EPTsplitting up bo3 is already bad enought, but splitting up bo5? are you serious? god this makes me angry on so many levels
MSL Re-organization - Page 4
| Forum Index > BW General |
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
splitting up bo3 is already bad enought, but splitting up bo5? are you serious? god this makes me angry on so many levels | ||
|
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
| ||
|
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
On May 29 2009 19:09 AttackZerg wrote: Everything else doesn't matter to me but splitting up bo5's is a fucking joke. Seriously that is the HARDEST moment of any starcraft players career, they should be sitting there sweating it out back to back. That is where stars are made. I agree. I would compare it to splitting up a tenis champion match with some sets played one day and the rest played the following day. No one wants to see that. | ||
|
wswordsmen
United States987 Posts
2) At this point in the post I am neutral, I assume there is a good reason. 4) It makes sense to have higher ranked players seeded, but why does every team get treated equally, why does an eSTRO/ACE (although this might be unfair as they both have improved substantially) get the same seed as say SKT. If a team has a lot of players in that win a game in the previous MSL (like Samsung) why should a weaker player get a seed. In short I hate this decision. Ro8 1) Dumbest move ever 2) I am glad they are moving away from the dumb preset bracket phase, but they should have a way of randomizing it, like have a 2-0 player randomly selected followed by a 2-1 player. | ||
|
ZBiR
Poland1092 Posts
Of course it should, each team is each team and ACE is no exception. | ||
|
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
On May 29 2009 21:13 wswordsmen wrote: 4) It makes sense to have higher ranked players seeded, but why does every team get treated equally, why does an eSTRO/ACE (although this might be unfair as they both have improved substantially) get the same seed as say SKT. If a team has a lot of players in that win a game in the previous MSL (like Samsung) why should a weaker player get a seed. Then again if SKT1 has already let say 3 to 4 players seeded to survivor (or MSL directly) they get highest KESPA ranked guy as bonus. Don't know when they choose those 12 players to survivor tournament. I assume its before offline qualifiers (otherwise players like Best etc could get spot to survivor even if he lost offline qualifiers). I bet OSL is going to change offline qualifiers too to match MSL some point (having 20 groups for MSL and 24 for OSL sounds weird and unfair) | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
The KeSPA thing isn't so bad as long as they don't continue to go that way (ie more seeded players later in the tournament). People who are screaming at this forget that MST is outside the Ro32 even. It's not a big deal to seed players by KeSPA rank into the MST, because the entire offline into MST qualification process is a grueling and brutal format as it is. They are just giving better players more rest and preparation time, which frankly isn't unfair because the lesser players get way more practice per match due to their less demanding schedules. It's not the Ro32, its the MST. | ||
|
King K. Rool
Canada4408 Posts
| ||
|
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
Why.. not just play all five at the same time?... Someone explain this to me. | ||
|
scwizard
United States1195 Posts
On May 29 2009 20:30 Carnac wrote: what the fuck splitting up bo3 is already bad enought, but splitting up bo5? are you serious? god this makes me angry on so many levels Pretty much this. They're just delaying things for no good damn reason. | ||
|
blapsd
England121 Posts
| ||
|
Pyrthas
United States3196 Posts
On May 29 2009 20:16 Too_MuchZerg wrote: splitting BO3s? thats so weird, but because OSL favorism here so it seems to be okay. I mean losing first game you are panicking next time you play, but at least BO5 you have 2 games to make comeback. You're overreacting a bit, I think. "I can SORT of understand" isn't exactly a ringing endorsement. | ||
|
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
| ||
RaGe
Belgium9950 Posts
| ||
|
SHr3DD3r
Pakistan2137 Posts
Lets just wait and see how this plays out. Could be different that what you expect. | ||
|
o3.power91
Bahrain5288 Posts
| ||
Heyoka
Katowice25012 Posts
| ||
|
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
On May 29 2009 23:11 Jayme wrote: I seriously don't understand playing 1 game and then playing 4 games the next time. Why.. not just play all five at the same time?... Someone explain this to me. Day 1: 4 games Day 2: 4 to 8 games Day 3: 4 to 8 games So I think its just to balance out games. Now if there would be ZvZ, TvT, ZvP, PvT matches, they could arrange that ZvZ is shown first at day 2 and either ZvP or PvT after that. Just to give variety of games. | ||
|
Ideas
United States8174 Posts
| ||
|
AttackZerg
United States7584 Posts
On May 29 2009 19:22 darktreb wrote: Well, they're only splitting up the RO8 games ... OSL doesn't even have BO5 in RO8. oh ok, I misread the op. I thought all the bo5's except the finals were split. I guess it matters alot less then. | ||
| ||
