|
On February 16 2016 11:47 Eden1892 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 11:41 Trfel wrote:
I found Palmar's push on Breshke interesting, I found sicklucker's first few posts interesting, I found Breshke's response to Palmar's push a bit interesting, and I found some of Tictock's post somewhat interesting.
Rsoultin, did you find any of these things interesting? I'm glad you did, but that doesn't make them of any objective interest in determining their alignments. You can also just come out and say that you think I'm mafia for failing to find these things interesting instead of using these veiled snippy rhetorical questions.
chill -pokes-
if he's scum, this is pointless, and if he's town you going all GROWL at him isn't going to get him to change his mind
that was directed at me. you're in assault mode
|
If that was a sincere question to you, it's a pretty crappy one. What did he find interesting that he wanted you to comment on? Suppose you were mafia, that's just a free invitation to just say whatever about any of these guys and maybe even look townie for it. There's no direction to any of what he said, it's just literally "I think ABCD people did interesting things what do you think about these things I didn't even identify in my question?"
|
On February 16 2016 11:29 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 11:27 rsoultin wrote:On February 16 2016 11:25 sicklucker wrote:
It was plain english. Towns dont really care about that stuff they want to find scum. Power roles especially wont bring it up in thread. Mafia needs things to talk about so they sure will -pokes- and if i said he's done almost the exact same thing in a prior town game? would you drop it, or do you have other reasons to scumread him? would still vote him untill theres someone better because he claimed vt
I have a real problem with this stuff SL. Like in the original quote you say town don't care about "this stuff". This stuff being rolespeculation and finding PR's
You then go on to vote eden because you think he isn't a PR. So the only reason you are voting him is because of the stuff you said towns shouldn't care about. There is no logic here.
|
On February 16 2016 11:51 Eden1892 wrote:
If that was a sincere question to you, it's a pretty crappy one. What did he find interesting that he wanted you to comment on? Suppose you were mafia, that's just a free invitation to just say whatever about any of these guys and maybe even look townie for it. There's no direction to any of what he said, it's just literally "I think ABCD people did interesting things what do you think about these things I didn't even identify in my question?"
-shrugs- ask him lol >< your point here kinda assumes he's either stupid town or scum partnering me and feels that i need the leg up by giving me a "free invitation" as you say
|
On February 16 2016 11:47 Eden1892 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 11:41 Trfel wrote:
I found Palmar's push on Breshke interesting, I found sicklucker's first few posts interesting, I found Breshke's response to Palmar's push a bit interesting, and I found some of Tictock's post somewhat interesting.
Rsoultin, did you find any of these things interesting? I'm glad you did, but that doesn't make them of any objective interest in determining their alignments. You can also just come out and say that you think I'm mafia for failing to find these things interesting instead of using these veiled snippy rhetorical questions. Eden, that's what I'm saying. That wasn't a veiled snippy rhetorical question because:
I'm making my stance clear
That wasn't a rhetorical question
Though I suppose "snippy" is a matter of opinion.
Though I am doubting that you would be annoyed as mafia here. It doesn't make sense.
I guess it's more likely that I'm just being stupid  I should really figure out that people don't place the same importance as I do in things.
|
On February 16 2016 11:55 Trfel wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 11:47 Eden1892 wrote:On February 16 2016 11:41 Trfel wrote:
I found Palmar's push on Breshke interesting, I found sicklucker's first few posts interesting, I found Breshke's response to Palmar's push a bit interesting, and I found some of Tictock's post somewhat interesting.
Rsoultin, did you find any of these things interesting? I'm glad you did, but that doesn't make them of any objective interest in determining their alignments. You can also just come out and say that you think I'm mafia for failing to find these things interesting instead of using these veiled snippy rhetorical questions. Eden, that's what I'm saying. That wasn't a veiled snippy rhetorical question because: I'm making my stance clear That wasn't a rhetorical question Though I suppose "snippy" is a matter of opinion. Though I am doubting that you would be annoyed as mafia here. It doesn't make sense. I guess it's more likely that I'm just being stupid I should really figure out that people don't place the same importance as I do in things.
okay, you can join bresh lol ^^
|
Don't have time to follow all your spam tonight. I'll take a look tomorrow at lunch at the latest.
|
Trefel what is SL's alignment?
Also could you quote specific posts of TT's you found interesting?
|
I got halfway through responding to that but decided this whole thing is stupid and pedantic.
Not that you are. The conversation is just not doing anything helpful for either of us or (presumably) anybody else. I also feel like I'm being unduly backhanded and snide and would like to stop doing that.
Suffice to say that I value trying to 'break' setups however possible, which is why I talk about setups all the time at the beginning of games. I don't think inviting millers to claim is actually going to win the game all by itself, but it's a small advantage that breaks our way, and enough of those piling up matters.
I also chime in with reads whenever I have something meaningful, and given enough time, I find meaningful things. You know that and I know you know that, so I'm going to ask you to trust that this will happen again this game.
