But what really surprised me was how Jackson kept defending him. You've gotta be blind to not see intentions there.
NBA 2010-2011 Season - Page 67
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
But what really surprised me was how Jackson kept defending him. You've gotta be blind to not see intentions there. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
On January 30 2011 09:09 Ace wrote: Garnett's always been a dirty player? Didn't seem that way until he made it to Boston and the hate started. No, it started when he was with the T-wolves. It was just his team wasn't being nationally covered as much, but it definitely started there. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
XaI)CyRiC
United States4471 Posts
Random examples: | ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
On January 30 2011 13:43 Ace wrote: setting hard screens and barking at people isn't dirty play. I'll nod in a agreement that cheap shotting people is always bad but let's not confuse being a jerk with being dirty. What we saw in the 80s would be considered dirty by today's standards. If guys are too weak to make it through a hard pick, none of which is even close to the pick we saw Derek Fisher set years ago, then they need to toughen up and stop whining. Under cutting a player, throwing elbows (multiple times), setting completely unnecessary hard screens, and directly going after people with and without the ball isn't dirty? If these were rare occurrences, sure, but they're not and that's why his name always comes up. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Throwing elbows you mean like everyone else? You think that is a rare thing? Going after people = dirty? So he has a temper and lashes out at other players for whatever reasons and that makes him a dirty player. Interesting. His name always comes up because it's media portrayal, not because it's necessarily true. He's no saint but he isn't a dirty player. If you want to see dirty look at clips of Bill Lambieer. | ||
|
unknown.sam
Philippines2701 Posts
garnett's such a pussy. would have been great if he played against the likes of barkley and rodman...like to see him try his antics against those guys. | ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
On January 30 2011 16:51 Ace wrote: Aside from last night when has he undercut a player? and was that on purpose? Throwing elbows you mean like everyone else? You think that is a rare thing? Going after people = dirty? So he has a temper and lashes out at other players for whatever reasons and that makes him a dirty player. Interesting. His name always comes up because it's media portrayal, not because it's necessarily true. He's no saint but he isn't a dirty player. If you want to see dirty look at clips of Bill Lambieer. Comparing a player in the early 90's to the late 80's isn't a comparison. The league was much different then. I don't know what makes you think Garnett isn't a dirty player. People have thrown elbows, yeah, but not as many times as to be recognized for it like Garnett. The media doesn't go out of it's way to make Garnett look like a bad guy. He had been in the lead long enough to where if they wanted to they could of started on him way before he came to Boston. That Boston team got a lot of coverage so it was much easier to see when he was being a prick with his unnecessary play. I think now you are just looking for a set stereotype for the word "dirty" and excusing all his flaws as an all around individual on the court. | ||
|
Ack1027
United States7873 Posts
Thanks! | ||
|
dcberkeley
Canada844 Posts
| ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
And ironically to this page Garnett gets whacked in the head and is bleeding profusely. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On January 31 2011 03:14 tonight wrote: Comparing a player in the early 90's to the late 80's isn't a comparison. The league was much different then. I don't know what makes you think Garnett isn't a dirty player. People have thrown elbows, yeah, but not as many times as to be recognized for it like Garnett. The media doesn't go out of it's way to make Garnett look like a bad guy. He had been in the lead long enough to where if they wanted to they could of started on him way before he came to Boston. That Boston team got a lot of coverage so it was much easier to see when he was being a prick with his unnecessary play. I think now you are just looking for a set stereotype for the word "dirty" and excusing all his flaws as an all around individual on the court. Why isn't it a comparison? Just because the league has made it a less physical game doesn't mean players don't play that way on the inside. Dirty play = cheap shotting guys, tripping, undercutting, elbows to the face. You know, the stuff that went on all the time in the 80s and 90s. Have you SEEN Garnett do this a lot? If he's setting hard picks, talking trash and trying to punk people then call him out on it but don't call it dirty play because it isn't. | ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37098 Posts
109 - 96, wtf? | ||
|
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
| ||
|
strongwind
United States862 Posts
have you guys read this? I just stumbled on it after hearing about all of this KG hate. I think it mirrors how I feel about the whole situation. I've always been a KG fan and I still am. Anyways, GO CELTS! | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13430 Posts
Meanwhile: | ||
| ||