|
While I understand that there's a need to discuss this matter, this thread has way too many trash posts in it. Please think carefully about what you want to say. Ad hominem attacks on Swedish people in general, calling you fellow Starcraft fans idiots etc etc will be dealt with with harsher punishment from here on out. Keep it civil people.
Page 230: Here's some more stuff that'll get you banned! - Conspiracy theory mongering about MLG and GOM - Comparing people to Hitler - Posting useless one liners of arguments that have already been repeated ad nauseum. |
On December 15 2011 02:52 zanmat0 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:36 Aerakin wrote: If i were in charge, it would be a 3 seasons ban.
No, that's too lenient. He should be banned from ever touching a computer again. Maybe give him life imprisonment too. That way we can be SURE he won't insult or abuse any spectators ever again. Well, that's a little ridiculous.
|
On December 15 2011 02:50 Eury wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:43 diophan wrote:On December 15 2011 02:33 labbe wrote: This isn't even about Naniwa anymore, this whole situation just shows how GOMTV has no respect for the foreign community Then why do you think GOM hands out Code A seeds to foreigners who would otherwise be unable to compete for them the usual way? GOMTV rely on the "foreign" audience. SC2 isn't that popular in Korea and the Korean audience get GSL for free with ads. Advertisement pay a lot less per viewer than paid ones. So we are very important for them but that doesn't stop them for treating us in a very condescending way. Do you think it was a coincident that they announced Idra and Sen to Code S at the same time that they announced their Naniwa decision?
What? Gom is literally doing all possible for foreigners to compete in the GSL. Not their fault nani decided he was a Diva and that he was too good to play that set.
Wow, just wow.
|
On December 15 2011 02:53 MayorITC wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:51 Europes-Mima wrote:On December 15 2011 02:45 StarStruck wrote:
[...]Gom felt threatened and now they made a scapegoat out of Johan [...] finally. someones got it. also this is turning into a copmlete wichhunt. people just want to see naniwa burn, because he probabl wasnt their favourite player anyways. hes not mine neither. but still i realize goms reaction is absolutely unfair (as childish as it might sound - the term "unfair" fits just perfect). Ya, they hate him so much they were considering giving him a Code S spot. Except as a result of Naniwa's own actions, Gom recanted their decision. Truly unfair!
Hahan worst argument ever from the most biased party. Well played sir.
|
naniwa lacked discipline. disciplinary action was taken.
well deserved, move on.
|
United States7483 Posts
On December 15 2011 02:53 Velocirapture wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 01:41 Slin wrote:On December 15 2011 01:36 ForgottenOne wrote: All I can think is how I payed good money for the tournament, in part to see Nestea and Naniwa clash. Then I wait for hours to see this game. Then Naniwa pissed all over my money and time because he cannot suck it up and play a 15 minutes game.
On the other side, Gom are doing their best to enforce hard rules and to ensure tournaments get better and better each time and to protect my interests.
To conclude, if anything, these kinds of decisions from Gom should make you realize how serious they are and to thrust them more and want even more so subscribe and support them. I mean, do you even realize how many efforts did they make to give cheap and easy (compared to going through code A qualifiers) good spots to foreigners.
Then you should be mad at GSL. They should have some kind of price money difference between going 0-4 and 1-3 if they expect the players at 0-3 to play seriously. Am I the only one who doesnt have to be told by my boss to do my job or offered separate financial compensation for each action I take in the day? If I agree to do something for my boss I do it. If it takes longer than I expected to finish then it is on me. If GOM lied to Naniwa about his obligations (saying he could take walk overs or something) then the fan boys have a case but I have seen nothing hinting to that. Pro gamers are entertainers, so do your jobs.
Difference is, you get paid for doing your job, and you'd get fired if you don't. Naniwa had no expectation of getting 'fired' (and the fact that did get punished in a similar fashion is irrelevant, he didn't expect it, and you do have that expectation). Naniwa was not going to get paid for putting in the effort, and didn't think he'd suffer a punishment, so under that logic, what's wrong with it?
Yeah, he screwed up, no, it wasn't good logic, but that was his thought process at the time.
|
On December 15 2011 02:53 MayorITC wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:51 Europes-Mima wrote:On December 15 2011 02:45 StarStruck wrote:
[...]Gom felt threatened and now they made a scapegoat out of Johan [...] finally. someones got it. also this is turning into a copmlete wichhunt. people just want to see naniwa burn, because he probabl wasnt their favourite player anyways. hes not mine neither. but still i realize goms reaction is absolutely unfair (as childish as it might sound - the term "unfair" fits just perfect). Ya, they hate him so much they were considering giving him a Code S spot. Except as a result of Naniwa's own actions, Gom recanted their decision. Truly unfair!
