• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:41
CEST 19:41
KST 02:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced25BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 I offer completely free coaching services What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 728 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 9802

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9800 9801 9802 9803 9804 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 30 2018 03:14 GMT
#196021
On January 30 2018 12:11 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 12:07 Plansix wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:01 Introvert wrote:
Indeed, if only the Democrats in Congress weren't so radical that 20 weeks was too early for them, we could get it under control. But they couldn't even let it pass cloture.

But the bill was put out there to force red state democrats to vote against it. And it failed. Republicans in congress don’t want to legislate on abortion. They want to run for election on the issue. That is why poison pill bills like this exist. They are to fuel election campaigns through identity politics.


Actually the question is very yes/no. ban after 20 weeks? And that's good, I want to know which Senators don't support it. I thought we were opposed to pulling bills from the floor that we knew would fail? If passed, it would have been signed and become law. That's not a poison bill by any definition.

A poison pill bill is one that you put out there with clauses that you know the opposing party will never vote for. It is designed to fail and paint the other side into a corner.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
January 30 2018 03:16 GMT
#196022
On January 30 2018 11:51 Plansix wrote:
But remember, Trump isn’t connected to Russia and all this investion stuff is fake news. No reason to be suspicious.


Move along everyone. Nothing to see here. Just trust Donald Trump.
Tachion
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada8573 Posts
January 30 2018 03:16 GMT
#196023
On January 30 2018 12:01 Introvert wrote:
Indeed, if only the Democrats in Congress weren't so radical that 20 weeks was too early for them, we could get it under control. But they couldn't even let it pass cloture.

According to the CDC, only 1.3% of abortions occur past the 20 week mark. Could you hazard a guess why that is?
Some health concerns like congenital heart defects or abnormal tissue and organ development are only reliably scanned at the 16+ week mark. If they are late to detect such risks in the baby or to the mother, do you want to be the one to tell them tough luck?
i was driving down the road this november eve and spotted a hitchhiker walking down the street. i pulled over and saw that it was only a tree. i uprooted it and put it in my trunk. do trees like marshmallow peeps? cause that's all i have and will have.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 30 2018 03:16 GMT
#196024
On January 30 2018 12:14 Introvert wrote:
Let's just acknowledge that Woodrow Wilson had yet another awful idea and then go back to written statements to Congress.

It was cool for decades. It only got ruined recently when it became other stump speech, rather than an update on the state of the country.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
January 30 2018 03:20 GMT
#196025
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4748 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-30 03:23:45
January 30 2018 03:22 GMT
#196026
On January 30 2018 12:14 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 12:11 Introvert wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:07 Plansix wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:01 Introvert wrote:
Indeed, if only the Democrats in Congress weren't so radical that 20 weeks was too early for them, we could get it under control. But they couldn't even let it pass cloture.

But the bill was put out there to force red state democrats to vote against it. And it failed. Republicans in congress don’t want to legislate on abortion. They want to run for election on the issue. That is why poison pill bills like this exist. They are to fuel election campaigns through identity politics.


Actually the question is very yes/no. ban after 20 weeks? And that's good, I want to know which Senators don't support it. I thought we were opposed to pulling bills from the floor that we knew would fail? If passed, it would have been signed and become law. That's not a poison bill by any definition.

A poison pill bill is one that you put out there with clauses that you know the opposing party will never vote for. It is designed to fail and paint the other side into a corner.


Apparently the whole bill is a "clause" now? Of course it would fail, and of course everyone who opposed it should be shown as opposing it. This isn't the Harry Reid tactic of "it won't be signed so we won't vote on it" (now a more common procedure), it's an up or down bill that would become law if not filibustered. Also 20 weeks is fairly popular poll wise I think.

Good Heavens.

On January 30 2018 12:16 Tachion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 12:01 Introvert wrote:
Indeed, if only the Democrats in Congress weren't so radical that 20 weeks was too early for them, we could get it under control. But they couldn't even let it pass cloture.

According to the CDC, only 1.3% of abortions occur past the 20 week mark. Could you hazard a guess why that is?
Some health concerns like congenital heart defects or abnormal tissue and organ development are only reliably scanned at the 16+ week mark. If they are late to detect such risks in the baby or to the mother, do you want to be the one to tell them tough luck?


