EPTBW Remastered Profiles - Page 4
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6961 Posts
| ||
|
CecilSunkure
United States2829 Posts
On May 27 2017 18:28 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i cant wait to see sc2 grand masters in bronze league !!! oh god ME TOO. It will be like a divine justice of some kind | ||
|
Dazed.
Canada3301 Posts
| ||
HaN-
France1920 Posts
On May 27 2017 18:28 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i cant wait to see sc2 grand masters in bronze league !!! ahah | ||
|
CecilSunkure
United States2829 Posts
| ||
|
SSMMA
15 Posts
| ||
|
Dirtyharry
Germany171 Posts
On May 27 2017 18:28 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i cant wait to see sc2 grand masters in bronze league !!! oh lul !! | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12037 Posts
On May 27 2017 07:32 Jealous wrote: Also support for match-pickers would be really good I think. You get to pre-select what race you want to play vs. what opponent race. That's pretty key IMO for a lot of Terrans and Zergs. Jealous I respect you but those race traitors need to learn and play the manly matchup TvT <3 | ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
| ||
|
AbouSV
Germany1278 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10036 Posts
On May 27 2017 20:15 AbouSV wrote: Why is the average APM so important to be shown this big on one of the main pages of the profile? big apm = big penis | ||
|
Netto.
Poland523 Posts
On May 27 2017 20:15 AbouSV wrote: Why is the average APM so important to be shown this big on one of the main pages of the profile? I am afraid to say that low APM players will never understand it  | ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
"Cloud saves keep your replays a click away on any computer. Access an overview or rewatch the action!" That's pretty cool, and something SC2 doesn't even have. | ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On May 27 2017 18:13 RedW4rr10r wrote: but they are fish, which highly surprises me that they seem to implement metal rankings... i highly dislike this sc2 content T_T yeah me too. I highly dislike the "metal rankings". I think this sort of modern ranking system is designed to be non-transparent. You are presented with a multitude of different graphs that show a lot of irrelevant stuff. Total mining rate across all games. Achievements unlocked. Dear god i hope the don't haver achievements. Biggest problem is that there's an internal rating and a external rating/ rank connected to a certain number of points. In Starcraft 2, as long as i followed those discussions, ranking was opaque at best. The fact that internal ratings decay and you had this "bonus pool" thing in Sc2 made it very unappealing to me. My intuition towards Sc2 ranks was, that it's meant to appease the Ego of us gamers. Being "solid D+" on ICCup sounds the way it is. You're a beginner, nothing fancy. Being a top 4 of Division 32 Diamond player and having all those fancy decals and achievements leaves a different impression. That being said, i don't mind if ranking serve our e-phalli, but i do mind if i have no clear impression of where i'm at. Im very much aware that there are issues with the ranking system's of ICCup/FISH too, but at least they are straight forward. | ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
| ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1769 Posts
| ||
|
saltis
159 Posts
| ||
|
B-royal
Belgium1330 Posts
Blizzard disbanding the 1.16 ladder was the first blow, while not giving me a working alternative (yes unfortunately I still have a lot of issues on my PC* with 1.18) so I could keep playing and climbing. This will be the second one. And yes I take this game very seriously. Specs in case anyone's interested + Show Spoiler + Summary Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1 CPU Intel Core i7 4770 @ 3.40GHz Haswell 22nm Technology RAM 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz Motherboard ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. H87M-E (SOCKET 1150) Graphics LG FULL HD (1920x1080@60Hz) 22M45 (1920x1080@60Hz) 2048MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (ASUStek Computer Inc) | ||
|
suddendeathTV
Sweden388 Posts
On May 27 2017 20:39 Cele wrote: yeah me too. I highly dislike the "metal rankings". I think this sort of modern ranking system is designed to be non-transparent. You are presented with a multitude of different graphs that show a lot of irrelevant stuff. Total mining rate across all games. Achievements unlocked. Dear god i hope the don't haver achievements. Biggest problem is that there's an internal rating and a external rating/ rank connected to a certain number of points. In Starcraft 2, as long as i followed those discussions, ranking was opaque at best. The fact that internal ratings decay and you had this "bonus pool" thing in Sc2 made it very unappealing to me. My intuition towards Sc2 ranks was, that it's meant to appease the Ego of us gamers. Being "solid D+" on ICCup sounds the way it is. You're a beginner, nothing fancy. Being a top 4 of Division 32 Diamond player and having all those fancy decals and achievements leaves a different impression. That being said, i don't mind if ranking serve our e-phalli, but i do mind if i have no clear impression of where i'm at. Im very much aware that there are issues with the ranking system's of ICCup/FISH too, but at least they are straight forward. Hello, since... I don't really remember when, but sc2 had an update that implemented showing actual MMR. This was because many felt like you do, so nobody really cares about points anymore, only your MMR vs opponent MMR. Blizzard were scared that casual players would be put off by a shown MMR. Not sure if they were right or not, but I'm hoping they will let us see our actual MMR in SC:R and not a fictional point system. We don't know yet though, what they call "points" could be our actual MMR. Let's wait for the announcements before we make any conclusions! | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6961 Posts
| ||
| ||