Hahan worst argument ever from the most biased party. Well played sir.
Like they even had the balls to deny him that when he won in front of thousands of peope.
|
Switzerland2892 Posts
On December 15 2011 02:54 Femari wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:51 pPingu wrote:On December 15 2011 02:42 ninjamyst wrote:On December 15 2011 02:41 The KY wrote: Well you weren't going to get that in the Nani v Nestea game, since both players were out and had nothing to gain from playing to their best and fullest potential. As Liquid'Tyler said, they would not and should not use their best strats against eachother in a meaningless game. Tyler also agree that Naniwa's behavior was inappropriate and thus deserve punishment. Where did you read that? The only thing I've found is TylerWasieleski Tyler Wasieleski People act like what Naniwa did is unprecedented. It's not. It's common. Naniwa just took it to the logical, non-deceptive extreme. And some posts but nothing saying nani should be punished State of the Game. Everyone was saying it was stupid of Naniwa and thought he shouldn't have done it. But they all said they understand how it happened.
Oh, I'm still waiting for the vod, I thought they wouldn't talk about serious thing this one
|
On December 15 2011 02:48 FLuE wrote: I'm sure this has been brought up, and everyone is chiming in with their 2 cents but I think people are letting a lot of factors play into this that don't really matter.
I think when you step back from your like or dislike of Nani as a person/player etc. and step back from whether or not GOM had the proper format in place the key issue comes down to this :
The whole situation creates a very slippery slope. You are basically saying that there are limits on certain strategies because those strategies are viewed as not "respecting the opponent" or putting proper effort into the competition. But where is the line drawn? I mean we've already seen that a probe rush can win games, granted it is a .0000000001% chance to work at that high level of competition and we know Nani was just throwing the game, but what if instead he made 1 gateway, built 1 zealot, and sent all his probes. Is that acceptable? Do we need to put in the rules that all protoss players are required to at least attempt a 1-base 4 gate, otherwise the game isn't respectful enough to the opponent? What about all the terran players that just a few minutes into the game say, "screw it I'm pulling all my scvs bringing a few marines and just going all-in." Yes it is a strategy that can win a game, and a viable strategy, but I'd say pretty "disrespectful" to your opponent and certainly not enjoyable to the fans to watch, especially those players that every game in a series did the same cheese type builds.
It just seems to me like this is the type of thing that might happen. You can try to create better formats/prize money incentives to help prevent it, but the players have the right to choose to play a game however they want. An organization should not dictate that, because it ruins the purity of the game. Should we add a rule that you can't 6pool either?
I think ultimately these types of things don't need a reaction from GOM in anyway. It will sort itself out. Nani would have clearly learned a lesson by the backlash and known that you need to provide the fans more than that, and GOM could have used it as a chance to examine their system and realize why something like that happened. The rule that Nani apparently violated is so vague and arbitrary, it can be applied in way to many instances. Make the rule, "No probe rushing," then.
This to me just seems like one of those instances where there is way to much drama. I think Nani, when you really get down to it, did nothing actually wrong as far as going by the book. Was it the right thing to do? Probably not, but it wasn't wrong, it wasn't illegal, he didn't use a map hack, he didn't cheat.
This should have been one of those learning situations for eSports organizers, and players. The fans are excited to watch you play, even if nothing is on the line and the organizers need to understand that without incentives players might mail it in and they can't force them to play a certain way. If they knew that Nani v. Nestea was such a marquee game, then make it the first game of the day so that no matter what they do from that point the game mattered. Don't put it at the end knowing it might mean nothing.
tl;dr : I feel this could have been one of those eSports moments where everyone learned lessons, all sides apologized, and the result would have been stronger tournament setups and players understanding the importance of the fans and the fans reactions to ANY game regardless of what is on the line. The player still have every right to play how they want, but knowing the type of backlash you might get from doing something like that will probably be incentive enough for most players to take any televised/anticipated game seriously. Instead I feel we've ended up with a situation that just makes what Nani did look even worse, makes GOM look bad, and ultimately went from a learning strengthening experience for eSports to an overall negative where everyone has lost out.
In all sports there's a universally accepted concept of "sportsmanship" that needs no definition, and "unsportsmanlike behavior" is a reason to be banned from competition in almost every sport, and deliberately losing matches is a universally accepted example of unsportsmanlike behavior. It's against the spirit of competition, which makes sports exist.