Then why oppose it? And of course the bill contained exceptions, though not for "fetal abnormalities" as far as I saw.
***

The point is, I'm glad this was put up to a vote, now we can see how they voted.
"It is therefore only at the birth of a society that one can be completely logical in the laws. When you see a people enjoying this advantage, do not hasten to conclude that it is wise; think rather that it is young." -Alexis de Tocqueville
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
January 30 2018 03:27 GMT
#196027
Abortion is still an argument these days?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 30 2018 03:29 GMT
#196028
On January 30 2018 12:22 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 12:14 Plansix wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:11 Introvert wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:07 Plansix wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:01 Introvert wrote:
Indeed, if only the Democrats in Congress weren't so radical that 20 weeks was too early for them, we could get it under control. But they couldn't even let it pass cloture.

But the bill was put out there to force red state democrats to vote against it. And it failed. Republicans in congress don’t want to legislate on abortion. They want to run for election on the issue. That is why poison pill bills like this exist. They are to fuel election campaigns through identity politics.


Actually the question is very yes/no. ban after 20 weeks? And that's good, I want to know which Senators don't support it. I thought we were opposed to pulling bills from the floor that we knew would fail? If passed, it would have been signed and become law. That's not a poison bill by any definition.

A poison pill bill is one that you put out there with clauses that you know the opposing party will never vote for. It is designed to fail and paint the other side into a corner.


Apparently the whole bill is a "clause" now? Of course it would fail, and of course everyone who opposed it should be shown as opposing it. This isn't the Harry Reid tactic of "it won't be signed so we won't vote on it" (now a more common procedure), it's an up or down bill that would become law if not filibustered. Also 20 weeks is fairly popular poll wise I think.

Good Heavens.

Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 12:16 Tachion wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:01 Introvert wrote:
Indeed, if only the Democrats in Congress weren't so radical that 20 weeks was too early for them, we could get it under control. But they couldn't even let it pass cloture.

According to the CDC, only 1.3% of abortions occur past the 20 week mark. Could you hazard a guess why that is?
Some health concerns like congenital heart defects or abnormal tissue and organ development are only reliably scanned at the 16+ week mark. If they are late to detect such risks in the baby or to the mother, do you want to be the one to tell them tough luck?


Then why oppose it? And of course the bill contained exceptions, though not for "fetal abnormalities" as far as I saw.
***

The point is, I'm glad this was put up to a vote, now we can see how they voted.

So it didn’t have an exception for the number one issue that someone would get this abortion? Because they are extremely uncommon.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
January 30 2018 03:34 GMT
#196029
On January 30 2018 12:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Abortion is still an argument these days?

yes, it's still goin gstrong as a fake argument by the republicans. they've been putting in lots of interference laws at the state level in places they're in power.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13925 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-30 03:53:36
January 30 2018 03:47 GMT
#196030
On January 30 2018 12:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Abortion is still an argument these days?

Ofc Abortion is still an argument. No one wants china esque late term abortions when the fetus reaches viability. Everyone whos reasonable on the issue has to accept horsetrading on whenever the line is for when you can abort the fetus or not.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 30 2018 03:55 GMT
#196031
The main problem is most of the state bills regarding abortion are shit and are designed to limit access, not provide the “reasonable” cut off point. From my understanding, the current bill was poorly drafted and didn’t have the appropriate exceptions.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-30 04:02:00
January 30 2018 04:00 GMT
#196032
On January 30 2018 12:47 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 12:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Abortion is still an argument these days?

Ofc Abortion is still an argument. No one wants china esque late term abortions when the fetus reaches viability. Everyone whos reasonable on the issue has to accept horsetrading on whenever the line is for when you can abort the fetus or not.

since the abortion you describe aren't a thing and nobody wants them, they're already illegal and not a problem.

there doesn't seem to be much actual horsetrading on the issue; or if there is, it seems rather low-key. not that one would expect much horse-trading on a human rights issue anyways. but I can' really think of much in terms of deals meant to address the issue. you'd think for such an ostensible important issue there'd be some grand bargains on it.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
January 30 2018 04:09 GMT
#196033
This guy had a job in the Trump Administration at one point

"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13925 Posts
January 30 2018 04:10 GMT
#196034
On January 30 2018 13:00 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 12:47 Sermokala wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Abortion is still an argument these days?

Ofc Abortion is still an argument. No one wants china esque late term abortions when the fetus reaches viability. Everyone whos reasonable on the issue has to accept horsetrading on whenever the line is for when you can abort the fetus or not.

since the abortion you describe aren't a thing and nobody wants them, they're already illegal and not a problem.

there doesn't seem to be much actual horsetrading on the issue; or if there is, it seems rather low-key. not that one would expect much horse-trading on a human rights issue anyways. but I can' really think of much in terms of deals meant to address the issue. you'd think for such an ostensible important issue there'd be some grand bargains on it.

