Just look at his face--he's got those two huge bones on the side of his face where his beard would have been.
Simple Questions, Simple Answers - Page 191
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Strategy |
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
Just look at his face--he's got those two huge bones on the side of his face where his beard would have been. | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
| ||
|
Unleashing
Denmark14978 Posts
On September 19 2012 18:12 Shikyo wrote: Dumb reason, Phantom Lancer has a beard too. As does Sniper. And Disruptor. And Storm. And Beastmaster. And Spirit Breaker. And... You're also discriminating against Skeleton King just because he's bald. It's not a dumb reason, Axe is the king of beards. But of course, Sven is super manly too. + Show Spoiler + ![]() Sven, baller king and king of beards share a #1 for me. | ||
|
Aldehyde
Sweden939 Posts
For reference: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=369794¤tpage=2#25 | ||
|
r.Evo
Germany14080 Posts
On September 19 2012 23:34 Aldehyde wrote: So, as not to derail the original thread any further, why is it a big deal saying champion instead of hero? I've never really played LoL and do not like the little I've played/seen/heard of it and I've always said hero myself but I really don't understand why people hate on the use of champion over hero. They mean basically the same thing. For reference: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=369794¤tpage=2#25 Just random, win a game and say "Wow, this champion is really easy". The tears. The... JOY. Basically it's people being overly sensitive most of the time. No one in League cares if you call a champion "hero" either. However, doing as the Romans do in Rome isn't exactly a bad idea either. It's kind of similar to OMG DOTA IS NO MOBA IT'S AN ARTS - then suddenly Valve uses the word "MOBA" in one of their press releases concerning DotA 2. =P | ||
|
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
On September 19 2012 23:36 r.Evo wrote: Just random, win a game and say "Wow, this champion is really easy". The tears. The... JOY. Thank you very much, I was almost out of things to say when the enemy is really mad, I am in your debt sir. | ||
|
Ingenol
United States1328 Posts
| ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34501 Posts
On September 20 2012 00:04 Ingenol wrote: Are phase boots or treads typically better on brewmaster? Generally people go either phase or arcanes, I never really see treads. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On September 20 2012 00:04 Ingenol wrote: Are phase boots or treads typically better on brewmaster? Phases are more common than Treads but Arcanes are more common than either recently. | ||
|
Avaryroro
Netherlands10 Posts
| ||
|
infam
Germany66 Posts
| ||
|
Darkren
Canada1841 Posts
On September 20 2012 03:42 Avaryroro wrote: So i only recently got into DotA, and im now looking to learn the game. I've been hesitant to play versus people because of my awful level and am mostly playing against bots to understand heroes, items, positioning etc. My question is, how much can the bots actually teach me? I feel that usually i can out-farm them but that only really happens in the later stages of the game. Because the games take +30 mins and they all feel the same as the last im wondering if this is the best way to learn DotA. Yes it teaches me new heroes but its not very exciting to only go up against fake opponents. Am i better off practicing against humans or should i work on my skill more first? Better to have fun, this is a game, jump online and play just be warned ur gonna loose alot at the beginning. | ||
|
Unleashing
Denmark14978 Posts
That will get you into DotA, it will be a rough start, but once you're into it, it will be an amazing thing from there on out. | ||
|
EtherealBlade
660 Posts
On September 20 2012 03:42 Avaryroro wrote: So i only recently got into DotA, and im now looking to learn the game. I've been hesitant to play versus people because of my awful level and am mostly playing against bots to understand heroes, items, positioning etc. My question is, how much can the bots actually teach me? I feel that usually i can out-farm them but that only really happens in the later stages of the game. Because the games take +30 mins and they all feel the same as the last im wondering if this is the best way to learn DotA. Yes it teaches me new heroes but its not very exciting to only go up against fake opponents. Am i better off practicing against humans or should i work on my skill more first? Definitely stick to coop vs bots first, despite the chance of learning quicker when doing matchmaking. You'd ruin the game for others if you don't know what you're doing, and when fighting the AI you're free to analyse and observe the game without the stress matchmaking would normally give to a new player. | ||
|
Heh_
Singapore2712 Posts
