|
On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season.
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same.
|
On May 07 2012 05:25 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? Sarcastic putdown to people who make stupid arguments.
The only stupid thing I see is using a sarcastic comment, it adds absolutely nothing to the discussion. No one ever said anything close to what he said.
|
On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history.
No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose).
|
On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose).
Actually someone did say that, that's why this argument got started in the first place.
|
On May 07 2012 05:32 Vindicare605 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Actually someone did say that, that's why this argument got started in the first place.
Who said that?
|
On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose).
Right here..
On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same.
|
On May 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Right here.. Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same.
I still fail to see your point.
|
On May 07 2012 05:38 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Right here.. On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same. I still fail to see your point.
Wow I need to spell it out ok
, the implication in that sentence is that the Bulls losing Rose is a bigger deal than the Spurs losing Manu or the Celtics losing Garnett because apparantly losing Manu or Garnett doesnt hurt your title shots but losing Rose does. That is incorrect.
Ill give the fact that the Bulls would probably not even have made it past Boston (if barely) without Rose because theyre offense relies on him a bit much. So in that sense it hurts them more. But as far as titles aspirations go being hit from that is no different from the events mentioned above.
The Bulls have however been exceptionally unfortunate in losing Noah aswell for the game today while already having a Deng whose not 100 percent.
|
On May 07 2012 05:43 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:38 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Right here.. On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same. I still fail to see your point. Wow I need to spell it out, the implication in that sentence is that the Bulls losing Rose is a bigger deal than the Spurs losing Manu or the Celtics losing Garnett because apparantly losing Manu or Garnett doesnt hurt your title shots but losing Rose does. Ill give the fact that the Bulls would probably not even have made it past Boston (if barely) without Rose because theyre offense relies on him a bit much but their titles aspirations being hit from that is no different from the events mentioned above. The Bulls have however been exceptionally unfortunate in losing Noah aswell for the game today while already having a Deng whose not 100 percent.
To which I answer : Yes it hurts the Bulls more. Ofc it hurts Boston and the Spurs a LOT too, I will never contest that, it is a no-brainer and their title aspirations were cut short, but in my opinion, losing Rose was a bigger hit, because they were centered around him. The Celtics still had Rondo, Pierce and Allen. The Spurs had Duncan and Parker.
|
On May 07 2012 05:49 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:43 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:38 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Right here.. On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same. I still fail to see your point. Wow I need to spell it out, the implication in that sentence is that the Bulls losing Rose is a bigger deal than the Spurs losing Manu or the Celtics losing Garnett because apparantly losing Manu or Garnett doesnt hurt your title shots but losing Rose does. Ill give the fact that the Bulls would probably not even have made it past Boston (if barely) without Rose because theyre offense relies on him a bit much but their titles aspirations being hit from that is no different from the events mentioned above. The Bulls have however been exceptionally unfortunate in losing Noah aswell for the game today while already having a Deng whose not 100 percent. To which I answer : Yes it hurts the Bulls more. Ofc it hurts Boston and the Spurs a LOT too, I will never contest that, it is a no-brainer and their title aspirations were cut short, but in my opinion, losing Rose was a bigger hit, because they were centered around him. The Celtics still had Rondo, Pierce and Allen. The Spurs had Duncan and Parker.
But its the same as far as title aspirations are concerned. And thats the point. I already said it hurts the bulls more. Your just replying to me what I said already. So what?
If your not winning the championship winning a playoff series or 2 in the larger scheme of things is moot.
|
On May 07 2012 05:52 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:49 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:43 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:38 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Right here.. On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same. I still fail to see your point. Wow I need to spell it out, the implication in that sentence is that the Bulls losing Rose is a bigger deal than the Spurs losing Manu or the Celtics losing Garnett because apparantly losing Manu or Garnett doesnt hurt your title shots but losing Rose does. Ill give the fact that the Bulls would probably not even have made it past Boston (if barely) without Rose because theyre offense relies on him a bit much but their titles aspirations being hit from that is no different from the events mentioned above. The Bulls have however been exceptionally unfortunate in losing Noah aswell for the game today while already having a Deng whose not 100 percent. To which I answer : Yes it hurts the Bulls more. Ofc it hurts Boston and the Spurs a LOT too, I will never contest that, it is a no-brainer and their title aspirations were cut short, but in my opinion, losing Rose was a bigger hit, because they were centered around him. The Celtics still had Rondo, Pierce and Allen. The Spurs had Duncan and Parker. But its the same as far as title aspirations are concerned. And thats the point.
