• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:27
CET 15:27
KST 23:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win
Tourneys
SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps Starcraft 2 Advance [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ sOs joins Best's team, Newcatsle University Rollback Netcode in Brood War SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stratus: Battle for the sky now on steam Early acc Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Deus Ex 3!?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Artificial Intelligence Thread US Politics Mega-thread Dating: How's your luck? Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7656 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2010

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
May 29 2015 00:24 GMT
#40181
And how is it relevant? Why do we need the majority of 18 year olds having the same wealth as 50 year olds? To my knowledge that is not a condition of the desired wealth breakdown.
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 00:38:41
May 29 2015 00:36 GMT
#40182
just read and understand his calculation to inform your knowledge.

propose your own lifetime wealth accumulation curve and give the wealth distribution of that society if you have a better idea.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 00:43 GMT
#40183
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.
Freeeeeeedom
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 01:05:38
May 29 2015 01:01 GMT
#40184
On May 29 2015 09:43 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.


It wasn't a Mother Jones survey it was a Harvard Business school prof and Duke. MJ just found out about it.

EDIT: Regardless it's not like the one we have now is the only possible one. It's also obvious the overwhelming majority of Americans want a different one than we have.

So it shouldn't be a class warfare issue to talk about how we can arrive at a more even distribution (even if it's not ideal). We know income is only a small piece of that puzzle though, so things like the estate tax have to be considered. Without getting people like ref to think it's going to impact him.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:04 GMT
#40185
It doesn't really matter. Math is what made it absurd, not the source.
Freeeeeeedom
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
May 29 2015 01:10 GMT
#40186
Dude your math is just an absurd abstraction. The math you put up is totally irrelevant. It's like me drawing a straight line when you ask about a differential equation. If you had bothered to think about a more "realistic" wealth distribution you would have realized this.
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:13 GMT
#40187
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.
Freeeeeeedom
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
May 29 2015 01:18 GMT
#40188
On May 29 2015 10:13 cLutZ wrote:
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.


I'm not sure what you're saying but we have already had better (more equal) wealth distributions just within living memory?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
May 29 2015 01:25 GMT
#40189
Let's assume that these robots reproduce, for example, so that they don't all die out in one generation, and that they must consume wealth on young robots who don't produce any.
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44439 Posts
May 29 2015 01:27 GMT
#40190
On May 29 2015 10:01 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:43 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.


It wasn't a Mother Jones survey it was a Harvard Business school prof and Duke. MJ just found out about it.

EDIT: Regardless it's not like the one we have now is the only possible one. It's also obvious the overwhelming majority of Americans want a different one than we have.

So it shouldn't be a class warfare issue to talk about how we can arrive at a more even distribution (even if it's not ideal). We know income is only a small piece of that puzzle though, so things like the estate tax have to be considered. Without getting people like ref to think it's going to impact him.

Taxes on estates over 5 million? Dude, ref already pays enough in taxes.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:30 GMT
#40191
On May 29 2015 10:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 10:13 cLutZ wrote:
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.


I'm not sure what you're saying but we have already had better (more equal) wealth distributions just within living memory?


Than America currently, or than in my Hypo? I'm particularly interested in the society that's Top 20% has wealth that is only 3x what the bottom 20% has (Survey) or actually, even the Top 20% having 9x the Bottom 20% (my Hypo).

On May 29 2015 10:25 IgnE wrote:
Let's assume that these robots reproduce, for example, so that they don't all die out in one generation, and that they must consume wealth on young robots who don't produce any.

Please do construct your new robot model.
Freeeeeeedom
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 01:49:40
May 29 2015 01:39 GMT
#40192
Its areas look just like the ideal desired wealth ratio. It's a higher order polynomial. It's beautiful.

Let's look at wealth distributions in Valencia in 1935.
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 29 2015 01:53 GMT
#40193
On May 29 2015 09:14 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Wednesday assured Texans that the state would receive federal relief following major flooding, even though the senator opposed federal funding following Hurricane Sandy.

