|
Yes I use my own experience as scum to predict how other people will act as scum. But actually I was accusing him of a standard scumtell, over defense.
Don't put too much stock in what I say, because I don't have any sort of handle on this game so far. I am looking forward to playing in a few days after the herd has been thinned.
My vote stays on Rels for now. Probably he isn't scum but maybe he is and on my phone it takes a lot of effort to change my vote.
|
On December 02 2015 02:45 kushm4sta wrote: Yes I use my own experience as scum to predict how other people will act as scum. But actually I was accusing him of a standard scumtell, over defense.
Don't put too much stock in what I say, because I don't have any sort of handle on this game so far. I am looking forward to playing in a few days after the herd has been thinned.
My vote stays on Rels for now. Probably he isn't scum but maybe he is and on my phone it takes a lot of effort to change my vote.
Uh wat? "I won't play today" "Maybe I'll play D2, maybe not" "My vote stays on a dude, cause he could be mafia though he probably isn't". Though I get that voting on phone sucks hardcore, been there done that, the "My vote stays on Rels for now." part implies that you don't want to change your vote after all? Or does the "because I don't have any sort of handle on this game so far." part means to say that you don't know who to change your vote to cause you have 0 reads?
I think I'll leave a present for you in the vote thread, so could please try harder?
|
Disinformation, I'm so scared of your vote that I will try super hard from now on.
|
On December 02 2015 02:45 kushm4sta wrote: Yes I use my own experience as scum to predict how other people will act as scum. But actually I was accusing him of a standard scumtell, over defense.
Don't put too much stock in what I say, because I don't have any sort of handle on this game so far. I am looking forward to playing in a few days after the herd has been thinned.
My vote stays on Rels for now. Probably he isn't scum but maybe he is and on my phone it takes a lot of effort to change my vote. Okay this is probably the worst thing I've ever read from someone on this site ever. You want to lynch someone who you don't think is scum because you can't be bothered to change your vote???
|
On December 02 2015 03:05 kushm4sta wrote: Disinformation, I'm so scared of your vote that I will try super hard from now on.
Sure thing cupcake, but don't worry I usually don't bite. Looking forward to seeing some reads from you.
|
@disinformation on second thoughts this must be a troll attempt, it cannot possibly be his serious thoughts. Still, I learned last time I played that "too dumb to be Mafia" is not a thing.
|
On December 02 2015 03:27 Fidei86 wrote: @disinformation on second thoughts this must be a troll attempt, it cannot possibly be his serious thoughts. Still, I learned last time I played that "too dumb to be Mafia" is not a thing.
Yeah, last game town also ran in a similar thing with Trfel like "would he be so obvious in defending a scum partner D1" and "why would he fight the uncc Vet"...
|
On December 02 2015 02:45 kushm4sta wrote: Yes I use my own experience as scum to predict how other people will act as scum. But actually I was accusing him of a standard scumtell, over defense.
Don't put too much stock in what I say, because I don't have any sort of handle on this game so far. I am looking forward to playing in a few days after the herd has been thinned.
My vote stays on Rels for now. Probably he isn't scum but maybe he is and on my phone it takes a lot of effort to change my vote.
Phoneposting from my bed - aside from the obvious you two (Fabian and James) just hashed out, do you or anyone else think the bolded is TMI? As in, he is posting as such he knows he won't die.
|
Why would scum kill kush?
Who in the game has played with kush extensively?
|
Besides me anyway, id wager almost no one
|
On December 02 2015 02:28 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2015 02:24 Trfel wrote: I realized that DoYouHas' activity fits a mafia motivation fairly strongly, assuming that Damdred is town. And still fits somewhat if Damdred is mafia. this is bad and you should know why
I took a hard look at DYH's filter again, obviously you aren't talking about the progression on yourself, but where you are drawing a contrast between say, his activity and, say, kushm4sta's? (LS and Shining have had obvious RL excuses, so I'll leave them out.)
|
On December 02 2015 03:53 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2015 02:28 Damdred wrote:On December 02 2015 02:24 Trfel wrote: I realized that DoYouHas' activity fits a mafia motivation fairly strongly, assuming that Damdred is town. And still fits somewhat if Damdred is mafia. this is bad and you should know why I took a hard look at DYH's filter again, obviously you aren't talking about the progression on yourself, but where you are drawing a contrast between say, his activity and, say, kushm4sta's? (LS and Shining have had obvious RL excuses, so I'll leave them out.)
that's a good thought and glad someone picked up on it. There are several people who are fitting into the same activity patterns so not sure why it would necessarily make x mafia over y.
