EPTTaxes friggin' suck - Page 3
| Blogs > Caller |
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
| ||
micronesia
United States24497 Posts
On June 29 2008 13:03 PsycHOTemplar wrote: Agree.Oh they're serious. The only thing people want when they have money, is more money. I believe this to be irrelevant to the first sentence. | ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
QQ more | ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14888 Posts
| ||
|
mahnini
United States6862 Posts
On June 29 2008 13:28 -orb- wrote: Taxes are completely necessary. QQ more not completely ! | ||
|
tiffany
3664 Posts
i just hope you aren't voting mccain | ||
LosingID8
CA10824 Posts
go cry somewhere else, ok? thanks. | ||
|
LazarusSpeaks
100 Posts
| ||
|
Railxp
Hong Kong1313 Posts
So he's born into a good family, its not like its his fault. stop giving him shit about that | ||
|
micronesia
United States24497 Posts
On June 29 2008 15:51 LosingID8 wrote: go cry somewhere else, ok? thanks. If he wants to cry about how he only is 99% fortunate instead of 100% fortunate in his blog, then he can do that and you/we can ignore it as appropriate. Of course, I think the issue he is discussing is more complex than simply him victimizing himself, the one who is least victimized in the world. | ||
|
Rayzorblade
United States1172 Posts
On June 29 2008 13:02 JeeJee wrote: I'm still debating with myself whether the few (3 I think?) people in this thread who are having money woes when they/their families make hundreds of thousands of dollars are actually serious or doing it for the 'internet lulz' | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
So he's born into a good family, its not like its his fault. stop giving him shit about that It's just hard to get over the irony of people with lots of money complaining about their money woes for most people. If he wanted to talk facts, it would have been a good idea to leave that part out lol. He says "$250,000, minus $90,000" like everyone is supposed to be shocked and horrified. Sorry, but no one cares. That's 90,000 dollars that everyone from a low income family will be glad to see put to services they can use too. In a system without government or taxes, the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. Genetics hold less value, and it becomes more about who was born where. Personally, I prefer a system where poor people (due to public programs) can climb the ladder a little, and rich people can't stomp on their hands at every step. If your complaint is about loopholes, you should be making suggestions to fix them, not disowning the system all together. | ||
|
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On June 29 2008 07:10 Slayer91 wrote: (450k-200k) = 250k*.03 = 7500$ more under obama. So $260,000 instead of $252,500? Not as bad as you'd think. This. People just like to get angry about things, they hear some figure and freak out, when it's not even a very big difference. The only part of the story they tell is how much they're supposedly going to have to pay, not how much the difference is between tax policies. But I guess that's how politics work, half-truths and slandering the other side. | ||
| ||
