|
|
On May 05 2014 21:41 zeo wrote: Unconfirmed reports say 20 people killed in total during battle around Slavyansk
Women murdered by Kiev snipers while on her balcony. That is a nice leap of logic you have there.
|
At least provide sources for those numbers...
It's basically pointless to post numbers at the moment as there's way too much variance. The same sources upgrade and downgrade numbers constantly. Here's an example:
Previously the number was 8 killed... Just hold off with the number posting, it's not sufficiently accurate at the moment for it to do any good. All we really know is that there's some fighting going on.
***
Regarding @PaulaSlier_RT, she's probably making all of that up, after all, she works for RT. There's no reason to think after all we've seen that any of their reporting is based on facts. Please post independent sources.
|
2 things: By Hammurabi's beard, how did you figure UKR snipers killed her?
Do you remove kebab from the premises?
|
@oneofthem my mental arithmetic is not defined on glorious motherland.
|
On May 05 2014 21:45 Ghanburighan wrote:At least provide sources for those numbers... It's basically pointless to post numbers at the moment as there's way too much variance. The same sources upgrade and downgrade numbers constantly. Here's an example: https://twitter.com/ChristopherJM/status/463292817884725248Previously the number was 8 killed... Just hold off with the number posting, it's not sufficiently accurate at the moment for it to do any good. All we really know is that there's some fighting going on. *** Regarding @PaulaSlier_RT, she's probably making all of that up, after all, she works for RT. There's no reason to think after all we've seen that any of their reporting is based on facts. Please post independent sources. Source... Kiev Post.
The most biased news source in Ukraine since 1995
|
@zeo kyivpost seems to be trash, lifenews.ru-like integrity. btw the new regional police chief was talking to the crowd which was reported to be lead by right sector militia. freaky! missed this tweet.
Howard Amos
Talking to Right Sector leader who says 4 of his guys were killed on Friday. 3 are in a critical condition in hospital. waddup, where's my money?
|
On May 05 2014 21:46 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:2 things: By Hammurabi's beard, how did you figure UKR snipers killed her? Do you remove kebab from the premises? I've only eaten kebab twice in my life, don't like it, burgers much better.
They arn't UKR snipers. They are a militia loyal to Kiev killing Ukrainian citizens.
Violation of human rights and law in Ukraine, must read. http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/media/events/eng/files/41d4d9d308e6f2ed8a7b.pdf
|
On May 05 2014 21:23 PaleMan wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2014 21:05 Mc wrote:at least you are curious enough to ask. Compare the numbers and tell me that it was a statistical error what Russia was reporting.... I honestly am surprised by what the report claims I'll use a website that I assume you follow: http://rt.com/news/crimea-referendum-results-official-250/and the quote from Putin's website : link Референдум
По мнению практически всех опрошенных специалистов и граждан:
- подавляющее большинство жителей Севастополя проголосовали на референдуме за присоединение к России (явка 50-80 %), в Крыму по разным данным за присоединение к России проголосовали 50-60 % избирателей при общей явке в 30-50 %;
- жители Крыма голосовали не столько за присоединение к России, сколько за прекращение, по их словам, «коррупционного беспредела и воровского засилья донецких ставленников». Жители же Севастополя голосовали именно за присоединение к России. Опасения перед незаконными вооруженными формированиями в Севастополе были больше, чем в других районах Крыма.
Предложения:
1. Продлить срок принятия жителями Крыма решения о сохранении гражданства Украины, по крайней мере, до 31 декабря 2014 г.
translation: referendum
According to almost all survey participants and citizens :
- The vast majority of inhabitants of Sevastopol voted in a referendum to join Russia ( 50-80 % turnout ) , in Crimea on different data for joining Russia voted 50-60% voter turnout with a total of 30-50 % ;
- Inhabitants of Crimea voted not so much for joining Russia , as for the termination, in their words, " corruption and lawlessness thieves dominance Donetsk henchmen ." Inhabitants of Sevastopol to vote for annexation to Russia . Fears illegal armed groups in Sevastopol were higher than in other regions of the Crimea .
suggestions:
1. Extend Deadline for residents of the Crimea decision to retain the citizenship of Ukraine , at least until December 31, 2014 "Putin's" website - good to know you know nothing about that structure this council consists mostly of opposition who are very pro-western i will give you just 2 names from the list of its staff: http://www.president-sovet.ru/composition/3080/http://www.president-sovet.ru/composition/25/those 2 are the biggest rusophobes and west worshippers i ever knew whatever USA does - they applause (even Iraq invasion), if Russia does something that USA is not happy with - they start to critisize russian position so i'm a little surprized their "polls" didn't show that all crimeans wanted to be with Ukraine forever and ever 2 of the first 3 links on the website's front page seem to be anti-Ukraine and saying more or less what the Kremlin is saying.
