• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:24
CEST 12:24
KST 19:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
How Long Does ACCA Take After BCom? Everything You Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 605 users

US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 206

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 204 205 206 207 208 322 Next
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
November 28 2018 12:58 GMT
#4101
--- Nuked ---
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
December 03 2018 12:42 GMT
#4102
On December 03 2018 21:02 ReditusSum wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2018 20:57 iamthedave wrote:
On December 03 2018 20:55 ReditusSum wrote:
On December 03 2018 02:18 Mohdoo wrote:
On December 03 2018 02:08 Acrofales wrote:
On December 03 2018 00:51 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 03 2018 00:42 Silvanel wrote:
On December 02 2018 22:51 georgehabadasher wrote:
The article said California has 19 million registered voters, not 19 million eligible voters.

Can non registered vote?
No.

The US uses an system here eligible voters have to register that they want to vote before actually being allowed to do so.
If you didn't register in time you can't vote on election day.

Its an antiquated system that one party has no interest in replacing because it would hurt their ability to suppress certain demographics from voting.

A quick google gives me 25 mil eligible voters in California and 19mil registered. Donno how that compares to the rest of the US.

As a foreigner living in Spain, I have to explicitly register to vote in the municipal elections. Simply being registered as living there is insufficient. It's not a hard process (they sent me a letter with a code on it that I could use on the website to register for voting), but it is something you have to do. I don't think it's so farfetched to require people to show some interest in the democratic process before election day? Assuming the process is simple and accessible for everybody.



But why require it? What is gained by requiring someone to sign up? Status quo should be that someone does vote. Voting is, imo, a duty, not just a right. Choosing not to participate is unethical and I think it is good for government to encourage participation.

Having less than 90% turnout is a failure. The fact that the entire planet has issues with voting participation shouldn't make us lose track of what the ideal scenario is. We have a lot of cultural work to do and I think automatic registration helps with participation frrlibg more implied than optional.

I should not have to vote if I don't want to vote. I do not support democracy as a governing system so forcing me to engage in the system is an abuse of power.


Interesting. What's your preference to Democracy?

I'm not sure yet. I'd need to do more research. I'm leaning toward theocratic-monarchy with some democratic elements as regards to local councils and what-not; maybe some kind of National Senate appointed by the State Governors (who would be more like Dukes; a hereditary position of basically absolute authority within the State) that has some kind of advisory, possibly more important function.

I intially wrote a far more sardonic reply to this, but it's hard to tell with this guy whether he is genuine or trolling. Then again he did say that he did think that 1250s where peaceful times for people's souls.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9621 Posts
December 04 2018 13:37 GMT
#4103
On December 03 2018 21:42 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2018 21:02 ReditusSum wrote:
On December 03 2018 20:57 iamthedave wrote:
On December 03 2018 20:55 ReditusSum wrote:
On December 03 2018 02:18 Mohdoo wrote:
On December 03 2018 02:08 Acrofales wrote:
On December 03 2018 00:51 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 03 2018 00:42 Silvanel wrote:
On December 02 2018 22:51 georgehabadasher wrote:
The article said California has 19 million registered voters, not 19 million eligible voters.

Can non registered vote?
No.

The US uses an system here eligible voters have to register that they want to vote before actually being allowed to do so.
If you didn't register in time you can't vote on election day.

Its an antiquated system that one party has no interest in replacing because it would hurt their ability to suppress certain demographics from voting.

A quick google gives me 25 mil eligible voters in California and 19mil registered. Donno how that compares to the rest of the US.

As a foreigner living in Spain, I have to explicitly register to vote in the municipal elections. Simply being registered as living there is insufficient. It's not a hard process (they sent me a letter with a code on it that I could use on the website to register for voting), but it is something you have to do. I don't think it's so farfetched to require people to show some interest in the democratic process before election day? Assuming the process is simple and accessible for everybody.



But why require it? What is gained by requiring someone to sign up? Status quo should be that someone does vote. Voting is, imo, a duty, not just a right. Choosing not to participate is unethical and I think it is good for government to encourage participation.

Having less than 90% turnout is a failure. The fact that the entire planet has issues with voting participation shouldn't make us lose track of what the ideal scenario is. We have a lot of cultural work to do and I think automatic registration helps with participation frrlibg more implied than optional.

I should not have to vote if I don't want to vote. I do not support democracy as a governing system so forcing me to engage in the system is an abuse of power.


Interesting. What's your preference to Democracy?