Deliberately losing games is not an acceptable practice in any other sport. There is no slippery slope here. Everyone who has a brain saw what Naniwa did, and why he did it. In any other sport he would have been punished much more severely, he got away easy.
|
On December 15 2011 02:55 The KY wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:44 Arceus wrote:On December 15 2011 02:39 Korelle wrote:On December 15 2011 02:31 kochanfe wrote:
Actually, as NaNiwa's the best foreigner, there aren't "heaps of people" that could take his place
This. Removing Naniwa from Code S, quite possibly the best foreigner in the world right now, to somehow preserve the integrity of their tournament is absolutely laughable when on the same day they invite Idra purely because of his popularity, even though his results lately have been abysmal and not even worthy of a Code A player. It's either a serious tournament or a popularity contest, can't have it both ways. This "best foreigner" goes 0-10 in GSL. Im actually questioning the quality of Code S if GOM includes a player who got whitewashed every single time in ro32 Code frickin' A. Is Naniwa that worthy ? I can imagine GSL becomes more of a "serious tournament" skill-wise by removing that kind of player. So you're denying that he's improved massively recently? Naniwa has proven that he can beat any player in the world, don't see how you could argue otherwise.
80% of the pro gamers can take games off anyone. that doesn't say anything about his relative skill.
|
On December 15 2011 02:54 Kznn wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:52 Wallstreet11 wrote: A question about all who cry "he should be a professional" and "Things are expected of him form his team and GOM" and also "He wasn´t mannered enough to be in korea"....
Where was all this outrage over the fact that Team MVP more or less froze him out while he was supposed to be in a partnership with that team? On top of that MVP during this "scandal" poured shit all over him.
The one thing I hate are hypocrites and there are no fewer in Korea than the rest of the world you just have to broaden the horizon. ????? Naniwa plays for quantic gaming son. Quantic has NOTHING to do with MVP.
Well you're a dumbass. As of like a week ago he played for complexity, which has a partnership with MVP and he was living in their house. Do you even follow this scene at all, or just fuck around writing question marks?
|
During a match, a player shall not offend the opponent or audience with abusive behaviours
"offence" is more of a subjective term, and in the case of Korea, a cultural clash.
And "abusive behaviours" is not what I'd call throwing a game, nor probe rushing.
|
people need to boycott gomtv and gsl, make them bankroot and maybe they'll show more respect for foreign ppl in the future
I'm stopping buying season tickets for the future and I call people to do the same
|
On December 15 2011 02:50 dp wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:47 ToasteR_ wrote:On December 15 2011 02:45 dp wrote: His personal view on the situation is irrelevant. For example, lets imagine he was invited to a show match where the winner takes $5,000 and the loser takes $2,500. What if his mindset that day is that he only needs $2,500, so the match is meaningless. He probe rushes 3 games outta 5, losing outright. The contract doesn't necessarily state that he has to TRY to win the matches to get paid. You think this is OK? Of a professional? Grow up. Your personal views on the situation don't matter. You are being paid to provide entertainment to fans. If you don't feel the need to do your job, there is a good chance you won't have one.
No one would be satisfied with $2500 when $5000 can be won, your example is terrible. Maybe you are confused. It doesn't matter what you think. Remember? Only what he thinks. Because the world revolves around his mindset. If you can't understand the point of my post, don't respond with mindless dribble. K, thanks, bye.
Your analogy is still faulty. Naniwa always plays to win tournaments, and he doesn't care about entertaining audiences. That's the way he is. If he loses, he wants to move on. He doesn't care about pleasing the crowd. He doesn't have the greatest personality (which clearly hurts him in situations like this, as Huk wouldn't have been punished in an identical situation), but he cares about success.
|
[QUOTE]On December 15 2011 02:53 Velocirapture wrote: Am I the only one who doesnt have to be told by my boss to do my job or offered separate financial compensation for each action I take in the day? /QUOTE]
Exactly. Maybe once my reviews are in for the semester, I should just sit in the front of class not doing anything for the entire lectures. I guess my university shouldn't be able to do anything to me 'cause it doesn't say specifically somewhere that that's not okay.
|
Naniwa's had it coming, the pro in pro-gamer doesn't just mean that he's earning money...
How do you guys expect the Blue Chip sponsors to come in and help e-sports grow when you have programers making tantrums all the time because things aren't going as they expected?
The only ones that are whining by this decision are the ones that didn't pay to watch the games, i for example was hoping to see the Naniwa vs Nestea rivalry (that was born at mlg due to NANIWA again, breaking the rules pausing a game and breaking the flow of it because he DIDNT EVEN KNEW when he picked the map that it was not cross position only) develop even more.
The punishment suited the offence, to begin with GOM has no responsibility to help Foreigners an easier entry to the GSL (The most prestigious tournament in the world), but yet they've come out of their way to help them, by adding english streams, a progaming house when they can live if they go to Korea, and even giving them seeds so they don't have to go through the nasty Code A Qualifications.
