|
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. |
On May 17 2013 22:04 Figgy wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2013 19:29 zatic wrote: He wants to convince Ned to confess to treason. It may have been to prevent the war from escalating. Of course, Joeffrey being a total cunt anyway kind of botched that plan. Ned did confess in order to try and save his own life. He took Varys offer and Jeoffry simply ignored it and executed him anyways. Lol so wrong. Ned explicitly said he doesnt care about his life, as a soldier he has learned dying a long time ago. Varys could only convince him by bringing up his daughters.
|
On May 17 2013 22:16 massivez wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2013 22:04 Figgy wrote:On May 17 2013 19:29 zatic wrote: He wants to convince Ned to confess to treason. It may have been to prevent the war from escalating. Of course, Joeffrey being a total cunt anyway kind of botched that plan. Ned did confess in order to try and save his own life. He took Varys offer and Jeoffry simply ignored it and executed him anyways. No, like he said to Varys he was ready to die. But after Varys brought up his children and how they would fare if he didn't confess treason, that's what made him change his mind. That's the only reason he confessed treason, not him trying to save his own life. Varys and most smart people wanted to send him to the wall, so Robb wouldn't rebel etc. Joffrey is responsible for the war of the five Kings. There might have still been a war though just without the Starks. The Baratheons really wanted that throne. Ultimately the war is the fault of Jaime and Cersei. Also I just realized the Starks were already at war with the Lannisters before Eddard was killed.
|
I agree with zatic, even Cersei wanted Ned to live and exiled to the Wall. There was no need for bloodshed or war if that happened. Diplomatic ties would have been broken between realm and the North for some time. Jamie would have been exchanged for Sansa/Arya and it would have been peace after all between Crown and the North.
Crown/Realm has enough threats to deal without being able to avoid them (stannis). Having the full host of the North wanting vengeance on the Crown is a risk they would rather not take.
|
On May 17 2013 22:35 frontliner2 wrote: I agree with zatic, even Cersei wanted Ned to live and exiled to the Wall. There was no need for bloodshed or war if that happened. Diplomatic ties would have been broken between realm and the North for some time. Jamie would have been exchanged for Sansa/Arya and it would have been peace after all between Crown and the North.
Crown/Realm has enough threats to deal without being able to avoid them (stannis). Having the full host of the North wanting vengeance on the Crown is a risk they would rather not take. The main battles between Stark and Lannister already hapened and Jaime was already taken prisoner before Ned was executed. But yeah, maybe it would have been possible to negotiate a peace between Stark and Lannister if he had lived, in exchange for Jaime for example. The baratheons would have continued marching anyway though.
|
Zurich15361 Posts
Right after the Lannisters ARE discussing possible ways towards peace, so it was their idea to negotiate with the North in order to be able to deal with Renly / Stannis. It's the scene when Tyrion points out that now that Ned is dead Robb will never settle for anything.
Joeffrey really fucked up that one haha.
|
Of course this is all just speculation, but I think that if Ned lives and gets sent to the wall, Robb would have gone to talk to him and he would have told him to just take the peace. He was tired of all the KL BS and he was Ned Stark, even if he lost his title the North would have most likely listened.
Then the same thing happens with Renly and Stannis but now what remains of the Lannister army can defend KL so their position is even stronger and most likely the Tyrells join them and Blackwater ends up going the same way. With no other distractions Stannis is hunted down and the war is effectively over. The North would probably still be seriously pissed but I imagine Tywin having enough common sense to give them some concessions in order to avoid future conflict.
But still, with retard Jeoffrey on the Throne for most likely many decades the chances of him seriously pissing off most other great houses is pretty great. So in the end there may been a Robert's Rebellion part II.
|
On May 16 2013 20:09 Scorch wrote: It's getting late in the week and we need some more unending discussion. After character alignments, swordsman rankings and ice melting methods, it's time for a current Power Rank of the Great Houses.
= 1 Lannister (still firmly in control, has the king, a good army and loads of money)
Well, they're sharing power with the Tyrells, and they have far fewer troops than at the outset of hostilities. They started out with around 45k men, raised another 10-15, which got destroyed, but now they're down to around 20k, because for the past two years they've been waging a brutal war of attrition. As for the king, yeah, they still have that. Loads of money? The crown is at least 6 million gold dragons in debt (which, considering the rough value of medieval gold coins, is billions if not trillions in today's money), and to some pretty hardass creditors.
On May 16 2013 20:09 Scorch wrote: ▲ 2 Tyrell (plays the Game well, about to have the queen, Margaery can control Joffrey, decent army and wealth)
Indeed, although I'd say not decent, but excellent army. By far the largest of any in the field.
