SC:R Launch Detected - Page 33

On July 31 2017 19:26 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:
do u like it ?

On July 31 2017 13:01 L_Master wrote:


That would make sense. But that is most certainly NOT how the mouse moves at all. It's dramatically slower. A full mouse movement from the left edge to the right edge of the mouse pad moves the mouse a much smaller portion of the way across the screen than it does on an open desktop.

Additionally, there is that "mouse through syrup" feeling. Which is absolutely different as far as I can tell from a slow mouse. If I go adjust my mouse down to the lowest setting in windows and move it around my desktop it feels...slow. But not "syrupy" the way it does in BW.

Now, normally I don't used windowed mode at all...so it wouldn't be an issue. Unfortunately, the new update messed up fullscreen for me. The mouse movements aren't the same as before, and I've already mentioned the small cursor and issues clicking the minimap.

1.19 is completely unplayable for me at the moment, which is unfortunate. If the remaster behaves like this...I'll be incredibly frustrated.

On August 01 2017 00:05 ProMeTheus112 wrote:

"syrup" feeling I think is probably input lag? not sure I have any myself, input lag is terrible thing for mouse, hardly playable
right now 1.19 is not good for me either, bad pixelated display even with bilinear (horrible without) in windowed fullscreen, menus take sometimes 5 seconds to load (create game or options) and flickering in fullscreen mode + small cursor and still pixelated I think, there is some slight performance issues also like framerate issue maybe or smtg? (unstable framerate, some actual stuttering, maybe missing inputs) idk but this isn't performing well (1.18 was performing well, only some menus were responding slightly slow but not super slow like now its just bad, 5 secs for loading text on a menu on windowed fullscreen what's going on?)
(my comp is core2 duo 3.33ghz radeon HD 5700 ram 4GB, BW must work flawless seriously, been playing it perfect on 166Mhz computers with no GPU and 256MB ram or smtg... 2017)

On August 01 2017 04:42 Dazed. wrote:
1.18 barely worked for me, it was force alt tabbing me for months. Now you know a fraction of my pain!
~~~~
How big of an advantage would be an increased screen size, really? I guess we wont know until we actually use it. I can see a longer screen giving an immediate advantage in tank vs tank battles, as you would be able to judge the length of shots easier--- provided you had vision already with a building. Maybe it would impact muta micro in some sense? Recall defense? Outside of a few specific scenarios, I'm not sure if theres an advantage to be had. Seeing more of the screen and requiring less mouse movement may actually be quite helpful, but it also might reduce your focus on the central battles going on in the middle of the screen. I dont know. I wish a pro would give an analysis on this. If the showcased graphics are the ones they release, with massive explosions and blinding scv lights and no gore on hydras, etc, then remastered will be utterly terrible. Especially if it comes with a host of technical issues and competitive disadvantages. This sc:R shit could either revitalize or destroy and split the community. Fuck!

On August 01 2017 04:39 ii.blitzkrieg wrote:
1.19 is playable for me but it feels like shit, doesn't matter what settings I try (and I have tried everything i've seen posted and messed around with it myself for a couple hours) the graphics are pixelated and the mouse/inputs and ui are laggy. Using either my ~4yo laptop or desktop (both 16 : 9)

1.18 was working pretty much fine after they fixed the initial issues so hopefully they can get shit sorted before the 14th...

On August 01 2017 05:58 L_Master wrote:


Hah yea, I do. It's really interesting to me how much different specs seem to wreak havoc with code (only thing I can think of that explains such varying responses in 1.18)

With response to the monitor portion, if that was partially in reply to me,

On August 01 2017 06:42 Dazed. wrote:
Was just a general question about the HD/SD potential competitive disadvantages. Anyone got a clue if you can scroll out as far as the observers did, even in a real melee game, or is that ob only?

On July 31 2017 19:51 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:
look at this picture,and the minerals,this is obviously not game i did see yesterday or now on streams,is blizzard not showing us the final form yet ?

or is the orange tileset the factor ?

On August 01 2017 06:32 AmstAff wrote:
Oh boy made my first game since years and it was a huge mistake.



I hope blizzard will adress this stuff, otherwise new players will very fast get disappointed because of the hackers or the "skillgap" if they dont know the other guy hacked.

well i guess i will just wait some more weeks for some private server wft/pgt plz xD

On August 01 2017 06:32 AmstAff wrote:
Oh boy made my first game since years and it was a huge mistake.

I hope blizzard will adress this stuff, otherwise new players will very fast get disappointed because of the hackers or the "skillgap" if they dont know the other guy hacked.

well i guess i will just wait some more weeks for some private server wft/pgt plz xD

On August 01 2017 11:28 arb wrote:
Hackers are blatantly obvious in BW.
Besides the fact its a new ladder in general of course people are going to lose a lot.
You think those baddies that larva was shitting on expected to be playing him? Nope.

Back in my day we used to be thankful for ladder resets cause it was the only time youd get to play top Korean players or even your favorite foreigner before they got too far in rank to give you time of day.

Managed to play Idra,Nony,Oversky,Ret and quite a few others cause of this and was pretty happy about it. Even though I played Oversky like 4 seasons on different accounts and was brutally violated every time:<

On August 01 2017 11:38 Flameling wrote:
You sure that's a hacker, or did you play that on a rigged UMS map?