I admit I had to run google translate because my Russian isn't very good. http://www.president-sovet.ru/news/6079/ http://www.president-sovet.ru/news/6078/
So from what I see the council seems to be actually partially pro-kremlin.
From reading the first paragraph of the report in question, you can figure out who worked on the report.
Проблемы жителей Крыма Настоящий обзор подготовлен членом Совета Бобровым Е.А., руководителем сети «Миграция и право» ПЦ «Мемориал» С.А. Ганнушкиной и адвокатом Сети Цейтлиной О.П. по результатам посещения городов Симферополь и Севастополь в период с 15 по 18 апреля 2014 г., встреч с должностными лицами органов государственной власти, духовенства, журналистами, общественными деятелями, адвокатами, правозащитниками и гражданами.
Neither of the names you referred to are mentioned. It appears to me that you failed to do your research properly.
Regardless, do you know what this councils purpose is? For now my assumption is this was a report prepared for the Putin government in order to establish actual facts on the ground, but as I said it's all murky for me due to me only knowing a little bit of Russian.
|
Hah, Zeo and Nunez (of all people) have finally noticed that we (rightly) say that RT.com and their other sources are biased and now try to label actual free press as biased. Unfortunately, there's no proof for their outlandish claims.
How about we look at what sources that Nunez likes say about Kyiv Post, here's an excerpt from Wikileaks:
Kyiv Post is Ukraine’s leading English-language newspaper. The Kyiv Post played a vital role as one of the few independent media outlets under former President Leonid Kuchma. Over the years, the weekly newspaper has led the charge for a free press in Ukraine, and has played roles in the Georgiy Gongadze scandal, the Orange Revolution and other significant Ukrainian events. It is produced by a team of Western and Ukrainian journalists. Launched in 1995, the newspaper's circulation is 25,000 copies.
***
Edit: Please stop posting propaganda in this thread. The Kremlin isn't a reliable source of human rights reporting. See the UN report on human rights on the previous page.
|
Zurich15329 Posts
On May 05 2014 22:02 Ghanburighan wrote: Edit: Please stop posting propaganda in this thread. The Kremlin isn't a reliable source of human rights reporting. See the UN report on human rights on the previous page. The point is that even the Kremlin's human rights group calls the Crimea referendum doctored. According to them, where the referendum reported 97% in favor, it was more like 60% with less than 50% turnout.
|
didin't they push the idiotic leaflet story f.ex? i do like wikileaks tho.
|
On May 05 2014 22:07 zatic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2014 22:02 Ghanburighan wrote: Edit: Please stop posting propaganda in this thread. The Kremlin isn't a reliable source of human rights reporting. See the UN report on human rights on the previous page. The point is that even the Kremlin's human rights group calls the Crimea referendum doctored. According to them, where the referendum reported 97% in favor, it was more like 60% with less than 50% turnout.
I know, I posted it in the thread..
I meant this post:
On May 05 2014 21:53 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2014 21:46 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:2 things: By Hammurabi's beard, how did you figure UKR snipers killed her? Do you remove kebab from the premises? I've only eaten kebab twice in my life, don't like it, burgers much better. They arn't UKR snipers. They are a militia loyal to Kiev killing Ukrainian citizens. Violation of human rights and law in Ukraine, must read. http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/media/events/eng/files/41d4d9d308e6f2ed8a7b.pdf
|
On May 05 2014 22:02 Ghanburighan wrote:Hah, Zeo and Nunez (of all people) have finally noticed that we (rightly) say that RT.com and their other sources are biased and now try to label actual free press as biased. Unfortunately, there's no proof for their outlandish claims. How about we look at what sources that Nunez likes say about Kyiv Post, here's an excerpt from Wikileaks: Show nested quote + Kyiv Post is Ukraine’s leading English-language newspaper. The Kyiv Post played a vital role as one of the few independent media outlets under former President Leonid Kuchma. Over the years, the weekly newspaper has led the charge for a free press in Ukraine, and has played roles in the Georgiy Gongadze scandal, the Orange Revolution and other significant Ukrainian events. It is produced by a team of Western and Ukrainian journalists. Launched in 1995, the newspaper's circulation is 25,000 copies.
