• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:58
CEST 12:58
KST 19:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27
Community News
Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1
StarCraft 2
General
How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey. Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Best crypto recovery experts in the world Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 35058 users

US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 37

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 35 36 37 38 39 322 Next
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
December 08 2016 03:38 GMT
#721
On December 08 2016 12:32 LegalLord wrote:
Frankly all I see is someone taking disagreement personally and calling the other a liar and asking for bans. Nothing there looks to be bad posting even if you disagree on the issues.

Then you have very different standards for acceptable behavior; as I documented the cases quite clearly. And the instances of his poor behavior are very numerous in the thread.

Have you ever played the legend of the five rings rpg? If you have there's something there that could perhaps make the point clearer. otherwise I can't think of a good reference point that would make it clear.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 08 2016 05:01 GMT
#722
I already made some rather clear remarks on what I think of his posting style, somewhat earlier. I understand exactly where the problem is and why people get pissed off by that. And yet, it simply isn't grounds for banning. Opinionated people often have an aggressive manner of sharing their opinions, surprise surprise. It's not really a good thing to start banning people because one person thinks that one other person is a liar.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
December 08 2016 06:10 GMT
#723
So the only concrete example of dauntless lying is that he said you don't give trump a "single ounce of fairness" but you measured the fairness you gave Trump on your digital scale and found it to be slightly over an ounce, even if maybe you should have given him two ounces? What am I reading? Is this why you lost your report button? I asked for a lie, not a disagreement wrapped in rhetoric.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-08 14:52:34
December 08 2016 14:35 GMT
#724
On December 08 2016 15:10 IgnE wrote:
So the only concrete example of dauntless lying is that he said you don't give trump a "single ounce of fairness" but you measured the fairness you gave Trump on your digital scale and found it to be slightly over an ounce, even if maybe you should have given him two ounces? What am I reading? Is this why you lost your report button? I asked for a lie, not a disagreement wrapped in rhetoric.

I provided a lie and documented it clearly. If you chose to ignore the points I can't help you; especially as you did not counter any of my points, and seem to have ignored some of my points entirely. Since you're ignoring some of my points, and/or not being careful when looking at them, I can't help you more; and am disinclined to. the fact that you misstate my point so blatantly, ignoring the fuzziness I added to the measurement, is why I say this.

I will provide other examples as they become available.

legal -> I tire of your insistence that I'm pushing for bans and only bans; it is rude. I've specifically stated REPEATEDLY; that things such as warnings and curtailing his problem posting would suffice. I also provided documented proof of "lying", went over the details and how it was far lesser than some other lies; and you ignore that without providing a counter to the actual argument. So this is going nowhere, and we may as well stop talking about it.


PS apologies to attitude; but it is stressful when people seem to be ignoring your points, or key parts of them.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
December 08 2016 15:32 GMT
#725
It's not a lie if its open to interpretation. Like I said, hermeneutics is not your strong suit.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-08 15:44:06
December 08 2016 15:38 GMT
#726
On December 09 2016 00:32 IgnE wrote:
It's not a lie if its open to interpretation. Like I said, hermeneutics is not your strong suit.

it's obviously not yours; since I already addressed and countered the point you just made. and you failed to note that I had done so (or choose to ignore it AND not cite where I did so and note your disagreement with it).
I already covered the issue of interpretation in detail.
so I recommend we just drop it.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
December 08 2016 15:57 GMT
#727
how many times are you going to suggest we drop it before you actually do?
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
December 08 2016 19:54 GMT
#728
Interesting that danglars knew the length of my ban. Is this part of a negotiation between him and a mod or something? The thread suffers from opinionated moderation. I had a ban from seeker, and when co fronted with posts that had the same offenses as mine, he could only say "I can't take action unless you link me to the posts".
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19028 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-08 20:09:39
December 08 2016 20:08 GMT
#729
maybe it's because durations and reasons are public
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 08 2016 20:29 GMT
#730
On December 09 2016 05:08 tofucake wrote:
maybe it's because durations and reasons are public

I think the conspiracy between him and the moderators is the more likely reality.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
December 10 2016 04:15 GMT
#731
On December 09 2016 04:54 Doodsmack wrote:
Interesting that danglars knew the length of my ban. Is this part of a negotiation between him and a mod or something? The thread suffers from opinionated moderation. I had a ban from seeker, and when co fronted with posts that had the same offenses as mine, he could only say "I can't take action unless you link me to the posts".

Oh you gave me a good chuckle. You're looking for the community automated ban list and automated ban list. You can learn what other people think about Seeker's "I can't even" or your hopes in moderator bingo (salacious stuff).

It's public knowledge. Like your three pages of mod notes. But behind the scenes, I'm always negotiating with mods to extend the lengths of bans for people I politically disagree with ... I just never thought anybody would notice!!!

((Moderation has been good in thread, I was wrong to suspect the RiK/Sabotage was a new mod direction.
Though I could argue for less restraint in these 'XD Chess' contentless memes:
On December 09 2016 10:22 Nebuchad wrote:
I never understood the appeal of the Trump 7d chess narrative. If he's playing 7d chess, you're the pawns.

