|
I'm so excited!
My sister and I spent a good two hours putting it all together, but it was so worth it!
After we were 3/4 done, I realised I should've taken photos of it in progress, but this is the only one I got of when it wasn't fully assembled. + Show Spoiler +
The completed telescope! + Show Spoiler +
It's really cloudy tonight, so unfortunately I can't try it out, but I'm eagerly awaiting a clear night sky!
|
5/5 just because i love telescopes.
|
Huh ive always wanted one of these, I just love the night sky. How much did you pay for it ? Im guessing that the good ones are really expensive ?
|
incredibly, it only costed $90 AUS.I'm assuming its because you had assemble it all yourself, but still, it was crazy cheap. It has a max magnification of x525
|
nice! i've always wanted a telescope and astronomy has always interested me. you should buy one of those telescope cameras so you can post some amazing photos when you have a clear night.
|
Magnification doesn't matter. Strong point of this type of telescope is usually that it gives you a big field of view because it doesn't magnify much.
This telescope is like very cheap so it will be bad. But it was cheap.
Dark skies are mostly more important that a telescope. You can see stuff with the naked eye under dark skies you can't see with even a huge telescope.
This is a lens telescope, a refractor. So it will be good for the moon, planets and the Andromeda galaxy. These objects that are bright by themselves. This telescope will not collect much light, which is what telescopes do. So you won't be able to see faint objects.
I don't know the specs of this telescope. But if it's a 3 inch telescope then 3 times 50 is the max magnification. Usually the atmosphere is the limiting factor. If you look at Jupiter low in the horizon there will be looking through a lot of air. If the air is rising or otherwise turbulent or just very humid it will reduce seeing. You need really exceptional weather to be able to go over 250 no matter what telescope you have.
If you have dark skies and you want a good telescope that can see galaxies and nebula, buy a mirror telescope, a newtonian dobsonian, as big as you can afford and get to your observing site.
So if you have dark skies you should still be excited. If you live in a metropolitan area and this telescope had Hubble pictures on the box, you shouldn't.
If you live under really good skies and you spend 600 dollar/euro on a telescope you will be able to view thousands of objects and millions of stars, filling a lifetime. They will all look totally unimpressive. You will see faint fuzzy smudges. It's knowing what you are seeing that is impressive. You know they are galaxies millions of light years away. And you know how they look through Hubble pictures.
Astrophotography is expensive. You need a special mount that's really steady and adjusts for the rotation of the earth. Then you need an expensive telescope design as a normal design is too huge to mount or too small for galaxies. Then you need the special photography equipment. But then you can do really impressive things compared to what you can see. You can do very long exposures of galaxies and then stack the best ones on the computer. Then you can edit the pictures to bring out the detail and colour.
If you live in the middle of nowhere and you have stunningly dark skies and you are interest in buying a telescope, do it. But sadly those places are rare. You can buy an A brand telescope not much unlike the one in the OP for 200 dollar/euro. Or you can buy a cheap big bucket mirror telescope for 300 to 400 dollar/euro which will show you galaxies. Binoculars are good for astronomy too. And cheap. Lie on your back during summer and watch the milky way.
|
Damn, thats cheap... I won a telescope a long time ago in a raffle. I have no idea where it is now but its really awesome if you're bored just to stargaze.
|
I have always wanted to buy one, good job for doing it! Hope you find some Transformers on Mars!
|
I was really hoping the title was "I bought a telestrator". A telescope is cool too I guess.
|
Snet
United States3573 Posts
You and your sis share a bunk bed? That's cute.
The telescope seems pretty cool though.
|
On November 14 2009 23:45 Snet wrote: You and your sis share a bunk bed? That's cute.
The telescope seems pretty cool though. Hey me too lol.
@ Book2: whats the stats on yr telescope? I don't trust scopes that tout its magnification as thats as good as cameras touting digital zoom (which is useless). Optics size and quality are much much more important, as is the stability of the mount /insert much astro-geekiness here
edit: Pandarus has got most of it down already. Try looking at planet & the moon with the scope as a test drive, other than that the bright objects readily available are Pleiades (M45?), M42 Orion Nebula and a bunch of double stars that you should be able to search around for. Make sure the mount is adequate and the optics are clear too before trying to observe with it.
edit again:@ Pandarus: umm isnt refractors usually for planetary/small object + high resolution obs instead of large-field (which is for short refractors and reflectors?)
|
Hong Kong20321 Posts
+ Show Spoiler +On November 14 2009 21:24 Pandarus wrote: Magnification doesn't matter. Strong point of this type of telescope is usually that it gives you a big field of view because it doesn't magnify much.
