User was warned for this post
Wikileaks: Yellowcake Uranium in Iraq - Page 10
Forum Index > Closed |
zizou21
United States3683 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
Liquoid
United Kingdom275 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
pi_rate_pir_ate
United States179 Posts
| ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
I heard these frenzied screams about "No Blood for Oil" and alleged connections to Halliburton for so many Bush years. This Wikileaks revelation is humorous now, to say the least. | ||
jmillz
73 Posts
On December 14 2010 14:48 Danglars wrote: So USA indeed invaded Iraq because it really did have WMD's? I heard these frenzied screams about "No Blood for Oil" and alleged connections to Halliburton for so many Bush years. This Wikileaks revelation is humorous now, to say the least. read the article not the title, if u cant be helped then just skim through some posts here in this thread. everyone is being mislead, this is no revelation and def not a turning point. in fact close and delete this thread. | ||
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
On December 14 2010 14:35 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: I think everybody knew Saddam had chemical weapons and was trying to get nuclear weapons. after 1991? The ISG begs to differ. | ||
Jemmani
United States76 Posts
On December 14 2010 09:30 Krigwin wrote: Why would they keep a lid on this if it provides justification for the entire war effort? Do they need justification for the war? | ||
Waxangel
United States32926 Posts
| ||
theSkareqro
Singapore102 Posts
On December 14 2010 15:07 Waxangel wrote: I think a lot of people don't actually remember why they were opposed to the war in the first place :o can't blame them though. its been too long and it doesn't even feel like its a war, its more like an invasion. like bullying an already 'broken' person. | ||
neorj
Brazil10 Posts
| ||
A3iL3r0n
United States2196 Posts
| ||
VabuDeltaKaiser
Germany1107 Posts
and they keep coming. if this was op's intention, he is a true genius. all hail to the mastermind, sorting the crop. | ||
WindOw
Sweden407 Posts
Usually lies are mixed in with truth to give the lies credibility. | ||
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
On December 14 2010 15:18 A3iL3r0n wrote: Seems like the thread should be renamed as something more accurate. That, or it could be left open in order to help TL identify and purge itself of people who post without reading Either would work. | ||
Craton
United States17186 Posts
On December 14 2010 15:22 Mindcrime wrote: That, or it could be left open in order to help TL identify and purge itself of people who post without reading Either would work. How is it a case of people not reading the OP if the OP is false? | ||
green.at
Austria1459 Posts
The south park guys would have their fun with this one i guess. It's really ironic that wikileaks kinda defends bush/america here ^^ | ||
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
On December 14 2010 15:33 Craton wrote: How is it a case of people not reading the OP if the OP is false? Do you see any mention of the OP in my last post? | ||
Norway
United States341 Posts
/eyeroll | ||
maliceee
United States634 Posts
On December 14 2010 09:32 sely wrote: This is from a far-right web site with a clear agenda. In 2008, when this yellowcake was supposedly removed from Iraq, George W. Bush was still president. Obama was not inaugurated until Jan 2009. Don't you think 550 metric tons of yellowcake found in Iraq would have been reported in the "mainscream" media during the Bush administration to help justify his war? The use of that pathetic phrase alone discredits this pathetic article. In reality, Dick Cheney outed the identity of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative because her husband, Joe Wilson, did not return Cheney the evidence he wanted. Consequently, over 70 US informants were assassinated. do you believe everything in the movies? your last paragraph is wholly untrue | ||
| ||