NBA 2010-2011 Season - Page 12
Forum Index > General Games |
![]()
bearbuddy
3442 Posts
| ||
crazeman
664 Posts
On October 30 2010 12:22 BlueRoyaL wrote: LMAO @ 12k courtside... how much do tickets go for usually on courtside? Seriously? I swore I saw an article during the summer saying that the heat fired all their season ticket marketing staff because after they got lebron/wade/bosh, they sold out within the day and didn't need the marketing staff at all. I really hope that the celtics/magic would beat miami in the East.... I'm really not a big fan of Lebron after this summer fiasco. Did anyone see his new commercial btw? it's pretty kooky. | ||
a176
Canada6688 Posts
On October 30 2010 10:59 King K. Rool wrote: Anyone watching Celtics-Knicks game? Holy fuck Rondo. Assists up the wazoo. those assists mean nothing if the guy on the recieving end cant convert. rondo's asst numbers from this year, last year, all testament to the ability of the celtics. and they are even better this year. | ||
Cauld
United States350 Posts
On October 30 2010 14:13 a176 wrote: those assists mean nothing if the guy on the recieving end cant convert. rondo's asst numbers from this year, last year, all testament to the ability of the celtics. and they are even better this year. That doesn't really make sense. It's not counted as an assist unless the guy receiving the ball converts it... | ||
Ducci
United States588 Posts
| ||
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
On October 30 2010 14:16 Cauld wrote: That doesn't really make sense. It's not counted as an assist unless the guy receiving the ball converts it... I'm not positive on what he meant but I think he meant that the assist stat relies on the scorer as much as the passer. His team is making that inflated stat possible | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
On October 30 2010 15:13 Ace wrote: Not necessarily. If you are tallying high assist numbers all the time it means you are giving the player receiving the ball a position to score from easily. So players like Rondo, CP3, Deron Williams, Nash and J.Kidd consistently put up insane assist numbers because they give you the ball in such a way that it's easy to score. That's the mark of an elite point guard. of course not necessarily. i was merely trying to interpret his comments | ||
a176
Canada6688 Posts
On October 30 2010 15:13 Ace wrote: Not necessarily. If you are tallying high assist numbers all the time it means you are giving the player receiving the ball a position to score from easily. So players like Rondo, CP3, Deron Williams, Nash and J.Kidd consistently put up insane assist numbers because they give you the ball in such a way that it's easy to score. That's the mark of an elite point guard. yes, getting the ball to the right guy is definitely part of it, but there are many a player in the nba that can and do miss "easy" shots. On October 30 2010 15:16 billyX333 wrote: of course not necessarily. i was merely trying to interpret his comments yes, you interpreted correctly | ||
crazeman
664 Posts
On October 30 2010 15:13 Ace wrote: Not necessarily. If you are tallying high assist numbers all the time it means you are giving the player receiving the ball a position to score from easily. So players like Rondo, CP3, Deron Williams, Nash and J.Kidd consistently put up insane assist numbers because they give you the ball in such a way that it's easy to score. That's the mark of an elite point guard. Assists is a pretty bullshit stat. I mean it's not very clearly defined and its open for interpretation. I've actually spent like a entire day arguing with a friend as to what "defines" as assist. I used a wikipedia reference where as he used some weird/funky definition. Also this is an article from like a year ago. Basically their's a few accounts of scorekeepers inflating assist numbers (nick van exel in this case) because he's a laker fan and taking blocks away from Mutumbo because "he's a bit of a punk". http://deadspin.com/5336974/an-assist-for-nick-van-exel-how-an-nba-scorekeeper-cooked-the-books | ||
igotmyown
United States4291 Posts
On October 30 2010 13:57 bearbuddy wrote: YEAH, Jeremy Lin! So did he do anything highlight reel worthy? --- I'm not impressed by Boston's defense, especially against Amare. He just kept sprinting to the rim and nobody could keep up. If Boston's getting that many easy baskets, they should have a huge lead. What happened to Jermaine O'Neal? And who's their backup small forward? Aren't they going to limit the big 3's minutes? | ||
iKill[ShocK]
Vietnam3530 Posts
On October 30 2010 15:54 igotmyown wrote: So did he do anything highlight reel worthy? --- I'm not impressed by Boston's defense, especially against Amare. He just kept sprinting to the rim and nobody could keep up. If Boston's getting that many easy baskets, they should have a huge lead. What happened to Jermaine O'Neal? And who's their backup small forward? Aren't they going to limit the big 3's minutes? Marquis Daniels plays a little back up small forward i think. And i seriously think Lamar Odom could lead the league in rebound if he had starter minutes (38+) | ||
shmay
United States1091 Posts
also, i love how phil jackson plays based on merit, putting blake and barnes in during crunchtime right away. | ||
![]()
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On October 30 2010 15:19 a176 wrote: yes, getting the ball to the right guy is definitely part of it, but there are many a player in the nba that can and do miss "easy" shots. yes, you interpreted correctly He's saying it's not just finding the right person, but putting it right in their box so that they can immediately shoot and get a high % shot. That's accuracy as much as decision making. Still, I think assist numbers mean less and less each year. I'd like to compare what an assist is from Jerry West to Magic Johnson to today. I have a feeling Magic and Oscar would be putting up 20 assists per game under the current method of counting. | ||
![]()
bearbuddy
3442 Posts
On October 30 2010 15:54 igotmyown wrote: So did he do anything highlight reel worthy? Nope =(. He was essentially put into the last 2min of a blowout game to dribble into victory. I know this is the clippers and all, but I'm somewhat impressed by the warriors and think that we may actually pull a .500 this season. I like how the fans went crazy every time he touches the ball, though, lol. | ||
Strategos
Canada132 Posts
| ||
Cauld
United States350 Posts
On October 30 2010 17:40 Jibba wrote: He's saying it's not just finding the right person, but putting it right in their box so that they can immediately shoot and get a high % shot. That's accuracy as much as decision making. Still, I think assist numbers mean less and less each year. I'd like to compare what an assist is from Jerry West to Magic Johnson to today. I have a feeling Magic and Oscar would be putting up 20 assists per game under the current method of counting. I watched about half of the Knicks-Celtics game and Rondo was clearly playing for assists to the detriment of his team at times. I wrote on the last page that there were multiple times he passed up 1-0 layups to try to get an assist. That always bothers me. 20 assists is still a huge amount, I'm not trying to take away from that, but it really bothers me when pgs pass up wide open dunks/layups just to try for another assist. | ||
unknown.sam
Philippines2701 Posts
| ||
crazeman
664 Posts
On October 31 2010 01:05 unknown.sam wrote: never thought the nets would win their first 2 games o_O The nets have a pretty good core. They have all stars in brook lopez and devin harris and I thought they were unlucky in a lot of games last year and should of definitely won more than 12 games. I mean even the wolves won 15 games last year and their team is a mess. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
| ||