Reported, unactioned
On December 09 2016 10:59 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2016 10:40 xDaunt wrote:
On December 09 2016 10:22 Nebuchad wrote:
I never understood the appeal of the Trump 7d chess narrative. If he's playing 7d chess, you're the pawns.

I know you guys don't want to hear this, but y'all on the left are badly underestimating Trump. Trump is going to keep winning politically until y'all wise up and start looking at him with a real critical eye as opposed to through the lens of the stupid the caricature that the media and democrats have provided y'all with. Believe me when I say that I hope y'all stay the course.


I'm not even discussing the likelihood of his playing 7d chess, I think it's pretty obvious that he isn't but that's not really a conversation I'm interested in having. I'm just asking why you want that to be the case. If he's playing 7d chess, clearly one of his moves has been to convince you that he wanted to do what you want him to do.

I didn't bother, previous was unactioned
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 11 2016 18:35 GMT
#732
I think I'm going to dust off my report button on a few posts I see that I feel are actionable and see if I notice this previously mentioned inconsistency in moderation. Will report back in whenever.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 13 2016 16:27 GMT
#733
There's enough hypocrisy in someone with a broken report button saying "this thread should be up to my standards in moderation" but when you go on further to post like shit it's a double whammy of hypocrisy.

On December 14 2016 01:02 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 14 2016 00:57 LegalLord wrote:
On December 14 2016 00:52 zlefin wrote:
On December 14 2016 00:49 LegalLord wrote:
On December 14 2016 00:47 zlefin wrote:
On December 14 2016 00:37 Danglars wrote:
On December 14 2016 00:15 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 14 2016 00:03 Danglars wrote:
On December 13 2016 22:11 Acrofales wrote:
On December 13 2016 21:11 Danglars wrote:
[quote]
I agree. Oh, and continued hysteria brings about some nasty parallels. The NYT, among other outlets, are trying to accomplish exactly what they're accusing Russia of trying to do.

This is a bit of a weird perspective. For starters, the NYT didn't hack anything or anybody. So even if you take the stance that the NYT was trying to influence the elections and that that is the problem (hint: it isn´t), they did so through legal means.

Moreover, Russia is not a newspaper, it is a foreign nation. You seem to be playing down the problems of a foreign nation explicitly trying to influence the elections through illicit means. Why? Just because your guy won? Would it have been okay if Russia had hacked the RNC (they might have) and dumped all Priebus' emails on Wikileaks (they didn't) with the explicit goal of discrediting the RNC and Trump, in order to influence people to vote for Hillary?

I'm making a comparison along intentions/goals, not trying to call the NYT Russia or justify hacking. Calm down.

But comparing intentions and goals without discussing method is apples and oranges.

Person A wants a nice shirt and buys it from a store
Person B wants a nice shirt and shoplifts it.

Person A cannot be critical of Person B because both wanted a nice shirt.
Horseshit.

The NYT trying to change someone's opinion with articles and Russia hacking US officials and selectively releasing dirt on the candidate they want to lose are not the same thing and your comparison is strait garbage and just illustrates how weak your argument against Russia's involvement is.

Then we're lost in your sea of equivocation. And if you think I'm making an argument against Russia's involvement, you're an inventor extraordinaire. "Cannot be critical" is not what has been done, and is not what is being done. If this is all true about Russia, they're lightweights compared to the real harm the NYT article and others in that vein by acting like the election was stolen (and broadly among other outlets, the electors should factor that in, or we should've had recounts. Like original article & response it's Hillary and the Dems reneging on promises of accepting the results of the election).

will you accept the claim that Trump has done great and real harm to our country, and will continue to do so?
If so, I'll accept your claim that the NYT stuff and similar is doing real harm.

And how do you define "doing harm to our country" in this context?

I think harm is a clear enough term to not need explanation; especially as danglars can use his own definition since I responded to his use of the term.

Fantastic. So you use an ambiguous definition of "doing harm" and you fail to define what you mean. And so it could arbitrarily be true or false because there is no standard by which that can be evaluated.

Give a definition of what you mean by "doing harm" because there is no clear context by which that is true. Otherwise the response is simply that no, he isn't doing harm, he is merely making America great again. And the definition of that is clear enough to need no explanation.

what I'm hearing is: you uselessly interject into someone else's conversation to quibble about their word choice, in a way that's not helpful to the question they asked or the larger discussion. You also ignore my clear point about definitions which leaves danglars with something he can use very easily; namely my already explicitly stated point that Danglars can use his OWN definition when answering the question.



