|
|
On March 04 2014 06:35 Ghanburighan wrote: I had already forgotten how boring multilateral meetings actually were... Good thing there's no Cuba. Oh, Fidel's speechs...
|
Nigeria even commends the transitional govt. on its steps to become more inclusive.
|
On March 04 2014 06:35 Ghanburighan wrote: I had already forgotten how boring multilateral meetings actually were... Good thing there's no Cuba. We need more 10h speech from comrade Castro though.
|
On March 04 2014 06:37 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 06:36 r.Evo wrote:On March 04 2014 06:35 Ghanburighan wrote: I had already forgotten how boring multilateral meetings actually were... Good thing there's no Cuba. It always stroke me as slightly awkward that they're basically going in a circle issuing statements... which aren't exactly responding to each other. No Gadafi, no fun.
At least he would brighten it up a bit, like the iraqi infominister. This is pretty dry of a fart, and no real surprises.
|
the need to solve this piss.....fully. They nearly got me there!
I actually like those meetings. To hear all the statements, their reasoning, who is with who etc. Kinda never can get enough of this
|
i thought that south korea would have announced thay they will send flash, i'm disappointed
|
On March 04 2014 06:39 Makro wrote: i thought that south korea would have announced thay they will send flash, i'm disappointed God is everywhere.
P.S. This stream is killing my PC :/
|
Australia and Nigeria being a bit more specific in their critique than other non-involved states. Was a bit surprised. Is there any indirect interest from Nigeria?
|
On March 04 2014 06:41 Ghanburighan wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 06:39 Makro wrote: i thought that south korea would have announced thay they will send flash, i'm disappointed God is everywhere. P.S. This stream is killing my PC :/ The screen flashes ? It's subliminal western propaganda.
|
This whole topic is really formal politics vs real politics. Most treaties are not the paper worth they are printed at. Also this "memorandum".
The behaviour of Russia is not really surprising. It would never just watch Ukraine becoming a NATO or even EU state, as most Russians and many Ukraines see themselves as "brother states", and just recently became two different states, having a common origin. In fact the origin of Russian culture lies in today's Ukraine.
So all the western politicians are not really honest if they act as they would be surprised by Russia's actions. It was really foreseeable.
And honestly, I don't think Ukraine in its current form has any future. The pro-western and anti-western groups just won't find any compromise to live in one state. The only reasonable solution in my opinion is for eastern Ukraine to separate itself and become associated or part of Russia, and for western and mid Ukraine to become part of EU and NATO. So everyone is happy.
It is also important to notice that borders are nothing that God gave to us (if there is any ), borders are results of actual politics and history. Borders can and will change in the future, if there is motivation to do so. And the two interest groups in Ukraine will not be able to live in one state, I'm pretty sure of this.
Btw, I have a M.A. in politics.
|
On March 04 2014 06:42 Caladan wrote:This whole topic is really formal politics vs real politics. Most treaties are not the paper worth they are printed at. Also this "memorandum". The behaviour of Russia is not really surprising. It would never just watch Ukraine becoming a NATO or even EU state, as most Russians and many Ukraines see themselves as "brother states", and just recently became two different states, having a common origin. In fact the origin of Russian culture lies in today's Ukraine. So all the western politicians are not really honest if they act as they would be surprised by Russia's actions. It was really foreseeable. And honestly, I don't think Ukraine in its current form has any future. The pro-western and anti-western groups just won't find any compromise to live in one state. The only reasonable solution in my opinion is for eastern Ukraine to separate itself and become associated or part of Russia, and for western and mid Ukraine to become part of EU and NATO. So everyone is happy. It is also important to notice that borders are nothing that God gave to us (if there is any  ), borders are results of actual politics and history. Borders can and will change in the future, if there is motivation to do so. And the two interest groups in Ukraine will not be able to live in one state, I'm pretty sure of this. Btw, I have a M.A. in politics. case closed!
|
On March 04 2014 06:37 Godwrath wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 06:35 Ghanburighan wrote: I had already forgotten how boring multilateral meetings actually were... Good thing there's no Cuba. Oh, Fidel's speechs... Mahmoud would have been nice too :D
|
Now it is getting really interesting
|
On March 04 2014 06:21 Sub40APM wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 06:19 xDaunt wrote:On March 04 2014 06:13 Sub40APM wrote: Atis Lejins, a member of the Latvian parliament’s foreign-affairs committee, said increasing the number of NATO aircraft patrolling Baltic airspace could be one way to beef up NATO’s presence. Currently a small, rotating contingent of fighter aircraft from NATO countries operates from a base in Lithuania. Mr. Lejins, a former U.S. Marine, said one example of a heightened presence was the U.S. Air Force Aviation Detachment (AV Det) program in Poland, which rotates fighter and transport units to bases in Poland. Critics of an increased NATO presence say that costs to both Latvia and NATO could be a hurdle to expanding air patrols. Increased air patrols would upgrade the NATO presence in all three countries because aircraft cover the airspace of all three Baltic countries. Mr. Kalnins spoke after a joint meeting of the Saeima’ s Foreign Affairs and European Affairs committees that condemned Russia’s incursion into Crimea and called for European Union and Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) observers to be sent to the Ukraine. He spoke on Monday at the same time as the Lithuanian Parliament’s Foreign Affairs and National Security and Defence Committee passed a resolution condemning Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine and the occupation of the territory of Ukraine. The Lithuanian resolution also called on the North Atlantic Council to temporarily redeploy NATO military forces to its “eastern part, including the Baltic states.”
I'd send a few squadrons of F22s over there as a gigantic middle finger to Russia and threaten to impose a no-fly zone if Russia starts shooting Ukranians. the bigger middle finger would be to pressure the UK to close the City and London to the Russian elite. Putin doesnt care about sending his soldiers to their deaths, but his precious money? Thats a whole other matter. Makes me remember Cyprus, the depositor bail-in and "har, har, they're mainly rich Russians anyways..." sentiment.
|
Russian UN envoy says Ukraine's ousted President Yanukovych sent letter to President Putin asking him to use Russian military force in Ukraine - @Reuters
|
Is there a bug or does the ukrainian guy speak french?
|
On March 04 2014 06:47 Saumure wrote: Is there a bug or does the ukrainian guy speaking french? He actually speaks english.
|
On March 04 2014 06:47 Saumure wrote: Is there a bug or does the ukrainian guy speak french?
he did at the beginning
|
On March 04 2014 06:47 Saumure wrote: Is there a bug or does the ukrainian guy speak french? I think he actually started with French and is now speaking English.
|
On March 04 2014 06:47 Saumure wrote: Is there a bug or does the ukrainian guy speaking french?
The translating service is really good, photoshopping his lips in real time so the deaf French people can understand.
|
|
|
|