EPTI'm just assuming he posted some article without offering his views on it. I didn't bother to look for the post, but I'm just assuming it was the same thing as it was for me. I gave a sarcastic comment on an article, but I didn't actually do a "here's what I think of it" kinda deal. I can't imagine Seeker has some sorta vendetta against a_flayer and made up a totally bogus claim that we could all see was false lol.
US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 160
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
I'm just assuming he posted some article without offering his views on it. I didn't bother to look for the post, but I'm just assuming it was the same thing as it was for me. I gave a sarcastic comment on an article, but I didn't actually do a "here's what I think of it" kinda deal. I can't imagine Seeker has some sorta vendetta against a_flayer and made up a totally bogus claim that we could all see was false lol. | ||
|
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24289 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On July 13 2018 05:08 GreenHorizons wrote: Right now I'm of the opinion there isn't an offending post and it was a bullshit reason. There very well may be a post though. What do you think Seeker's motivation for banning a_flayer is? | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24289 Posts
On July 13 2018 05:26 Mohdoo wrote: What do you think Seeker's motivation for banning a_flayer is? He wanted to ban him. I just think the reason was bullshit. | ||
|
Excludos
Norway8278 Posts
On July 13 2018 05:27 GreenHorizons wrote: He wanted to ban him. I just think the reason was bullshit. I mean the reason is stated quite clearly. I also disagree with the rule in itself (I think it only enforces people to not post sources for their comments, as even links followed by a statement and a followup discussion gets warned), but it is a rule nonetheless. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24289 Posts
On July 13 2018 05:36 Excludos wrote: I mean the reason is stated quite clearly. I also disagree with the rule in itself (I think it only enforces people to not post sources for their comments, as even links followed by a statement and a followup discussion gets warned), but it is a rule nonetheless. Not the rule itself (well sorta but I understand why it exists), I'm saying there's no post offending said rule. Of course if bans included links to the offending post or the offending posts were notated in some way this wouldn't be an issue. Alas, here we are with blind faith by some and skepticism on my part. Barring the aforementioned remedies, the simplest way to quell this skepticism would be to provide the offending post. I don't think there is one (as I've said), I don't think one is coming. Based on those reasons, I think the ban reason was bullshit. a_flyer may well have had some post somewhere violating some rule, but the stated reason (and as of yet to be provided post) don't seem to be it. Hence the calling of bullshit. | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 13 2018 05:08 GreenHorizons wrote: Right now I'm of the opinion there isn't an offending post and it was a bullshit reason. There very well may be a post though. I reported him for lacking context for one of the links he posted lol. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24289 Posts
On July 13 2018 07:14 Doodsmack wrote: I reported him for lacking context for one of the links he posted lol. I'm not surprised, you want to share it with us? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
 | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14195 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24289 Posts
On July 13 2018 10:14 Doodsmack wrote: He had a post with two links I believe, and one of them only had one sentence of context. It had a spoilered video, but you had to watch the video to get context. We're getting closer... | ||
|
Blitzkrieg0
United States13132 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/532255-us-politics-mega-thread?page=451#9015 This one got reported so I'm assuming it's this one. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/532255-us-politics-mega-thread?page=443#8856 Close but it wasn't reported. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24289 Posts
On July 13 2018 10:39 Blitzkrieg0 wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/532255-us-politics-mega-thread?page=451#9015 This one got reported so I'm assuming it's this one. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/532255-us-politics-mega-thread?page=443#8856 Close but it wasn't reported. lol, that seems silly but at least now we know. Now I'm just curious how long is it supposed to last? | ||
|
iamthedave
England2814 Posts
| ||
|
Excludos
Norway8278 Posts
On July 13 2018 18:21 iamthedave wrote: What got GH banned? That's a site ban too. No idea, but sounds like he martyred himself | ||
| ||
