• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:29
CET 12:29
KST 20:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - RO16 Preview3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational10SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)19Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 2 will not be in the Esports World Cup Rongyi Cup S3 - RO16 Preview herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list?
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Which foreign pros are considered the best? BW General Discussion BW AKA finder tool
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Navigating the Risks and Rew…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1702 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2010

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 00:24 GMT
#40181
And how is it relevant? Why do we need the majority of 18 year olds having the same wealth as 50 year olds? To my knowledge that is not a condition of the desired wealth breakdown.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 00:38:41
May 29 2015 00:36 GMT
#40182
just read and understand his calculation to inform your knowledge.

propose your own lifetime wealth accumulation curve and give the wealth distribution of that society if you have a better idea.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 00:43 GMT
#40183
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.
Freeeeeeedom
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23591 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 01:05:38
May 29 2015 01:01 GMT
#40184
On May 29 2015 09:43 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.


It wasn't a Mother Jones survey it was a Harvard Business school prof and Duke. MJ just found out about it.

EDIT: Regardless it's not like the one we have now is the only possible one. It's also obvious the overwhelming majority of Americans want a different one than we have.

So it shouldn't be a class warfare issue to talk about how we can arrive at a more even distribution (even if it's not ideal). We know income is only a small piece of that puzzle though, so things like the estate tax have to be considered. Without getting people like ref to think it's going to impact him.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:04 GMT
#40185
It doesn't really matter. Math is what made it absurd, not the source.
Freeeeeeedom
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 01:10 GMT
#40186
Dude your math is just an absurd abstraction. The math you put up is totally irrelevant. It's like me drawing a straight line when you ask about a differential equation. If you had bothered to think about a more "realistic" wealth distribution you would have realized this.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:13 GMT
#40187
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.
Freeeeeeedom
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23591 Posts
May 29 2015 01:18 GMT
#40188
On May 29 2015 10:13 cLutZ wrote:
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.


I'm not sure what you're saying but we have already had better (more equal) wealth distributions just within living memory?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 01:25 GMT
#40189
Let's assume that these robots reproduce, for example, so that they don't all die out in one generation, and that they must consume wealth on young robots who don't produce any.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43483 Posts
May 29 2015 01:27 GMT
#40190
On May 29 2015 10:01 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:43 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:53 Chocolate wrote:
On May 29 2015 08:37 cLutZ wrote:
Child tax breaks are probably a good, or at worst neutral idea. But they certainly have screwed up the education system, particularly higher ed, and low-income K-12. But those things are like a shiny bauble on the top of a rotting Christmas tree when you look at the inner workings of the tax breaks and subsidies carved out and doled out by the Federal and State governments.

You're not bringing anything up in particular. Most tax breaks and subsidies exist for good reason. Many of them exist to encourage investing in renewable energy, biodiesel, education, home ownership (this one's a little fucked up because IMO housing doesn't need to be seen as an investment per se), retirement savings to help people reduce expenses and earn more over the long term. You can't just bash on something and not say why it's messed up.

I'm going to assume this is correct, because I don't want to look far.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/taxbreaks/2014/visualization/

1. Employee Sponsored Healthcare: Bad-Very Bad. Prevents employee mobility, prevents people from understanding the true cost of healthcare, reduces personalization in insurance plans, encourages over-insurance.
2. Capital Gains and Dividends: Good (Potential Bad). But only because of the corporate income tax. Would be reduced/eliminated in ideal world, simply because there would be no corporate tax.
3. Employer retirement Plans: Neutral-Bad. Typically limits choices. Causes short term liquidity issues often because of penalties for early withdrawal. Also schizophrenic with Social Security/Medicare.
4/5. Imputed Rental/Home Mortgage: Actually the same, mostly. Encourages home ownership, which reduces mobility, reduces liquidity, encourages speculation, and creates unbalanced investment portfolios (1 property in 1 economic area...hard to get any LESS balanced).
6. Corporate income aboard: Good. Should be no corporate income tax, see 2.
7. Accelerated Depreciation: Good. See 2.
8. Charitable contributions: Neutral-Bad. often used to evade other laws, particularly regarding corruption. Not that charity is bad, but a lot of it goes to vanity/activism projects like theaters and ACLU/Cato, etc.
9. State and Local Tax Deductions: Very Bad-Terrible. Encourages bad state fiscal policy.
10. Capital Gains on Home Sales: Bad. Similar to 4. Also has a lock-in effect where once you own a property you are tax-disadvantaged to return to renting.


On May 29 2015 09:10 IgnE wrote:
On May 29 2015 04:47 cLutZ wrote:
On May 29 2015 02:55 IgnE wrote:
How does it make little sense?

Because, lets say I assume Kwark's estimation of the graph is correct.