I'm not sure yet. I'd need to do more research. I'm leaning toward theocratic-monarchy with some democratic elements as regards to local councils and what-not; maybe some kind of National Senate appointed by the State Governors (who would be more like Dukes; a hereditary position of basically absolute authority within the State) that has some kind of advisory, possibly more important function.

I intially wrote a far more sardonic reply to this, but it's hard to tell with this guy whether he is genuine or trolling. Then again he did say that he did think that 1250s where peaceful times for people's souls.


Remeber when your ability to rule was judged solely by what family line you are from?
Those were the days, I definitely don't remember that causing any issues
RIP Meatloaf <3
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
December 15 2018 16:42 GMT
#4104
Well it wasn't necessarily a matter of having the 'ability' to rule. You were part of x line ergo you had to rule, and god be praised if we get someone competent this time. And there's always the dagger if we don't.

I think RSum has generally demonstrated a lack of understanding of the history he's referencing, given the assumptions he makes about such times (even about the 'quality' of faith in those times, which I'd say is arguably his main focus). On those grounds there's little value to be gained from talking about it.

On its face I don't think it's necessarily an impossible or even horrible idea, but only with serious thought given to how the past centuries have exposed serious flaws in the church.

Whatever theology of choice would have to be severely altered to prevent wealth acquisition for such an idea to be remotely practical (since wealth was the whole corrupting problem the first time round).
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
December 29 2018 18:56 GMT
#4105
--- Nuked ---
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
December 30 2018 17:59 GMT
#4106
Aya's been on a bit of a roll: ten mod actions in 2018, eight since July. Most of it involves poor posting in USMT.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
December 31 2018 20:54 GMT
#4107
--- Nuked ---
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-02 00:48:41
January 02 2019 00:48 GMT
#4108
Introvert wrote:
by what measure? They gained House seats and took over the Senate in 2014.

edit: however this outrage on behalf of the federal workforce is great fun to read. You can all keep pretending that I'm trashing federal workers if it makes you feel better.

edit2: below post is exactly what I'm talking about lmao

User was temp banned for this post.

Introvert was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.

That account was created on 2011-04-18 15:54:46 and had 3564 posts.

Reason: I don't care about your political views, but don't make fun of people less fortunate than you.

It looks like he was just giving his perspective on the frequency of shutdowns, long term impact (given universal recovery of all lost pay at the end of it), and how many people were intentionally falsely interpreting his perspective (which I happen to agree with).

Think what you wish about whether or not his political appraisal is accurate, but you should at least be able to debate the long term ramifications of shutdowns in today's political climate.

If even Introvert can't bring it up, who can? I hope cooler heads (Liquid'Drone maybe? Falling?) prevail on the mods to reverse the decision or speak out.

I expect the next couple of years to involve dozens more "Take it or leave it" temporary funding bills where the entire debate is whether or not certain funding or defunding is worth a partial government shutdown.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
January 02 2019 01:14 GMT
#4109
That seems like an odd post to get KBB's attention and banhammer unreported?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
January 02 2019 01:43 GMT
#4110
On January 02 2019 10:14 GreenHorizons wrote:
That seems like an odd post to get KBB's attention and banhammer unreported?

The only attention I want is mods that regularly read and post in this thread and can evaluate Introvert's ban on the merits for their own, and they might interact with KBB or reduce the ban on their own intiative.

Alternatively, they can inform me of what I'm missing about the ban reason and his past posting.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-02 12:41:31
January 02 2019 01:49 GMT
#4111
On January 02 2019 10:43 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 02 2019 10:14 GreenHorizons wrote:
That seems like an odd post to get KBB's attention and banhammer unreported?

The only attention I want is mods that regularly read and post in this thread and can evaluate Introvert's ban on the merits for their own, and they might interact with KBB or reduce the ban on their own intiative.

Alternatively, they can inform me of what I'm missing about the ban reason and his past posting.


I didn't mean yours I meant I don't think anyone reported introverts post so it was simply something KBB read and actioned on his own while perusing the thread I guess. I just thought it seemed odd is all.

I rarely had such luck where a post I found trivializing the suffering of less fortunate people was acted on reported or not.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-02 19:59:01
January 02 2019 19:57 GMT
#4112
i'm 50/50 on the intro ban. feels a little harsh (maybe a warning instead?), but he also seemed to go out of the way to insist there was no human cost/ impact to the shutdown in a rather dickish way, and then mock/strawman others about it.

there are some mod actions that come from non participating mods which sometime feel a little out of the blue/ harsh, but that might be due to the thread being a rather unique posting environment overall, i guess.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-02 22:06:12
January 02 2019 20:16 GMT
#4113
On January 03 2019 04:57 ticklishmusic wrote:
i'm 50/50 on the intro ban. feels a little harsh (maybe a warning instead?), but he also seemed to go out of the way to insist there was no human cost/ impact to the shutdown in a rather dickish way, and then mock/strawman others about it.

there are some mod actions that come from non participating mods which sometime feel a little out of the blue/ harsh, but that might be due to the thread being a rather unique posting environment overall, i guess.