Ofc, but that was YOUR point, not everyone's point.
As far as having a shot at a deeper playoff run, its not the same.
|
On May 07 2012 05:53 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:52 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:49 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:43 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:38 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:19 Holcan wrote:
hry vindicare, don't you see, nothing is as tragic as rose going down ! not bynum getting injured, not garnett, manu, tmac, brandon roy, not the 2002 kings lakers playoff series, nor larry birds back injury, not magics contraction of aids, not len bias dying of an overdose, rose getting injured is the greatest travesty since the conception of basketball. they were going to win it all ! they had the best record, and rose was mvp I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Right here.. On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same. I still fail to see your point. Wow I need to spell it out, the implication in that sentence is that the Bulls losing Rose is a bigger deal than the Spurs losing Manu or the Celtics losing Garnett because apparantly losing Manu or Garnett doesnt hurt your title shots but losing Rose does. Ill give the fact that the Bulls would probably not even have made it past Boston (if barely) without Rose because theyre offense relies on him a bit much but their titles aspirations being hit from that is no different from the events mentioned above. The Bulls have however been exceptionally unfortunate in losing Noah aswell for the game today while already having a Deng whose not 100 percent. To which I answer : Yes it hurts the Bulls more. Ofc it hurts Boston and the Spurs a LOT too, I will never contest that, it is a no-brainer and their title aspirations were cut short, but in my opinion, losing Rose was a bigger hit, because they were centered around him. The Celtics still had Rondo, Pierce and Allen. The Spurs had Duncan and Parker. But its the same as far as title aspirations are concerned. And thats the point. Ofc, but that was YOUR point, not everyone's point. As far as having a shot at a deeper playoff run, its not the same.
No I believe thats what they meant. Maybe my understanding was wrong. Only they can answer that.
|
On May 07 2012 05:55 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2012 05:53 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:52 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:49 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:43 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:38 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:33 Rebs wrote:On May 07 2012 05:29 Roggay wrote:On May 07 2012 05:26 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 07 2012 05:22 Roggay wrote:
[quote]
I don't exactly see the point of this post? The point is that injuries are a part of basketball especially in the post season. Making Rose's injury out to be something super special is a discredit to all of the other major injuries that have happened throughout NBA playoff history. No one said it was super special, just that it was unfortunate for the bulls, as it really shot their contender pretention (note that I dont think they would have passed the Heat even with Rose). Right here.. On May 07 2012 05:27 Stringy wrote:
ah yes, and in every situation where a big name goes down its exactly the same. I still fail to see your point. Wow I need to spell it out, the implication in that sentence is that the Bulls losing Rose is a bigger deal than the Spurs losing Manu or the Celtics losing Garnett because apparantly losing Manu or Garnett doesnt hurt your title shots but losing Rose does. Ill give the fact that the Bulls would probably not even have made it past Boston (if barely) without Rose because theyre offense relies on him a bit much but their titles aspirations being hit from that is no different from the events mentioned above. The Bulls have however been exceptionally unfortunate in losing Noah aswell for the game today while already having a Deng whose not 100 percent. To which I answer : Yes it hurts the Bulls more. Ofc it hurts Boston and the Spurs a LOT too, I will never contest that, it is a no-brainer and their title aspirations were cut short, but in my opinion, losing Rose was a bigger hit, because they were centered around him. The Celtics still had Rondo, Pierce and Allen. The Spurs had Duncan and Parker. But its the same as far as title aspirations are concerned. And thats the point. Ofc, but that was YOUR point, not everyone's point. As far as having a shot at a deeper playoff run, its not the same. No I believe thats what they meant. Maybe my understanding was wrong. Only they can answer that.
That was not my impression, but w/e, its not that important anyway.
|
|
|
Amare on fire this game. Maybe Miami needs a fire extinguisher.
|
This injuries....fucking terrible
|
On May 07 2012 06:28 andrewlt wrote:
Amare on fire this game. Maybe Miami needs a fire extinguisher.
or that.
|
There have always been some key injuries but the amount of injuries this season is just absurd...
|
Knicks are cursed.
Davis, Lin, Shumpert. That's pretty much all their best backcourt players.
|
Old man davis is out, that injury ouch...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
