|
On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
how do upsets like this happen? with great goaltending by the winning team.
Or shit goaltending by the losing team.
See Chris Osgood/Mike Vernon circa 1996, Marc-Andre Fleury every year sans one.
But hey, saying there is more than one factor involved in something happening is overly technical and doesn't fit the Roy as god narrative.
On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
Avs sweep the 4 game series for only one reason.
Roy > The Beezer.
Lol, you're right. It had nothing to do with one team having players like Sakic and Forsberg and the other having a leading scorer named Scott Mellanby. loooooooool. The teams were identical besides goaltending! Hero Roy! ermahgerhdbestgerlternderrr
edit: Shit, I just responded to Jimmy. That's like giving the drunk, obnoxious kid another beer. Sorry guys - won't happen again.
|
|
|
Canada8159 Posts
On May 29 2014 23:52 Flaccid wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
how do upsets like this happen? with great goaltending by the winning team. Or shit goaltending by the losing team. See Chris Osgood/Mike Vernon circa 1996, Marc-Andre Fleury every year sans one. But hey, saying there is more than one factor involved in something happening is overly technical and doesn't fit the Roy as god narrative. On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
Avs sweep the 4 game series for only one reason.
Roy > The Beezer. Lol, you're right. It had nothing to do with one team having players like Sakic and Forsberg and the other having a leading scorer named Scott Mellanby. loooooooool. The teams were identical besides goaltending! Hero Roy! ermahgerhdbestgerlternderrr edit: Shit, I just responded to Jimmy. That's like giving the drunk, obnoxious kid another beer. Sorry guys - won't happen again.
I find myself checking the names of every post before i respond to anything in this thread
|
On May 30 2014 06:02 Jer99 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2014 23:52 Flaccid wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
how do upsets like this happen? with great goaltending by the winning team. Or shit goaltending by the losing team. See Chris Osgood/Mike Vernon circa 1996, Marc-Andre Fleury every year sans one. But hey, saying there is more than one factor involved in something happening is overly technical and doesn't fit the Roy as god narrative. On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
Avs sweep the 4 game series for only one reason.
Roy > The Beezer. Lol, you're right. It had nothing to do with one team having players like Sakic and Forsberg and the other having a leading scorer named Scott Mellanby. loooooooool. The teams were identical besides goaltending! Hero Roy! ermahgerhdbestgerlternderrr edit: Shit, I just responded to Jimmy. That's like giving the drunk, obnoxious kid another beer. Sorry guys - won't happen again. I find myself checking the names of every post before i respond to anything in this thread
ya, you want to be careful not to claim the William Jennings winner who wins the Conn Smythe the next year is "SHIT".
the red wings had shit goaltending in 95-96...
HAHAHAHAHA
|
On May 30 2014 06:02 Jer99 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2014 23:52 Flaccid wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
how do upsets like this happen? with great goaltending by the winning team. Or shit goaltending by the losing team. See Chris Osgood/Mike Vernon circa 1996, Marc-Andre Fleury every year sans one. But hey, saying there is more than one factor involved in something happening is overly technical and doesn't fit the Roy as god narrative. On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
Avs sweep the 4 game series for only one reason.
Roy > The Beezer. Lol, you're right. It had nothing to do with one team having players like Sakic and Forsberg and the other having a leading scorer named Scott Mellanby. loooooooool. The teams were identical besides goaltending! Hero Roy! ermahgerhdbestgerlternderrr edit: Shit, I just responded to Jimmy. That's like giving the drunk, obnoxious kid another beer. Sorry guys - won't happen again. I find myself checking the names of every post before i respond to anything in this thread
The best part is where we go on for a fair duration of ignoring him and he just gets his alts to reply to each other. Anyways, really hoping Montreal takes it to seven tonight.
|
Question for the non-French Canadians. What do you find more distasteful: a Canadian team not winning the cup again, or Montreal winning the cup again?
|
On May 30 2014 06:29 Shelke14 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2014 06:02 Jer99 wrote:On May 29 2014 23:52 Flaccid wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
how do upsets like this happen? with great goaltending by the winning team. Or shit goaltending by the losing team. See Chris Osgood/Mike Vernon circa 1996, Marc-Andre Fleury every year sans one. But hey, saying there is more than one factor involved in something happening is overly technical and doesn't fit the Roy as god narrative. On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
Avs sweep the 4 game series for only one reason.
Roy > The Beezer. Lol, you're right. It had nothing to do with one team having players like Sakic and Forsberg and the other having a leading scorer named Scott Mellanby. loooooooool. The teams were identical besides goaltending! Hero Roy! ermahgerhdbestgerlternderrr edit: Shit, I just responded to Jimmy. That's like giving the drunk, obnoxious kid another beer. Sorry guys - won't happen again. I find myself checking the names of every post before i respond to anything in this thread The best part is where we go on for a fair duration of ignoring him and he just gets his alts to reply to each other. Anyways, really hoping Montreal takes it to seven tonight.
I'm not an alt of Raynor. I have my own thoughts, and opinions. My team is the Washington Capitals, since I live in DC.
|
On May 30 2014 06:29 Shelke14 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2014 06:02 Jer99 wrote:On May 29 2014 23:52 Flaccid wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
how do upsets like this happen? with great goaltending by the winning team. Or shit goaltending by the losing team. See Chris Osgood/Mike Vernon circa 1996, Marc-Andre Fleury every year sans one. But hey, saying there is more than one factor involved in something happening is overly technical and doesn't fit the Roy as god narrative. On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
Avs sweep the 4 game series for only one reason.
