• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:29
CEST 10:29
KST 17:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters9[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism5Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?118Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? [ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters ASL22 General Discussion Pros React To: Calm's Big Brain Play Vs Mini New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2v2v2v2 Tournament [ASL22] Ro16 Group A
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
F* the Children and Get Off …
TrAiDoS
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6646 users

Blizzard's Terms are Illegal

Blogs > mmp
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 00:34:29
May 28 2010 00:25 GMT
#1
This thread was promptly closed and dismissed as more Blizzard-bashing. It should be noted that some of the terms that Blizzard claims a right to are illegal (or a liberal misinterpretation of copyright law). That is, they cannot deprive you of a purchased service under certain circumstances:

In particular:
2Bcd are unilateral claims regarding real world transactions. These transactions are legal just about everywhere in the world, but MMO companies are trying to fabricate a common law precedent that this is unlawful.
2D claims that you don't own your RAM.
2E claims that you don't own your hard drive.
2F claims that you cannot use their software for alternative purposes.
2G claims that you don't own your NIC.

The above are invalid claims provided you do not infringe upon 2H, which is a valid claim. As long as you're not tampering with their server or disrupting gameplay, you haven't done anything wrong.

Rich's UDP-blocker for example, is a violation of 2G and Blizzard claims they have the right to revoke your account for such "tampering."

This is only a small issue in the larger battle for software rights, but Blizzard is already way out of bounds and should be reprimanded for their arrogance.

**
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
May 28 2010 00:33 GMT
#2
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.
hejakev
Profile Joined August 2009
Sweden518 Posts
May 28 2010 00:38 GMT
#3
I'm with you, but I feel like I'm missing something. I don't have a very good grasp on anything to do with law, but Blizzard seems like too big of a company to have lawyers that would overlook something like this. You do make a very interesting point, though. I'd definitely like to see some more explanation on Blizzard's part
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
May 28 2010 00:40 GMT
#4
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
fabiano
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Brazil4644 Posts
May 28 2010 00:40 GMT
#5
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


Even so Blizzard cant go out of bounds, like seems to be the case of some of the claims the OP stated
"When the geyser died, a probe came out" - SirJolt
Conquest101
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1395 Posts
May 28 2010 00:41 GMT
#6
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.
Conquest101
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1395 Posts
May 28 2010 00:42 GMT
#7
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.
Wohmfg
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom1292 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 00:43:04
May 28 2010 00:42 GMT
#8
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


I'm pretty damned sure the law takes precedence over a ToS.

And I'm sure Blizzard are just covering their asses, and they aren't out to hurt you.
BW4Life!
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
May 28 2010 00:43 GMT
#9
On May 28 2010 09:38 hejakev wrote:
I'm with you, but I feel like I'm missing something. I don't have a very good grasp on anything to do with law, but Blizzard seems like too big of a company to have lawyers that would overlook something like this. You do make a very interesting point, though. I'd definitely like to see some more explanation on Blizzard's part


It's an exaggeration, a stretch, an attempt to forge a common understanding in what is a gray area of the law.

Only because game companies are big can they make presumptuous statements like this and convince a court that they're in the right. It is, in fact, an ongoing legal debate just waiting for another lawsuit.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
Destro
Profile Joined September 2009
Netherlands1206 Posts
May 28 2010 00:45 GMT
#10
Its amazing how alarmist people are over this. blizzard is just protecting its rights and controlling liability. You cannot look at this literally, these are written for lawyers by lawyers.

Yes, blizzard is reserving the right to stop tournaments. Does this mean they are stopping tournaments? no.

Blizzard like most companies more likely than not does a legal risk management. If lets say, you wanted to run a tournament called: the "blizzard is a bunch of nazi fascists and i hope they die" 24 person invitational, they have the ability to shut it down.

bring back weapon of choice for hots!
Mullet_Power
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada64 Posts
May 28 2010 00:46 GMT
#11
On May 28 2010 09:25 mmp wrote:
This thread should be promptly closed and dismissed as more Blizzard-bashing. It should be noted that this a liberal misinterpretation of terms that Blizzard claims.


Look I can take what you said and spin it how I want, just like you did to the ToS.
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
May 28 2010 00:46 GMT
#12
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.

You do not forfeit this right unless you knowingly agree to do so, but this cannot be verified unless licenses make a more opaque statement of what they're claiming. Until then, people will continue to hastily click "Accept." Alternatively, you would need some witness or evidence that it was understood.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
May 28 2010 00:48 GMT
#13
On May 28 2010 09:42 Wohmfg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


I'm pretty damned sure the law takes precedence over a ToS.


If people don't read agreements, then they shouldn't agree to them. The agreement is not in any way deliberately misleading.

The law does take precedent over ToS, but just because it's illegal for someone to steal something from me doesn't mean that if I agree to sell something to someone they're stealing from me when they take it. We agreed to do it, that's why it's called an agreement. In this case, Blizzard says you can use our service if you do these things. Take it or leave it. If you think it's a bad deal, leave it.
Mooga
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States575 Posts
May 28 2010 00:51 GMT
#14
On May 28 2010 09:46 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.


Haha this has to be a troll.

