|
On August 15 2017 21:05 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Yeah the ladder stuff is not working properly. Not the blizzard quality standard
I thought multiplayer being broken during the release window of their games and every time there is an expansion *is* the Blizzard quality standard though.
At least for the last decade anyway.
|
Anyone's game crashing? Mine crashed and unable to start-up again. So annoying.
|
I have the issue that my game randomly disconnects from the b.net and the game i'm playing. It says Error 6:10. Any idea how to fix it?
|
On August 15 2017 21:12 sd_andeh wrote: Ran through the campaign... Anyone else get completely turned off by those new portraits of e.g Kerrigan and Raynor? Raynor looks like a completely different dude that I've never seen before, and Kerrigan looks like some doofus drawing...
Also, I tend to keep my mouse scroll speed on quite high to do big adjustments to the camera, but I use mousewheel-click to do very small adjustments to the camera angle, however the sensitivity when pressing the mousewheel is bloody insane and it's impossible to make any small adjustments. Is there any way to change this?
Yes, these portraits were poorly made, with no resemblance at all to the original ones. it seems like human kerrigan has lost the unique look in her eyes she had.
|
Fuck. This game is so pretty now. Luv it.
|
Well, the thing is, I was expecting once Remastered was launched Blizzard could do some patch to fix the poor graphics, lag, etc, we experienced in 1.19. I actually wasn't expecting be able to play in HD (because my laptop is not good enough), but I would be great for me just getting more online games using the old graphics. However, the reality is, in the old graphics view, it looks worse than in the past (same thing than 1.19), and I also get terrible image and mouse lag. Hoping Blizzard will deliver a patch improving this.
|
On August 15 2017 21:38 SOMAA wrote: So after upgrading to remastered, it just locked the nickname i randomly picked for broodwar europe server... can I use a diferent name now? Yeah just connect to a server and then press escape
|
Just so everyone knows, SC:R is perfect and i'm having one hell of a day. Its the most fun i've had in a long time. THANK YOU BLIZZARD!
|
On August 15 2017 22:52 Matto wrote: Well, the thing is, I was expecting once Remastered was launched Blizzard could do some patch to fix the poor graphics, lag, etc, we experienced in 1.19. I actually wasn't expecting be able to play in HD (because my laptop is not good enough), but I would be great for me just getting more online games using the old graphics. However, the reality is, in the old graphics view, it looks worse than in the past (same thing than 1.19), and I also get terrible image and mouse lag. Hoping Blizzard will deliver a patch improving this. basically I seem to have the same problems, the game in SD doesn't look as good as 1.18 (like 1.19, doesn't look as good as before), and I'm getting some framerate issues and unresponsive menus (like up to 10s for loading options screen during which I can't do anything, many menus on bnet are also slow to respond or just don't work, there is all around minor or not responsiveness problems for nearly everything even highlighting or scrolling text, window panes sliding may stutter and stuff, chat list take few seconds to load, game list (randomly also doesnt display at all), etc, pretty much everything). Btw I am above the recommended system reqs. The fonts on bnet chat don't downscale well as they are too small, making some things difficult/uncomfortable to read or almost invisible like ".". The biggest issue for me is the framerate drops during gameplay. I haven't really played much yet though.. The HD graphics seem to look great, except for archons feet^^
|
On August 15 2017 22:34 upro)wraith wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 21:12 sd_andeh wrote: Ran through the campaign... Anyone else get completely turned off by those new portraits of e.g Kerrigan and Raynor? Raynor looks like a completely different dude that I've never seen before, and Kerrigan looks like some doofus drawing...
Also, I tend to keep my mouse scroll speed on quite high to do big adjustments to the camera, but I use mousewheel-click to do very small adjustments to the camera angle, however the sensitivity when pressing the mousewheel is bloody insane and it's impossible to make any small adjustments. Is there any way to change this? Yes, these portraits were poorly made, with no resemblance at all to the original ones. it seems like human kerrigan has lost the unique look in her eyes she had. In addition to this, the high res portraits make it painfully obvious there's no lip sync whatsoever. Maybe it's a necessary evil with high res graphics, but certainly looks awkward with some characters. At least general Duke is strikingly out of sync with his talk.
|
On August 15 2017 23:20 Bacillus wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:34 upro)wraith wrote:On August 15 2017 21:12 sd_andeh wrote: Ran through the campaign... Anyone else get completely turned off by those new portraits of e.g Kerrigan and Raynor? Raynor looks like a completely different dude that I've never seen before, and Kerrigan looks like some doofus drawing...