On September 20 2012 03:42 Avaryroro wrote: So i only recently got into DotA, and im now looking to learn the game. I've been hesitant to play versus people because of my awful level and am mostly playing against bots to understand heroes, items, positioning etc. My question is, how much can the bots actually teach me? I feel that usually i can out-farm them but that only really happens in the later stages of the game. Because the games take +30 mins and they all feel the same as the last im wondering if this is the best way to learn DotA. Yes it teaches me new heroes but its not very exciting to only go up against fake opponents. Am i better off practicing against humans or should i work on my skill more first? Once you learn the basics, then go play with real humans. However, be prepared to deal with the dumbest teammates ever, because some humans are dumber than bots. Your time spent playing bots is not useless though. It's very important to learn what every single hero does, and you never get good training when playing in human games. | ||
|
Unleashing
Denmark14978 Posts
On September 20 2012 04:04 EtherealBlade wrote: Definitely stick to coop vs bots first, despite the chance of learning quicker when doing matchmaking. You'd ruin the game for others if you don't know what you're doing, and when fighting the AI you're free to analyse and observe the game without the stress matchmaking would normally give to a new player. What? How would he ruin games for others? He will be against people at his skill-level, and if not then he will be adjusted to be at that. I think this is a really stupid reason for people to not play against humans, his first games will always be bad since bots teach you bad habits if you only play against them. He might as well go Q up. @Above, how does he not learn more from playing against humans than playing against bots? Sorry but i'm not following this logic. | ||
|
Heh_
Singapore2712 Posts
On September 20 2012 04:49 Unleashing wrote: What? How would he ruin games for others? He will be against people at his skill-level, and if not then he will be adjusted to be at that. I think this is a really stupid reason for people to not play against humans, his first games will always be bad since bots teach you bad habits if you only play against them. He might as well go Q up. @Above, how does he not learn more from playing against humans than playing against bots? Sorry but i'm not following this logic. You encounter a more diverse array of heroes when playing against bots. Low level human games tend to see a ton of PA, FV, Sniper... you won't see a half decent Enchantress (which the bots might be capable of, not sure how good bots are though), basically you won't see a lot of heroes, or you see heroes played in a crappy way (nuker Chen, carry CM). This might be my biased viewpoint when I was trying to get out of the "normal" bracket that I started in, but I felt that learning hero roles was bad... really bad. | ||
|
valheru
Australia966 Posts
| ||
|
r.Evo
Germany14080 Posts
On September 20 2012 08:39 valheru wrote: Why do people say that DOTA is an RTS where LoL/HoN are MOBAs? Because people are denying the fact that Valve themselves calls DotA 2 a MOBA - the word simply won over the others in terms of being the most accepted over the entire genre. The "old guard" still associates the word exclusively with League of Legends. Since League of Legends is also associated with "bad" those guys hate using the same word for DotA 2. He then goes one further, pointing out that despite the fact that a number of different studios are working on "Moba-Like" games, it's possible that none of them will outdo the original. That, Smith says, is perhaps the most dispiriting thing of all: As you read these words, a dozen professional studios around the world are racing to emulate Dota's success. What's going to be truly depressing is if of all the contenders in the brand-new moba genre, Valve's curator-like porting of Dota 2 into the Source engine remains the most popular one. Not only could our games industry not have had this idea, they can't even improve on it. Valve’s New Project Is A Dota Doc, A MOBA Movie The tournament is for DOTA 2, Valve's upcoming MOBA-style game. Valve's second sponsored Dota 2 Tournament - portentously titled 'The International' - begins August 31st at gaming show PAX Prime, taking place in Seattle. It runs until September 2nd, and will see some of the biggest and best MOBA teams in the world compete: Evil Geniuses, Orange eSports, Counter Logic Gaming and LGD. All quotes from official Valve news. Returned results when searching for "ARTS": Zero. Returned results when searching for "RTS", one: But unlike Minecraft and Day Z, Dota's design could never have surfaced from a commercial games development studio. Mostly, game development studios adhere to genre conventions, and we consider ourselves lucky when they work with no care for genre at all. But what they categorically do not do is go against people's instincts. Nobody's going to make a multiplayer game with one map, that takes an hour to play, that looks like an RTS but will fuck you if you try and play it like one. | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i47.tinypic.com/1zfok8l.jpg)