|
On March 09 2016 22:54 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2016 21:17 Vivax wrote: ima talk things through with competent players when they're back, I think geript might not even be wrong about Slam, but if I think thta it's not cause of the stuff he posts which requires me to sheep geripts meta reads blindly which I was slightly willing to do before he started vomiting in my face, but cause Shape rightly pointed out that slam's PoE would have looked odd, besides that he wasn't pushing it at all.
Saitama was quite better than that. About alakaslam: He's still null to me, and I'm not liking the points brought against him. - Geript - he's scum because godread
The reasoning behind this read seems to be something between tone and lack of trolling. I think there has been a distinct change in slam's tone recently as both alignments. He seems meaner. The trolling thing is dumb. Slam can turn that on or off as either alignment.
- Shape - he's scum because of he did a PoE
Since when does a simple PoE make someone scum?
- Vivax - he's scum because he's playing less townie comparitively to Saitama.
He was trying to not be recognized so it's hard to compare it to that.
I didn't call him scum kush, I was trying to figure out how much Slam actually had to do (reading and such) within his logic. when i looked at it, it was 3 people. Therefore I was a bit confused on how Slam said there was a lot to do or something along those lines. But I also figured that he was prob. joking a bit and factor that in.
If i thought it was heavily scum, or enough to call him scum based off of that, i would of said it.
|
On March 10 2016 07:23 Koshi wrote: Well. If Alakaslam is mafia a lot of what I am saying here is worth nothing tbh. But is he?
The case on Alakaslam is: - The geript accusation of meta - Alakaslam changed his read on me
Is there more? No.
You have the clearest head as far as I can see. This is good as it will continue to seal your towniene-
Oh wait
|
On March 10 2016 07:24 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2016 22:54 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On March 09 2016 21:17 Vivax wrote: ima talk things through with competent players when they're back, I think geript might not even be wrong about Slam, but if I think thta it's not cause of the stuff he posts which requires me to sheep geripts meta reads blindly which I was slightly willing to do before he started vomiting in my face, but cause Shape rightly pointed out that slam's PoE would have looked odd, besides that he wasn't pushing it at all.
Saitama was quite better than that. About alakaslam: He's still null to me, and I'm not liking the points brought against him. - Geript - he's scum because godread
The reasoning behind this read seems to be something between tone and lack of trolling. I think there has been a distinct change in slam's tone recently as both alignments. He seems meaner. The trolling thing is dumb. Slam can turn that on or off as either alignment.
- Shape - he's scum because of he did a PoE
Since when does a simple PoE make someone scum?
- Vivax - he's scum because he's playing less townie comparitively to Saitama.
He was trying to not be recognized so it's hard to compare it to that.
I didn't call him scum kush, I was trying to figure out how much Slam actually had to do (reading and such) within his logic. when i looked at it, it was 3 people. Therefore I was a bit confused on how Slam said there was a lot to do or something along those lines. But I also figured that he was prob. joking a bit and factor that in. If i thought it was heavily scum, or enough to call him scum based off of that, i would of said it. Nah I literally forgot how small the game was.
|
The case on Alakaslam is: - The geript accusation of meta - Alakaslam changed his read on me - The PoE thingie
more?
|
Vote Count - Day 1
Alakaslam (4): geript, Vivax, Rels, Vivax, Tumblewood Vivax (2): Tumblewood, yamato77, Alakaslam Tumblewood (1): Vivax, nnn_thekushmountains, Rels, Vivax Rels (1): Koshi yamato77 (0): Koshi geript (0): Alakaslam
Not Voting (1): Shapelog
At this time, no one is slated to be lynched. With 9 players, 5 are needed to lynch. The next check will occur on 23:00 GMT (+00:00). Town must find the mafia before on 23:00 GMT (+00:00)
The voting thread is here. Only votes there will be counted.
|
On March 10 2016 07:25 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2016 07:23 Koshi wrote: Well. If Alakaslam is mafia a lot of what I am saying here is worth nothing tbh. But is he?
The case on Alakaslam is: - The geript accusation of meta - Alakaslam changed his read on me
Is there more? No. You have the clearest head as far as I can see. This is good as it will continue to seal your towniene- Oh wait If you flip mafia I am just going to say I played devils advocate on purpose to find your scumbuddy.
|
On March 10 2016 07:23 Koshi wrote: Well. If Alakaslam is mafia a lot of what I am saying here is worth nothing tbh. But is he?
