• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:51
CEST 17:51
KST 00:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Server Blocker Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Starcraft Superstars Winner/Replays [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 668 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2010

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 00:24 GMT
#40181
And how is it relevant? Why do we need the majority of 18 year olds having the same wealth as 50 year olds? To my knowledge that is not a condition of the desired wealth breakdown.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 00:38:41
May 29 2015 00:36 GMT
#40182
just read and understand his calculation to inform your knowledge.

propose your own lifetime wealth accumulation curve and give the wealth distribution of that society if you have a better idea.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 00:43 GMT
#40183
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.
Freeeeeeedom
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 01:05:38
May 29 2015 01:01 GMT
#40184
On May 29 2015 09:43 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.


It wasn't a Mother Jones survey it was a Harvard Business school prof and Duke. MJ just found out about it.

EDIT: Regardless it's not like the one we have now is the only possible one. It's also obvious the overwhelming majority of Americans want a different one than we have.

So it shouldn't be a class warfare issue to talk about how we can arrive at a more even distribution (even if it's not ideal). We know income is only a small piece of that puzzle though, so things like the estate tax have to be considered. Without getting people like ref to think it's going to impact him.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:04 GMT
#40185
It doesn't really matter. Math is what made it absurd, not the source.
Freeeeeeedom
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 01:10 GMT
#40186
Dude your math is just an absurd abstraction. The math you put up is totally irrelevant. It's like me drawing a straight line when you ask about a differential equation. If you had bothered to think about a more "realistic" wealth distribution you would have realized this.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:13 GMT
#40187
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.
Freeeeeeedom
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
May 29 2015 01:18 GMT
#40188
On May 29 2015 10:13 cLutZ wrote:
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.


I'm not sure what you're saying but we have already had better (more equal) wealth distributions just within living memory?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 01:25 GMT
#40189
Let's assume that these robots reproduce, for example, so that they don't all die out in one generation, and that they must consume wealth on young robots who don't produce any.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42596 Posts
May 29 2015 01:27 GMT
#40190
On May 29 2015 10:01 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:43 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.


It wasn't a Mother Jones survey it was a Harvard Business school prof and Duke. MJ just found out about it.

EDIT: Regardless it's not like the one we have now is the only possible one. It's also obvious the overwhelming majority of Americans want a different one than we have.

So it shouldn't be a class warfare issue to talk about how we can arrive at a more even distribution (even if it's not ideal). We know income is only a small piece of that puzzle though, so things like the estate tax have to be considered. Without getting people like ref to think it's going to impact him.

Taxes on estates over 5 million? Dude, ref already pays enough in taxes.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:30 GMT
#40191
On May 29 2015 10:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 10:13 cLutZ wrote:
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.


I'm not sure what you're saying but we have already had better (more equal) wealth distributions just within living memory?


Than America currently, or than in my Hypo? I'm particularly interested in the society that's Top 20% has wealth that is only 3x what the bottom 20% has (Survey) or actually, even the Top 20% having 9x the Bottom 20% (my Hypo).

On May 29 2015 10:25 IgnE wrote:
Let's assume that these robots reproduce, for example, so that they don't all die out in one generation, and that they must consume wealth on young robots who don't produce any.

Please do construct your new robot model.
Freeeeeeedom
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 01:49:40
May 29 2015 01:39 GMT
#40192
Its areas look just like the ideal desired wealth ratio. It's a higher order polynomial. It's beautiful.

Let's look at wealth distributions in Valencia in 1935.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 29 2015 01:53 GMT
#40193
On May 29 2015 09:14 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Wednesday assured Texans that the state would receive federal relief following major flooding, even though the senator opposed federal funding following Hurricane Sandy.

"There are a series of federal statutory thresholds that have to be satisfied. Initially, it appears those thresholds are likely to be satisfied by the magnitude of the damage we're seeing," Cruz said while touring the flooding in Wimberley, Texas, according to Texas television station KSAT. "Democrats and Republicans in the congressional delegation will stand as one in support of the federal government meeting its statutory obligations to provide the relief to help the Texans who are hurting."