On May 16 2013 20:09 Scorch wrote: ▼ 3 Stark (lost the Karstarks, will soon gain Frey's forces)
Well, the Karstarks were hardly half of Robb's force. It's an exaggeration. But definitely fallen somewhat.
On May 16 2013 20:09 Scorch wrote: ▲ 4 Targaryen (playing Spartacus. Will be the strongest force when dragons grow and slaves and Dothraki join)
8000 men + baby dragons is not much, although definitely an increase. Though I wouldn't say having tens of thousands of unarmed, untrained slaves would be good. They'd be pretty worthless and hamper logistics.
On May 16 2013 20:09 Scorch wrote: ▼ 5 Baratheon (has not recovered from Blackwater Bay. Melisandre may still assassinate anyone with a shadow)
Quite so, although I wouldn't wager on Mel's assassination abilities anytime soon.
|
i have a feeling dany in later seasons will start going mad, just like her father. Would be interesting to see anyway. AS for her story line right now, she really fucking hates slavers.
Charles dance/tywin has a such a strong presence on screen, but he migt piss joffrey off a bit too much.
|
dany has the longest title, therefore is the strongest.
can anyone recite from memory? lol
|
On May 18 2013 04:33 jinorazi wrote: dany has the longest title, therefore is the strongest.
can anyone recite from memory? lol
first of her name, queen of westeros, breaker of chains, mother of dragons, rider of horsies + Show Spoiler +
|
daneresy stormborn, queen of the andels and the first men, kalesi of the green grass? great waste? break of chains, mother of dragons, i dunno. the titles are getting a bit out of hand. its like midevil business cards
|
honestly the only one that really matters is mother of dragons, should just be queen of the seven kingdoms and mother of dragons.
Also they seem to only focus on the red dragon, would like to get some close ups of the other dragons.
|
She is Daenerys Stormborn of House Targaryen, the First of Her Name, Queen of the Andals and the First Men, Lady Regent of the Seven Kingdoms and Protector of the Realm, Khaleesi of the Great Grass Sea, Breaker of Chains, and Mother of Dragons.
How could anybody forget? It's only a paragraph of titles, lol.
+ Show Spoiler +I looked it up 
Edit: I got it her titles from http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wiki/Daenerys_Targaryen in order to not confuse myself between book and show titles. I have no idea which titles are in each version. I think "blood of Old Valyria" is just something she says to sound more badass, not an actual title.
|
On May 18 2013 05:00 Jophess wrote:She is Daenerys Stormborn of House Targaryen, the First of Her Name, Queen of the Andals and the First Men, Lady Regent of the Seven Kingdoms and Protector of the Realm, Khaleesi of the Great Grass Sea, Breaker of Chains, and Mother of Dragons. How could anybody forget? It's only a paragraph of titles, lol. + Show Spoiler +I looked it up 
You forgot "Queen Across the Sea", "The Unburnt" and "Something Something of the Rhoynar".
|
blood of old valyria or something too right?
|
On May 18 2013 05:38 CrimsonLotus wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 05:00 Jophess wrote:She is Daenerys Stormborn of House Targaryen, the First of Her Name, Queen of the Andals and the First Men, Lady Regent of the Seven Kingdoms and Protector of the Realm, Khaleesi of the Great Grass Sea, Breaker of Chains, and Mother of Dragons. How could anybody forget? It's only a paragraph of titles, lol. + Show Spoiler +I looked it up  You forgot "Queen Across the Sea", "The Unburnt" and "Something Something of the Rhoynar". Daenerys "where the hell are my dragons" Targaryen
|
Daenerys Stormborn of House Targeryen, the First of Her Name, Queen of the Friendzone, Breaker of Chains, Creator of Meaningless Titles.
|
Daenerys Stormborn of House Targaryen, Blood of old Valyria, the First of Her Name, Queen of the Andals and the First Men, Lady Regent of the Seven Kingdoms and Protector of the Realm, Khaleesi of the Great Grass Sea, Breaker of Chains, Mother of Dragons, and The One that Has a Gift to You (your life).
|
I just finished rewatching Season 2. Wasnt Sam supposed to die at the very last scene there. What the fuck happened exactly. I thought he was good as dead -_-
|
On May 18 2013 09:13 Emnjay808 wrote: I just finished rewatching Season 2. Wasnt Sam supposed to die at the very last scene there. What the fuck happened exactly. I thought he was good as dead -_-
We can only speculate.I think it might be the same reason they let the guy in the very first scene in season 1 live as well. Maybe they don't kill cowards/helpless/not aggressive people?
|
|
|
|
|
|