The case on Alakaslam is: - The geript accusation of meta - Alakaslam changed his read on me
Is there more? I am going to say it, I hate pure meta reasons to scum or town read someone, period. Especially after cell were LS got off free of charge because he broke his meta.
I can understand if you see a post, and comapre it + X, where X= something they did scummy, in the game currently being played. At least then your supporting the meta AND have a post from the game that makes you think he is scum.
Just IMO about it tbh.
|
On March 10 2016 07:13 Koshi wrote: I'll say this thing. Everytime Alakaslam said to lynch him, he has been town. But I'll also add that most of the times he says: "lynch me for the good of the town, if you don't lynch me I will come back with a vengeance". Something like that. Well yeah only reason I haven't said that here is I felt it went without saying.
So to make it official: Vote me you ass (person not voting me) and use the info/discredit to meta to figure out people's motives for jumping on my bandwagon.
If Geript is town, I don't ever want to read "Godread" again. Rayn has already failed this bullshit catastrophically? So don't bring it up
EVER
AGAIN
because it is UNRELIABLE.
|
The case on Alakaslam is: - The geript accusation of meta. - Alakaslam changed his read on me. - The PoE thingie. - Less townie than saitama game.
Oh Kush already made a list.
|
On March 10 2016 07:28 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2016 07:25 Alakaslam wrote:On March 10 2016 07:23 Koshi wrote: Well. If Alakaslam is mafia a lot of what I am saying here is worth nothing tbh. But is he?
The case on Alakaslam is: - The geript accusation of meta - Alakaslam changed his read on me
Is there more? No. You have the clearest head as far as I can see. This is good as it will continue to seal your towniene- Oh wait If you flip mafia I am just going to say I played devils advocate on purpose to find your scumbuddy. Well yeah. But you know as well as I do that there's no reason to think in that world.
|
On March 10 2016 07:29 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2016 07:13 Koshi wrote: I'll say this thing. Everytime Alakaslam said to lynch him, he has been town. But I'll also add that most of the times he says: "lynch me for the good of the town, if you don't lynch me I will come back with a vengeance". Something like that. Well yeah only reason I haven't said that here is I felt it went without saying. So to make it official: Vote me you ass (person not voting me) and use the info/discredit to meta to figure out people's motives for jumping on my bandwagon. If Geript is town, I don't ever want to read "Godread" again. Rayn has already failed this bullshit catastrophically? So don't bring it up EVER AGAIN because it is UNRELIABLE. There will be a game soon in which I will play my mafia meta just to get lynched. I just need to do it and somewhat feel ok about the content I brought.
|
On March 10 2016 07:30 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2016 07:28 Koshi wrote:On March 10 2016 07:25 Alakaslam wrote:On March 10 2016 07:23 Koshi wrote: Well. If Alakaslam is mafia a lot of what I am saying here is worth nothing tbh. But is he?
The case on Alakaslam is: - The geript accusation of meta - Alakaslam changed his read on me
Is there more? No. You have the clearest head as far as I can see. This is good as it will continue to seal your towniene- Oh wait If you flip mafia I am just going to say I played devils advocate on purpose to find your scumbuddy. Well yeah. But you know as well as I do that there's no reason to think in that world. Meh. atm I don't really know who is mafia. Like I said. 66% is the highest % I would give somebody and that is Rels.
|
Anyway. Who is mafia in your eyes?
|
On March 10 2016 04:09 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2016 04:08 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: I could see slam giving up like that if scumteam was slam/tumble. Otherwise it would just be uncharacteristically mean to his scumteam. being mafia is tough Bullshit. + Show Spoiler +you do not live the scum live!
|
I second koshi, what is your scum reads Slam.
|
Note that I might or not have the vote thread open and have your name + ##vote in bold waiting to be posted. Do not take this as a gesture of bad faith. As I am still determining what i think of you.
|
On March 10 2016 07:30 Koshi wrote: The case on Alakaslam is:
- The geript accusation of meta. - Alakaslam changed his read on me.
- The PoE thingie. I can see where you are coming from though with this - Less townie than saitama game. Meh
Oh Kush already made a list. My opinions
|
I'm on my phone skimmed everything
|
What is funny, is that according to slam, I have the scum game that he been working towards for the last 2 years. *peels a banana* So we are looking for BS that would get him town read without doing anything. *takes a bite, talks with mouth full* But I am pretty sure he trys to do it for town as well so this really is not helpful.
Still quick reading his filter for the hijole way
|
On March 10 2016 07:48 Rels wrote: I'm on my phone skimmed everything *takes another bite of banana* Well go on.
|
|
|
|