He merely pointed out/corrected facts regarding the previous shut down and then everyone else in the thread decided that he was pro shutdown and disregarding any valuable discussion that could actually happen. Reminds me of a few months ago when I was discussing gerrymandering and quite a few people explaining to me why gerrymandering was bad instead of discussing actual solutions over and over again.

You can certainly justify it with his edited comment to Fallingmicronesia, but it is frustrating to try to have a discussion with people who aren't having a discussion.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 02 2019 20:27 GMT
#4114
On January 03 2019 05:16 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2019 04:57 ticklishmusic wrote:
i'm 50/50 on the intro ban. feels a little harsh (maybe a warning instead?), but he also seemed to go out of the way to insist there was no human cost/ impact to the shutdown in a rather dickish way, and then mock/strawman others about it.

there are some mod actions that come from non participating mods which sometime feel a little out of the blue/ harsh, but that might be due to the thread being a rather unique posting environment overall, i guess.


He merely pointed out/corrected facts regarding the previous shut down and then everyone else in the thread decided that he was pro shutdown and disregarding any valuable discussion that could actually happen. Reminds me of a few months ago when I was discussing gerrymandering and quite a few people explaining to me why gerrymandering was bad instead of discussing actual solutions over and over again.

You can certainly justify it with his edited comment to Falling, but it is frustrating to try to have a discussion with people who aren't having a discussion.

Labeling outrage over people directly affected by a government shutdown as "great fun to read" is not trying to have a discussion about it. There were half a dozen different ways he could have posted if he wanted to transition into a conversation about the ins and outs of a government shutdown. The action might seem like it came from left field, but I would have to go well out of my way to say something that douchey about other people. I don't have a terrible amount of sympathy for him.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 02 2019 20:43 GMT
#4115
On January 03 2019 05:16 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2019 04:57 ticklishmusic wrote:
i'm 50/50 on the intro ban. feels a little harsh (maybe a warning instead?), but he also seemed to go out of the way to insist there was no human cost/ impact to the shutdown in a rather dickish way, and then mock/strawman others about it.

there are some mod actions that come from non participating mods which sometime feel a little out of the blue/ harsh, but that might be due to the thread being a rather unique posting environment overall, i guess.


He merely pointed out/corrected facts regarding the previous shut down and then everyone else in the thread decided that he was pro shutdown and disregarding any valuable discussion that could actually happen. Reminds me of a few months ago when I was discussing gerrymandering and quite a few people explaining to me why gerrymandering was bad instead of discussing actual solutions over and over again.

You can certainly justify it with his edited comment to Falling, but it is frustrating to try to have a discussion with people who aren't having a discussion.

Like many long time posters, introvert ban has more to do with a history in the thread than the one specific post. On the topic of immigration he can get a bit hyperbolic while glossing some of the more repugnant of current immigration policy. People are used to it and get annoyed quickly.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
January 02 2019 21:02 GMT
#4116
On January 03 2019 05:16 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2019 04:57 ticklishmusic wrote:
i'm 50/50 on the intro ban. feels a little harsh (maybe a warning instead?), but he also seemed to go out of the way to insist there was no human cost/ impact to the shutdown in a rather dickish way, and then mock/strawman others about it.

there are some mod actions that come from non participating mods which sometime feel a little out of the blue/ harsh, but that might be due to the thread being a rather unique posting environment overall, i guess.


He merely pointed out/corrected facts regarding the previous shut down and then everyone else in the thread decided that he was pro shutdown and disregarding any valuable discussion that could actually happen. Reminds me of a few months ago when I was discussing gerrymandering and quite a few people explaining to me why gerrymandering was bad instead of discussing actual solutions over and over again.

You can certainly justify it with his edited comment to Falling, but it is frustrating to try to have a discussion with people who aren't having a discussion.

