• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:55
CEST 12:55
KST 19:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32108 users

Blizzard's Terms are Illegal - Page 3

Blogs > mmp
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
seppolevne
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada1681 Posts
May 28 2010 02:07 GMT
#41
On May 28 2010 10:59 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 10:54 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:41 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:36 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:25 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:19 Kralic wrote:
I gave this blog a 5/5 but then I realized he was serious.

Don't sweat the terms of use unless you are planning on using malicious software to cheat in this game or gain money off of it without their consent. Did you know that warden scans your computer and records everything? Now warden is evil but guess what it was found to be a legal program for Blizzard to use.

Here is what you just agreed to have running on your computer by accepting their TOS.
Warden


It's not malicious software I'm defending.

On May 28 2010 10:19 ShaperofDreams wrote:
mmp it doesn't matter, and what blizzard is doing is legal. who cares whether people read the user agreement or not, they are supposed to.


So you agree that you don't have the right to run programs like APMLive, or Build order coachers, Rich's latency-fixing program, latency fixes that may come in the future, etc?

And you forfeit the right to customize textures, sounds, models, configuration files...?

You forfeit all of this?

YES YES YES. If you don't want to then don't buy the game.

So you think Rich and anyone who uses his program deserve to have their accounts revoked?
How about the TL users that are customizing textures and other game features. They don't deserve to play on the same server as you?

You may worship a benevolent dictator, but don't complain when the other shoe drops.

If Blizzard wanted to revoke their accounts, they would absolutely be within their rights. Does it suck? Yes. Is it in any way illegal? No. How is that so hard to understand?

Show me a legal (U.S.) ruling that backs the right of commercial software to restrict access to computer memory.

"provided, however, that Blizzard may, at its sole and absolute discretion, allow the use of certain third party user interfaces;"
If R1ch's program is in no way malicious, I don't see them not allowing it. This basically states "if something is good, we will allow it"
J- Pirate Udyr WW T- Pirate Riven Galio M- Galio Annie S- Sona Lux -- Always farm, never carry.
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 02:16:32
May 28 2010 02:11 GMT
#42
On May 28 2010 11:07 seppolevne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 10:59 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:54 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:41 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:36 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:25 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:19 Kralic wrote:
I gave this blog a 5/5 but then I realized he was serious.

Don't sweat the terms of use unless you are planning on using malicious software to cheat in this game or gain money off of it without their consent. Did you know that warden scans your computer and records everything? Now warden is evil but guess what it was found to be a legal program for Blizzard to use.

Here is what you just agreed to have running on your computer by accepting their TOS.
Warden


It's not malicious software I'm defending.

On May 28 2010 10:19 ShaperofDreams wrote:
mmp it doesn't matter, and what blizzard is doing is legal. who cares whether people read the user agreement or not, they are supposed to.


So you agree that you don't have the right to run programs like APMLive, or Build order coachers, Rich's latency-fixing program, latency fixes that may come in the future, etc?

And you forfeit the right to customize textures, sounds, models, configuration files...?

You forfeit all of this?

YES YES YES. If you don't want to then don't buy the game.

So you think Rich and anyone who uses his program deserve to have their accounts revoked?
How about the TL users that are customizing textures and other game features. They don't deserve to play on the same server as you?

You may worship a benevolent dictator, but don't complain when the other shoe drops.

If Blizzard wanted to revoke their accounts, they would absolutely be within their rights. Does it suck? Yes. Is it in any way illegal? No. How is that so hard to understand?

Show me a legal (U.S.) ruling that backs the right of commercial software to restrict access to computer memory.

"provided, however, that Blizzard may, at its sole and absolute discretion, allow the use of certain third party user interfaces;"
If R1ch's program is in no way malicious, I don't see them not allowing it. This basically states "if something is good, we will allow it"

It's not their right to approve or disapprove what else is running on your computer.

Again, it's easy to side with the benevolent dictator, but what if a program is deemed to give an "unfair advantage?" Certainly a tournament can kick you out, but Blizzard cannot deny you service for the way that you run your personal computer.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
Durak
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Canada3684 Posts
May 28 2010 02:56 GMT
#43
On May 28 2010 11:06 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 10:56 Durak wrote:
I thought this thread was going to contain a legal argument since the title is "Blizzard's terms are illegal." However, this quote destroyed that hope.
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


This is incorrect by Canadian law. You can't claim that you were unaware after accepting a terms of use agreement because it counts as reasonable notice. I'm pretty sure American contract law is the same in this regard.

If you're trying to make an argument as to how regulation prevents some of these contract terms, make it. Don't make extreme claims such as, "this says you don't own your RAM" without quoting some regulation. At a glance, it looks fine to me.

