|
On October 04 2016 21:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
Lol wtf you guys played like less than 10 games together and profess to be able to read each other one post into the game, come on man. 6 games together, 7 games if you count the game she coached me. She never said she was "able to read [me] one post into the game". Neither have I. Where did you get this from? All she said is that I was an easy read for her (which, again, is not necessarily true) and that I always was the first one lynched as mafia. I don't make anything out of this. Calix is just that person with a massive ego. While she is as tall as Peter Dinklage IRL, her ego is as big as Robert Downey Jr. Show nested quote +Calix that's really soft. Why can't I vote for superbia? Am I gonna lose my vote? No. Am I free to vote again? Yes.
That is not what she said. You are contradicting yourself by saying that Calix appears scummy to you, yet, you vote Superbia whom you made no comment on. Show nested quote +So why is my vote even alignment indicative when there are still more than 24 hours to Lynch?
I would like to hear this. Really, really, really defensive here. Calix never said your vote was AI. 3 "reality twists" in one post.
This is actually not a terrible post.
|
Anyone want spoilers yet? Or do people want to figure this game out for themselves?
|
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother?
|
On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother?
I promise to contribute at some point. ;p
|
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1.
|
On October 04 2016 21:59 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother? I promise to contribute at some point. ;p
If the contribution isn't stellar then I'm probably going to vote for you. No pressure 
|
On October 04 2016 21:51 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:47 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:44 Calix wrote:Actually I'm calling bullshit here. NU says that 'what I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd' On October 04 2016 21:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:32 Calix wrote:
Legit question. Are you actually scum-reading me?
You've made some mocking comments and "oh XYZ bullshit reason concerns me" and even agreed with me on a point or two but you have not actually said "I think Calix is scummy" or called anything I've done scummy...just questionable. I town-read you. What I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd. I agreed with Oats' comment on you because I could understand where he was coming from. Not knowing you're Hypocrisy Incarnate, he could not know that your comments about me making fluff posts were NAI. Capiche? ...yet he makes these posts in his catch-up where he clearly has concerns and doubts about my posts. This strikes me as inconsistent. On October 04 2016 20:44 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. I see what you did with my name, lul. I'm concerned that Calix didn't question my BS confirm. She just went along with it and called me bad. On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. On October 04 2016 21:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. For the sake of argument, why would he try force a read on the one person who can most easily rebut him ? She can claim that she knows my play and get others to lynch me. Doesn't matter if I can rebut her, as long as the others trust her voice over mine. I don't really understand why you ask this question. Power Wolfs do this all the time. There isn't really a 'why'. On October 04 2016 21:31 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:07 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. So you're arguing that I am pushing a read onto someone who I claim has obvious town/ scum meta. Let's just indulge in this delusion and pretend that I'm scum and let's assume that you're town...since this push makes no sense for two of the scum to do. I decide to make a lame push on you based on the question. People start to town-read you for your question. I pop in and double down on my push, thus drawing a shit-load of attention to myself. Even if I mislynched you, I would look exceptionally bad for mislynching someone that I claim has "obvious town/ scum meta" So what exactly does scum!Calix get out of doing this, exactly? Inquiring minds want to know. Put that way my point looks dumb. Still feel uneasy about you saying I look for shortcuts often (NAI)and associating a scum-read to it. I don't even know what shortcuts you are referring to. Where is the contradiction? Your posts don't strike me as odd AI-wise, but I am concerned with the points you are missing. Wait, so your posts where you accuse me of "forcing a read on you" and say that I "still make you uneasy" AREN'T things that you find odd???
Ah. I did contradict myself.
Well, I think you are town now. So check this:
IC 540
|
Damn it, didn't see your last post.
|
On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother?
Btw Calix, I am curious. What was the "Superbia stole my laptop" about?
|
On October 04 2016 22:01 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:59 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother? I promise to contribute at some point. ;p If the contribution isn't stellar then I'm probably going to vote for you. No pressure
None taken. ;p
|
On October 04 2016 22:01 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother? Btw Calix, I am curious. What was the "Superbia stole my laptop" about?
C'mon, it was a great joke. I'm disappointed you did not get it.
It was about posting one-liners in a quick succession, like you did in HM3.
|
On October 04 2016 22:01 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother? Btw Calix, I am curious. What was the "Superbia stole my laptop" about?
I made a string of one-liners and then made that post to poke at you for your tendency to post in one-liners, duh.
|
It's rare that I am superbusy but I am superbusy.
Been skimming the thread all day but last 25ish post I started skimming to only read posts not from Calix or ud and there weren't any so that's that.
|
On October 04 2016 22:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:51 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:47 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:44 Calix wrote:Actually I'm calling bullshit here. NU says that 'what I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd' On October 04 2016 21:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:32 Calix wrote:
Legit question. Are you actually scum-reading me?