I know you insufferable nitwit thats what my post says. Learn to give your posts at least a single read through so you don't come off like a middle school learning to use the internet. When one side belives life begins at conception and no one has a real marker for when it begins its going to remain an issue. I had you above Doodsmack but you're starting to slip.

The issues been peculating throughout the decades so the horsetrading happened a while ago in the US. it still happens in other nations.

User was warned for this post
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
January 30 2018 04:14 GMT
#196035
On January 30 2018 13:10 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 13:00 zlefin wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:47 Sermokala wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Abortion is still an argument these days?

Ofc Abortion is still an argument. No one wants china esque late term abortions when the fetus reaches viability. Everyone whos reasonable on the issue has to accept horsetrading on whenever the line is for when you can abort the fetus or not.

since the abortion you describe aren't a thing and nobody wants them, they're already illegal and not a problem.

there doesn't seem to be much actual horsetrading on the issue; or if there is, it seems rather low-key. not that one would expect much horse-trading on a human rights issue anyways. but I can' really think of much in terms of deals meant to address the issue. you'd think for such an ostensible important issue there'd be some grand bargains on it.

I know you insufferable nitwit thats what my post says. Learn to give your posts at least a single read through so you don't come off like a middle school learning to use the internet. When one side belives life begins at conception and no one has a real marker for when it begins its going to remain an issue. I had you above Doodsmack but you're starting to slip.

The issues been peculating throughout the decades so the horsetrading happened a while ago in the US. it still happens in other nations.

yes, you are an idiot; that's not what your post said, so I responded reasonably, and you responded like an ass. not my fault you post poorly then complain when people respond to what you actually wrote rather than what was in your mind that you didn't say. I don't care about your rankings, since you're known to be a poor (though not terrible) quality poster with poor judgment.

User was warned for this post
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13925 Posts
January 30 2018 04:22 GMT
#196036
On January 30 2018 13:14 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2018 13:10 Sermokala wrote:
On January 30 2018 13:00 zlefin wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:47 Sermokala wrote:
On January 30 2018 12:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Abortion is still an argument these days?

Ofc Abortion is still an argument. No one wants china esque late term abortions when the fetus reaches viability. Everyone whos reasonable on the issue has to accept horsetrading on whenever the line is for when you can abort the fetus or not.

since the abortion you describe aren't a thing and nobody wants them, they're already illegal and not a problem.

there doesn't seem to be much actual horsetrading on the issue; or if there is, it seems rather low-key. not that one would expect much horse-trading on a human rights issue anyways. but I can' really think of much in terms of deals meant to address the issue. you'd think for such an ostensible important issue there'd be some grand bargains on it.

I know you insufferable nitwit thats what my post says. Learn to give your posts at least a single read through so you don't come off like a middle school learning to use the internet. When one side belives life begins at conception and no one has a real marker for when it begins its going to remain an issue. I had you above Doodsmack but you're starting to slip.

The issues been peculating throughout the decades so the horsetrading happened a while ago in the US. it still happens in other nations.

yes, you are an idiot; that's not what your post said, so I responded reasonably, and you responded like an ass. not my fault you post poorly then complain when people respond to what you actually wrote rather than what was in your mind that you didn't say. I don't care about your rankings, since you're known to be a poor (though not terrible) quality poster with poor judgment.

You must have a poor self image if you call me a poor poster when you can barely use capitalization in your posts.

I said no one wants china esque late term abortions. You respond with that no one wants them. You used word for word what I said and you are dumb enough to say that's not what my post said.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
January 30 2018 05:07 GMT
#196037
On January 30 2018 13:09 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:
This guy had a job in the Trump Administration at one point

https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/958162143656009729


Well this memo better deliver at this point. If the only thing it talks about is the renewal of Carter Page's FISA surveillance that's pretty tame. Page was on unrelated FISA surveillance like three years before the election because of his idiocy in dealing with Russian intelligence agents. Republicans' attempts to cast a cloud over the entire FBI and DOJ are a transparent political maneuver to hedge against whatever may come out of the FBI investigation of Trump and his campaign. And apparently this maneuver is being done at the request of Trump himself.
Uldridge
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium4765 Posts
January 30 2018 06:13 GMT
#196038
Abortion is going to remain an issue, not only because some groups refer to the start of a human life at conception, while others are more lenient, but because it's a very difficult human problem, boiling down to fundamental conflict, reflected by society.
When is a human, a human? Stupid question when you hear it coming from a guy who just got stoned, but one that's actually addressable when a human is gestating inside a womb and there are currently no actual empirical methods available to quantitatively measure when this human has met all its parameters to be considered a human. Some draw the line at "all the potential, so from conception", some draw the line at "brain formation", but in the end it's something we base on a gut feeling of what we consider special enough insofar we shouldn't waste it.

