• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:42
CEST 19:42
KST 02:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy19ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy2GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding6Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage5Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win
Tourneys
GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage BW General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The China Politics Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Streamers Inspire Gamers…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2698 users

HOTS main buildings now displaying # of workers - Page 15

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next All
jinorazi
Profile Joined October 2004
Korea (South)4948 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 23:37:25
June 08 2012 23:35 GMT
#281
is blizzard serious about making sc2 a competitive game...??? because it seems it gets more casual as time passes.
i consider "star sense" a huge part of the game, being able to eye how many workers you have and timings without even looking at the clock is skill...why they removing these?

its already become so easily to defend against dt/banshee most efficiently just by looking at the clock...
age: 84 | location: california | sex: 잘함
confusedcrib
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1307 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 23:41:27
June 08 2012 23:36 GMT
#282
I really don't like this change. Counting workers was one of the small and amazing things that separated a good player from a great one.

Edit:

Let me clarify, I don't think it's game breaking or anything, I'll just miss that little extra multitasking.
I'm a writer for TeamLiquid, you've probably heard of me
uSnAmplified
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1029 Posts
June 08 2012 23:36 GMT
#283
I think people need to be reminded of this video....+ Show Spoiler +
~
setzer
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3284 Posts
June 08 2012 23:37 GMT
#284
On June 09 2012 08:19 Defacer wrote:
Let's put it this way -- you could increase the skill cap of Chess by making all the pieces white and forcing players to remember who's is what, or forcing players to move their pieces with chopsticks.

But that's not how chess is intended to be challenging.

Anything that improves the user interface of a game for both players and fans should be welcomed. It improves the experience for entry level players and spectators but will have almost no impact on the game at the professional level.

Edit: SC2 is a strategy game, not a game about counting moving objects.





Actually it is a real-time strategy (RTS) game and you do count moving units all the time, both your own and the enemies.

This is a very unnecessary addition to the game meant to make it even more casual and inviting. "improving the UI" is a terrible reason for this being implemented. Why not, then, add counters and displays to show how many of each unit you have and when future units/upgrades are finished?

Lots of clicking and interpreting information is a part of the game and a reason why Starcraft is head-and-shoulders above the cheap RTS knock-offs that have come along over the last decade.
StarBrift
Profile Joined January 2008
Sweden1761 Posts
June 08 2012 23:37 GMT
#285
On June 09 2012 08:31 uSnAmplified wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2012 08:17 StarBrift wrote:
On June 09 2012 08:13 uSnAmplified wrote:
On June 09 2012 08:07 CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr wrote:
On June 09 2012 08:04 Batch wrote:
Great change, should have been added a long time ago.

I don't want to see games won by the player who has the best counting skills. I want to see the player with the best strategies, best macro, and best micro to win.


U are a stupid human being. ok mb not but maynarding workers, saturating bases perfectly is part of managing an economy, aka macro. why should players like Bomber, who put hours of work to make sure they het the perfect income at any given time get their efforts dismissed ? its like saying i dont want to see the player who split their marines better have more success, it should only be about talent, and talent is reflected by strategy. Stupid views like that piss me off so much...
I didn't know counting to 24 was such a hard skill to obtain.



If you trul,y can't understand how counting workers at 3-4 bases in a hectic game is an advanced skill then you are really really ignorant and know close to nothing about high level startcraft. Stop trying to be a smartass and call other people stupid when you don't understand the fundamentals of the game.
No i understand it, and being a smartass is perfectly fine response when someone wants to be an obvious asshole and come up with a jackass response like the original quote.

Compared to MBS and auto mine this is a extremely small change, to bitch about it at this point is just doing it for the sake of bitching and being critical about something. Counting to 24 isn't hard, the two seconds it takes you to box the workers and count lines and add for gases being minded is now replaced by taking one second to look at a number, big fucking deal.

Calling me stupid, ignorant or claiming that i don't know how to play doesn't actually prove that counting to 24 is hard skill by the way, it just makes you look like a jackass.



