BW Remastered Profiles - Page 2
Forum Index > BW General |
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
| ||
killer1nz
New Zealand164 Posts
![]() | ||
JungleTerrain
Chile799 Posts
On May 27 2017 10:05 killer1nz wrote: 2v2 on heartbreak ridge? ![]() Players vs Observers! ![]() | ||
TibbersCute
19 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
On May 27 2017 12:07 TibbersCute wrote: Not ganna lie, pretty upset at seeing some weird Bronze symbol in there instead of A-F. Why? Pretty sure points = ladder rating right? As long as they give your exact rating and server rank i dont really care if the "ladder groupings" are F to S or Bronze to GM. All i care about is my rating and server rank. | ||
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
![]() this pic makes me think that theres gonna be team game matchamking as well, which would be sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeet. | ||
TibbersCute
19 Posts
On May 27 2017 12:45 TT1 wrote: looks s i c k Why? Pretty sure points = ladder rating right? As long as they give your exact rating and server rank i dont really care if the "ladder groupings" are F to S or Bronze to GM. All i care about is my rating and server rank. Ever heard the phrase: give an inch and they will take a mile? Same concept. | ||
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
On May 27 2017 13:27 TibbersCute wrote: Ever heard the phrase: give an inch and they will take a mile? Same concept. Ah so SC2 ranks today, MBS and smartcast tomorrow.. gotcha ![]() | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4313 Posts
| ||
TibbersCute
19 Posts
On May 27 2017 13:49 TT1 wrote: Ah so SC2 ranks today, MBS and smartcast tomorrow.. gotcha ![]() Nothing wrong with disliking SC2. I wouldn't expect a lazy player to understand. | ||
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
On May 27 2017 14:28 TibbersCute wrote: Nothing wrong with disliking SC2. I wouldn't expect a lazy player to understand. what, lazy? i mean everyone's entitled to their opinion, even if yours isn't a very logical one. the classics team already stated that they wouldnt touch anything gameplay related. also i'm pretty sure that they're not a balance team anyways, they wouldn't be allowed to make any gameplay related changes. you're complaining about BW getting bonus features (and you're pretty much the only person doing so), do you realize how dumb that is? | ||
TibbersCute
19 Posts
On May 27 2017 14:53 TT1 wrote: The classics team already stated that they wouldnt touch anything gameplay related You mean like in-gameplay hotkeys? On May 27 2017 14:53 TT1 wrote: you're complaining about BW getting bonus features (and you're pretty much the only person doing so) They asked for feedback, that's my feedback. Look at yourself! Called my opinion dumb, illogical, and are trying to say I'm alone in my opinion? Yeah, my opinion looks completely alone. Edit: Oh hey, another one a couple minutes after I posted: https://us.battle.net/forums/en/starcraft/topic/20754937500?page=4#post-67 | ||
IntoTheStorm
116 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
On May 27 2017 15:07 TibbersCute wrote: Speaking of illogical... "Ah so SC2 ranks today, MBS and smartcast tomorrow.. gotcha" is a straw-man. Seems a little silly to call others dumb coming from your position. You mean like in-gameplay hotkeys? They asked for feedback, that's my feedback. Look at yourself! Called my opinion dumb, illogical, and are trying to say I'm alone in my opinion? Yeah, my opinion looks completely alone. wait, you gave feedback.. did i read that right? feedback on what, exactly? you being paranoid about the dev team adding SC2 gameplay features like MBS and smartcast (by giving an inch!) has nothing to do with giving feedback on the new profiles, it's you being paranoid. also by gameplay changes i meant changing unit stats/the game's mechanics (they stated that they didn't add rebinds for f keys and control groups because they didn't want to touch the games mechanics). keep wearing that tin foil hat of yours tho, wouldn't want to ruin your fun. im hoping people like you will be able to relax once the launch happens and nothing ends up changing, god knows you need it. edit: and just to be clear i don't really have an issue with you wanting F - S ranks. what i have an issue with is your "give an inch, take a mile" statement, that's a terrible mindset to have. | ||
TibbersCute
19 Posts
Please try to be nicer to people posting. It's really annoying when some thug comes up and starts bashing your opinion for god knows what reason Edit: I dont even know what MBS is User was warned for this post | ||
arb
Noobville17920 Posts
On May 27 2017 15:19 TT1 wrote: wait, you gave feedback.. did i read that right? feedback on what, exactly? you being paranoid about the dev team adding SC2 gameplay features like MBS and smartcast (by giving an inch!) has nothing to do with giving feedback on the new profiles, it's you being paranoid. also by gameplay changes i meant changing unit stats/the game's mechanics (they stated that they didn't add rebinds for f keys and control groups because they didn't want to touch the games mechanics). keep wearing that tin foil hat of yours tho, wouldn't want to ruin your fun. im hoping people like you will be able to relax once the launch happens and nothing ends up changing, god knows you need it. better to just ignore low post count new date users imo. usually come to troll the fuck out of the threads and be morons basically. features look nice though | ||
TT1
Canada9984 Posts
On May 27 2017 15:22 TibbersCute wrote: lol TT1 nobody said anything about MBS and smartcast except you, that's sort of what straw-man means. I know you're a pretty lazy player, but at least try not to be so lazy with your vocabulary too. Here's a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Please try to be nicer to people posting. It's really annoying when some thug comes up and starts bashing your opinion for god knows what reason when you say "give an inch take a mile" you're implying that more SC2 features will be implemented (in the context of what we were talking about), so what exactly were you referring to? seemed like you had your panties in a bunch over something so i assumed you were talking about gameplay related stuff (which imo is a reasonable assumption to make.. because why else would you get "upset" over any of this?). Edit: Please tell me EXACTLY what you're referring to when you say "give an inch take a mile", let's get to the bottom of this bro. | ||
CobaltBlu
United States919 Posts
| ||
TibbersCute
19 Posts
Blizzard also has a super bad habit of implementing complete shit and relying on community feedback to find solutions. This happens sort of in general; Blizzard won't fix something unless a ton of community backlash occurs. That's why they have Blizzard forums with tons of whiny posts. Edit: Some examples: SC2 balance was fuckin aweful, and still is. Bnet 2.0 was fuckin aweful, and for all I know it probably still is. Didn't even have chat channels when it launched? Like come on. That's some god aweful development. Like how do you screw something up people got right in the 90's when the internet was actually new? No LAN-play? This fucked up a bunch of tournament matches due to latency or drop problems. Took them FOREVER to implement the replay feature, where the game could start from a replay. This solved the drop-problems for tournaments. But it's still a fuckin band-aid solution. The hype is lost when a match is paused and reloaded. Also why didn't they actually implemented this replay feature in the beginning, and why did it take SO LONG to implement? "too hard to implement"? What a joke. Some random college student hacked together an example and posted here on teamliquid. Without the fucking source code of sc2. A college student. Then Blizzard finally took their fingers out their ass and got in the replay thing. But don't forget, this was all a problem because no LAN play, which is a retarded and greedy decision to begin with. So now here we are, and the same kind of dev-process and disrespect of brood war can be seen in some of the SC:R development. It's natural to get pissy considering the longer history. It's a valid opinion to be annoyed at Blizzard touching Brood War. | ||
oOOoOphidian
United States1402 Posts
should be fun playing all this ![]() | ||
| ||