User was warned for this post
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
May 28 2010 00:51 GMT
#15
On May 28 2010 09:46 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.

You do not forfeit this right unless you knowingly agree to do so, but this cannot be verified unless licenses make a more opaque statement of what they're claiming. Until then, people will continue to hastily click "Accept." Alternatively, you would need some witness or evidence that it was understood.


This is Battle.Net terms of use. That means that you can modify the bits on your hard drive any way you want. You just won't be able to use Battle.Net at Blizzard's discretion.

I think you mean a more transparent statement of claims, but it's right there for you to read. What part of this agreement do you find difficult to understand?
Wohmfg
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom1292 Posts
May 28 2010 00:52 GMT
#16
On May 28 2010 09:48 ramen- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:42 Wohmfg wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


I'm pretty damned sure the law takes precedence over a ToS.


If people don't read agreements, then they shouldn't agree to them. The agreement is not in any way deliberately misleading.

The law does take precedent over ToS, but just because it's illegal for someone to steal something from me doesn't mean that if I agree to sell something to someone they're stealing from me when they take it. We agreed to do it, that's why it's called an agreement. In this case, Blizzard says you can use our service if you do these things. Take it or leave it. If you think it's a bad deal, leave it.


I don't really understand what you just wrote but I think we agree. I was just pointing out that Blizzard can't break the law just because someone clicks "accept" on a ToS.
BW4Life!
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
May 28 2010 00:52 GMT
#17
On May 28 2010 09:42 Conquest101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.

You know that joke is actually more aligned to "invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too" then i think you initially meant making it frankly hilarious to me.
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 01:20:40
May 28 2010 00:53 GMT
#18
On May 28 2010 09:42 Conquest101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.


Yes, exactly because no one reads the terms for a computer game versus a license for more important goods and services. There is no means of verifying that a user agreed to the terms as they are presented - therefore Blizzard's claims constitute "fine print."

If Blizzard just said they could ban users for completely arbitrary reasons (such as race, religion, politics) and it was in the ToS, it would still be an illegal overreach of your civil liberties to enjoy a good or service - precisely because a wide audience of people who may be unfairly harmed.

In general, you have a right to use your computer hardware as you like (provided you harm no one else) and it takes far more sophisticated legal statements than this to invalidate your property rights.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
May 28 2010 00:54 GMT
#19
On May 28 2010 09:51 Mooga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:46 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:41 Conquest101 wrote:
If you buy their game, you need to agree to their terms. Otherwise, don't buy it. Simple.

Blizzard isn't claiming that you can't modify files on your hard drive if you buy their game. They're claiming that you can't modify their game if you agree to their terms of use. You know that agreement you say you read and understand when you install the game.


You purchased those bits on your hard drive, you can do what you want with them.


Haha this has to be a troll.

He just being stupid, So if i pirated software becuase i bought my HDD the pirated software is now mine? Just using his logic.

All that agreement says is don't make 3rd party shit that injects into sc2 for any reason or hack sc2 memory locations/hdd partitions.
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-28 00:57:56
May 28 2010 00:57 GMT
#20
On May 28 2010 09:53 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2010 09:42 Conquest101 wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:40 mmp wrote:
On May 28 2010 09:33 ramen- wrote:
This is a terms of use agreement, meaning that you agree to do this. If you don't agree to these terms, then just don't buy the game. Blizzard is not under a legal obligation to sell you its software with a liberal license agreement.


You must knowingly forfeit your property rights. It is understood that virtually no user reads or understands these agreements, therefore the claims are invalid.


Lol what? The claims are invalid because people don't read what they're agreeing too?

Brb, going to "buy" some real estate.


Yes, exactly because no one reads the terms for a computer game versus a license for more important goods and services. There is no means of verifying that a user agreed to the terms as they are presented - therefore Blizzard's claims constitute "fine print."

If Blizzard just said they could ban users for completely arbitrary reasons (such as race, religion, politics) and it was in the ToS, it would still be an illegal overreach of your civil liberties to enjoy a good or service - precisely because a wide audience of people who may be harmed wouldn't know what they were getting into.

Nope, it's a private service they can do what they want, discrimination for no reason is frankly only auto protected to the elderly obviously you never heard of the boyscouts, You obviously don't know about gym memberships or cell phone contracts either.

"Your defense is i am an idiot, not my fault, blizz is mean took advant(fuck that word is soo long) me by sur prize! Hell me please"
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 32m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
FoxeR 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 5031
Bisu 622
Leta 307
BeSt 295
PianO 83
Hm[arnc] 65
Mong 60
sSak 48
Yoon 46
Mind 33
[ Show more ]
actioN 31
Bale 26
ZergMaN 14
JulyZerg 13
Noble 10
Sharp 5
Dota 2
syndereN178
League of Legends
JimRising 600
Counter-Strike
olofmeister760
dupreeh49
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox486
Other Games
singsing857
ceh9607
Pyrionflax86
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 28
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Light_VIP 13
• iopq 12
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2139
League of Legends
• Jankos925
Other Games
• WagamamaTV189
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
2h 32m
Replay Cast
15h 32m
The PondCast
1d 1h
KCM Race Survival
1d 1h
Escore
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
BlizzCon
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
GSL
6 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-08
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.