However there is another bad part to it and that's u flipped association which isn't as important.
|
On December 02 2015 03:49 Damdred wrote: Besides me anyway, id wager almost no one
Nope, 0 experience with kush. That being said the part Dani highlighted together with his answer to me indicate that he probably is a very cocky player, presumable as either alignment. Can you confirm?
Also still working on a follow up post on The Shining.
|
Also seems like checking up on DYH should be next on my TODO for today. Haven't gotten to that, yet.
|
I know I haven't. Only experience was Carol, where he did nothing, in my newbie which was over a year ago, he was more active, but in any case, not really a good metric to read him. My take on it, was with a possible vig in the setup, that, why he'd just say something like that. Town generally will spout whatever so I want to think that's what he's doing here, but that one sentence, when someone phrases something like that, it gives me pause. It might seem like "too scummy to be scum" but even when I go back to his explanation that it is an over defence stance, the standard thing to do at least to check Shining against Rels and evaluate whether he lynches Shining over Rels. Even if he's too lazy to follow up on Shining or was just unable, he's clearly throwing his vote away atm seeing as there isn't a train on Rels atm nor is he actually pushing him. Even if he doesn't want to do the latter, the explanation for voting Shining as it stands makes more sense than what I'm seeing for Rels at least based on what he's posted.
I mean if he wasn't lazy enough to post those two paragraphs, surely he's not lazy enough to change his vote?
|
Kush is kush. He's a bit more lurky as scum but more cocky as town.
His meta is easily interchangeable though...
disfor are you my town buddy this game?
|
Looking at 346/349 -
LS, I'm not referring to meta. Let's make sure I'm not misunderstanding you here.
I'm not talking about Palmar's tone in general. I'm talking about his case. If you read the context differently, then tell me how you interpreted that.
You are saying that he's town because his tone is serious and from 349 it's based on meta. Okay fine, but regardless of meta, why would Palmar's case NOT be serious? What I'm trying to say here is that you are townreading him for a poor reason.
|
Also post 349:
Just got to college campus and took care of stuff and about Palmar: It's meta read that I have on him because he did similar stuff to me in Metal Mini which you observed and I do find Shining town for now although he did show huge emotions as scum last game but I giving him a benefit of a doubt. Mainly Shining's content seems better ths game than his last game when he was scum vs me.
Alright, so in spite of your meta read on Shining and your fear read from earlier, you still think his content is better this game rather than last. What game was this, and how long ago and how are you so sure that his scum game hasn't improved given what you've said with the emotions?
|
Okay I here now and Tfrel I did answer HTS just not directly quoted.
On December 02 2015 04:15 Half the Sky wrote: Looking at 346/349 -
LS, I'm not referring to meta. Let's make sure I'm not misunderstanding you here.
I'm not talking about Palmar's tone in general. I'm talking about his case. If you read the context differently, then tell me how you interpreted that.
You are saying that he's town because his tone is serious and from 349 it's based on meta. Okay fine, but regardless of meta, why would Palmar's case NOT be serious? What I'm trying to say here is that you are townreading him for a poor reason. I didn't say it wasn't serious? Anyways the way he argued Shining like I said had a serious tone plus like said he did a very similar thing to me in Metal Mini when I was fighting him and felt frustrated with him. It took me a bit of arguing to get him to townread me in that game because I was still a newbie lol.... So it a little both but more towards personal experience with him.
|
I need to put my head down again since I'm still feeling pretty sick. Going to go through again Trfel/Damdred/Fidei/disformation etc. on a full re-read. I'm also having issues with town reads.
Right now, I need to flesh out Trfel a little more, same for disformation and LS. The lynch list right now is kush/DYH, Onegu is straight policy, but there's got to be an active mafia somewhere.
Palmar is probably town but this is a gut feel based on how he proceeded with the case.
|
|
|
|