Maybe we should talk about what you found interesting that I didn't. I was kinda interested in that but let my pettiness take over for a bit. I know you talked about those guys already and I could look it up in your filter, but humor me as to what you find interesting in those people you listed?
|
On February 16 2016 11:58 Breshke wrote:
Trefel what is SL's alignment?
Also could you quote specific posts of TT's you found interesting? I found Tictock's play surprisingly active, I'm not used to Tictock having a larger presence in the game. He also seemed rather relaxed. However, I think I remember Tictock being one of those players who almost seem more involved and willing to interact as scum than as town, I'll check that when I have more time.
I feel that sicklucker is slightly more likely town for being both more and less argumentative than I expected. Sicklucker has a very weird stance for mafia to take, and I'm not used to sicklucker admitting that he made an error and trying to work with me as mafia. Last time I was suspicious of sicklucker and he was mafia, we yelled at each other for a while and he just out-yelled me instead of answering my statements. So I actually think he's more likely town.
|
why do people find my posts interesting. it was random garbale
|
On February 16 2016 11:52 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 11:29 sicklucker wrote:On February 16 2016 11:27 rsoultin wrote:On February 16 2016 11:25 sicklucker wrote:
It was plain english. Towns dont really care about that stuff they want to find scum. Power roles especially wont bring it up in thread. Mafia needs things to talk about so they sure will -pokes- and if i said he's done almost the exact same thing in a prior town game? would you drop it, or do you have other reasons to scumread him? would still vote him untill theres someone better because he claimed vt I have a real problem with this stuff SL. Like in the original quote you say town don't care about "this stuff". This stuff being rolespeculation and finding PR's You then go on to vote eden because you think he isn't a PR. So the only reason you are voting him is because of the stuff you said towns shouldn't care about. There is no logic here.
you always have a problem with everything i do. You know this right? probably should focus on otherthings :D
|
Eden, please allow me to clarify, I'm not saying that your setup talk was useless, pointless, or scummy. I'm not criticizing the validity of anything you have said.
I want to townread Tictock for his relaxed tone and decent activity, but I feel hesitant because I remember thinking he was town for those reasons one game where he was mafia.
I feel that Breshke's reaction to Palmar's push is a bit towny. That feels like a really stupid thing for mafia to do, because it's a horrible reaction. If Palmar decided to push me early Day 1, I'd be extremely careful and cautious with how I responded, I wouldn't throw away a response like "nope". Breshke is also a methodical town player.
I think that's about all I have. I should have some time to go over stuff again tomorrow morning.
|
On February 16 2016 12:11 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 11:52 Breshke wrote:On February 16 2016 11:29 sicklucker wrote:On February 16 2016 11:27 rsoultin wrote:On February 16 2016 11:25 sicklucker wrote:
It was plain english. Towns dont really care about that stuff they want to find scum. Power roles especially wont bring it up in thread. Mafia needs things to talk about so they sure will -pokes- and if i said he's done almost the exact same thing in a prior town game? would you drop it, or do you have other reasons to scumread him? would still vote him untill theres someone better because he claimed vt I have a real problem with this stuff SL. Like in the original quote you say town don't care about "this stuff". This stuff being rolespeculation and finding PR's You then go on to vote eden because you think he isn't a PR. So the only reason you are voting him is because of the stuff you said towns shouldn't care about. There is no logic here. you always have a problem with everything i do. You know this right? probably should focus on otherthings :D
h3h3h3 I do know thats why im not calling you mafia.
On February 16 2016 12:06 Trfel wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 11:58 Breshke wrote:
Trefel what is SL's alignment?
Also could you quote specific posts of TT's you found interesting? I found Tictock's play surprisingly active, I'm not used to Tictock having a larger presence in the game. He also seemed rather relaxed. However, I think I remember Tictock being one of those players who almost seem more involved and willing to interact as scum than as town, I'll check that when I have more time. I feel that sicklucker is slightly more likely town for being both more and less argumentative than I expected. Sicklucker has a very weird stance for mafia to take, and I'm not used to sicklucker admitting that he made an error and trying to work with me as mafia. Last time I was suspicious of sicklucker and he was mafia, we yelled at each other for a while and he just out-yelled me instead of answering my statements. So I actually think he's more likely town.
No sorry i meant can you show me the posts you were referring to here
On February 16 2016 11:41 Trfel wrote:
I found Palmar's push on Breshke interesting, I found sicklucker's first few posts interesting, I found Breshke's response to Palmar's push a bit interesting, and I found some of Tictock's post somewhat interesting.
Rsoultin, did you find any of these things interesting?
Okay i get your SL read, im just trying to work out what you thought was so important that what Eden was talking about was so unproductive.
|
I found the general trend across Tictock's posts interesting. Like, his willingness to respond and easy-going tone. I can pull up a few random posts if you'd like, but it's a general trend, it's best seen by looking through his filter.
|
Iiiiiii am drunk and IIIIIII AAAAAM TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWN
|
|
|
On February 16 2016 12:27 GlowingBear wrote:
WHO'S MAFIA? Hi, GlowingBear 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
