On September 04 2012 22:18 Snowbear wrote:
Guys I actually think that every sc2 owner will receive a beta key, I just feel it...
Guys I actually think that every sc2 owner will receive a beta key, I just feel it...
positive thinking. I like it

Forum Index > Closed |
Do not use this thread to beg users for beta access or trade access with others. Thanks. | ||
PresenceSc2
Australia4032 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:18 Snowbear wrote: Guys I actually think that every sc2 owner will receive a beta key, I just feel it... positive thinking. I like it ![]() | ||
Tppz!
Germany1449 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:17 Existor wrote: Digging in HotS resources and found some interesting ability and unit icons: - here are another 2 different Swarm Hosts - greeny Carrion and purplish with spines Creeper - remember flying locusts on early arts? They are in icons - we have 2 icons of widow mine activation/deactivation that are red/green - found Syphon ability for Corruptor. Don't know is it removed or not - ocular parasite icon too, but it was removed long time ago ![]() could you please upload a screen with better quality? | ||
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50118 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:19 MavercK wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 22:14 BLinD-RawR wrote: On September 04 2012 22:04 MavercK wrote: so spider mines can't be targeted at all by anything once they are in the air. not by marines nor point defense drone. they are a guaranteed hit. fairly disappointing but oh well. :/ that needs to be fixed, it means that you need a unit with 6 range to clear them out easily. do they hit cloaked units when cloaked? their target filter says Visible: Required this would indicate they do not hit cloaked units unless they are revealed. oh well that is some compensation, then again I forgot that would have totally killed observers | ||
johnny123
521 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:11 Cabinet Sanchez wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 21:57 Illiterate wrote: Is anyone else pissing themselves in excitement? I am eager to have a play because I'm a bit bored lately. I'm actually not looking forward to what this will do to the multiplayer game of SC2 as it is. Several of the units show a clear lack of foresight and direction to me in their design. I hope I'm wrong but I suspect not. The simplest way to put it is "gimmicky" even though it's a bit of a catchall word. I feel like SC2 only just reached a point of stability and interesting gameplay in the last 6 months, it's aobut to be pissed away. i am not really worried, you cant expect new units to be added without braking the entire foundation . Question is, will the end result be a better one than wings of liberty? i'd say yes, from a design standpoint | ||
TheWorldToCome
United States452 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:22 Za7oX wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 22:18 Snowbear wrote: Guys I actually think that every sc2 owner will receive a beta key, I just feel it... positive thinking. I like it ![]() Well that might be true, but not everyone right at the beginning of the beta. There were waves of invites last time. | ||
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Somewhere in HotS we will fight on Zerus planet - the main homeworld of Zergs, where they born. Zerus - as we can see, jungles and lava. We saw that tileset, but only now we know, that it's a homeworld of Zerg http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Zerus ![]() Some new planets from loading screens Rendezvous ![]() Korhal - it's dark and reminds me about Xel'Naga ![]() | ||
Rah
United States973 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:22 Za7oX wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 22:18 Snowbear wrote: Guys I actually think that every sc2 owner will receive a beta key, I just feel it... positive thinking. I like it ![]() overhype > disappointment > anger > boycott The cycle has begun. | ||
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
So freaking excited.!! | ||
Gben592
United Kingdom281 Posts
| ||
pischner
Germany6 Posts
| ||
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
| ||
Lorch
Germany3682 Posts
Not that I believe it will happen, would just be a nice way of announcing it while supporting gom. | ||
Cabinet Sanchez
