|
On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote: I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now. Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum?
I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read.
|
On October 04 2016 22:21 Calix wrote: You're not even voting for Superbia. I just checked the vote thread.
So what the fuck are you doing? Why the fuck do I need to vote in the vote thread???
|
On October 04 2016 22:24 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:18 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 22:16 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote: For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1. Dude what the fuck. So you think that finding mafia isn't your first priority but instead, staying alive is your first priority? Full of shit Wow you caught me. That is 100% the exact reason I want to stay on the sidelines. I'm still not sure how staying on the sidelines is conductive to you finding scum, pls explain.
Maybe if you vote me in the actual vote thread you'll find out.
|
On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote: I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now. Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum?
Can you explain why you are doing it as town?
I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little.
So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot"
You're welcome for this incisive analysis.
|
On October 04 2016 22:24 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote: I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now. Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read. Go and reread your first 2 posts and tell me they are made with the town wincon in mind.
|
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope.
|
On October 04 2016 22:25 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:24 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote: I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now. Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read. Go and reread your first 2 posts and tell me they are made with the town wincon in mind.
I have studied them thoroughly and have conclusively concluded that they are not only incredibly townie, they are the key to town winning this game.
|
On October 04 2016 22:21 Superbia wrote: This buddying is making me a little iffy.
You want in?
Calix, did you get the essence of the code? Would be nice to have a bond for when we town-read each other over here. Kind of like the one I have with Mesk where we speak in phonetic and broken French so that our talk cannot be translated. Hmm?
|
On October 04 2016 22:35 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:21 Superbia wrote: This buddying is making me a little iffy. You want in? Calix, did you get the essence of the code? Would be nice to have a bond for when we town-read each other over here. Kind of like the one I have with Mesk where we speak in phonetic and broken French so that our talk cannot be translated. Hmm?
No I mean from Calix to myself. I'm okay with it for now.
|
Why HF and Palmar I think the exposition you did before revealing those names means you're serious about those names
|
On October 04 2016 22:18 NeverUnlucky wrote: Quick shitpost to make sure I have more posts than Calix. lol. best post I read since long.
|
On October 04 2016 22:36 batsnacks wrote: Why HF and Palmar I think the exposition you did before revealing those names means you're serious about those names
Ohi snacks.
Why not?
|
Superbia, you made a similar comment about me "pocketing" you last game. What I wonder is why you think anyone would be buddying up to a lurker.
@NU, I think so? But codes are lame so don't expect me to use one.
|
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right?
|
On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote: I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now. Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist
|
On October 04 2016 22:39 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:36 batsnacks wrote: Why HF and Palmar I think the exposition you did before revealing those names means you're serious about those names Ohi snacks. Why not? no I was wondering why pls tell now
|
On October 04 2016 22:28 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:25 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:24 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote: I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now. Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read. Go and reread your first 2 posts and tell me they are made with the town wincon in mind. I have studied them thoroughly and have conclusively concluded that they are not only incredibly townie, they are the key to town winning this game. Explain
|
On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote: Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right?
Sick. I don't think it's right but I like the jazziness.
|
Another question I ask myself is why would you kill a lurker N1?
|
On October 04 2016 22:41 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:39 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 22:36 batsnacks wrote: Why HF and Palmar I think the exposition you did before revealing those names means you're serious about those names Ohi snacks. Why not? no I was wondering why pls tell now
You'll have to wait. Sry.
|
|
|
|