Fundamentally, abortions aren't something you'd want to have as a potential mother. Sometimes you do opt for it out of necessity or if you wouldn't be able to cope (financially or mentally) and that's another issue to consider. Who gets more say in these rights? The mother, who provides a house, food and protection for the embryo, or the potential human life that can make immeasurable contributions to this world? If it's going to be a bit of both (only up to a certain time point can you abort, aka, what we have now), where is that time point?
It's a tough question. Maybe we get over this hurdle in a few decades, once we merge ourselves with AI (or been enslaved by it) or some revolutionary ethicist comes along and blows everyone away with the arguments.
So ultimately this topic is just a reflection of how different (sub)cultures deal with fundamental questions, which makes it very difficult to actually change something in this world on a large scale if you use a non oppressive form of governing.

Taxes are for Terrans
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-30 07:34:07
January 30 2018 06:53 GMT
#196039
On January 30 2018 12:20 Doodsmack wrote:
https://twitter.com/natashabertrand/status/958121487805878275


Well. You know, trump and its fellowship of the bling said that they'd drain the swamp, but not to what extend. They turned the swamp into a marsh now. A way bigger and more obvious marsh filled with stupid, but alas. Not a swamp anymore.

So lets give credit where credit is due. Trump tried its hardest to fight corruption, self-interests, manipulation, abuse of power, misrepresentation, lying and the sorts. Including common sense, reason, intelligence, honesty, integrity, the political influence of the US in the world, equality, and those things.

Tough life to fight so many things. It gets up at like 8 to watch a few hours of TV, so it knows what's going on in the USA, then sits on an empty desk with a MAGA hat (it puts it on itself, no further help needed) for pictures, and has to rush to Mar-a-Lago for its umpteenth time of golfing while not getting any, because its trophy-wife is a bit grumpy because it roars about how it can grab any bimbo by the pussy and pays 6 digits to silence a pornstar that it humped.

I mean, come on. Surely you have to see how hard its life is. Ruining the reputation of the US in the world alone is, like, a fulltime job. But don't fret. It has the best bad character, it'll manage quickly and effortlessly.

edit

sidenote, i'm starting to wonder at what point the FBI hits back. I mean, picking a fight with one of the most powerful agencies in the world, especially as a party that has so many criminals that you can just randomly investigate a few and find money launders, pedophiles, traitors etc, that can't be the smortest thing to do? I wonder if at one point ominous leaks start to happen. People in the FBI in the end are still people, and people get fed up eventually. It only differs as to how much a person can take before making a stupid(?) decision.

edit2:

Sidenote, isn't "not putting up sanctions" after being ordered by senate with an overwhelming majority AND signing it into law quite unconstitutional? Good publicity though, i'm sure no one will take anything away from the president just doing a Konrad Adenauer who famously (allegedly) said "the hell do i care about my blabbering from yesterday".
On track to MA1950A.
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
January 30 2018 09:06 GMT
#196040
Will this memo live up to the hype?



Reading this it's going to be outrage about campaign people being spied on (for dealing with actual russian spies but they will conveniently forget that part) and 'but her emails' episode 377
Neosteel Enthusiast
Prev 1 9800 9801 9802 9803 9804 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14:00
Bracket Day 2 - Final
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Clem vs Reynor
RotterdaM2336
ComeBackTV 1781
IndyStarCraft 578
WardiTV404
CranKy Ducklings203
3DClanTV 133
Rex132
EnkiAlexander 64
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 2336
IndyStarCraft 578
Rex 132
Vindicta 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 35495
Larva 813
Nal_rA 719
Shine 443
BeSt 406
firebathero 280
Soulkey 146
Hyun 74
sSak 37
yabsab 25
[ Show more ]
Free 25
Terrorterran 13
IntoTheRainbow 6
Dewaltoss 1
Dota 2
Gorgc6842
qojqva4294
420jenkins425
Counter-Strike
fl0m3836
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor722
Liquid`Hasu403
Other Games
B2W.Neo622
Hui .203
KnowMe143
QueenE95
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1948
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 64
• HeavenSC 40
• Adnapsc2 12
• iHatsuTV 12
• Legendk 7
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki21
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Nemesis2406
• WagamamaTV880
League of Legends
• Jankos1749
Other Games
• imaqtpie572
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
20m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Wardi Open
17h 20m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 16h
WardiTV European League
1d 22h
Online Event
1d 23h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.