• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:53
CEST 17:53
KST 00:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection6Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2
Community News
[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June2Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th151Weekly Cups (May 18-24): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League6
StarCraft 2
General
TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes? Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview What kind of tool would you be interested in?
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected Welcome to the External Content forum
Brood War
General
25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 BW General Discussion BW animated web series: seeking contributors FlaSh's ASL S21 Finals Review BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST [ASL21] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction
Other Games
General Games
PC Games Sales Thread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Summer Games Done Quick 2026! The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Esportsmanship: How to NOT B…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6790 users

Blizzard's Terms are Illegal

Blogs > mmp
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 00:34:29
May 28 2010 00:25 GMT
#1
This thread was promptly closed and dismissed as more Blizzard-bashing. It should be noted that some of the terms that Blizzard claims a right to are illegal (or a liberal misinterpretation of copyright law). That is, they cannot deprive you of a purchased service under certain circumstances:

In particular:
2Bcd are unilateral claims regarding real world transactions. These transactions are legal just about everywhere in the world, but MMO companies are trying to fabricate a common law precedent that this is unlawful.
2D claims that you don't own your RAM.
2E claims that you don't own your hard drive.
2F claims that you cannot use their software for alternative purposes.
2G claims that you don't own your NIC.

The above are invalid claims provided you do not infringe upon 2H, which is a valid claim. As long as you're not tampering with their server or disrupting gameplay, you haven't done anything wrong.

Rich's UDP-blocker for example, is a violation of 2G and Blizzard claims they have the right to revoke your account for such "tampering."

This is only a small issue in the larger battle for software rights, but Blizzard is already way out of bounds and should be reprimanded for their arrogance.

**
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
May 28 2010 00:33 GMT
#2
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.
hejakev
Profile Joined August 2009
Sweden518 Posts
May 28 2010 00:38 GMT
#3
I'm with you, but I feel like I'm missing something. I don't have a very good grasp on anything to do with law, but Blizzard seems like too big of a company to have lawyers that would overlook something like this. You do make a very interesting point, though. I'd definitely like to see some more explanation on Blizzard's part
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
May 28 2010 00:40 GMT
#4
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
fabiano
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Brazil4644 Posts
May 28 2010 00:40 GMT
#5
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


Even so Blizzard cant go out of bounds, like seems to be the case of some of the claims the OP stated
"When the geyser died, a probe came out" - SirJolt
Conquest101
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1395 Posts
May 28 2010 00:41 GMT
#6
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.
Conquest101
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1395 Posts
May 28 2010 00:42 GMT
#7
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.
Wohmfg
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom1292 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 00:43:04
May 28 2010 00:42 GMT
#8
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


I'm pretty damned sure the law takes precedence over a ToS.

And I'm sure Blizzard are just covering their asses, and they aren't out to hurt you.
BW4Life!
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
May 28 2010 00:43 GMT
#9
On May 28 2010 09:38 hejakev wrote:
I'm with you, but I feel like I'm missing something. I don't have a very good grasp on anything to do with law, but Blizzard seems like too big of a company to have lawyers that would overlook something like this. You do make a very interesting point, though. I'd definitely like to see some more explanation on Blizzard's part


It's an exaggeration, a stretch, an attempt to forge a common understanding in what is a gray area of the law.

Only because game companies are big can they make presumptuous statements like this and convince a court that they're in the right. It is, in fact, an ongoing legal debate just waiting for another lawsuit.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
Destro
Profile Joined September 2009
Netherlands1206 Posts
May 28 2010 00:45 GMT
#10
Its amazing how alarmist people are over this. blizzard is just protecting its rights and controlling liability. You cannot look at this literally, these are written for lawyers by lawyers.

Yes, blizzard is reserving the right to stop tournaments. Does this mean they are stopping tournaments? no.

Blizzard like most companies more likely than not does a legal risk management. If lets say, you wanted to run a tournament called: the "blizzard is a bunch of nazi fascists and i hope they die" 24 person invitational, they have the ability to shut it down.

bring back weapon of choice for hots!
Mullet_Power
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada64 Posts
May 28 2010 00:46 GMT
#11
On May 28 2010 09:25 mmp wrote:
This thread should be promptly closed and dismissed as more Blizzard-bashing. It should be noted that this a liberal misinterpretation of terms that Blizzard claims.


Look I can take what you said and spin it how I want, just like you did to the ToS.
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
May 28 2010 00:46 GMT
#12
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.

You do not forfeit this right unless you knowingly agree to do so, but this cannot be verified unless licenses make a more opaque statement of what they're claiming. Until then, people will continue to hastily click "Accept." Alternatively, you would need some witness or evidence that it was understood.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
May 28 2010 00:48 GMT
#13
On May 28 2010 09:42 Wohmfg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


I'm pretty damned sure the law takes precedence over a ToS.


If people don't read agreements, then they shouldn't agree to them. The agreement is not in any way deliberately misleading.

The law does take precedent over ToS, but just because it's illegal for someone to steal something from me doesn't mean that if I agree to sell something to someone they're stealing from me when they take it. We agreed to do it, that's why it's called an agreement. In this case, Blizzard says you can use our service if you do these things. Take it or leave it. If you think it's a bad deal, leave it.
Mooga
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States575 Posts
May 28 2010 00:51 GMT
#14
On May 28 2010 09:46 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.


Haha this has to be a troll.

User was warned for this post
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
May 28 2010 00:51 GMT
#15
On May 28 2010 09:46 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.