In a real game with 3 bases. 2+2+2 = 6. 6 Seconds in a hectic high level game is significant. After this change zerg players will be able to cycle through their hatches during combat or at any other time in the game. Suddenly I can have perfect econ management at significantly lower levels of multitasking. If you don't understand this concept after I've explained this then the discussion is over because you have problems reading and comprehending simple logic.
Xlancer
Profile Joined February 2010
United States126 Posts
June 08 2012 23:37 GMT
#286
On June 09 2012 07:53 Embir wrote:
I guess people dont understand Blizzard philosophy - all the interface changes, with the exception of Automining, were done because there werent involved any decisions when you make them - they want to remove those interface limitations and leave for players those elements where decision will be made by them. Using chees analogy - they dont want you to made figures from pieces of wood, they want you to actually play and make decisions. Basically thanks to all those changes hated by elitist, SC2 isn't game where you need brainless grind to overcome interface limitations, but where you can actualy focus on gameplan and strategy.

I love this direction.


I agree, it frees up apm so pros can use it on executing more complex strategies. The strategies in HotS are totally going to blow BW and WoL out of the water
“The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history.” - Friedrich Hegel
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
June 08 2012 23:38 GMT
#287
On June 09 2012 08:36 confusedcrib wrote:
I really don't like this change. Counting workers was one of the small and amazing things that separated a good player from a great one.


I cant see someone who doenst take time to mouse over there workers in mid game taking time to click on CC and fix it.
labbe
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1456 Posts
June 08 2012 23:38 GMT
#288
Eh? Is this really thread-worthy? It's like a super minor change that doesn't really change anything at all. I really don't mind either way.
teamsolid
Profile Joined October 2007
Canada3668 Posts
June 08 2012 23:38 GMT
#289
On June 09 2012 08:17 StarBrift wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2012 08:13 uSnAmplified wrote:
On June 09 2012 08:07 CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr wrote:
On June 09 2012 08:04 Batch wrote:
Great change, should have been added a long time ago.

I don't want to see games won by the player who has the best counting skills. I want to see the player with the best strategies, best macro, and best micro to win.


U are a stupid human being. ok mb not but maynarding workers, saturating bases perfectly is part of managing an economy, aka macro. why should players like Bomber, who put hours of work to make sure they het the perfect income at any given time get their efforts dismissed ? its like saying i dont want to see the player who split their marines better have more success, it should only be about talent, and talent is reflected by strategy. Stupid views like that piss me off so much...
I didn't know counting to 24 was such a hard skill to obtain.



If you trul,y can't understand how counting workers at 3-4 bases in a hectic game is an advanced skill then you are really really ignorant and know close to nothing about high level startcraft. Stop trying to be a smartass and call other people stupid when you don't understand the fundamentals of the game.

This is sarcasm/troll, right...?
CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr
Profile Joined June 2012
544 Posts
June 08 2012 23:38 GMT
#290
On June 09 2012 08:26 Gheed wrote:
You still have to click and read a number. Literally the only aspect of skill this alleviates is being able to mentally multiply by 8 and subtract however many don't fill up the last line.


No. Thats like if u had an alert that tells u "build a supply depot in the 10 next second or u will be supply blocked". Its is right in front of your eyes, you dont have to force yourself to remember to do it, the game tells you to do it. Its pretty big.
awaiting the return of the space cowboy
EMPaThy789
Profile Joined July 2009
New Zealand878 Posts
June 08 2012 23:39 GMT
#291
i dont think it will have much of an impact, it does make the very slightly game better for bad players but i dought they know how many workers they need to fully saturate a base anyway. those who do know will probably know how to count in the selection ui anyway. the only time i think i would find this useful is when i forget to put dudes on gas or something.
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 23:40:11
June 08 2012 23:39 GMT
#292
heyooo its like the MBS/Automine debate all over again

in the end nobody really gives a fuck
Writerptrk
Defacer
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada5052 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 23:41:28
June 08 2012 23:39 GMT
#293
On June 09 2012 08:23 AndAgain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2012 08:19 Defacer wrote:
Let's put it this way -- you could increase the skill cap of Chess by making all the pieces white and forcing players to remember who's is what, or forcing players to move their pieces with chopsticks.