*** Edit: Please stop posting propaganda in this thread. The Kremlin isn't a reliable source of human rights reporting. See the UN report on human rights on the previous page. Lets go to the wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyiv_Post# First line 'The Kyiv Post was founded in October 1995 (as part of KP Media)[1] by an American, Jed Sunden.'
Jed Sunden? I wonder what else he has done, oh, he was the main sponsor of FEMEN till 2012. Wonder what FEMEN think about Russia
Former editor of the Kiev post Brian Bonner (American): http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/brian-bonner-if-europe-wont-lead-the-us-should-in-protecting-ukraine-345361.html totally unbiased
Current editor Jakub Parusinski, just look through his twitter and facebook to see how unbiased he is.
Kiev Post is extremely biased
|
Zurich15329 Posts
On May 05 2014 22:12 Ghanburighan wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2014 22:07 zatic wrote:On May 05 2014 22:02 Ghanburighan wrote: Edit: Please stop posting propaganda in this thread. The Kremlin isn't a reliable source of human rights reporting. See the UN report on human rights on the previous page. The point is that even the Kremlin's human rights group calls the Crimea referendum doctored. According to them, where the referendum reported 97% in favor, it was more like 60% with less than 50% turnout. I know, I posted it in the thread.. I meant this post: .... My bad, this thread is a bit hectic to follow.
|
kyivpost not trash? you can't be serious!
|
Russian Federation1953 Posts
On May 05 2014 22:01 Mc wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2014 21:23 PaleMan wrote:On May 05 2014 21:05 Mc wrote:at least you are curious enough to ask. Compare the numbers and tell me that it was a statistical error what Russia was reporting.... I honestly am surprised by what the report claims I'll use a website that I assume you follow: http://rt.com/news/crimea-referendum-results-official-250/and the quote from Putin's website : link Референдум
По мнению практически всех опрошенных специалистов и граждан:
- подавляющее большинство жителей Севастополя проголосовали на референдуме за присоединение к России (явка 50-80 %), в Крыму по разным данным за присоединение к России проголосовали 50-60 % избирателей при общей явке в 30-50 %;
- жители Крыма голосовали не столько за присоединение к России, сколько за прекращение, по их словам, «коррупционного беспредела и воровского засилья донецких ставленников». Жители же Севастополя голосовали именно за присоединение к России. Опасения перед незаконными вооруженными формированиями в Севастополе были больше, чем в других районах Крыма.
Предложения:
1. Продлить срок принятия жителями Крыма решения о сохранении гражданства Украины, по крайней мере, до 31 декабря 2014 г.
translation: referendum
According to almost all survey participants and citizens :
- The vast majority of inhabitants of Sevastopol voted in a referendum to join Russia ( 50-80 % turnout ) , in Crimea on different data for joining Russia voted 50-60% voter turnout with a total of 30-50 % ;
- Inhabitants of Crimea voted not so much for joining Russia , as for the termination, in their words, " corruption and lawlessness thieves dominance Donetsk henchmen ." Inhabitants of Sevastopol to vote for annexation to Russia . Fears illegal armed groups in Sevastopol were higher than in other regions of the Crimea .
