EPTBanshee versus Dark Templar [Extended Serious] - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
| ||
|
Dommk
Australia4865 Posts
On March 10 2011 20:44 NB wrote: last time i check DTs 2 hit scv, not 1 hit... confirm? 1 hit for 0/0 DT vs 0/0 SCV 2 hits for 0/0 DT vs 0/1 SCV 1 hit for 1/0 DT vs 0/3 SCV | ||
|
Armsved
Denmark642 Posts
Where as you can just warpin as many DTs as you feel like when you get up your dark shrine. So I prefere DTs | ||
|
hoby2000
United States918 Posts
On March 10 2011 20:31 Sporadic44 wrote: did you watch the series between san and scf0u? i think he proved the utility of dts with that series alone. You mean against a player who had poor control? That same player was able to eliminate DTs instantly as long as he had a Raven, and even AFTER that he just used scans. In late game, scans aren't a big deal to have because you have a multiple OC's going on at once. The ONLY reason sanZenith was able to have map control through DTs was because sCfou didn't control is Raven well. | ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4179 Posts
| ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
Siege tank or colossus? Apple or orange? | ||
|
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
On March 10 2011 21:00 Bagi wrote: Hey guys, zealot or zergling? Siege tank or colossus? Apple or orange? Zealot, colossus, apple. But really everyone knows it's a joke question. Nobody is serious about it (i hope), but it's still fun to discuss. | ||
|
StallingHard
144 Posts
On-topic: I would prefer to have banshees (I'm a random player and bancheese is much easier for me to transition from than DT cheese which leaves you pretty all-in gateway only) | ||
|
Dezire
Netherlands640 Posts
| ||
|
sickle
New Zealand656 Posts
| ||
|
Striding Strider
United Kingdom787 Posts
On March 10 2011 20:48 Armsved wrote: If I had to chose between 1 DT and 1 banchee I would take banchee, but the thing is it takes 60 sec to build a banchee and you need one starport with techlab to do it. Where as you can just warpin as many DTs as you feel like when you get up your dark shrine. So I prefere DTs Why does everyone has this misconception that Protoss units have no build time? It takes 5 seconds to warp in a DT and then the Warp Gate is occupied for 45 seconds. So to build a DT it takes 50 seconds total. And a DT cuts into your core unit production where as a Banshee only cuts into Vikings/Medievacs/etc. | ||
|
zivac
Croatia389 Posts
| ||
|
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
On March 10 2011 21:08 sickle wrote: The thing about banshees is that in TvP, if the toss doesnt get a robo fast enough, hes fucked. Well same thing goes for DTs in PvP? | ||
|
ZeGzoR
Sweden307 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12248 Posts
| ||
|
rolfe
United Kingdom1266 Posts
On March 10 2011 20:44 NB wrote: last time i check DTs 2 hit scv, not 1 hit... confirm? they might 2 shot them with armour upgrades or something. i think anyway | ||
|
sickle
New Zealand656 Posts
4-gate is just too fast, but rushing dts could work although its much more risky than opening banshees. | ||
|
Z-R0E
United States147 Posts
| ||
|
zivac
Croatia389 Posts
true its to much risk when i play pvp  | ||
|
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
| ||
| ||
