and less of a "optimize the order in which you run over minor empires to achieve your WC 10 years earlier". I prefer the risk of failure over playing time attack. The changes didn't really make WC harder at all though. Now you just go humanist every single game, move your capital to Europe if it wasn't already, take all TC regions and then buy down your +.8 corruption with your infinite money while you run everyone else over. Really all the patch did was railroad campaigns even more into the same routine and make the Mughals insanely OP. | ||
|
Archeon
3250 Posts
On September 13 2018 17:11 Silvanel wrote: Why is forcing players to play certain way a good thing? Because the game lacks any feeling of threat after you reach a certain size and I find playing time attack fairly boring. Like sure there's a lot to optimize, but once you reach 800 dev there's basically no way you loose the game and once you hit like 1.2-1.5k there's no way you even loose a war. Rebellions are laughable. In reality Empires like the Brits and French weren't just threatened by other superpowers, some of their biggest losses came from rebellions. And there isn't/wasn't a lot of playstyles after you reach a certain size, you just gobble things up at other ends of your empire to keep AA low and start with the smallest enemies. Yes there's a lot of optimization possible, but fundamentally you play the same way. | ||
|
LetaBot
Netherlands557 Posts
On September 13 2018 05:09 zulu_nation8 wrote: congrats to letabot for doing the first OF on this abomination of a patch Thanks | ||
|
Yurie
11649 Posts
Don't think it has been this cheap to pick up the DLC before. Not sure how good the game is now a days since I stopped playing a few years ago but was fun for ~500 hours at least. | ||
|
Lysteria
France2279 Posts
| ||
|
Matiz_pl
Poland163 Posts
There's new DLC and we are launching a new multiplayer campaign with 500$ prizepool. We are ex bw/sc2 players so we figured some e-sport in EU4 would be pretty interesting. We already have 37 signups for the campaign, but a couple more would be great. We play on thursdays 20:30 CET till midnight (starting 16th november). There's some good players but also some newer players so if you don't have too much multiplayer experience, dont worry just ask and we will help you. More details and signups here: https://discord.gg/qAQ7UkHZ | ||
| ||
