had it during the beta season, and it wasnt x.x now that im poor, i just cant justify doing it, especially after i already pay for raptors TV which is a rip off :D. unless you mean league pass for TV, then yes its worth it, but for the internet, ugh support is bad, black outs are bad, just over all bad !

all good things must come to an end, RIP ATDHE.net

zulu_nation8

China26351 Posts

February 02 2011 07:17 GMT

#1364

Does anyone watch the Pacers here and know what the hell is going on with Roy Hibbert? He put up consistent numbers at the beginning of the season but then just self destructed over the past month or so. I remember Jim O'Brien saying Hibbert was playing under his potential even when he was seemingly doing well. I just don't understand how a 7'2" center who's one of the league leader in blocks can have a shooting % lower than the guards on his team and also consistently gets less than 10 rebs when there is no one else on the team who averages more than 7 rebs a game.

Xeris

Iran17695 Posts

February 02 2011 07:19 GMT

#1365

It's probably a mental thing

Holcan

Canada2593 Posts

February 02 2011 07:29 GMT

#1366

it was a coaching thing, watch he will blossom underneath their new head coach, as he should be their #1 post option as well as their #2 or #3 option overall.

RowdierBob

Australia13029 Posts

February 02 2011 08:05 GMT

#1367

LeMarcus Aldridge is just killing it this year.

Maybe having Roy out has almost been a blessing for the Blazers (dare I say it..)?

MajorityofOne

Canada2506 Posts

February 02 2011 08:45 GMT

#1368

Celtics vs. Who in the finals?

XaI)CyRiC

United States4471 Posts

February 02 2011 11:16 GMT

#1369

On February 02 2011 17:45 MajorityofOne wrote:
Celtics vs. Who in the finals?

The only two possible teams I can see would be the Lakers and the Spurs.

The Lakers have the combination of offense, defense and size that has been shown to be successful in the postseason. While they've been very inconsistent, they still look a tier above the rest when they're playing the right way and focused, which I'm confident Phil will have them doing by the postseason.

The Spurs have been very impressive in the regular season and have some nice depth. Only concern would be whether Duncan still has enough to anchor what I consider to be just an okay frontcourt rotation otherwise (Blair = unproven in postseason, undersized and still young; McDyess = getting pretty old and production has continued dip that started last season; Bonner = good for stretching offenses and little else; Splitter = unproven, hasn't shown much so far, probably needs another season to acclimate to the NBA game). Their backcourt is as good as any team's with Parker, Manu, Hill and Neal all playing quite well this season, but we haven't seen a team that is carried so much by its backcourt win a championship in a while.

Nik0

Uruguay460 Posts

February 02 2011 18:56 GMT

#1370

On February 02 2011 17:45 MajorityofOne wrote:
Celtics vs. Who in the finals?

The Western conference finals are going to be Lakers vs Spurs. I don't think that the Spurs can deal with Pau-Bynum-Odom (unless Tim Duncan finds the fountain of youth) , plus Mr.Kobe Bean Bryant (the playoff version).
If they can bring the corpse of Ron Artest back to life they have a way to deal with Manu, so other than Parker going berserk and score 45 points a game in the hole series (it could happen if they try to guard him with fisher to much, but i¡m pretty sure that Kobe will end up defending parker) the Lakers would be going to the Finals a 4th straight year.

Holcan

Canada2593 Posts

February 02 2011 21:57 GMT

#1371

If Kobe is on Parker, who will be on Manu? Artest? than who will be on RJ? Fisher? The back court matchups for the spurs are going to be an offensive powerhouse in the postseason with this spiral effect. They might be screwed in the front court, and pau might eat them alive, but i still have faith in Timmy D to eat more minutes during the playoffs, and with 4 other people to give hard fouls they arent in as deep of a hole as it seems.

RowdierBob

Australia13029 Posts

February 02 2011 23:15 GMT

#1372

I might get hammered for this, but I think the key for the Lakers vs the Spurs will actually be a fit Bynum.. If Bynum is fit and playing it will give the Lakers the advantage in the front court and particularly at PF. I think the bench battle between those two teams will also prove pretty decisive and intriguing (both have pretty deep benches).

Ace

United States16096 Posts

February 03 2011 01:16 GMT

#1373

On February 03 2011 06:57 Holcan wrote:
If Kobe is on Parker, who will be on Manu? Artest? than who will be on RJ? Fisher? The back court matchups for the spurs are going to be an offensive powerhouse in the postseason with this spiral effect. They might be screwed in the front court, and pau might eat them alive, but i still have faith in Timmy D to eat more minutes during the playoffs, and with 4 other people to give hard fouls they arent in as deep of a hole as it seems.

Boston's back court of Allen/Rondo gave the Lakers a hard time and they managed. If the Lakers play good team defense as they are known to do when they give a shit it might be more even than we think.

Holcan

Canada2593 Posts

February 03 2011 01:44 GMT

#1374

Eh, i still think that was Ray missing more than it was good D on him, theres no way that Fisher at 4 inches shorter can truly guard ray. Manu is taller, and more of a jack of all trades, they would be stupid to switch defensive schemes on him, by putting Kobe on Parker, that is, they are better off letting Fisher guard Parker since Manu is much better at creating his own shot than Allen is, who just runs around screens. Batmanu is just to good for Kobe to not guard him.

Of course i think Matt Barnes will play a huge part in defending Manu, and giving Kobe a break.

XaI)CyRiC

United States4471 Posts

February 03 2011 01:52 GMT

#1375

Under the current no-handcheck rules there's no way to stop talented perimeter players one-on-one. It requires strong, coordinated and crisp team defense where everyone is helping and rotating properly. We've seen the Lakers capable of that kind of defense last season with largely the same roster, and they've displayed it inconsistently this season as well. If they can execute the way they should, and are fully capable of, they can definitely take the Spurs in a 7-game series.

RowdierBob

Australia13029 Posts

February 03 2011 02:10 GMT

#1376

Take them? You make it sound like the Lakers would be the underdogs!

I like the Spurs, but come Playoffs time the Lakers will and should be favourites in any series IMO. I know they've been erratic this year but they'll turn up for sure.

a176

Canada6688 Posts

February 03 2011 02:55 GMT

#1377

On February 02 2011 15:15 Ace wrote:

Show nested quote +

atdhe.me

http://atdhenet.tv/

MassHysteria

United States3678 Posts

February 03 2011 03:22 GMT

#1378

Clippers vs Bulls in a bit...would be a better game if Gordon was in it though.

iLoveKT

Philippines3615 Posts

February 03 2011 04:30 GMT

#1379

Blake Griffin is so unfair.

Ducci

United States588 Posts

February 03 2011 06:14 GMT

#1380

Haha I hope the cavs end up with the biggest losing streak of all time.

Does anyone remember the Lou Holtz motivational speech to the Knicks from a few years ago? I really want to watch it again but can't find it anywhere. It appears ESPN has taken it down from their website. Does anyone know where I can see it?