EPTafter the clusterfuck of actions which will go on then everythings gonna take place in PM land sighhh
mafia letting one of their own get lynched day 1 = epic fail
TL Mafia XXX - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
after the clusterfuck of actions which will go on then everythings gonna take place in PM land sighhh mafia letting one of their own get lynched day 1 = epic fail | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:56 Protactinium wrote: Sorry, I feel like derailing for just one little moment to boost my ego. Are you sure about that, tree.hugger? Disregarding the bomb, detail to me how all the blues were dead by Night 4. Explain to me how Roffles died Night 2, and how we hit a Veteran night 1. And no, I didn't need Subversion to "run naked" through the metaphorical town. We could have killed him any time we wanted. BloodyC0bbler had the blue roster being lakrismamma/sINiquity/bumatlarge (two for three). d3 was read for a vet, and Divinek claimed. The only ones we didn't figure out were the two town KP roles, and there was no need to. Only reason we "sucked" at blue sniping by your definition was because we were nerfed by having 2 KP instead of 3, and having two veterans and two medics makes for permanently invincible people if not stacked. Add to that the fact that if you hit somebody and they survive, they are confirmed town due to the fact that Mafia cannot hit their own. Think about all that, and then tell us again that Mafia sucked at bluesniping last game. Alright, just wanted to say that. Enjoy the game! do you seriously not know what a pm is | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:56 Protactinium wrote: Sorry, I feel like derailing for just one little moment to boost my ego. Are you sure about that, tree.hugger? Disregarding the bomb, detail to me how all the blues were dead by Night 4. Explain to me how Roffles died Night 2, and how we hit a Veteran night 1. And no, I didn't need Subversion to "run naked" through the metaphorical town. We could have killed him any time we wanted. BloodyC0bbler had the blue roster being lakrismamma/sINiquity/bumatlarge (two for three). d3 was read for a vet, and Divinek claimed. The only ones we didn't figure out were the two town KP roles, and there was no need to. Only reason we "sucked" at blue sniping by your definition was because we were nerfed by having 2 KP instead of 3, and having two veterans and two medics makes for permanently invincible people if not stacked. Add to that the fact that if you hit somebody and they survive, they are confirmed town due to the fact that Mafia cannot hit their own. Think about all that, and then tell us again that Mafia sucked at bluesniping last game. Alright, just wanted to say that. Enjoy the game! Nobody likes smurfs. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
The reason for lynching inactives is because it forces activity which is good for the town. Regardless of your alignment if you are not posting and barely contributing you are anti-town. The Traitor role is added to games because having even one town person trying cause problems can balance a game where the mafia is too weak. Every person who creates chaos for sake of chaos or who hides and doesn't post is effectively playing a traitor role. The town feels good if a lynch gets the traitor even though he isn't technically red. For some players even if they flip green town should cheer because at least we got traitor even if in name only. If everyone is active then sure, lets look at posts for day one, but if we have inactives you can be sure I will be voting for them because regardless of how they flip the town is better off. Sorry for the rant, but is something I have been pondering for a while and wanted to share. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:54 bumatlarge wrote: Wow I wasnt one to get on people's ass for what they said on the first day, but I may have to change that. If chez changes his style, I will eat my words. Ive seen him try to be smart about the game and succeed. You are justifying him again. If it works? He was red, and town doesnt lynch him eventually because hes being chezinu (has happened before). DOESNT WORK. Ok hes blue and hes trying to lead the scum astray, but gets lynched eventually. DOESNT WORK. Hes green, and mafia wont touch him anyway, town lynches him eventually, and although hes not blue, still a wasted lynch. DOESNT WORK. Or can I assume that by "it works", you mean it works for mafia. Im not pointing a finger at you, but you excusing him is silly. Chez knows how to act normal. Dont egg him on. I'm not saying "LET'S NOT LYNCH CHEZ BECAUSE OF HIS STYLE! HE'S IMMUNE" I'm saying it's okay for him to play that way and anything that happens down the road that gives town cause to lynch him is fine, but immediately going to lynch him because of the way he always plays is dumb as fuck. Why don't you include the scenario where he possibly snipes a red? Bias bias bias. Look I'm not saying Chez isn't red, I'm just saying your reasoning for lynching him isn't valid at all. | ||
|
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:44 youngminii wrote: Why are you being so hard on Chez? I mean he's not BAD, but when people try to imitate him it's bad (case in point: DTA last game). I don't see why you're trying to force him to change his play when it works for him. Yeah it's annoying but if it works, it works. What's the bet that if Chez does change his style, bum will accuse him of being scum because of his changed ways? Who said I was trying to imitate Chezinu last game? I've already said that Chez's style is much better than what I did last game, and takes more effort than I cared to take at the time. That said, your play wasn't all that great last game either youngminii. The difference is that you were playing seriously and I wasn't, until the end. | ||
|
LarJarsE
United States1378 Posts
BillMurray, right after he got his two "random" votes against him wrote: I proclaim the Random Voting Stage hereby dead. I am voting not for randomness, An obvious reason to stick with my vote. | ||
|
LarJarsE
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
and the random voting stage is already over after only a few hours...???? Oh incoming bandwagon | ||
|
LarJarsE
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
VayeshMoru
201 Posts
If I understand how this game should be done, should we not be concentrating on a more logical method for our lynching? I think it would be at least prudent if we discussed who was getting votes and why. As of now I see Divinek and Bill Murray tied at 3 votes. After looking at this, then comparing to what has been said, why are there no reasons posted? Is this method not too chaotic? | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On August 06 2010 14:32 DarthThienAn wrote: Who said I was trying to imitate Chezinu last game? I've already said that Chez's style is much better than what I did last game, and takes more effort than I cared to take at the time. That said, your play wasn't all that great last game either youngminii. The difference is that you were playing seriously and I wasn't, until the end. I know I played bad, but so did you, and you can't make excuses for that. | ||
|
Iaaan
Canada578 Posts
| ||
|
LarJarsE
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On August 06 2010 14:54 Jayme wrote: I still hate voting for inactives on day one because it's so pointless. and the random voting stage is already over after only a few hours...???? Oh incoming bandwagon 1.Gets people talking(more info) 2.Force potential lurkers/mafia trying to hide to talk more, reveal stuff. 3.(going along with #1) Encourages people to talk and share opinions Compared with random lynching, in which case we have a 1/5 chance of hitting mafia 4/5 chance of NOT Depending on # of Ninjas (someone said 3? I'll go with that) than 1/10 chance of hitting ninja and more of a chance of hitting a blue than a red(on the assumption theres at least one blue of every role.) On August 06 2010 14:57 larjarse wrote: I would say BillMurray's concern about not being randomly voted to be killed justifies that he probably isn't a Townie. Yeah, because its a just cause to accuse someone of being mafia because they have 2 votes out of 30. Not that he's neccesarily innocent, but as of now we should lynch an inactive for the reasons I stated above. | ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
| ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
I would like him to post in the thread though. | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
On August 06 2010 13:32 bumatlarge wrote: What are you even saying? Be sure to post a little bit more, because there isnt much substance here. xD I'm sorry! I'll try to post better, but for me, it's hard to post in the beginning of the game... Vote count is: (3) Bill Murray (1) Divinek (1) Misder (1) Chezinu (1) Youngminii This leaves my suspicions on BM. If everyone randomized, BM would be more likely to get a higher vote count (due to already having 2 votes on him). I'm not voting yet though; don't want to be impulsive... | ||
| ||