But that's not how chess is intended to be challenging.

Anything that improves the user interface of a game for both players and fans should be welcomed. It improves the experience for entry level players and spectators but will have almost no impact on the game at the professional level.

Edit: SC2 is a strategy game, not a game about counting moving objects.



If you want the interface to be as simple as possible, there are lots of other things you can add. For example, an auto-produce button on any building. Obviously, we don't want the interface to either be as simply or as complex as it can be. There should be some sort of proper degree. I don't see how this simplification is desirable.


Interface -- The actual GUI -- is NOT the same as actual game design.

You're equating an aesthetic or graphic design change, which makes what's happening in the game easier to understand, with automating the game. There is a big difference.

To further the chess analogy, you believe showing the worker count is like allowing Deep Blue to make chess moves on Kasparov's behalf. It's more akin to Kasparov playing speed chess, and allowing a visible timer on the table.

We could take the minimap, resources mined and supply counts out of the game, too. All it would do is make the game ridiculously hard and unbearable for everyone but a handful of people, and DISCOURAGE mastery.

If anything, having the worker count displayed ENCOURAGES mastery, providing an basic in-game stat that players can use to perfect their play. It will make players play better, not make gameplay 'easier'.


GreyKnight
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4720 Posts
June 08 2012 23:40 GMT
#294
Well many pros still dont mine efficiently so this is amusing.

Dont like the implications. Whats next? Give us the observer functions?
jinorazi
Profile Joined October 2004
Korea (South)4948 Posts
June 08 2012 23:40 GMT
#295
On June 09 2012 08:40 GreyKnight wrote:
Well many pros still dont mine efficiently so this is amusing.

Dont like the implications. Whats next? Give us the observer functions?


i bet you they actually contemplated about that...scary thought.
age: 84 | location: california | sex: 잘함
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
June 08 2012 23:41 GMT
#296
Only for spectators = great

Available in game = what the fuck, why? God damn.
-Kira
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
352 Posts
June 08 2012 23:41 GMT
#297
I don't like it but it's not a big deal.
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
June 08 2012 23:42 GMT
#298
This is completely stupid. Part of the skill is to estimate how many workers you got. This is really taking things a bit too far regarding user-friendliness.
CtrlShiftAltGrrrrrrr
Profile Joined June 2012
544 Posts
June 08 2012 23:42 GMT
#299
On June 09 2012 08:37 setzer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2012 08:19 Defacer wrote:
Let's put it this way -- you could increase the skill cap of Chess by making all the pieces white and forcing players to remember who's is what, or forcing players to move their pieces with chopsticks.

But that's not how chess is intended to be challenging.

Anything that improves the user interface of a game for both players and fans should be welcomed. It improves the experience for entry level players and spectators but will have almost no impact on the game at the professional level.

Edit: SC2 is a strategy game, not a game about counting moving objects.





Actually it is a real-time strategy (RTS) game and you do count moving units all the time, both your own and the enemies.

This is a very unnecessary addition to the game meant to make it even more casual and inviting. "improving the UI" is a terrible reason for this being implemented. Why not, then, add counters and displays to show how many of each unit you have and when future units/upgrades are finished?

Lots of clicking and interpreting information is a part of the game and a reason why Starcraft is head-and-shoulders above the cheap RTS knock-offs that have come along over the last decade.


yea seriously why not make a production tab of your own units in game. its the direction this change is taking that upsets me the most, and i think a good number of ppl who are unhappy with it feel the same way. competitive rts isnt about getting spoon fed...
awaiting the return of the space cowboy
Daniel C
Profile Joined October 2010
Hong Kong1606 Posts
June 08 2012 23:42 GMT
#300
On June 09 2012 08:22 StarBrift wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2012 08:13 Alacast wrote:
On June 09 2012 08:01 StarBrift wrote:
On June 09 2012 07:51 roymarthyup wrote:
lol at someone in this thread saying counting workers is the only thing that seperated really high master zergs from low master zergs


lmao. im pretty sure every every top30 master zerg knows exactly how many workers they have at all times and i garuntee all of their builds are mapped to a T in determining when they will have X amount of workers in order to pull off Y timing or Y action

and below top30 master is pretty much just an extension of diamond in my opinion so you cant compare diamond to top30 masters


Nah, I said its the only thing that separates a top pro from a masters player ECONOMY WISE. If you're gonna be a douchebag and try to earn cool points atleast try to actually read the post. Also there's a quote feature on this forum. That "some guy" person is really easy to find and quote in a short thread like this.