Edit: Seriously, this is a basic standard form offer. I don't know why you're making such strong claims without support.


I agree that the Canadian interpretation makes sense - but when fine print oversteps what it has a reasonable right to claim (in this case property rights over your computer hardware), then you can take it to court (in the U.S. anyway).

Your bias is backwards. It's a basic and standard form in that companies often say things that have zero legal backing. No one cares to bring these things to court because of the cost - when was the last time you saw a class action lawsuit over a video game?

It's the same thing in Canada. If there is regulation that overrules the contract terms, the contract terms are obviously invalid.

Standard form offers do often have unenforceable claims. I don't see why that would be my problem though because they would be prosecuting (plus I live in Canada, lol).

To bring this back to your argument in the OP, I believe you have some good points. I agree that much of 2, especially D, is too broad. In fact, 2D is easily interpreted to mean that every user of the software is violating the ToS. Your operating system is always going to be a software intermediary between Battle.net and your RAM.

I think that you're approaching this from the wrong angle by arguing about property rights though. Again, I don't know anything about American contract law, but there are probably better objections.

Blizzard is definitely trying to make the terms more general than they reasonably can be. However, it doesn't effect me so I don't care.

SoManyDeadLings
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada255 Posts
May 28 2010 02:56 GMT
#44
On May 28 2010 10:59 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 10:54 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:41 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:36 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:25 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:19 Kralic wrote:
I gave this blog a 5/5 but then I realized he was serious.

Don't sweat the terms of use unless you are planning on using malicious software to cheat in this game or gain money off of it without their consent. Did you know that warden scans your computer and records everything? Now warden is evil but guess what it was found to be a legal program for Blizzard to use.

Here is what you just agreed to have running on your computer by accepting their TOS.
Warden


It's not malicious software I'm defending.

On May 28 2010 10:19 ShaperofDreams wrote:
mmp it doesn't matter, and what blizzard is doing is legal. who cares whether people read the user agreement or not, they are supposed to.


So you agree that you don't have the right to run programs like APMLive, or Build order coachers, Rich's latency-fixing program, latency fixes that may come in the future, etc?

And you forfeit the right to customize textures, sounds, models, configuration files...?

You forfeit all of this?

YES YES YES. If you don't want to then don't buy the game.

So you think Rich and anyone who uses his program deserve to have their accounts revoked?
How about the TL users that are customizing textures and other game features. They don't deserve to play on the same server as you?

You may worship a benevolent dictator, but don't complain when the other shoe drops.

If Blizzard wanted to revoke their accounts, they would absolutely be within their rights. Does it suck? Yes. Is it in any way illegal? No. How is that so hard to understand?

Show me a legal (U.S.) ruling that backs the right of commercial software to restrict access to computer memory.


There isn't one.

But that wasn't his point. All he said was that Blizzard has the right to revoke your account should they deem your actions undesirable. It's beyond me why you just cannot understand/accept this fact.

And you need to stop dramatizing everything. The way you rant about the issue sounds like Blizzard is giving out Trojans with the game clients.
wsrgry
Redmark
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada2129 Posts
May 28 2010 03:27 GMT
#45
Does this not apply to almost every multiplayer game out there? I can't even think of an example where the player 'owns' the account. This is what lawyers do, they cover all the bases; and you can bet that Blizzard has a lot of lawyers. It's like buying a ticket to a concert, they reserve the right to kick you out. I don't see how this stops you from owning your hard drive - what are they going to do, nuke it from headquarters? The most they can do is ban your account.
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 03:32:33
May 28 2010 03:30 GMT
#46
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


i know nothing about law but i at least am capable of running a search through lexisnexis
5 minutes turned up this extract from south carolina lawyer '08: (original discussion was about online privacy but this is an analogy to the eula/tos)
An analogy can be made to the online license agreement, about which there is a large body of case law discussing online contract formation. Those cases have found that users are bound to online licenses to which they have "clicked" acceptance or where they have actual notice of the terms. Users are not bound to license agreements that are only visible to the user by "browsing"--scrolling down the screen or to a different screen--and where the user is not required to view the license in order to complete the transaction. See Motise v. America Online, Inc., 346 F. Supp. 2d 563 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).


so just because people don't read them, doesn't mean they're not binding.. see the relevant case
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
SoManyDeadLings
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada255 Posts
May 28 2010 03:44 GMT
#47
On May 28 2010 11:11 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 11:07 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:59 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:54 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:41 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:36 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:25 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:19 Kralic wrote:
I gave this blog a 5/5 but then I realized he was serious.

Don't sweat the terms of use unless you are planning on using malicious software to cheat in this game or gain money off of it without their consent. Did you know that warden scans your computer and records everything? Now warden is evil but guess what it was found to be a legal program for Blizzard to use.

