Wikileaks: Yellowcake Uranium in Iraq - Page 6
Forum Index > Closed |
Offhand
United States1869 Posts
| ||
rredtooth
5458 Posts
| ||
mav451
United States1596 Posts
| ||
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
US does have counter intelligence agencies you know. | ||
Puzz
Netherlands18 Posts
YES THE WAR ON INFORMATION is see this thread derailing into a discussion about iraq that's to be suspected.... IF this is leaked to wikileaks then .gov just lost the war on info cause they will only leak known stuff like this on purpose. Realy i hope this is not an eye opener for people in here, But the main job of a goverment is to make ppl listen and obay the law. Their main tool is information. The news will tell u the "truth" every day just like they do in every country and if they are right or wrong is for U to decide and for U only. Yes even the things posted on wikileaks...And this is why there is an upset... cause for all country's things got out of hands. The only thing i am surprised with is that ppl actually got to see this shit about wikileaks on the news. And tbh i dont realy do conpiracy theory i just think this is pretty much the truth eventough western media (europe more then us maybe) will bring u what they think is the truth indepently. | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
People referring to yellowcake as evidence of WMDs are fucking dumb. | ||
EzCheeze
United States81 Posts
| ||
Retgery
Canada1229 Posts
| ||
Fzero
United States1503 Posts
Lets Occam's razor a bit and say that all those people who were being tortured would say something about active nuclear warheads. If we want to go to war on the potential dangers in the world, we may as well try to take over the whole thing and tell everyone else to fuck off to the moon. | ||
skindzer
Chile5114 Posts
| ||
synapse
China13814 Posts
On December 14 2010 09:56 sluggaslamoo wrote: No it doesn't. They should have done an inspection, not bomb hospitals, shell peoples houses and kill thousands of innocent victims. I can't believe people would even say this, omg. Well to be fair, that's not exactly what they did. Full-scale invasion? Yes. Killing thousands of innocent victims? That falls more on the terrorists. | ||
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
lowercase
Canada1047 Posts
On December 14 2010 11:01 synapse wrote: Well to be fair, that's not exactly what they did. Full-scale invasion? Yes. Killing thousands of innocent victims? That falls more on the terrorists. True, the USA killed hundreds of thousands. | ||
ERGO
United States168 Posts
Big difference is that this can't be used for anything besides nuclear power and WMDs. Just want everyone to realize how hard it is to turn a pile of uranium into something that will blow up. | ||
GypsyBeast
Canada630 Posts
| ||
FishForThought
Canada88 Posts
It is sad, but the truth is WMD does protect your country and give you a bigger seat at the bargaining table. | ||
Roe
Canada6002 Posts
On December 14 2010 11:12 ERGO wrote: This isn't really a WMD, it's a bunch of shit uranium. It's like saying a block of metal is a fully automatic rifle. Big difference is that this can't be used for anything besides nuclear power and WMDs. Just want everyone to realize how hard it is to turn a pile of uranium into something that will blow up. might want to go into that more, you weren't even clear in the part you did say | ||
Jzerg
84 Posts
The NY Times story (now added to the original post) says: Although the material could not be used in its current form for a nuclear weapon or even a so-called dirty bomb, officials decided that in Iraq's unstable environment, it was important to make sure that it did not fall into the wrong hands. Read: No WMD and continues to say: The yellowcake removed from Iraq - which was not the same yellowcake that President George W. Bush claimed, in a now discredited section of his 2003 State of the Union address, that Saddam was trying to purchase in Africa - could be used in an early stage of the nuclear fuel cycle. ... The vast Tuwaitha site has been bombed repeatedly since 1981, when Israeli warplanes destroyed the Osirak nuclear reactor there before it could be used to make weapons-grade uranium. American warplanes bombed the site in 1991 during the first Gulf War. Read: This was old leftover yellowcake from Saddam's first nuclear program (which was totally bombed and shut down.) According to all the evidence we found, there was no attempt to restart the program nor to purchase additional yellowcake as asserted by Bush - and this article supports that. Honestly, what was Saddam going to do with the leftovers from his previous endeavors (yellowcake & non-functional chemical weapons)? Flush them down the toilet? Of course we found that old leftover stuff, but that had nothing to do with any active programs or actual WMD threat. I don't see what the 'revelation' is. The only revelation would be if we HADN'T found that stuff. | ||
ilj.psa
Peru3081 Posts
| ||
| ||