Australia1097 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:23 johnny123 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 22:11 Cabinet Sanchez wrote: On September 04 2012 21:57 Illiterate wrote: Is anyone else pissing themselves in excitement? I am eager to have a play because I'm a bit bored lately. I'm actually not looking forward to what this will do to the multiplayer game of SC2 as it is. Several of the units show a clear lack of foresight and direction to me in their design. I hope I'm wrong but I suspect not. The simplest way to put it is "gimmicky" even though it's a bit of a catchall word. I feel like SC2 only just reached a point of stability and interesting gameplay in the last 6 months, it's aobut to be pissed away. i am not really worried, you cant expect new units to be added without braking the entire foundation . Question is, will the end result be a better one than wings of liberty? i'd say yes, from a design standpoint That's where we disagree, I see several units being included in this as just cookie cutter idiot units from some kind of dumb B level RTS developed by people new to the genre. Battle Hellion and Warhound come to mind. | ||
Arkani
Austria60 Posts
looking forward to it | ||
Illiterate
Netherlands49 Posts
| ||
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:32 Cabinet Sanchez wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 22:23 johnny123 wrote: On September 04 2012 22:11 Cabinet Sanchez wrote: On September 04 2012 21:57 Illiterate wrote: Is anyone else pissing themselves in excitement? I am eager to have a play because I'm a bit bored lately. I'm actually not looking forward to what this will do to the multiplayer game of SC2 as it is. Several of the units show a clear lack of foresight and direction to me in their design. I hope I'm wrong but I suspect not. The simplest way to put it is "gimmicky" even though it's a bit of a catchall word. I feel like SC2 only just reached a point of stability and interesting gameplay in the last 6 months, it's aobut to be pissed away. i am not really worried, you cant expect new units to be added without braking the entire foundation . Question is, will the end result be a better one than wings of liberty? i'd say yes, from a design standpoint That's where we disagree, I see several units being included in this as just cookie cutter idiot units from some kind of dumb B level RTS developed by people new to the genre. Battle Hellion and Warhound come to mind. We will have to wait and see. | ||
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:33 Illiterate wrote: @MaverCK: Are the Widowmines actually burrowed and invisible? Or just activated and "sieged" without being able to move? they are burrowed http://imgur.com/a/CvTJP#0 new tilesets | ||
johnny123
521 Posts
On September 04 2012 21:51 Yonnua wrote: I feel like if they took autocast off the warhound it would actually be a pretty decent unit. Encourages micro, but not too extensive as its essentially just spam click every few seconds and you get a decent reward for doing so. EDIT: That said, banshees to force stalkers in to warhound would make for a really tough 1/1/1 to deal with... hows 1/1/1 a problem with mothership core defense? stop thinking in WOL terms.lawl | ||
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
![]()
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
On September 04 2012 22:32 Cabinet Sanchez wrote: Show nested quote + On September 04 2012 22:23 johnny123 wrote: On September 04 2012 22:11 Cabinet Sanchez wrote: On September 04 2012 21:57 Illiterate wrote: Is anyone else pissing themselves in excitement? I am eager to have a play because I'm a bit bored lately. I'm actually not looking forward to what this will do to the multiplayer game of SC2 as it is. Several of the units show a clear lack of foresight and direction to me in their design. I hope I'm wrong but I suspect not. The simplest way to put it is "gimmicky" even though it's a bit of a catchall word. I feel like SC2 only just reached a point of stability and interesting gameplay in the last 6 months, it's aobut to be pissed away. i am not really worried, you cant expect new units to be added without braking the entire foundation . Question is, will the end result be a better one than wings of liberty? i'd say yes, from a design standpoint That's where we disagree, I see several units being included in this as just cookie cutter idiot units from some kind of dumb B level RTS developed by people new to the genre. Battle Hellion and Warhound come to mind. Battle hellion makes sense in a way, if it was its own thing. And warhound could work if there was no marauder. Thats how I see it. The one thing I dont like about the battle hellion -- it gains more hp. How the hell does that make any sort of intuitive sense. And how does that work when the unit is damaged? | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War actioN Dota 2![]() Mini ![]() Larva ![]() Barracks ![]() Soma ![]() firebathero ![]() Pusan ![]() TY ![]() Hyun ![]() Dewaltoss ![]() [ Show more ] Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH227 StarCraft: Brood War• sitaska29 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
Epic.LAN
CSO Contender
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Online Event
Esports World Cup
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
Esports World Cup
Esports World Cup
CranKy Ducklings
|
|