Here is what you just agreed to have running on your computer by accepting their TOS.
Warden


It's not malicious software I'm defending.

On May 28 2010 10:19 ShaperofDreams wrote:
mmp it doesn't matter, and what blizzard is doing is legal. who cares whether people read the user agreement or not, they are supposed to.


So you agree that you don't have the right to run programs like APMLive, or Build order coachers, Rich's latency-fixing program, latency fixes that may come in the future, etc?

And you forfeit the right to customize textures, sounds, models, configuration files...?

You forfeit all of this?

YES YES YES. If you don't want to then don't buy the game.

So you think Rich and anyone who uses his program deserve to have their accounts revoked?
How about the TL users that are customizing textures and other game features. They don't deserve to play on the same server as you?

You may worship a benevolent dictator, but don't complain when the other shoe drops.

If Blizzard wanted to revoke their accounts, they would absolutely be within their rights. Does it suck? Yes. Is it in any way illegal? No. How is that so hard to understand?

Show me a legal (U.S.) ruling that backs the right of commercial software to restrict access to computer memory.

"provided, however, that Blizzard may, at its sole and absolute discretion, allow the use of certain third party user interfaces;"
If R1ch's program is in no way malicious, I don't see them not allowing it. This basically states "if something is good, we will allow it"

It's not their right to approve or disapprove what else is running on your computer.

Again, it's easy to side with the benevolent dictator, but what if a program is deemed to give an "unfair advantage?" Certainly a tournament can kick you out, but Blizzard cannot deny you service for the way that you run your personal computer.


Of course not, but you still don't get it.

It's not their right to approve or disapprove what else is running on your computer.

But it IS their right to terminate your account when 3rd party software is running in CONJUNCTION with whatever game client you're running.
wsrgry
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
May 28 2010 04:00 GMT
#48
On May 28 2010 11:11 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 11:07 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:59 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:54 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:41 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:36 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:25 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:19 Kralic wrote:
I gave this blog a 5/5 but then I realized he was serious.

Don't sweat the terms of use unless you are planning on using malicious software to cheat in this game or gain money off of it without their consent. Did you know that warden scans your computer and records everything? Now warden is evil but guess what it was found to be a legal program for Blizzard to use.

Here is what you just agreed to have running on your computer by accepting their TOS.
Warden


It's not malicious software I'm defending.

On May 28 2010 10:19 ShaperofDreams wrote:
mmp it doesn't matter, and what blizzard is doing is legal. who cares whether people read the user agreement or not, they are supposed to.


So you agree that you don't have the right to run programs like APMLive, or Build order coachers, Rich's latency-fixing program, latency fixes that may come in the future, etc?

And you forfeit the right to customize textures, sounds, models, configuration files...?

You forfeit all of this?

YES YES YES. If you don't want to then don't buy the game.

So you think Rich and anyone who uses his program deserve to have their accounts revoked?
How about the TL users that are customizing textures and other game features. They don't deserve to play on the same server as you?

You may worship a benevolent dictator, but don't complain when the other shoe drops.

If Blizzard wanted to revoke their accounts, they would absolutely be within their rights. Does it suck? Yes. Is it in any way illegal? No. How is that so hard to understand?

Show me a legal (U.S.) ruling that backs the right of commercial software to restrict access to computer memory.

"provided, however, that Blizzard may, at its sole and absolute discretion, allow the use of certain third party user interfaces;"
If R1ch's program is in no way malicious, I don't see them not allowing it. This basically states "if something is good, we will allow it"

It's not their right to approve or disapprove what else is running on your computer.

Again, it's easy to side with the benevolent dictator, but what if a program is deemed to give an "unfair advantage?" Certainly a tournament can kick you out, but Blizzard cannot deny you service for the way that you run your personal computer.

In other words, they're not allowed ban people for hacking?

If you're generalizing to "what else is running on your computer", then at that level, there's no relevant difference between Oblivion and Chaoslauncher.
Moderator
frogmelter
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States971 Posts
May 28 2010 08:07 GMT
#49
Wait you don't own your hard drive? Meaning they could just collect everyone's hard drives if they wanted?
TL+ Member
Hamster1800
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
United States175 Posts
May 28 2010 11:29 GMT
#50
One of the two sides of this argument seriously needs to show some precedent. As far as I am aware, not being aware of the terms of a contract is never grounds for breaking it. If mmp or someone else has a court case that establishes a precedent in the opposite direction, please show it to us.
D is for Diamond, E is for Everything Else
Vexx
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States462 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 12:13:01
May 28 2010 12:05 GMT
#51
Edit: would rather not get into it. Not a lawyer.
I am not nice.
Hunter_Killers
Profile Joined June 2009
Canada23 Posts
May 28 2010 12:12 GMT
#52
They are reserving the right to ban you from Battle.net which they certainly can do as they please if you are doing something they don't like and its pretty obvious what those are, twisting their words into something completely unrelated isn't making you have a better argument.