Also, I tend to keep my mouse scroll speed on quite high to do big adjustments to the camera, but I use mousewheel-click to do very small adjustments to the camera angle, however the sensitivity when pressing the mousewheel is bloody insane and it's impossible to make any small adjustments. Is there any way to change this? Yes, these portraits were poorly made, with no resemblance at all to the original ones. it seems like human kerrigan has lost the unique look in her eyes she had. In addition to this, the high res portraits make it painfully obvious there's no lip sync whatsoever. Maybe it's a necessary evil with high res graphics, but certainly looks awkward with some characters. At least general Duke is strikingly out of sync with his talk. I assumed they used the classic ones from BW, cause ya know they didnt line up at all. I was hoping they'd fix that in Remaster, though.
|
I guess for the sake of completeness I'll say something positive. For Me SC:R worked out of the box, but only if I set the Wine Windows version to Windows 2003. Otherwise, it doesn't start with the error
err:module:attach_process_dlls "ClientSdk.dll" failed to initialize, aborting
Not sure if it would theoretically run better under a newer version. Also can't get dynamic lighting to work, which doesn't bother me too much since it makes Zealots look like bronze statues (maybe related to Windows version?). I can't check it because it says I don't have enough VRAM, although this is with my laptop with a 7500U. It might work on my desktop through Wine with a Radeon Pro Duo.
|
i have played like 6 ladder games but only 2 are showing up when i check. Bnet having trouble recording ladder games?
|
On August 15 2017 23:20 Bacillus wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:34 upro)wraith wrote:On August 15 2017 21:12 sd_andeh wrote: Ran through the campaign... Anyone else get completely turned off by those new portraits of e.g Kerrigan and Raynor? Raynor looks like a completely different dude that I've never seen before, and Kerrigan looks like some doofus drawing...
Also, I tend to keep my mouse scroll speed on quite high to do big adjustments to the camera, but I use mousewheel-click to do very small adjustments to the camera angle, however the sensitivity when pressing the mousewheel is bloody insane and it's impossible to make any small adjustments. Is there any way to change this? Yes, these portraits were poorly made, with no resemblance at all to the original ones. it seems like human kerrigan has lost the unique look in her eyes she had. In addition to this, the high res portraits make it painfully obvious there's no lip sync whatsoever. Maybe it's a necessary evil with high res graphics, but certainly looks awkward with some characters. At least general Duke is strikingly out of sync with his talk. Haha yeah, played a bit of campaign, the lipsync is horrible. It always was horrible of course, so it's true to it's nature and no BW fan can get upset xD. But it looks so stupid.
I do like the HD portraits though. I never even knew Duke was in a marine suit, always thought that red thing was his confederate scarf for some reason. And the ghost old kerrigan face was just weird, nobody has eyebrows like that.
|
ok, ranked play stopped working for me. It's searching for an opponent for multiple minutes and it never matches me........... annoying...
|
rank play is not working ! search more than 5 min no game! OMG , i am from singapore. anyone have solution for it?
|
Does anybody know how I can get eAPM from replays in sc:r?
|
On August 16 2017 01:55 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 23:20 Bacillus wrote:On August 15 2017 22:34 upro)wraith wrote:On August 15 2017 21:12 sd_andeh wrote: Ran through the campaign... Anyone else get completely turned off by those new portraits of e.g Kerrigan and Raynor? Raynor looks like a completely different dude that I've never seen before, and Kerrigan looks like some doofus drawing...
Also, I tend to keep my mouse scroll speed on quite high to do big adjustments to the camera, but I use mousewheel-click to do very small adjustments to the camera angle, however the sensitivity when pressing the mousewheel is bloody insane and it's impossible to make any small adjustments. Is there any way to change this? Yes, these portraits were poorly made, with no resemblance at all to the original ones. it seems like human kerrigan has lost the unique look in her eyes she had. In addition to this, the high res portraits make it painfully obvious there's no lip sync whatsoever. Maybe it's a necessary evil with high res graphics, but certainly looks awkward with some characters. At least general Duke is strikingly out of sync with his talk. Haha yeah, played a bit of campaign, the lipsync is horrible. It always was horrible of course, so it's true to it's nature and no BW fan can get upset xD. But it looks so stupid. I do like the HD portraits though. I never even knew Duke was in a marine suit, always thought that red thing was his confederate scarf for some reason. And the ghost old kerrigan face was just weird, nobody has eyebrows like that. I think the thing is that you need to match the overall quality. Either HD animations with decent sync or 1998 graphical quality with 1998 animations. Any kind of mismatch seems out of place.
|
On August 15 2017 23:20 Bacillus wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2017 22:34 upro)wraith wrote:On August 15 2017 21:12 sd_andeh wrote: Ran through the campaign... Anyone else get completely turned off by those new portraits of e.g Kerrigan and Raynor? Raynor looks like a completely different dude that I've never seen before, and Kerrigan looks like some doofus drawing...
Also, I tend to keep my mouse scroll speed on quite high to do big adjustments to the camera, but I use mousewheel-click to do very small adjustments to the camera angle, however the sensitivity when pressing the mousewheel is bloody insane and it's impossible to make any small adjustments. Is there any way to change this? Yes, these portraits were poorly made, with no resemblance at all to the original ones. it seems like human kerrigan has lost the unique look in her eyes she had. In addition to this, the high res portraits make it painfully obvious there's no lip sync whatsoever. Maybe it's a necessary evil with high res graphics, but certainly looks awkward with some characters. At least general Duke is strikingly out of sync with his talk. i just disabled animated portraits, it makes it look better in game, although the mission briefings still have the problem.
|
White-Ra + Ret in BGH 2v2
|
|
|
|