And NO, top 30 master zergs do not have perfect econ management in this build. I watch maybe 10 hours of top zerg streams every week. Players like Idra, Ret, DRG, Nestea, Losira, Stephano, Revival etc. All of them have 2-5 too many workers on their main mineral lines from time to time in the early to midgame. Small things that give you maybe 100 more minerals in the long run so they wont break a game for you but its still something every pro can to improve on. Every single top pro mind you. Forget top 30 GM being able to do it.

If this change is not for obs only but also for players then all these pros will have perfect ammounts of workers at their bases at all times. Blizzard has then sucessfully removed something that separates the very top of progamers from the rest of the top echelon of players. That is purely negative.

This change will make macro easier especially for zerg players as econ management is very heavily based on how many workers you can squeeze out to mine from the maximum ammount of bases without dying. Zergs that bind their hatcheries individually (like Nestea, DRG, Losira, Revival etc) will be able to jump in between their hatches during battles or slightly before/after and VERY easily allways have the optimal counts.


You DO realize that having the number on the screen is not the same as automatically moving workers around right? It still takes time, thought, practice, planning, and execution to manage your workers; they simply removed a single step of the process: boxing your workers. Now all you have to do is look at the number! You'll probably see lots of mid/low-tier pros with over/under saturation often because there's simply too many other important things to do in the game that demand your APM and concentration. Don't deny the infinity that is the potential options at any given moment in the game-you can always be doing something more, even if 99% of the game is automated.



With this change my econ management would be equal to DRG or Nestea.

roflol!

OT: I don't see the problem with this change. It gives you information, that's all, doesn't help you micro or make decisions. Or are you one of those people who think less information = better? So let's remove things like supply counts and mineral shrinking animation and upgrade progress and game timer and no. of resources because clearly a good player would be able to keep track of all of these and we don't need to make the game any easier!!
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IPSL
16:00
Ro24 Group A
Hawk vs TBD
StRyKeR vs TBD
Airneanach55
Liquipedia
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
15:55
FSL s10 code A/B Championships
Freeedom32
Liquipedia
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
15:00
Season 2 - Bonus Cup 7
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 449
elazer 192
BRAT_OK 92
Ketroc 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 20525
Mini 652
Shuttle 455
firebathero 297
ggaemo 249
Zeus 127
Dewaltoss 116
Sexy 46
Rock 32
910 27
[ Show more ]
Hm[arnc] 22
Sacsri 21
Movie 11
GoRush 10
ivOry 10
Dota 2
qojqva3623
Fuzer 118
Counter-Strike
fl0m4338
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor226
MindelVK15
Other Games
Grubby3177
FrodaN1502
Beastyqt664
B2W.Neo536
crisheroes231
RotterdaM106
Trikslyr54
QueenE48
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL39328
Other Games
BasetradeTV827
gamesdonequick409
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 49
• Adnapsc2 18
• Response 8
• OhrlRock 2
• Kozan
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 10
• Michael_bg 4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV599
League of Legends
• Jankos1960
• TFBlade1533
Other Games
• imaqtpie673
• Shiphtur181
• tFFMrPink 11
Upcoming Events
BSL
1h 18m
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
16h 18m
WardiTV Team League
17h 18m
OSC
19h 18m
BSL
1d 1h
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
1d 1h
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
Replay Cast
1d 15h
Wardi Open
1d 16h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 16h
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 22h
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs PianO
hero vs Rain
GSL
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Escore
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
IPSL
6 days
WolFix vs nOmaD
dxtr13 vs Razz
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W2
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.