EPTLike, Eden's statement is of minimal significance, and even less relevance.
Shin Megami Tensei: The Devil Inside Mafia - Page 11
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
Like, Eden's statement is of minimal significance, and even less relevance. | ||
|
Shapelog
United States5184 Posts
| ||
|
Shapelog
United States5184 Posts
| ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 16 2016 10:10 sicklucker wrote: I want to know it when im mafia . when im town I do not care Want to know what? You're not making any sense. | ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 16 2016 10:12 Trfel wrote: You posted a question? Oh, I thought it was rhetorical. I obviously disagree. Power roles can play their own roles, they don't need someone to direct them. The point isn't the setup speculation, that's not alignment indicative. I can't see how Eden as town could care so much about his setup speculation and not care about anything else. Where do you get the impression that I "care so much about [my] setup speculation and not care about anything else"? I wouldn't characterize my play that way at all, and I don't understand why you do, either. | ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 16 2016 10:02 Tictock wrote: Palmar, though I'm mostly trusting in Trfel's meta read on him. Personally I was holding off trying to read Palmar till he'd posted more. ah okay. So it's really three town reads and a trust-Trfel's-townreading read? That's reasonable enough I guess. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
nh, truffle wuffle, i has a problem with youse...namely, that you seem to be dropping reads instead of inviting comments on reads, which makes me antsy also, idk about palmar. every time i think i've got a good read on him he throws me off the scent @.@ not sure how you think you have a meta read on him. explain it more? the eden point on leaving an out to withdraw his read isn't a bad one, though tbf i can easily see a town eden believing that, too, cause it has been a year lol >< also this reminds me of a certain ooooother game where he focused on the same things <3s the rsoul's favorite devil's advocate for those of you slow on the uptake, sl posted his diary entries after truffle asked someone else to run point on being "scummy" enough to get reactions. not really sure that the actual reactions mean scum, tbh, cause townies are dumb all the time, but yeah | ||
|
Tictock
United States6051 Posts
So I'm just gunna take that as a sign that it's time to take a break, and hopefully have more to read after my Raid. Oh also there was some thought about how almost everyone has posted (everyone but GB, impressive) but there has been no miller claims. So I think it's a safe assumption there are none? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
that's right lol forgot ^^ no problem with millers claiming | ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 16 2016 10:56 Tictock wrote: Ok I was writting a post about how I sorta agreed that Trfel might have a point about Eden disengaging, got distracted by the offering of soup, then come back to find Eden posting. So I'm just gunna take that as a sign that it's time to take a break, and hopefully have more to read after my Raid. Oh also there was some thought about how almost everyone has posted (everyone but GB, impressive) but there has been no miller claims. So I think it's a safe assumption there are none? Trfel wouldn't have a point even if I hadn't come back and posted more. He claimed that I was "disengaged" from the thread because I only gave one clear read within the first few hours of day 1, in a thread where very few people, in my estimation, have done anything alignment-indicative. Frankly, his accusation sucks. I had a very clear direction with my early posting: as I always do, I analyzed what we knew of the setup and set about trying to construct the best game state for us by proposing that millers claim, for reasons already explained. Everyone that's bothered to chime in directly on the idea itself so far has said it is a good idea. Trfel ignored the proposal and misrepresented my posting as being overly focused on setup at the expense of giving reads, at a point in the game where reads worth sharing are hard to come by. I had some more stuff to develop the lack of miller claims (on the assumption there won't be any, running with your suggestion), but I doubt that information helps town (it's either incorrect or it possibly contributes to mafia planning how to play around town PRs), so I'm not going to discuss it. | ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 16 2016 10:53 rsoultin wrote: for those of you slow on the uptake, sl posted his diary entries after truffle asked someone else to run point on being "scummy" enough to get reactions. not really sure that the actual reactions mean scum, tbh, cause townies are dumb all the time, but yeah I find it hard to argue conclusively that sicklucker's initial posting was coming from town reaction testing. I didn't really think anything of it either way -- what did you see in it that I don't, such that you think it makes him town? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On February 16 2016 11:14 Eden1892 wrote: I find it hard to argue conclusively that sicklucker's initial posting was coming from town reaction testing. I didn't really think anything of it either way -- what did you see in it that I don't, such that you think it makes him town? i don't see that it makes him town i do see that, regardless of his alignment, it prob was in response to truffle's post, especially since he then went on to get reads from people's reactions | ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 16 2016 11:17 rsoultin wrote: i don't see that it makes him town i do see that, regardless of his alignment, it prob was in response to truffle's post, especially since he then went on to get reads from people's reactions Never mind, I went back and reread Trfel's initial post, and my interpretation of what you were proposing doesn't make sense // isn't very useful/relevant. With that said, what is sicklucker's alignment? | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 16 2016 11:23 sicklucker wrote: How could she know? Instead of worrying about that, why don't you go clarify what you said to me earlier? I still don't understand what you were trying to say about setup spec being suspicious. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
thats not true I read my role pm today im not sure why I said that trolol;p; | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On February 16 2016 11:21 Eden1892 wrote: Never mind, I went back and reread Trfel's initial post, and my interpretation of what you were proposing doesn't make sense // isn't very useful/relevant. With that said, what is sicklucker's alignment? lol how the fuck should i know? xP assuming i'm even still around late-game (lol ><) i'll catch him by poe, if at all, if he's scum the point was there was nothing alignment-indicative about his diary posts ^^ | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On February 16 2016 11:25 sicklucker wrote: It was plain english. Towns dont really care about that stuff they want to find scum. Power roles especially wont bring it up in thread. Mafia needs things to talk about so they sure will -pokes- and if i said he's done almost the exact same thing in a prior town game? would you drop it, or do you have other reasons to scumread him? | ||
| ||