suggestions:
1. Extend Deadline for residents of the Crimea decision to retain the citizenship of Ukraine , at least until December 31, 2014 "Putin's" website - good to know you know nothing about that structure this council consists mostly of opposition who are very pro-western i will give you just 2 names from the list of its staff: http://www.president-sovet.ru/composition/3080/http://www.president-sovet.ru/composition/25/those 2 are the biggest rusophobes and west worshippers i ever knew whatever USA does - they applause (even Iraq invasion), if Russia does something that USA is not happy with - they start to critisize russian position so i'm a little surprized their "polls" didn't show that all crimeans wanted to be with Ukraine forever and ever 2 of the first 3 links on the website's front page seem to be anti-Ukraine and saying more or less what the Kremlin is saying. I admit I had to run google translate because my Russian isn't very good. http://www.president-sovet.ru/news/6079/http://www.president-sovet.ru/news/6078/So from what I see the council seems to be actually partially pro-kremlin. From reading the first paragraph of the report in question, you can figure out who worked on the report. Show nested quote +Проблемы жителей Крыма Настоящий обзор подготовлен членом Совета Бобровым Е.А., руководителем сети «Миграция и право» ПЦ «Мемориал» С.А. Ганнушкиной и адвокатом Сети Цейтлиной О.П. по результатам посещения городов Симферополь и Севастополь в период с 15 по 18 апреля 2014 г., встреч с должностными лицами органов государственной власти, духовенства, журналистами, общественными деятелями, адвокатами, правозащитниками и гражданами. Neither of the names you referred to are mentioned. It appears to me that you failed to do your research properly. Regardless, do you know what this councils purpose is? For now my assumption is this was a report prepared for the Putin government in order to establish actual facts on the ground, but as I said it's all murky for me due to me only knowing a little bit of Russian.
i gave you those 2 just to show what ppl work there and what atmosphere is in this council the point of this council (the real point, not what is declared) to give pro-west opposition something so they cannot say "ah, no democracy in Russian at all, cause we have no authority, nobody listens to us" they say it anyway but at least Putin can answer with: "well, you are in the council, give me your suggestions and ideas, let's see maybe you can produce something decent except for receiving grants from USAID and NED for glorifying the holy-West" of course not 100% of council are ppl i just described, but vast majority are
|
On May 05 2014 22:02 Ghanburighan wrote: Edit: Please stop posting propaganda in this thread. The Kremlin isn't a reliable source of human rights reporting. See the UN report on human rights on the previous page. You mean Ivan Šimonović's report? You mean the guy who was a part of Tuđman's government during the 90's? I can't believe someone actually took that report seriously. Horrible piece of bias that was probably given to him before he left for Ukraine.
|
On May 05 2014 22:18 nunez wrote:kyivpost not trash? you can't be serious!
I don't see what you're insinuating. That was a very good step by step overview of preceding events that you linked.
|
Russian Federation1953 Posts
either is Ghan is trolling hard or he is really propaganda-bot so he doesn't understand that all his post are pro-west propaganda
|
On May 05 2014 22:24 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2014 22:02 Ghanburighan wrote: Edit: Please stop posting propaganda in this thread. The Kremlin isn't a reliable source of human rights reporting. See the UN report on human rights on the previous page. You mean Ivan Šimonović's report? You mean the guy who was a part of Tuđman's government during the 90's? I can't believe someone actually took that report seriously. Horrible piece of bias that was probably given to him before he left for Ukraine.
Yes, that report. I guess what you post is supposed to somehow tarnish his reputation but I don't see how. I, like most sensible people, believe that the UN human rights office is objective and comprised of the best technical staff on the planet. This is also why the report was praised nearly unanimously by all UN countries except for Russia.
Here's his impeccable CV:
Ivan Šimonović assumed his functions as Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights on 17 July 2010, heading OHCHR’s New York Office.
Before joining the United Nations, from 2008 he held the position of Minister of Justice of Croatia. Previously Mr. Šimonović was Deputy Minister in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York, where he served as Senior Vice-President and President of the Economic and Social Council from 2001 to 2003.
A Croatian national, Mr. Šimonović worked as a professor at the Faculty of Law at the University of Zagreb, where he served as Head of the Legal Theory Department, Vice-Dean and Vice-Rector for international cooperation. He has experience and has published extensively in the fields of international relations, law, human rights, and development of national institutions. In an expert capacity, he has been a member of the Council of Europe’s Commission for Democracy through Law (i.e. the Venice Commission) and the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), as well as the Agent of the Republic of Croatia before the United Nations International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Mr. Šimonović has a graduate degree in law, a master’s degree in public administration and politics, and a Ph.D. from the University of Zagreb and was a visiting scholar at the Universities of Graz and Yale. Mr. Šimonović was born in 1959 in Zagreb, Croatia. He is married with two children.
***
On a related note, Zatic, if you're still reading this thread, could we have a policy against making wild accusations such as "UN report was handed to him before he left for Ukraine" - they are basically flamebaiting and nothing else.
|
|
|
|