At least 15 people have died due to widespread flooding in Texas, and officials have warned that the flooding may worsen in certain parts of the state.


Source

I fucking love how Cruz uses the word "statutory" as a cover for "I'm bending over backwards so far that my nose is in my colon."

On an unrelated note, the state of Michigan doesn't think TL is work appropriate


I mean, Texas crying and running to uncle Sam when something bad happens is nothing new. Heck, Texas has had a net inflow of money from the Fed for most of it's history IIRC.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
May 29 2015 03:01 GMT
#40194
This article is quite interesting imho, albeit a long read:
http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/the-science-of-scarcity

tldr: poverty and the struggle to pay for everything exerts a considerable mental drain which weakens people's ability to do other tasks, such as long term planning.
Not a perfect tldr as its not easy to summarize, and if you have objections, make sure you've read the article.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
lastpuritan
Profile Joined December 2014
United States540 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 04:09:46
May 29 2015 04:01 GMT
#40195
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 04:30:52
May 29 2015 04:24 GMT
#40196
On May 29 2015 13:01 lastpuritan wrote:
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?


If he was a legit cop then you're going to get harassed hard by his friends, unless they end up laughing at him for getting punked by some college kids.

Could of just been a Zimmerman type with a badge though. It's not hard to get a legit looking badge and a gun.

Not intended to be legal advice

If it was in Washington it would of been 100% legal though.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 04:39 GMT
#40197
On May 29 2015 12:01 zlefin wrote:
This article is quite interesting imho, albeit a long read:
http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/the-science-of-scarcity

tldr: poverty and the struggle to pay for everything exerts a considerable mental drain which weakens people's ability to do other tasks, such as long term planning.
Not a perfect tldr as its not easy to summarize, and if you have objections, make sure you've read the article.


The article is fine and whatever, but this is beyond obvious. Anyone here operating under different assumptions has a pretty bad model of how people actually operate.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
killa_robot
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada1884 Posts
May 29 2015 04:40 GMT
#40198
On May 29 2015 13:01 lastpuritan wrote:
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?


Save the logs, report him. If he threatened you and arranged the meeting he's not doing a very good job as a cop.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 29 2015 05:05 GMT
#40199
Sounds like a private dispute, he can't leverage being a cop to get you in trouble

Well he can, but it's not exactly legal and your burden of proof is pretty low. What kind of cop makes a parody account and trolls people on the internet...
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 05:06 GMT
#40200
Assholes become cops. It is known.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Prev 1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Group Stage
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 526
Hui .308
mcanning 118
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 39240
EffOrt 2527
Shuttle 1640
Larva 1137
Mini 682
Stork 616
firebathero 504
Barracks 497
actioN 495
Hyuk 455
[ Show more ]
Light 357
PianO 137
TY 97
Snow 89
Mind 86
sSak 74
Dewaltoss 53
Sharp 51
[sc1f]eonzerg 46
Aegong 39
Terrorterran 20
scan(afreeca) 20
Free 12
SilentControl 11
Bale 9
Shinee 5
Dota 2
Gorgc12405
singsing3258
qojqva1800
syndereN126
Counter-Strike
sgares1112
markeloff101
Other Games
FrodaN2082
hiko1169
Scarlett`706
Lowko454
Fuzer 216
oskar162
KnowMe148
ArmadaUGS101
ROOTCatZ82
Trikslyr60
QueenE57
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2907
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 30
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis7827
• Jankos1886
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
9m
sebesdes vs SpeCial
Harstem vs YoungYakov
GgMaChine vs uThermal
RotterdaM526
CranKy Ducklings
18h 9m
Epic.LAN
20h 9m
CSO Contender
1d 1h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 18h
Online Event
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.