Your use of the word “merely” is incorrect; he “corrected” others and then added in a bunch of careless hyperbole that is plainly contradicted by some basic facts about how this shutdown has affected federal workers and those who depend on federal functions.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
January 02 2019 22:05 GMT
#4117
On January 03 2019 06:02 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2019 05:16 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:
On January 03 2019 04:57 ticklishmusic wrote:
i'm 50/50 on the intro ban. feels a little harsh (maybe a warning instead?), but he also seemed to go out of the way to insist there was no human cost/ impact to the shutdown in a rather dickish way, and then mock/strawman others about it.

there are some mod actions that come from non participating mods which sometime feel a little out of the blue/ harsh, but that might be due to the thread being a rather unique posting environment overall, i guess.


He merely pointed out/corrected facts regarding the previous shut down and then everyone else in the thread decided that he was pro shutdown and disregarding any valuable discussion that could actually happen. Reminds me of a few months ago when I was discussing gerrymandering and quite a few people explaining to me why gerrymandering was bad instead of discussing actual solutions over and over again.

You can certainly justify it with his edited comment to Fallingmicronesia, but it is frustrating to try to have a discussion with people who aren't having a discussion.

Your use of the word “merely” is incorrect; he “corrected” others and then added in a bunch of careless hyperbole that is plainly contradicted by some basic facts about how this shutdown has affected federal workers and those who depend on federal functions.


Not gonna defend his phrasing, but I think people are hung up on the hyperbole instead of addressing the issue.

Not sure if he edited this post after I read it, but don't recall the jab being there when I did.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
January 02 2019 22:16 GMT
#4118
Seems clear he's talking about the political implications not whether fed workers are going to feel like poor Americans for a couple weeks and the trouble that causes for people.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21658 Posts
January 02 2019 22:25 GMT
#4119
On January 03 2019 07:16 GreenHorizons wrote:
Seems clear he's talking about the political implications not whether fed workers are going to feel like poor Americans for a couple weeks and the trouble that causes for people.

On January 01 2019 10:22 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 01 2019 10:18 micronesia wrote:
On January 01 2019 09:57 Introvert wrote:
Also, a friendly reminder that no one cares about shutdowns. When it's over we'll forget it happened. Well most people will, the base of either party won't, but all the leaders have to do is convince their bases that they fought as hard as they could. How many shutdowns without consequences do we need to have?

This is not very friendly but is very insensitive. Government shutdowns cause hardship to many people.

I meant as a broader political issue. That being said, government shutdowns have been happening on and off for over 30 years, by now if you go into the federal workforce you should be aware that it is something you will deal with multiple times throughout your career. Most of them are short and don't hurt that much anyways.

It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23209 Posts
January 02 2019 22:47 GMT
#4120
On January 03 2019 07:25 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2019 07:16 GreenHorizons wrote:
Seems clear he's talking about the political implications not whether fed workers are going to feel like poor Americans for a couple weeks and the trouble that causes for people.

Show nested quote +
On January 01 2019 10:22 Introvert wrote:
On January 01 2019 10:18 micronesia wrote:
On January 01 2019 09:57 Introvert wrote:
Also, a friendly reminder that no one cares about shutdowns. When it's over we'll forget it happened. Well most people will, the base of either party won't, but all the leaders have to do is convince their bases that they fought as hard as they could. How many shutdowns without consequences do we need to have?

This is not very friendly but is very insensitive. Government shutdowns cause hardship to many people.

I meant as a broader political issue. That being said, government shutdowns have been happening on and off for over 30 years, by now if you go into the federal workforce you should be aware that it is something you will deal with multiple times throughout your career. Most of them are short and don't hurt that much anyways.



Is that not accurate? Do these workers have it worse than a typical citizen working for poverty wages? If it's not worse than making poverty wages I'd say "don't hurt that much" is a fair assessment. That said you can bring it to my Blog because we're venturing away from feedback.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 204 205 206 207 208 322 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #136
CranKy Ducklings34
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 275
Nina 224
StarCraft: Brood War
BeSt 3617
Mini 989
Larva 469
Soma 358
firebathero 295
Hyun 267
Pusan 199
TY 183
Dewaltoss 171
Sharp 132
[ Show more ]
Barracks 130
Backho 97
Last 76
ToSsGirL 62
Free 43
Bonyth 35
sorry 26
zelot 25
ajuk12(nOOB) 17
Britney 0
Sea 0
Dota 2
Gorgc5287
singsing1713
XcaliburYe374
League of Legends
JimRising 433
Super Smash Bros
Westballz42
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor203
Other Games
Happy353
DeMusliM246
Fuzer 227
SortOf92
Trikslyr26
Lowko0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2603
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 408
UltimateBattle 70
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH228
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2172
League of Legends
• Jankos1506
• Stunt790
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
1h 36m
CSO Contender
6h 36m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 36m
Online Event
1d 5h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.