On May 29 2015 03:01 KwarK wrote:
Looks like the top 20 have around 32%, next 20 have 33-55 so around 22%, next 20 have 56 to 75 so around 20%, next 20 have 76 to 89 so around 14% and the final 20 have the remaining 11%.


Then lets say every person is the same, and earns the same, saves the same % of income (no interest), works from 20-65, retires, and dies at 80 with $0. We know all these things are untrue in the real world, and all those assumptions, if untrue, would make wealth distribution more uneven than that "ideal" graph.

Here is that society's wealth distribution:
[image loading]

http://s18.postimg.org/ovk82b4e1/Robot.png

Top 20: 36%
21-40: 28%
41-60: 20%
61-80: 12%
81-100: 4%


What are you talking about? What is a more sensical graph according to you? I think your hypothetical is meaningless.


My hypothetical was just to illustrate the absurdity of the Mother Jones "ideal distribution" survey by showing in a society formed of equal people doing the same thing it still wasn't even true.


It wasn't a Mother Jones survey it was a Harvard Business school prof and Duke. MJ just found out about it.

EDIT: Regardless it's not like the one we have now is the only possible one. It's also obvious the overwhelming majority of Americans want a different one than we have.

So it shouldn't be a class warfare issue to talk about how we can arrive at a more even distribution (even if it's not ideal). We know income is only a small piece of that puzzle though, so things like the estate tax have to be considered. Without getting people like ref to think it's going to impact him.

Taxes on estates over 5 million? Dude, ref already pays enough in taxes.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
May 29 2015 01:30 GMT
#40191
On May 29 2015 10:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 10:13 cLutZ wrote:
I created a more equal society than exists in the world, and showed that it had a less equal distribution than the "desirable" distribution from the survey.

All realistic wealth distributions are even less equal, which is what I said in the assumptions section of the hypothetical.


I'm not sure what you're saying but we have already had better (more equal) wealth distributions just within living memory?


Than America currently, or than in my Hypo? I'm particularly interested in the society that's Top 20% has wealth that is only 3x what the bottom 20% has (Survey) or actually, even the Top 20% having 9x the Bottom 20% (my Hypo).

On May 29 2015 10:25 IgnE wrote:
Let's assume that these robots reproduce, for example, so that they don't all die out in one generation, and that they must consume wealth on young robots who don't produce any.

Please do construct your new robot model.
Freeeeeeedom
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 01:49:40
May 29 2015 01:39 GMT
#40192
Its areas look just like the ideal desired wealth ratio. It's a higher order polynomial. It's beautiful.

Let's look at wealth distributions in Valencia in 1935.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 29 2015 01:53 GMT
#40193
On May 29 2015 09:14 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 29 2015 09:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Wednesday assured Texans that the state would receive federal relief following major flooding, even though the senator opposed federal funding following Hurricane Sandy.

"There are a series of federal statutory thresholds that have to be satisfied. Initially, it appears those thresholds are likely to be satisfied by the magnitude of the damage we're seeing," Cruz said while touring the flooding in Wimberley, Texas, according to Texas television station KSAT. "Democrats and Republicans in the congressional delegation will stand as one in support of the federal government meeting its statutory obligations to provide the relief to help the Texans who are hurting."

At least 15 people have died due to widespread flooding in Texas, and officials have warned that the flooding may worsen in certain parts of the state.


Source

I fucking love how Cruz uses the word "statutory" as a cover for "I'm bending over backwards so far that my nose is in my colon."

On an unrelated note, the state of Michigan doesn't think TL is work appropriate


I mean, Texas crying and running to uncle Sam when something bad happens is nothing new. Heck, Texas has had a net inflow of money from the Fed for most of it's history IIRC.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
May 29 2015 03:01 GMT
#40194
This article is quite interesting imho, albeit a long read:
http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/the-science-of-scarcity

tldr: poverty and the struggle to pay for everything exerts a considerable mental drain which weakens people's ability to do other tasks, such as long term planning.
Not a perfect tldr as its not easy to summarize, and if you have objections, make sure you've read the article.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
lastpuritan
Profile Joined December 2014
United States540 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 04:09:46
May 29 2015 04:01 GMT
#40195
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23591 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-29 04:30:52
May 29 2015 04:24 GMT
#40196
On May 29 2015 13:01 lastpuritan wrote:
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?


If he was a legit cop then you're going to get harassed hard by his friends, unless they end up laughing at him for getting punked by some college kids.

Could of just been a Zimmerman type with a badge though. It's not hard to get a legit looking badge and a gun.

Not intended to be legal advice

If it was in Washington it would of been 100% legal though.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 04:39 GMT
#40197
On May 29 2015 12:01 zlefin wrote:
This article is quite interesting imho, albeit a long read:
http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/the-science-of-scarcity

tldr: poverty and the struggle to pay for everything exerts a considerable mental drain which weakens people's ability to do other tasks, such as long term planning.
Not a perfect tldr as its not easy to summarize, and if you have objections, make sure you've read the article.