Roy > The Beezer. Lol, you're right. It had nothing to do with one team having players like Sakic and Forsberg and the other having a leading scorer named Scott Mellanby. loooooooool. The teams were identical besides goaltending! Hero Roy! ermahgerhdbestgerlternderrr edit: Shit, I just responded to Jimmy. That's like giving the drunk, obnoxious kid another beer. Sorry guys - won't happen again. I find myself checking the names of every post before i respond to anything in this thread The best part is where we go on for a fair duration of ignoring him and he just gets his alts to reply to each other. Anyways, really hoping Montreal takes it to seven tonight.
loool, yeah. At least we learned that a playoff SV% of 898/864 isn't shitty - which honestly explains the MAF defense. Also hoping for a game 7. This series has been too entertaining to end already.
|
On May 30 2014 06:40 xDaunt wrote:
Question for the non-French Canadians. What do you find more distasteful: a Canadian team not winning the cup again, or Montreal winning the cup again?
1st one
|
i've never states those save percentages are good.
you should quote me rather than blabbing about bullshit.
|
On May 30 2014 06:43 Flaccid wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2014 06:29 Shelke14 wrote:On May 30 2014 06:02 Jer99 wrote:On May 29 2014 23:52 Flaccid wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
how do upsets like this happen? with great goaltending by the winning team. Or shit goaltending by the losing team. See Chris Osgood/Mike Vernon circa 1996, Marc-Andre Fleury every year sans one. But hey, saying there is more than one factor involved in something happening is overly technical and doesn't fit the Roy as god narrative. On May 29 2014 10:12 lamprey1 wrote:
Avs sweep the 4 game series for only one reason.
Roy > The Beezer. Lol, you're right. It had nothing to do with one team having players like Sakic and Forsberg and the other having a leading scorer named Scott Mellanby. loooooooool. The teams were identical besides goaltending! Hero Roy! ermahgerhdbestgerlternderrr edit: Shit, I just responded to Jimmy. That's like giving the drunk, obnoxious kid another beer. Sorry guys - won't happen again. I find myself checking the names of every post before i respond to anything in this thread The best part is where we go on for a fair duration of ignoring him and he just gets his alts to reply to each other. Anyways, really hoping Montreal takes it to seven tonight. loool, yeah. At least we learned that a playoff SV% of 898/864 isn't shitty - which honestly explains the MAF defense. Also hoping for a game 7. This series has been too entertaining to end already.
Raynor defended MAF's first 2 long playoff runs .. that's it
Post a source or shut up
You're the guy claiming Jennings 1 year and Conn Smythe the next = shit goalie
User was warned for this post
|
On May 30 2014 06:58 KelianQatar wrote:
You're the guy claiming Jennings 1 year and Conn Smythe the next = shit goalie
I'm saying they had shit goaltending in the '96 playoffs which contributed to the Wings losing. Or is sub .900 awesome now, you guys tell me? No one is talking about any other years.
edit: fuck, did it again. Got fooled by the 3rd-person use of Jimmy. I'm going to have to pay much better attention if Jimmy is going to refer to himself in 3rd person in his posts. Confusing.
|
Canada8159 Posts
On May 30 2014 06:40 xDaunt wrote:
Question for the non-French Canadians. What do you find more distasteful: a Canadian team not winning the cup again, or Montreal winning the cup again?
As far as I'm aware most of Canada is hoping that Mtl wins the cup
and lol jimmy banned
|
JimmyJRaynor was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2010-04-11 22:42:46 and had 2457 posts.
Reason: Can you shut up about 1996 please? Hard to enjoy the playoffs in 2014 with you shitting up that thread. Thamks.
lamprey1 was just banned by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2012-06-03 06:21:21 and had 917 posts.
Reason: Prove to me you aren't jjr.
Looool
|
On May 30 2014 06:40 xDaunt wrote:
Question for the non-French Canadians. What do you find more distasteful: a Canadian team not winning the cup again, or Montreal winning the cup again?
Montreal winning the cup again.
But I'm mostly a salty Albertan that is tired of Quebec wasting my tax dollars... so feel free to ignore me.
|
On May 30 2014 06:40 xDaunt wrote:
Question for the non-French Canadians. What do you find more distasteful: a Canadian team not winning the cup again, or Montreal winning the cup again?
Montreal winning is much more distasteful... The only Canadian team sans Leafs that I wouldn't find distasteful winning would be the Jets and that's just because I didn't grow up hating them :d
|
On May 30 2014 06:40 xDaunt wrote:
Question for the non-French Canadians. What do you find more distasteful: a Canadian team not winning the cup again, or Montreal winning the cup again?
As a British Columbian that dislikes Quebec I'd still rather see Montreal win than an American team. Most people I know feel the same way (about Quebec too xD). Might be an after effect of the Canucks being the Canucks.
|
rangers up 1-0, is the king just going to go to town on mtl?
|
FUCK YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSs
rangers in the finals, two jimmy accounts banned TODAY FUCKING OWNS
|
On May 30 2014 11:40 QuanticHawk wrote:
FUCK YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSs
rangers in the finals, two jimmy accounts banned TODAY FUCKING OWNS
Haha, pretty much what I expected verbatim. Hawk never disappoints.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