"There are a series of federal statutory thresholds that have to be satisfied. Initially, it appears those thresholds are likely to be satisfied by the magnitude of the damage we're seeing," Cruz said while touring the flooding in Wimberley, Texas, according to Texas television station KSAT. "Democrats and Republicans in the congressional delegation will stand as one in support of the federal government meeting its statutory obligations to provide the relief to help the Texans who are hurting."

At least 15 people have died due to widespread flooding in Texas, and officials have warned that the flooding may worsen in certain parts of the state.


Source

I fucking love how Cruz uses the word "statutory" as a cover for "I'm bending over backwards so far that my nose is in my colon."

On an unrelated note, the state of Michigan doesn't think TL is work appropriate


I mean, Texas crying and running to uncle Sam when something bad happens is nothing new. Heck, Texas has had a net inflow of money from the Fed for most of it's history IIRC.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
May 29 2015 03:01 GMT
#40194
This article is quite interesting imho, albeit a long read:
http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/the-science-of-scarcity

tldr: poverty and the struggle to pay for everything exerts a considerable mental drain which weakens people's ability to do other tasks, such as long term planning.
Not a perfect tldr as its not easy to summarize, and if you have objections, make sure you've read the article.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
lastpuritan
Profile Joined December 2014
United States540 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 04:09:46
May 29 2015 04:01 GMT
#40195
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 04:30:52
May 29 2015 04:24 GMT
#40196
On May 29 2015 13:01 lastpuritan wrote:
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?


If he was a legit cop then you're going to get harassed hard by his friends, unless they end up laughing at him for getting punked by some college kids.

Could of just been a Zimmerman type with a badge though. It's not hard to get a legit looking badge and a gun.

Not intended to be legal advice

If it was in Washington it would of been 100% legal though.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
May 29 2015 04:39 GMT
#40197
On May 29 2015 12:01 zlefin wrote:
This article is quite interesting imho, albeit a long read:
http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/the-science-of-scarcity

tldr: poverty and the struggle to pay for everything exerts a considerable mental drain which weakens people's ability to do other tasks, such as long term planning.
Not a perfect tldr as its not easy to summarize, and if you have objections, make sure you've read the article.


The article is fine and whatever, but this is beyond obvious. Anyone here operating under different assumptions has a pretty bad model of how people actually operate.
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
killa_robot
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada1884 Posts
May 29 2015 04:40 GMT
#40198
On May 29 2015 13:01 lastpuritan wrote:
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?


Save the logs, report him. If he threatened you and arranged the meeting he's not doing a very good job as a cop.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 29 2015 05:05 GMT
#40199
Sounds like a private dispute, he can't leverage being a cop to get you in trouble

Well he can, but it's not exactly legal and your burden of proof is pretty low. What kind of cop makes a parody account and trolls people on the internet...
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
May 29 2015 05:06 GMT
#40200
Assholes become cops. It is known.
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
Prev 1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IntoTheTV X SOOP
20:00
Premier - Quarterfinals
herO vs RogueLIVE!
IntoTheiNu 1075
CranKy Ducklings SOOP105
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EnDerr 33
ByuN (SOOP) 24
Rex 21
EmSc Tv 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 39699
Calm 4694
Rain 1597
Horang2 813
FanTaSy 513
BeSt 449
Mini 446
actioN 178
ggaemo 158
Hyun 125
[ Show more ]
Last 85
sSak 48
Pusan 37
Yoon 31
Bale 25
scan(afreeca) 25
Aegong 22
sOs 22
hero 21
Classic 21
Sacsri 19
Rock 18
ajuk12(nOOB) 18
Movie 17
yabsab 10
Dota 2
qojqva1503
Dendi1261
monkeys_forever155
XcaliburYe144
Other Games
B2W.Neo778
Lowko508
Fuzer 231
DeMusliM199
420jenkins124
Mew2King93
QueenE59
NeuroSwarm39
Railgan24
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV383
ComeBackTV 224
Counter-Strike
PGL149
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 13
EmSc2Tv 13
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 7
• Michael_bg 7
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV332
Upcoming Events
IPSL
2h 33m
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
AI Arena Tournament
4h 33m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
20h 33m
IPSL
1d 2h
Azhi_Dahaki vs ggnore13
Double vs WIZARD
Replay Cast
1d 8h
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
KCM Race Survival
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-05
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

Sector 951
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.