Explicitly naming a build, either after yourself (the Tastelss build is an exception) or with some non-descriptive name is just annoying and stupid. If the build is worthy of being named then people will name it as a community.
Self-Titled Build Orders - Opinions? - Page 3
Blogs > Synystyr |
Logo
United States7542 Posts
Explicitly naming a build, either after yourself (the Tastelss build is an exception) or with some non-descriptive name is just annoying and stupid. If the build is worthy of being named then people will name it as a community. | ||
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
Meanwhile you have people like FaZe who purposley stated that he wanted something named after him hence the void ray fazing. Then theres "The Gretorp build" in early/mid beta for PvT, which was just a marine ghost sorta play. "The Cauthonluck Build" which I suppose was more of a root thing that designated the build that name. It really does vary, but I think every build should have a generic name, not named after someone unless its actually revolutionary ie: Bisu build, Flash build, etc. | ||
Turgid
United States1623 Posts
The only real Tasteless build is a cannon rush btw. | ||
a176
Canada6688 Posts
SMH | ||
Synystyr
United States1446 Posts
On February 26 2011 04:45 a176 wrote: trying to get away with naming unit bombing after yourself was incredibly arrogant and stupid. like what, trying to take advantage of all the newbies in SC2 to make a name for yourself? it annoyed me even more than Day9 decided to do an entire episode about it. SMH I hope you're not confusing me with Stalife I never did such thing sir. But I do agree with you there. Griffith naming the magic box after himself and Stalife naming unit bombing after himself are both absolutely ridiculous. Not original =[ | ||
| ||