This telescope is like very cheap so it will be bad. But it was cheap.
Dark skies are mostly more important that a telescope. You can see stuff with the naked eye under dark skies you can't see with even a huge telescope.
This is a lens telescope, a refractor. So it will be good for the moon, planets and the Andromeda galaxy. These objects that are bright by themselves. This telescope will not collect much light, which is what telescopes do. So you won't be able to see faint objects.
I don't know the specs of this telescope. But if it's a 3 inch telescope then 3 times 50 is the max magnification. Usually the atmosphere is the limiting factor. If you look at Jupiter low in the horizon there will be looking through a lot of air. If the air is rising or otherwise turbulent or just very humid it will reduce seeing. You need really exceptional weather to be able to go over 250 no matter what telescope you have.
If you have dark skies and you want a good telescope that can see galaxies and nebula, buy a mirror telescope, a newtonian dobsonian, as big as you can afford and get to your observing site.
So if you have dark skies you should still be exited. If you live in a metropolitan area and this telescope had Hubble pictures on the box, you shouldn't.
If you live under really good skies and you spend 600 dollar/euro on a telescope you will be able to view thousands of objects and millions of stars, filling a lifetime. They will all look totally unimpressive. You will see faint fuzzy smudges. It's knowing what you are seeing that is impressive. You know they are galaxies millions of light years away. And you know how they look through Hubble pictures.
Astrophotography is expensive. You need a special mount that's really steady and adjusts for the rotation of the earth. Then you need an expensive telescope design as a normal design is too huge to mount or too small for galaxies. Then you need the special photography equipment. But then you can do really impressive things compared to what you can see. You can do very long exposures of galaxies and then stack the best ones on the computer. Then you can edit the pictures to bring out the detail and colour.
If you live in the middle of nowhere and you have stunningly dark skies and you are interest in buying a telescope, do it. But sadly those places are rare. You can buy an A brand telescope not much unlike the one in the OP for 200 dollar/euro. Or you can buy a cheap big bucket mirror telescope for 300 to 400 dollar/euro which will show you galaxies. Binoculars are good for astronomy too. And cheap. Lie on your back during summer and watch the milky way.
i love how on TL, whenever there's a topic posted about something random like telescopes, seemingly out of NOWHERE a low post count user comes out and posts super detailed informative shit about the topic.
nice telescope by the way! never used one mysefl, tell us what you see.
|
United States24493 Posts
Cool. Thanks for sharing. Let us know how it goes.
BTW are you able to use that telescope for land to land observations as well as the night sky? Like, how well can you spy on people down the street?
|
I totally agree alffla, this is the seriously best about TL lol! we have experts in ALL areas :D
|
Magnification depends on focal length of course. If you have a really long tube, like 1.5 meters, then it's going to be hard to look through it when you point it up. So really most reflectors don't have that much focal length. Especially not the small ones. But for reflectors you look through the top end. And catadioptric ones have more focal length than their actual length. Almost all refractors are below 1.2 meters. Most reflectors are above 1 meter.
Resolution depends on the aperture. Refractors have small aperture so lower resolution. This is what limits magnification which you do want for planets. Refractors are planetary scopes mainly because large ones with good optics are absurdly expensive. So they are almost all small and can't see faint objects. But yeah it depends on actual specs.
But refracting telescopes you can use for birds and stuff or yeah spy on people. If you get a purely astronomical Newtonian mirror scope it shows everything upside down.
But yeah he should get good views of things like Pleiades which is huge and easy to find. So a good first object. But maybe he lives on the southern hemisphere. But then you can look at the bulge of the milky way. Jupiter is the first thing you will see right now. You can see it through the clouds sometimes even with the naked eye. But if you live too far west it may be too low on the horizon.
I lost my password, sorry.
|
I got my first telescope when I was in grade 5 and it was awesome, but it was on the cheaper end so I couldn't really see much...living in Toronto didn't help either with all the light pollution.
But yeah, what struck me besides the nostalgia was that you share a bunkbed with your sis and the mere thought of two little kids putting together a telescope, excited and all, makes my day happier haha.
|
i've always wanted one but i've never had the time, plus i live in new york and no one ever sleeps so the lights are always on..
|
konadora
Singapore66063 Posts
90 AUS dollars?
Wow, that's so cheap T___T
|
|
|
|
|
|