EPTIt's simply sub-optimal to stasising terran's army in almost every situation.
[Q] Stasis-ing SCVs - Page 4
| Forum Index > Brood War Strategy |
|
ultramagnetics
Poland215 Posts
It's simply sub-optimal to stasising terran's army in almost every situation. | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
On July 10 2009 14:16 SlayerS_`HackeR` wrote: WTF are you saying? Freezing SCVs is an "absolutely horrible strategy." Stasis lasts for a helluva long time, and it can jack potentially hundreds of minerals. When you're looking for advice, watch out for people who don't know what they're talking about. Freezing a bunch of SCV's for a long time is DEFINITELY better than getting 2 vessels or 2 tanks. Although recall is better than stasis if you have the units and the proper location to recall at. Freezing tanks/vessels < Freezing SCVs < Recall If you don't Stasis the Terran army, you risk losing battles and your own units (and whatever expo they're defending). It's better to kill his army and win a battle, thus killing the expansion he was trying to defend, than to make him lose 300 or so minerals in the late game when he has 3 + bases mining. I can't think of any situation where it wouldn't be more practical to storm drop. Your thinking is flawed. Stasising peons really is only useful in very peculiar once in a hundred game scenarios. I don't know if you're trying to be funny, but there's no place for humour in the strategy forum :O Also, what the hell... a 4 page thread about stasising peons T.T | ||
|
nebffa
Australia776 Posts
| ||
|
EEEE1234
Canada55 Posts
| ||
|
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
On July 10 2009 14:18 Game wrote: +1 and to poster: could you really not think of anything better to post, really? The same could be said to you. +1 is really the best thing you could think of? You're far worse than him. | ||
| ||
