EPTTested and confirmed. If the queen dies while the projectile is midair, the projectile will hit and produce a green poison cloud, but the target will not die and no broodlings are spawned.
Units You Never Bother Making? - Page 8
| Forum Index > Brood War Strategy |
|
Darkwhite
Norway352 Posts
Tested and confirmed. If the queen dies while the projectile is midair, the projectile will hit and produce a green poison cloud, but the target will not die and no broodlings are spawned. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
|
skzlime
Hungary462 Posts
| ||
|
Stratos
Czech Republic6104 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28734 Posts
On January 20 2014 00:13 skzlime wrote: can't believe i'm still learning new things I'm gonna post a replay of a trick soon that I've never seen anyone do! | ||
Harem
United States11393 Posts
On January 20 2014 05:19 Stratos wrote: I've also seen Sky use feedback in PvP (ht) and Shuttle in PvT (vessel). http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/games/50343_Jaehoon_vs_sSak jaehoon MC'd a vessel here (feedback is also very viable but micro required with everything else is pretty rough) | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On January 20 2014 08:49 Harem wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/games/50343_Jaehoon_vs_sSak jaehoon MC'd a vessel here (feedback is also very viable but micro required with everything else is pretty rough) I keep thinking that if the game speed were lower (i.e. not always Fastest), some of the 'most unloved' units, many of whom are spellcasters, would be seen more. I forget... didn't SC2 get rid of Fastest? | ||
|
rauk
United States2228 Posts
sc2 faster is slightly faster than bw fastest | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28734 Posts
even in like 2006 when every single player on bnet played on fastest, blizzard refused to change the ladder speed because they believed the game was better on fast.  | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On January 20 2014 21:36 Liquid`Drone wrote: it was never played on normal by like, anyone. But blizzard insisted on "Fast" as their ladder game speed, and consequently there was like a year-ish where competitive standards weren't totally established and some would play fast and some fastest back then. even in like 2006 when every single player on bnet played on fastest, blizzard refused to change the ladder speed because they believed the game was better on fast. I'm not certain I'd that. Maybe the game really was 'better' on Fast/more in-line with Blizzard's design intent at that speed. But if many ppl don't want to play at that speed, you can't really make 'em. Not forever, anyway. I remember a lot of younger players 'back in the day' saying stuff like, "I love Starcraft, but man, nothing happens for the first 4 minutes, I'm soooo bored early on." Apparently, working a very specific BO, scouting, stopping THEIR scouting, constructing wall-ins, doing or defending super-early rushes, yeah, none of that registers. So, you pretty much HAVE to 5-pool 'em after they say that.  | ||
|
fencer
122 Posts
Can anyone confirm this? | ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On January 18 2014 09:16 rauk wrote: if the protoss is a good player he'll chase your queens with +1 sairs. making a bunch of +1 sairs against 10 queens is an amazing investment but is only okay vs a couple of mutas that come out after a ton of hydras are already made. losing one or mutas isn't a big deal, losing 1 or 2 queens is huge vs C level and a little better protosses i found that sniping HT with even just mutas is excessive/unnecessary, just 1a2a3a and spread your hydras vs storm and that's really all you need to win. basically just make stuff and amove works at C and below, no need to get fancy hmm can't say much on the queens due to having only encountered them once before way back I think. ya, sniping isn't needed as much if you can spread out and micro. On January 21 2014 06:04 fencer wrote: I read somewhere that Blizzard originally added Fastest as a 'joke' speed just for giggles. Sort of like: "wouldn't it be hilarious if we had a setting where everything moves comically fast and noone can keep up with anything? I bet noone will ever use it anyway". Can anyone confirm this? I can't confirm or deny this but fastest isn't that, well, fast lol. | ||
|
fencer
122 Posts
On January 21 2014 08:08 BigFan wrote: I can't confirm or deny this but fastest isn't that, well, fast lol. I didn't say it was fast, I only conveyed what some Blizzard employee had apparently said. And for a 90's RTS it was pretty fast, compare it to the speed of Total Annihilation or Red Alert for example. | ||
|
JohnChoi
1773 Posts
On January 21 2014 06:04 fencer wrote: I read somewhere that Blizzard originally added Fastest as a 'joke' speed just for giggles. Sort of like: "wouldn't it be hilarious if we had a setting where everything moves comically fast and noone can keep up with anything? I bet noone will ever use it anyway". Can anyone confirm this? I played a fish fastest game with a #X5 setting. now that was hilariously fast haha | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On January 21 2014 08:42 fencer wrote: I didn't say it was fast, I only conveyed what some Blizzard employee had apparently said. And for a 90's RTS it was pretty fast, compare it to the speed of Total Annihilation or Red Alert for example. well ya, I never said you did. Just commenting on the overall speed of fastest from my perspective ya, TA was slower in comparison. I think same for RA, but don't remember it well lol. | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On January 21 2014 06:04 fencer wrote: I read somewhere that Blizzard originally added Fastest as a 'joke' speed just for giggles. Sort of like: "wouldn't it be hilarious if we had a setting where everything moves comically fast and noone can keep up with anything? I bet noone will ever use it anyway". Can anyone confirm this? I can't confirm it, and I was hanging out on the Blizzard Starcraft forum for like a couple of years prior to release and for a couple of years after. I think they were surprised that Fastest became almost the only speed anyone would play (though you could find some games on Fast or Faster too). I think a lot of ppl just gravitate to whatever is seen as the most EXTREEEEEEME, lol. Probably if Blizzard had put in a speed called 'Hyper' that was 3x faster than Fastest, a lot of ppl would play it, maybe even insist on it. Their micro and macro would then suck donkey lint, but they'd play it. | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On January 23 2014 12:08 [[Starlight]] wrote: I can't confirm it, and I was hanging out on the Blizzard Starcraft forum for like a couple of years prior to release and for a couple of years after. I think they were surprised that Fastest became almost the only speed anyone would play (though you could find some games on Fast or Faster too). I think a lot of ppl just gravitate to whatever is seen as the most EXTREEEEEEME, lol. Probably if Blizzard had put in a speed called 'Hyper' that was 3x faster than Fastest, a lot of ppl would play it, maybe even insist on it. Their micro and macro would then suck donkey lint, but they'd play it. I would love a hyper game mode XD | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On January 23 2014 12:52 BigFan wrote: I would love a hyper game mode XD And a dozen cups of coffee to go with it.  | ||
|
SilverSkyLark
Philippines8437 Posts
| ||
|
fencer
122 Posts
On January 23 2014 12:08 [[Starlight]] wrote:I can't confirm it, and I was hanging out on the Blizzard Starcraft forum for like a couple of years prior to release and for a couple of years after. I think they were surprised that Fastest became almost the only speed anyone would play (though you could find some games on Fast or Faster too). I think a lot of ppl just gravitate to whatever is seen as the most EXTREEEEEEME, lol. Probably if Blizzard had put in a speed called 'Hyper' that was 3x faster than Fastest, a lot of ppl would play it, maybe even insist on it. Their micro and macro would then suck donkey lint, but they'd play it. Oh I wish there were replays from like 1998 of 'good' people playing. My only memories from back then is when I typed in "power overwhelming" on b.net and expected it to work. And constant backstabbing in 2v2; if you had the stronger army than your ally when you had almost won, it was more or less standard to unally at the last second and have the win for yourself. | ||
| ||