You've made some mocking comments and "oh XYZ bullshit reason concerns me" and even agreed with me on a point or two but you have not actually said "I think Calix is scummy" or called anything I've done scummy...just questionable. I town-read you. What I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd. I agreed with Oats' comment on you because I could understand where he was coming from. Not knowing you're Hypocrisy Incarnate, he could not know that your comments about me making fluff posts were NAI. Capiche? ...yet he makes these posts in his catch-up where he clearly has concerns and doubts about my posts. This strikes me as inconsistent. On October 04 2016 20:44 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. I see what you did with my name, lul. I'm concerned that Calix didn't question my BS confirm. She just went along with it and called me bad. On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. On October 04 2016 21:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. For the sake of argument, why would he try force a read on the one person who can most easily rebut him ? She can claim that she knows my play and get others to lynch me. Doesn't matter if I can rebut her, as long as the others trust her voice over mine. I don't really understand why you ask this question. Power Wolfs do this all the time. There isn't really a 'why'. On October 04 2016 21:31 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:07 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. So you're arguing that I am pushing a read onto someone who I claim has obvious town/ scum meta. Let's just indulge in this delusion and pretend that I'm scum and let's assume that you're town...since this push makes no sense for two of the scum to do. I decide to make a lame push on you based on the question. People start to town-read you for your question. I pop in and double down on my push, thus drawing a shit-load of attention to myself. Even if I mislynched you, I would look exceptionally bad for mislynching someone that I claim has "obvious town/ scum meta" So what exactly does scum!Calix get out of doing this, exactly? Inquiring minds want to know. Put that way my point looks dumb. Still feel uneasy about you saying I look for shortcuts often (NAI)and associating a scum-read to it. I don't even know what shortcuts you are referring to. Where is the contradiction? Your posts don't strike me as odd AI-wise, but I am concerned with the points you are missing. Wait, so your posts where you accuse me of "forcing a read on you" and say that I "still make you uneasy" AREN'T things that you find odd??? Ah. I did contradict myself. Well, I think you are town now. So check this: IC 540
I thought I was town to begin with?
Your progression is muddled and I don't follow it.
Why are you asking me about ice cream? lmao
|
On October 04 2016 21:58 Superbia wrote:
Anyone want spoilers yet? Or do people want to figure this game out for themselves?
If you have valuable information, spoil me by any means.
On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1.
I would like to know what reason it is that is preventing you from being useful, but if I ask and the reason is actually valid, then your "lurking.exe" program will get a runtime error. Is it something I should know?
|
On October 04 2016 22:07 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:58 Superbia wrote:
Anyone want spoilers yet? Or do people want to figure this game out for themselves? If you have valuable information, spoil me by any means. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1. I would like to know what reason it is that is preventing you from being useful, but if I ask and the reason is actually valid, then your "lurking.exe" program will get a runtime error. Is it something I should know?
How much % of the mafia team do you want?
|
On October 04 2016 22:03 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:01 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother? Btw Calix, I am curious. What was the "Superbia stole my laptop" about? I made a string of one-liners and then made that post to poke at you for your tendency to post in one-liners, duh.
I don't get the relationship to laptops though. 
|
Superbia, just spit it out instead of wasting time and posts with promising stuff -_-
|
On October 04 2016 22:04 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:51 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:47 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:44 Calix wrote:Actually I'm calling bullshit here. NU says that 'what I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd' On October 04 2016 21:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:32 Calix wrote:
Legit question. Are you actually scum-reading me?
You've made some mocking comments and "oh XYZ bullshit reason concerns me" and even agreed with me on a point or two but you have not actually said "I think Calix is scummy" or called anything I've done scummy...just questionable. I town-read you. What I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd. I agreed with Oats' comment on you because I could understand where he was coming from. Not knowing you're Hypocrisy Incarnate, he could not know that your comments about me making fluff posts were NAI. Capiche? ...yet he makes these posts in his catch-up where he clearly has concerns and doubts about my posts. This strikes me as inconsistent. On October 04 2016 20:44 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. I see what you did with my name, lul. I'm concerned that Calix didn't question my BS confirm. She just went along with it and called me bad. On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. On October 04 2016 21:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. For the sake of argument, why would he try force a read on the one person who can most easily rebut him ? She can claim that she knows my play and get others to lynch me. Doesn't matter if I can rebut her, as long as the others trust her voice over mine. I don't really understand why you ask this question. Power Wolfs do this all the time. There isn't really a 'why'. On October 04 2016 21:31 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:07 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. So you're arguing that I am pushing a read onto someone who I claim has obvious town/ scum meta. Let's just indulge in this delusion and pretend that I'm scum and let's assume that you're town...since this push makes no sense for two of the scum to do. I decide to make a lame push on you based on the question. People start to town-read you for your question. I pop in and double down on my push, thus drawing a shit-load of attention to myself. Even if I mislynched you, I would look exceptionally bad for mislynching someone that I claim has "obvious town/ scum meta" So what exactly does scum!Calix get out of doing this, exactly? Inquiring minds want to know. Put that way my point looks dumb. Still feel uneasy about you saying I look for shortcuts often (NAI)and associating a scum-read to it. I don't even know what shortcuts you are referring to. Where is the contradiction? Your posts don't strike me as odd AI-wise, but I am concerned with the points you are missing. Wait, so your posts where you accuse me of "forcing a read on you" and say that I "still make you uneasy" AREN'T things that you find odd??? Ah. I did contradict myself. Well, I think you are town now. So check this: IC 540 I thought I was town to begin with? Your progression is muddled and I don't follow it. Why are you asking me about ice cream? lmao
*giggles* I town-read you since this morning, not from the beginning.
Shucks.
lmaoooooooooo. Think of it like that thing Mesk does in her first posts as town.
|
On October 04 2016 22:10 Calix wrote:
Superbia, just spit it out instead of wasting time and posts with promising stuff -_-
Wow! I am hurt.
HF.
Palmar.
66.67%
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