Let me try:

Person 1: Do you think Trump is making America great again?
Person 2: What do you mean by "great again" exactly?
Person 1: I think the definition speaks for itself.
Person 2: Well then that's a non-statement since that could basically mean anything...
Person 1: WELL I DIDNT EVEN ASK YOU'RE OPINION UR JUST INTERJECTING

or:

Person 1: Do you think Trump is basically Hitler?
Person 2: What do you mean by "basically Hitler" exactly?
Person 1: I think the definition speaks for itself.
Person 2: Well then that's a non-statement since that could basically mean anything...
Person 1: WELL I DIDNT EVEN ASK YOU'RE OPINION UR JUST INTERJECTING

I suppose the saying "those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" applies here. Don't talk about how we should "action liars and people who post badly" when your own posting is utter shit. Start with yourself.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
December 13 2016 17:07 GMT
#734
slefin operates in a narrow world where words mean exactly and only what he thinks they mean.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-13 18:20:06
December 13 2016 18:16 GMT
#735
I was'nt going to request a mod review of the alleged incident; but since Legal choose to assert unfounded and inaccurate things against me; deliberately strawmanning my clear points. I do request mods go over that chain for his violations.
shame on him for such an unjustified accusation of hypocrisy.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-13 18:35:30
December 13 2016 18:29 GMT
#736
It seems to me that a more accurate description of what happened would be:

Person 1: The NYT is doing harm by acting like the election was stolen
Person 2: Well, would you say Trump has similarly been doing harm to the country?
Person 3: Hey person 2, what do you mean by "doing harm"?
Person 2: The same thing person 1 meant.
Person 3: *flips out at person 2*

By "forgetting" to mention that Danglars is the one who used "doing harm" first and that zlefin explicitly told you he was using it like Danglars, you're painting a completely inaccurate picture of the exchange. In any case, just report his post if you feel it violates forum guidelines. There's no need to attack him here.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 13 2016 18:51 GMT
#737
Kwizach, since you continually butt in to play bothersome semantic games and/or bring up old grudges (not just his post but in general over the past few weeks), I feel the need to say this once: I do not wish to discuss any topic with you. I have made it clear what I think of your posting, and I would appreciate it if you would fuck off. I do not care what you think about this topic, that topic, these topics, those topics, or any topic. I would appreciate it if there were not a troll constantly following me around spewing unwanted commentary from the sidelines. I realize my posts on your posting issues in this thread have made the point they were intended to make and that I've brought them up more times than necessary for the points I had, and as long as you can refrain from following me around like a troll I will not be making any more of them (because Drone is right that in a way I drone on and on about them). I can't really force you to do it one way or the other, but just know that the request was made.

As for Danglars, he defined quite well in what way the NYT was "doing harm" while zlefin did no such thing with Trump. He was quite confused as well as to what was meant there, by the way.

I do not have any particular problem with zlefin as a poster, except for his inability to adequately acknowledge the hypocrisy of going to this thread and complaining about other posters being "not up to his standards" when people could damn well point out the hypocrisy in that view.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
December 13 2016 19:24 GMT
#738
I can't help but snicker at Legal's last statement; and the parallels with the situation. he accuses another of unwanted commentary from the sidelines when that is what I accused him of.

I'd really rather just wait for the mods to review the matter, but since you seem so interested in discussing here beforehand:
I'm not being a hypocrite; I wish the standards were higher, but they are not, so I post at the standards extant in the thread, and work on posting better to the extent I can. I'd also claim that my posts are in general quite good; and the poor ones are only in response to other people's poor ones, so if there were no other poor ones, mine would always be good.
And my contention is generally that the thread would be better with higher moderation standards; not that my own posts live up to that high standard all the time.

and if danglars is unclear about what I mean; he can ask me himself, or simply not answer my question.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 13 2016 19:39 GMT
#739
The mods can act as they see fit. As for me, I will simply leave my point as "those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" and before you accuse other posters of acting banworthy you should look at yourself.

No further commentary.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
December 13 2016 19:43 GMT
#740
Fortunately, I live in a stone house, so throwing stones won't really be a problem.
And I already addressed and dealt with your point.

still seemed unnecessary for you to also go off on kwizach.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Prev 1 35 36 37 38 39 322 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #94
CranKy Ducklings146
LiquipediaDiscussion
GSL Code S
08:00
Semi-Finals & Finals
Rogue vs ClassicLIVE!
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .121
Rex 91
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 6823
Rain 5769
Bisu 2869
Horang2 1377
Pusan 792
Larva 628
BeSt 397
Stork 292
Mini 244
EffOrt 156
[ Show more ]
Last 140
Leta 135
Soulkey 127
hero 111
Hyun 109
Killer 73
sSak 54
ToSsGirL 47
ZerO 45
Aegong 44
Shinee 26
HiyA 21
sas.Sziky 14
JulyZerg 13
Movie 10
SilentControl 9
Noble 7
ivOry 5
Hm[arnc] 5
eros_byul 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe543
Fuzer 202
Pyrionflax148
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1053
flusha476
edward91
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0399
Mew2King103
Westballz62
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor322
Other Games
singsing1760
XaKoH 204
ZerO(Twitch)8
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream14362
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4152
Other Games
gamesdonequick625
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 12
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 89
• Adnapsc2 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2127
• WagamamaTV121
League of Legends
• Stunt568
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Qualifier
5h 2m
BSL: ProLeague
7h 2m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
13h 2m
Wardi Open
1d
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
RSL Revival
1d 23h
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
SC Evo League
6 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-11
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.