EPTThe 2014 NHL Season - Two Accounts, No Cups - Page 203
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
gruff
Sweden2276 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32106 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/q4p5Br3.jpg) Kovyyyyy :D | ||
|
Kyhron
United States945 Posts
| ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On May 30 2014 20:03 Jer99 wrote: Lunqvuist taking the guts, glory, ram spot off tokarski for sure This guts glory ram stuff is NONSENSE. Just bring back highlight of the night. | ||
|
nikj
Canada669 Posts
Lol Sweet! Now I can enjoy this thread again! But just a suggestion, can we change JJR's ban length to "The remainder of the NHL playoffs." If I recall correctly he was banned around this time last year as well? But he was unbanned before the finals were over, and came back to the thread talking with his Bob Cole voice. | ||
|
Nausea
Sweden807 Posts
 | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
| ||
|
Blisse
Canada3710 Posts
| ||
|
sharkeyanti
United States1273 Posts
| ||
|
Kyhron
United States945 Posts
| ||
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
| ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
Whoever wins is going to need to kick it up a notch or 100 in net or they are in for a rough time | ||
|
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
On June 01 2014 05:46 Orcasgt24 wrote: I have been saying all along that whoever wins the west wins the cup but Lundqvist is running good right now. You can not say the same for Crawford and Quick. Both those goalies have looked pretty unremarkable and unable to steal games for there club in the west final. Whoever wins is going to need to kick it up a notch or 100 in net or they are in for a rough time Even if Boston won the east I think the west would have won either way, its such an elite division its unreal how strong they are. Vs. NY they will take it in 5, maybe 6 | ||
|
Nausea
Sweden807 Posts
| ||
|
Kyhron
United States945 Posts
On June 01 2014 05:46 Orcasgt24 wrote: I have been saying all along that whoever wins the west wins the cup but Lundqvist is running good right now. You can not say the same for Crawford and Quick. Both those goalies have looked pretty unremarkable and unable to steal games for there club in the west final. Whoever wins is going to need to kick it up a notch or 100 in net or they are in for a rough time Quick and Crawford look fine. You have the last two Stanley Cup Champions duking it out. Both teams know how to score and are playing near the top of their games. I think it says more about the teams offenses and their ability to score than it does about the goalies level of play. That series has been the best series of the playoffs and shows why the West is considered the better of the conferences | ||
|
L1ghtning
Sweden353 Posts
On May 31 2014 01:07 QuanticHawk wrote: Kovyyyyy :D That's a bit harsh towards the Montreal fans, lol, to cheer against a team you used to play for. | ||
|
L1ghtning
Sweden353 Posts
Although I think a LA - NYR series would be fairly evenly matched, I can't say the same thing for a CHI - NYR series. Chicago has skilled enough players to dismantle the Rangers, and if they can score 3-4 goals every game against LA's defense, they should accomplish the equivalent against the Rangers, and I can't see the Rangers doing the same in return. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32106 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/k0jVPaZ.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/nsqts6c.jpg) hahahaha On June 01 2014 23:16 L1ghtning wrote: Although I see the Rangers as the underdogs no matter what, I think they would have a better shot against LA. LA could struggle defensively because of the Rangers speed, and the Rangers are better defensively than any of the teams that LA has faced in this playoffs, so they won't be able to rely on their offensive zone efficiency which along with their defense has carried them in all their series. Although I think a LA - NYR series would be fairly evenly matched, I can't say the same thing for a CHI - NYR series. Chicago has skilled enough players to dismantle the Rangers, and if they can score 3-4 goals every game against LA's defense, they should accomplish the equivalent against the Rangers, and I can't see the Rangers doing the same in return. La's dmen are all pretty mobile though. I think Chicago would have much more trouble with the Rangers offense. also apparently DeBoer and the Devils were somewhat open to Brodeur returning. Jesus. If they don't lock up Schneider the second he is elligible this summer they are nuts. | ||
|
L1ghtning
Sweden353 Posts
On June 02 2014 00:46 QuanticHawk wrote: hahahaha La's dmen are all pretty mobile though. I think Chicago would have much more trouble with the Rangers offense. also apparently DeBoer and the Devils were somewhat open to Brodeur returning. Jesus. If they don't lock up Schneider the second he is elligible this summer they are nuts. LA struggled against SJ when they were keeping a fast pace in the regular season and at times in the playoffs. Speed seems to be the most effective way to deal with LA, not necessarily because they're slow, but fast paced games doesn't suit them because it gives them less time to organize themselves, and when they're not organized, they're not a strong team. I think the Rangers is a stronger team than LA on paper, if you look on individual players, so if they're unable to stick to their organized playstyle, they're in big trouble. The Rangers might not be as strong as the Sharks and the Ducks and the Hawks, but they might be better equiped at dealing with LA. | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
On June 02 2014 04:56 L1ghtning wrote: LA struggled against SJ when they were keeping a fast pace in the regular season and at times in the playoffs. Speed seems to be the most effective way to deal with LA, not necessarily because they're slow, but fast paced games doesn't suit them because it gives them less time to organize themselves, and when they're not organized, they're not a strong team. I think the Rangers is a stronger team than LA on paper, if you look on individual players, so if they're unable to stick to their organized playstyle, they're in big trouble. The Rangers might not be as strong as the Sharks and the Ducks and the Hawks, but they might be better equiped at dealing with LA. I cant see how the rangers are the better team on paper honestly. This is not 2004 anymore. | ||
| ||
