Don't you think it would be better to have the min only as the gold minerals ? It seems to mee the corners are more easy to take. Also it would make you decide between more gas and a high yield

AngryAsian

Canada68 Posts

April 23 2010 13:25 GMT

#23

should have been grassland........

DarkSaieden

South Africa254 Posts

April 23 2010 13:33 GMT

#24

On April 23 2010 22:16 Marradron wrote:
Don't you think it would be better to have the min only as the gold minerals ? It seems to mee the corners are more easy to take. Also it would make you decide between more gas and a high yield

was thinking the same thing..

also, will it be ok having 2 gas at at all gas expansions? this *could* affect the balance of the metagame in quite a big way compared to other maps which i believe only have 2 gas at the main

Spenguin

Australia3316 Posts

April 23 2010 13:36 GMT

#25

Most maps have 2 gas at all bases iirc

Osmoses

Sweden5302 Posts

April 23 2010 13:39 GMT

#26

What's the point of splitting the gas into 2 if you can't have the option of putting just one at an exp? Hell, consider putting 3, it's the map maker's priviliege.

I like python fine, looking forward to this, but come on, jungle seeet!

LordWeird

United States3411 Posts

April 23 2010 13:39 GMT

#27

It's looking good so far. Nice work

YPang

United States4024 Posts

April 23 2010 14:08 GMT

#28

im a little behind on the news but map editor's already out/useable? :O

LordWeird

United States3411 Posts

April 23 2010 14:09 GMT

#29

On April 23 2010 23:08 YPang wrote:
im a little behind on the news but map editor's already out/useable? :O

Yeah, it came out in the latest patch.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=120910

awesome news imo

Pulimuli

Sweden2766 Posts

April 23 2010 14:22 GMT

#30

On April 23 2010 22:33 DarkSaieden wrote:

Show nested quote +

uh? all maps have 2 gas on every expansion

great work btw, looks cool

Fogul

United Kingdom179 Posts

April 23 2010 14:29 GMT

#31

balancing maps for reapers will probably be the hardest thing for map makers

GHOSTCLAW

United States17042 Posts

April 23 2010 14:30 GMT

#32

i'm 99% sure that you'll be able to cliff on this maps in spots that you couldn't cliff in bw - example being top left to 9 nat. Already commented on upon furthur inspection

design/sc2 related questions
should reapers/stalkers/cliff mobility units be able to get to the islands from the center?
what about colossi?
muta harass in close positions is going to be basically unstoppable -_-;
high mineral yield?

Nightmarjoo

United States3359 Posts

April 23 2010 14:50 GMT

#33

The main bases don't look very close in size to me.

never_Nal

Costa Rica676 Posts

April 23 2010 14:51 GMT

#34

I think the 2 gases on 8 o clock main will interfere with the ramp and getting out?

wishbones

Canada2600 Posts

April 23 2010 14:59 GMT

#35

how did you get the editor to do that, i keep trying and get stuck with a map with mineral placement, and nothing else, the map is completely black, and not smoothed. I just tried blood bath, but this cant be right, you wouldn't have smoothed that whole map and rebuilt it from scratch? or did you.

JohannesH

Finland1364 Posts

April 23 2010 15:02 GMT

#36

Imo it would be more interesting to have the min only expos be the gold ones

Hehe read comments now too and seems im not alone :D

d0da

United States103 Posts

April 23 2010 15:05 GMT

#37

I really don't think python is going to be a great SC2 map if it's directly copied with things like reapers and colossus, but hey I could be wrong.

SubtleArt

2710 Posts

April 23 2010 15:10 GMT

#38

Just add double gas on every base cause its Sc2 and it looks good

minus_human

4784 Posts

April 23 2010 15:21 GMT

#39

Why oh why is it not grass/jungle? Because of that, it looks really ugly imho (aestetically), but except for that I'd say it's pretty good, quite true to the original