SC1 mods aren't even supposed to exist with all the backdooring the programs do to make them work but they don't care about them over Battle.net, it's pretty obvious why their ToU wouldn't be supportive of something like ICCUP running on its own server emulator or assisting its development (data-mining) or you hacking their game for your own advantage.

It's the same agreement for pretty much every online service/game out there, whats your next argument going to be that they shouldn't be allowed to ban RMT spammers?
beetlelisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Poland2276 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 14:35:35
May 28 2010 13:21 GMT
#53
On May 28 2010 09:53 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:42 Conquest101 wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.


Yes, exactly because no one reads the terms for a computer game versus a license for more important goods and services. There is no means of verifying that a user agreed to the terms as they are presented - therefore Blizzard's claims constitute "fine print."

If Blizzard just said they could ban users for completely arbitrary reasons (such as race, religion, politics) and it was in the ToS, it would still be an illegal overreach of your civil liberties to enjoy a good or service - precisely because a wide audience of people who may be unfairly harmed.

In general, you have a right to use your computer hardware as you like (provided you harm no one else) and it takes far more sophisticated legal statements than this to invalidate your property rights.

What about those parts in points you mentioned?
however, that Blizzard may, at its sole and absolute discretion, allow the use of certain third party user interfaces;

in any way not expressly authorized by Blizzard;

using programs or tools not expressly approved by Blizzard;

If you are resorting to something that isn't there then I don't think you have any examples to back your OP. ICCUP and every program made for WoW (and there is fuckton of them) is enough to show that you are wrong.

On May 28 2010 10:41 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 10:36 seppolevne wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:25 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 10:19 Kralic wrote:
I gave this blog a 5/5 but then I realized he was serious.

Don't sweat the terms of use unless you are planning on using malicious software to cheat in this game or gain money off of it without their consent. Did you know that warden scans your computer and records everything? Now warden is evil but guess what it was found to be a legal program for Blizzard to use.

Here is what you just agreed to have running on your computer by accepting their TOS.
Warden


It's not malicious software I'm defending.

On May 28 2010 10:19 ShaperofDreams wrote:
mmp it doesn't matter, and what blizzard is doing is legal. who cares whether people read the user agreement or not, they are supposed to.


So you agree that you don't have the right to run programs like APMLive, or Build order coachers, Rich's latency-fixing program, latency fixes that may come in the future, etc?

And you forfeit the right to customize textures, sounds, models, configuration files...?

You forfeit all of this?

YES YES YES. If you don't want to then don't buy the game.

So you think Rich and anyone who uses his program deserve to have their accounts revoked?
How about the TL users that are customizing textures and other game features. They don't deserve to play on the same server as you?

You may worship a benevolent dictator, but don't complain when the other shoe drops.

Who customizes textures to play normal games and not just mods? What other features do you have in mind?

when was the last time you saw a class action lawsuit over a video game?

When was the last time you saw them ban accounts for anything other than hacking?



On a side note, + Show Spoiler +
I remember W3 UMS games where demons where running with huge erected falluses attached and blink described as using those falluses as poles to jump.

My friend saw a Naruto UMS with little Sasuke doing seals. How badly does this break Blizzard's ToS?
wwww
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
GSL Code S
09:30
Ro8 - Group A
Maru vs SolarLIVE!
Rogue vs TBD
GuMiho vs TBD
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech84
EnDerr 52
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28330
Calm 6579
Rain 3925
Bisu 2319
Jaedong 1050
Pusan 780
Horang2 585
BeSt 387
EffOrt 207
TY 191
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 154
Last 123
ToSsGirL 107
PianO 106
Mini 61
Hyun 61
[sc1f]eonzerg 57
Shine 49
Killer 40
Dewaltoss 39
Aegong 37
ZerO 32
NaDa 22
Movie 20
Barracks 18
sorry 18
Sharp 18
Sacsri 13
HiyA 9
JYJ8
Mong 3
Dota 2
XcaliburYe466
420jenkins405
BananaSlamJamma391
Fuzer 224
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss880
x6flipin248
Super Smash Bros
Westballz21
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor155
Other Games
singsing2133
crisheroes296
Pyrionflax237
DeMusliM236
Crank 230
XaKoH 174
B2W.Neo108
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream6273
Other Games
gamesdonequick383
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 39
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV114
Upcoming Events
Online Event
13h 5m
Replay Cast
15h 5m
GSL Code S
22h 35m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
23h 5m
Replay Cast
1d 13h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.