EPTNBA Playoffs 2012 - Page 48
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
Bonzinator
Slovenia862 Posts
| ||
|
Bonzinator
Slovenia862 Posts
 | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16124 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:17 VENDIZ wrote: They should've won, but they threw the games away, in no way, shape or form did I say that the Mavericks were entitled to win those games.. Grizzlies SHOULD'VE won game two versus Clippers, but they threw it away. The reason I said "Mavs are up 3-1 in my head" is because they had game one, two and four in their clutch, and it sucks to see such a good series only go four games. On another note, the Bulls are looking at a 3-1 uphill battle if they don't shape up, shame how the playoffs have turned out so far :\ Shame? How? New York never had a chance, everyone knew that (except Knicks fans). Clippers vs Memphis was always going to be a close series, and Dallas getting swept by OKC wasn't all THAT surprising. The only real shitty thing about the post season so far are the injuries Chicago has suffered, but that's pretty much what Chicago has been dealing with all season so you can't really say it's something unique for the playoffs this season. | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:32 Vindicare605 wrote: Shame? How? New York never had a chance, everyone knew that (except Knicks fans). Clippers vs Memphis was always going to be a close series, and Dallas getting swept by OKC wasn't all THAT surprising. The only real shitty thing about the post season so far are the injuries Chicago has suffered, but that's pretty much what Chicago has been dealing with all season so you can't really say it's something unique for the playoffs this season. Yep I agree with this. Still, its really unfortunate for Chicago, the way things went. | ||
|
VENDIZ
1575 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:32 Vindicare605 wrote: Shame? How? New York never had a chance, everyone knew that (except Knicks fans). Clippers vs Memphis was always going to be a close series, and Dallas getting swept by OKC wasn't all THAT surprising. The only real shitty thing about the post season so far are the injuries Chicago has suffered, but that's pretty much what Chicago has been dealing with all season so you can't really say it's something unique for the playoffs this season. The fuck are you talking about? I'm obviously talking about the Bulls-Sixers series and how the Bulls went from a contender to a possible first round bust.. how did you not get that? User was warned for this post | ||
|
scaban84
United States1080 Posts
| ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:36 VENDIZ wrote: The fuck are you talking about? I'm obviously talking about the Bulls-Sixers series and how the Bulls went from a contender to a possible first round bust.. how did you not get that? Because you said "how the playoffs have turned so far" instead of "how the Bulls's playoff has turned so far". You have to admit that it was confusing. | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16124 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:36 VENDIZ wrote: The fuck are you talking about? I'm obviously talking about the Bulls-Sixers series and how the Bulls went from a contender to a possible first round bust.. how did you not get that? That doesn't qualify as a shameful post season to me. That's a single team going from contender to bust, in other words exactly what happened to the Spurs last season. Aside from what's going on with Chicago the playoffs have been really good so far. | ||
|
Stringy
United States127 Posts
also, you can tell Deng's wrist is killing him, he wasn't then same after he tore it in the regular season but especially after he landed on it early in this game :/ | ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16124 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:44 rei wrote: Laker fans saying Lakers are tanking this to game 7 so Artest can play in game 1 of OKC. I'm not buying it They wouldn't need to tank to Game 7, only game 6 for Artest to be playable in game 1 against OKC. Which I would be ok with really but with Kobe playing 40+ minutes in the game 3 loss, that kind of defeats the purpose if your goal is to be 100% prepared for OKC. | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:42 Vindicare605 wrote: That doesn't qualify as a shameful post season to me. That's a single team going from contender to bust, in other words exactly what happened to the Spurs last season. Aside from what's going on with Chicago the playoffs have been really good so far. I think he meant how it was turning out for the Bulls and the Mavs. Mavs didnt have enough weapons the needed and their defense missed the final piece. But I can see why its confusing, I could easily have thought he meant the post season as a whole. Bulls have like no offense but honestly theyve had the worst luck Ive seen in years. A healthy full roster gets to the Eastern finals easy, maybe some trouble from Boston. Not quite the same with the Spurs missing Manu, Memphis was just really good. This is a bit different. Knicks about to get schooled for the final time this year. | ||
|
MilesTeg
France1271 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:44 rei wrote: Laker fans saying Lakers are tanking this to game 7 so Artest can play in game 1 of OKC. I'm not buying it Which is a completely ridiculous idea for anyone with a brain and the willingness to spend 5 seconds thinking about it. | ||
|
Holcan
Canada2593 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:46 Vindicare605 wrote: They wouldn't need to tank to Game 7, only game 6 for Artest to be playable in game 1 against OKC. Which I would be ok with really but with Kobe playing 40+ minutes in the game 3 loss, that kind of defeats the purpose if your goal is to be 100% prepared for OKC. especially 40 minutes at 3000m above sea level. plus wouldn't they go up 3 before tanking a game or two? it makes no logical sense to LET them win at home. | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16124 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:48 MilesTeg wrote: Which is a completely ridiculous idea for anyone with a brain and the willingness to spend 5 seconds thinking about it. It's an arrogant idea sure, it takes all the credit away from Denver as a legitimate opponent, which after the way they played in game 3, they definitely proved they are. | ||
|
Looms
United States4624 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:42 Vindicare605 wrote: Aside from what's going on with Chicago the playoffs have been really good so far. Not sure if serious... only three of the series have been "good" so far in my opinion. OKC/DAL, MIA/NY, SA/UT, and IND/ORL have all been pretty terrible honestly. Grizzlies vs Clippers has been the most competitive match-up probably, so I would say that has been the best series. | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:50 Holcan wrote: rose going down is no different from manu goinh down last year, or garnett going down in 2009. it turned a contender into playoff fodder. especially 40 minutes at 3000m above sea level. plus wouldn't they go up 3 before tanking a game or two? it makes no logical sense to LET them win at home. Well they missed Noah today a fair bit and a 100 percent Deng. Lets be honest the CJ Watsons and Rips were never going to get it done in the playoffs. I dont think anyone whose ever seen a playoff series would believe that. As for Rose, Manu and Garnett dont have their teams built around them as important as they are. Dont know why anyones entertaining the idea the Lakers lost on purpose. Its absurd. | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On May 07 2012 04:53 Looms wrote: Not sure if serious... only three of the series have been "good" so far in my opinion. OKC/DAL, MIA/NY, SA/UT, and IND/ORL have all been pretty terrible honestly. Grizzlies vs Clippers has been the most competitive match-up probably, so I would say that has been the best series. OKC/DAL has been really good, what are you talking about? The fact that Dallas got swept doesnt mean that the games weren't close (they were) and competitive. | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16124 Posts
I really hate this stupid Ice Cube Coors Light ad campaign. | ||
| ||