Naniwa an others should learn from this, and start behaving not only as adults, but professionally as well. He's not a kid any-more, so she shouldn't act like one, no body likes losing, but you don't see players like white-ra acting like assholes because of it.
The worst part about it is not Naniwa's attitude, but the support hes getting from the community, yeah i get it guys, you like him, i was rooting for him too to do well, but he needs to be hold accountable for what he's done.
|
On December 15 2011 01:28 Waste wrote: This is just WRONG seriously, zero compassion. Just a all out terrible decision this also makes the GSL such a worse show in my opinion. The RIGHT decision would have been a warning, GSL just lost a huge chunk of respect, Mr Chae better yourself please or please find someone else more up for the job with any sense at all. So little respect for Nani, think about all the hours he put down (actually one of the most hardworking people in the entire community). People at the GSL should think about this community as a modern one, let's face it we love that bm and shit. This is not Brood War. NANIWA FIGHTING <3
Think of how much money GOM spends to produce a quality show and run a tournament. Advertisers don't like seeing people throw games and not taking there profession seriously. This is not the first incident with Naniwa either, he has started to get a reputation, and in the real world a reputation can come back to haunt you. This is all on Naniwa he needs to grow up and act like a professional or things like this will keep happening to him.
|
On December 15 2011 02:56 Wallstreet11 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:53 MayorITC wrote:On December 15 2011 02:51 Europes-Mima wrote:On December 15 2011 02:45 StarStruck wrote:
[...]Gom felt threatened and now they made a scapegoat out of Johan [...] finally. someones got it. also this is turning into a copmlete wichhunt. people just want to see naniwa burn, because he probabl wasnt their favourite player anyways. hes not mine neither. but still i realize goms reaction is absolutely unfair (as childish as it might sound - the term "unfair" fits just perfect). Ya, they hate him so much they were considering giving him a Code S spot. Except as a result of Naniwa's own actions, Gom recanted their decision. Truly unfair! Hahan worst argument ever from the most biased party. Well played sir. Like they even had the balls to deny him that when he won in front of thousands of peope.
sadly they can naniwa is just one player, gomtv is the one making the calls what's naniwa going to do huh?
|
I'm glad that the GSL is being consistant; Coca lost his Code S; the same level of standards should apply to foreigners as well.
It's really awesome in fact that they are willing to treat foreigners the same as they would Koreans; which is awesome that GSL respects foreigners .
|
On December 15 2011 02:57 JoeSchmoe wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:55 The KY wrote:On December 15 2011 02:44 Arceus wrote:On December 15 2011 02:39 Korelle wrote:On December 15 2011 02:31 kochanfe wrote:
Actually, as NaNiwa's the best foreigner, there aren't "heaps of people" that could take his place
This. Removing Naniwa from Code S, quite possibly the best foreigner in the world right now, to somehow preserve the integrity of their tournament is absolutely laughable when on the same day they invite Idra purely because of his popularity, even though his results lately have been abysmal and not even worthy of a Code A player. It's either a serious tournament or a popularity contest, can't have it both ways. This "best foreigner" goes 0-10 in GSL. Im actually questioning the quality of Code S if GOM includes a player who got whitewashed every single time in ro32 Code frickin' A. Is Naniwa that worthy ? I can imagine GSL becomes more of a "serious tournament" skill-wise by removing that kind of player. So you're denying that he's improved massively recently? Naniwa has proven that he can beat any player in the world, don't see how you could argue otherwise. 80% of the pro gamers can take games off anyone. that doesn't say anything about his relative skill.
But 80% of them can't take a Bo3 against MVP and Nestea, nor HuK, DRG and... Should I continue?
|
On December 15 2011 02:53 perestain wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 02:51 Asymmetric wrote: This should put MLG in a precarious position actually.
1) MLG and its employees made it clear that Naniwa would recieve a code S spot from his performance at providence.
2) MLG tolerates players forfeiting games. Several well known players have forfeited there consolation seeding games after being knocked out of the championship bracket. They can therefor not logically endorse GOMTV punishing a player for essentially refusing to play an even less meaningful match.
They will get away with this scam though, because naniwa is not a popular player. He is to honest, gom expects people to fake a competition in situations like the one against nestea.
right on. there all about makin that cash and dont care for the players. we seen it already in BW. not really sure why u'd expect anything different from a country like that anyway. ppl dont really fight for there rights too much there if ya catch my drift.
oh and the entire world needs to disconnect themselves from GOM. theres enough foriegn money in viewership to pay for the great koreans to play in our tournies. they wont need GOM for too much longer i hope
User was temp banned for this post.
|
|
|
|