The article is fine and whatever, but this is beyond obvious. Anyone here operating under different assumptions has a pretty bad model of how people actually operate.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
killa_robot
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada1884 Posts
May 29 2015 04:40 GMT
#40198
On May 29 2015 13:01 lastpuritan wrote:
its not about politics but i have one question,

+ Show Spoiler +
yesterday one guy from facebook groups (uni graduate) were trolling the thread and they kicked him. i saw his messages very late and commented on the post he trolled people: its 2015 what stupid would troll with parody accounts. several hours later he messaged me that he will f*** my mother, f**ck me and threatened me, i flamed back and gave my number saying say these to my face (i know im a flamer) so he called me, he wanted me to meet with him in an abandoned place over and over again but i said come-nearby a school entrance where we both are close, he said ok ill kill you. i went there with couple of friends, called him, said raise your hand, he raised his hands n put my phone in my pocket, punched his ugly face 1-2 times. his friends attacked me but they were trying to hold me mostly, no punches or kicks, they tried to bend my arm etc. that a*hole tried to punch me while his friends are taking me away but i juked his punch and punched him back. later on some folks from school came there and stopped us saying guys guys guys please talk, fix this by talking. i said if you had not threatened me i would even delete my comment but you said you will kill me, here i am, he said im a little kid and he will find me again. at that moment students from the school started to get angry at guys threatenings and pushed him back "go away bro you are not human" etc. AT THAT VERY MOMENT, he pulled his wallet off and raised his police badge, it was not a fake one. (saw his gun next to it also) "IM A POLICE ON YOUR KNEES ASSHOLES" .... His friends were also police men, but students (around 15-20 black-white mixed) refused to listen him and shout at him IF YOU ARE POLICE WE ARE REVOLUTIONARY FRONT M**F**KER and they began to push him back by almost hitting his face, he realized he will be beaten to death, jumped his car, and left. Students came and asked me what happened, they said you are right nothing will happen, they walked with me couple of blocks and farewell....WTF. I cant still believe... I did fight a lot of guys who threatened me before but not with a cop! With the aid of unknown lefties, never.....


So my question is, there could be any problem for me? Should i find a lawyer? Set a claymore on my backdoor? Leave the town?


Save the logs, report him. If he threatened you and arranged the meeting he's not doing a very good job as a cop.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
May 29 2015 05:05 GMT
#40199
Sounds like a private dispute, he can't leverage being a cop to get you in trouble

Well he can, but it's not exactly legal and your burden of proof is pretty low. What kind of cop makes a parody account and trolls people on the internet...
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 29 2015 05:06 GMT
#40200
Assholes become cops. It is known.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Prev 1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
11:00
Season 13 World Championship
herO vs ClemLIVE!
Cure vs TBD
Solar vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
WardiTV418
LiquipediaDiscussion
RongYI Cup
11:00
Group A
ByuN vs TriGGeR
herO vs Rogue
RotterdaM411
Harstem91
IndyStarCraft 84
Rex69
BRAT_OK 55
3DClanTV 47
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 411
SortOf 140
Harstem 91
IndyStarCraft 84
Rex 69
BRAT_OK 55
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2475
GuemChi 2213
Rain 1869
BeSt 712
Hyuk 689
Horang2 657
Stork 396
Soma 362
Mini 298
Soulkey 277
[ Show more ]
Larva 241
Zeus 189
Last 179
ggaemo 138
Hyun 108
Mong 101
Killer 93
Snow 91
hero 90
Backho 79
Sharp 62
Mind 59
Yoon 59
Shinee 50
Shuttle 44
soO 38
Barracks 37
ToSsGirL 36
Bale 30
910 19
Movie 17
Icarus 16
Free 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Noble 13
GoRush 11
zelot 8
[sc1f]eonzerg 3
Dota 2
XcaliburYe276
NeuroSwarm107
League of Legends
JimRising 389
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1461
x6flipin330
allub211
Other Games
gofns8050
summit1g5436
Liquid`RaSZi1293
B2W.Neo772
crisheroes287
XaKoH 182
Hui .127
ToD99
Mew2King95
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick889
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 23
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 7
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1475
• HappyZerGling115
Upcoming Events
RongYI Cup
23h 31m
Clem vs ShoWTimE
Zoun vs Bunny
Big Brain Bouts
1d 5h
Serral vs TBD
RongYI Cup
1d 23h
SHIN vs Creator
Classic vs Percival
OSC
2 days
BSL 21
2 days
RongYI Cup
2 days
Maru vs Cyan
Solar vs Krystianer
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
BSL 21
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-20
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Rongyi Cup S3
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.