You do not forfeit this right unless you knowingly agree to do so, but this cannot be verified unless licenses make a more opaque statement of what they're claiming. Until then, people will continue to hastily click "Accept." Alternatively, you would need some witness or evidence that it was understood.


This is Battle.Net terms of use. That means that you can modify the bits on your hard drive any way you want. You just won't be able to use Battle.Net at Blizzard's discretion.

I think you mean a more transparent statement of claims, but it's right there for you to read. What part of this agreement do you find difficult to understand?
Wohmfg
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom1292 Posts
May 28 2010 00:52 GMT
#16
On May 28 2010 09:48 ramen- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:42 Wohmfg wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


I'm pretty damned sure the law takes precedence over a ToS.


If people don't read agreements, then they shouldn't agree to them. The agreement is not in any way deliberately misleading.

The law does take precedent over ToS, but just because it's illegal for someone to steal something from me doesn't mean that if I agree to sell something to someone they're stealing from me when they take it. We agreed to do it, that's why it's called an agreement. In this case, Blizzard says you can use our service if you do these things. Take it or leave it. If you think it's a bad deal, leave it.


I don't really understand what you just wrote but I think we agree. I was just pointing out that Blizzard can't break the law just because someone clicks "accept" on a ToS.
BW4Life!
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
May 28 2010 00:52 GMT
#17
On May 28 2010 09:42 Conquest101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.

You know that joke is actually more aligned to "invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too" then i think you initially meant making it frankly hilarious to me.
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 01:20:40
May 28 2010 00:53 GMT
#18
On May 28 2010 09:42 Conquest101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.


Yes, exactly because no one reads the terms for a computer game versus a license for more important goods and services. There is no means of verifying that a user agreed to the terms as they are presented - therefore Blizzard's claims constitute "fine print."

If Blizzard just said they could ban users for completely arbitrary reasons (such as race, religion, politics) and it was in the ToS, it would still be an illegal overreach of your civil liberties to enjoy a good or service - precisely because a wide audience of people who may be unfairly harmed.

In general, you have a right to use your computer hardware as you like (provided you harm no one else) and it takes far more sophisticated legal statements than this to invalidate your property rights.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
May 28 2010 00:54 GMT
#19
On May 28 2010 09:51 Mooga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:46 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.


Haha this has to be a troll.

He just being stupid, So if i pirated software becuase i bought my HDD the pirated software is now mine? Just using his logic.

All that agreement says is don't make 3rd party shit that injects into sc2 for any reason or hack sc2 memory locations/hdd partitions.
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 00:57:56
May 28 2010 00:57 GMT
#20
On May 28 2010 09:53 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:42 Conquest101 wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.


Yes, exactly because no one reads the terms for a computer game versus a license for more important goods and services. There is no means of verifying that a user agreed to the terms as they are presented - therefore Blizzard's claims constitute "fine print."

If Blizzard just said they could ban users for completely arbitrary reasons (such as race, religion, politics) and it was in the ToS, it would still be an illegal overreach of your civil liberties to enjoy a good or service - precisely because a wide audience of people who may be harmed wouldn't know what they were getting into.

Nope, it's a private service they can do what they want, discrimination for no reason is frankly only auto protected to the elderly obviously you never heard of the boyscouts, You obviously don't know about gym memberships or cell phone contracts either.

"Your defense is i am an idiot, not my fault, blizz is mean took advant(fuck that word is soo long) me by sur prize! Hell me please"
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Maestros of the Game
15:00
Playoffs
Classic vs LamboLIVE!
Clem vs Maru
RotterdaM1553
IntoTheiNu 1068
ComeBackTV 859
TaKeTV 431
Rex177
Ryung 157
IndyStarCraft 151
3DClanTV 77
EnkiAlexander 67
BRAT_OK 65
CosmosSc2 58
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1553
Rex 177
Ryung 157
IndyStarCraft 151
BRAT_OK 65
CosmosSc2 58
Codebar 45
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 5606
Sea 2633
Shuttle 1062
Mini 833
ggaemo 766
actioN 516
Hyuk 327
Soulkey 229
Snow 169
Rush 114
[ Show more ]
Hyun 106
Noble 72
Sharp 71
Free 47
Barracks 37
JYJ 36
sSak 31
Killer 23
Sacsri 23
soO 22
Rock 22
Movie 21
GoRush 19
Terrorterran 16
NaDa 15
IntoTheRainbow 15
JulyZerg 8
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Dota 2
qojqva2789
Dendi1393
syndereN425
Counter-Strike
fl0m931
kRYSTAL_51
Other Games
gofns44194
tarik_tv11987
singsing2678
Liquid`RaSZi1375
B2W.Neo762
FrodaN728
hiko603
Beastyqt461
byalli400
ceh9317
ArmadaUGS205
crisheroes180
Liquid`VortiX111
Hui .99
KnowMe92
QueenE85
Trikslyr35
SHIN 11
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV271
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3180
• Jankos1938
• TFBlade1093
Other Games
• WagamamaTV448
• Shiphtur67
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
8h 7m
The PondCast
18h 7m
Maestros of the Game
23h 7m
Serral vs Rogue
herO vs SHIN
OSC
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 8h
Maestros of the Game
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
OSC
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 22
2026 GSL S2
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
Acropolis #4 - GSB
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
Maestros of the Game 2
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026

Upcoming

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #3
Heroes Pulsing #2
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.