On April 20 2015 22:54 Bill Murray wrote:You know, this setup seems absurdly scum favored upon looking at it. We REALLY Don't need a mislynch on me. IF anyone would come around right now, I would greatly enjoy some discussion. As it is, though, I am doing some filter diving.
Speaking of scumteams I thought 1) we had 9 players and there were 2 scum
2) it was Cop/Doc/Goon/Goon
3) I am actually relatively confirmed village idiot at this point
But you all can go ahead and lynch me I'm not even going to doublevote on someone to get the vote off of me
Show nested quote +On April 20 2015 01:03 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:
Hey veterans here.
What is your experience about inactive players that come to thread with post stating their reason for inactivity and haven't posted at all.
How many times they have been scums? I mean just inactivity on day1 gives them like "free" day. Less posts, less scumhunting on them.
I don't see this guy as being scum. The last part of his post is more of a "theory posed as a question"
There is a guy on this website named Foolishness, who, in the prime of his mafia playing, wasn't the best mafia player. He was great as town, but as mafia, he would emulate his blue play, possibly subconsciously, and coast through D1 to D2 before he would start posting. As VT however the guy would be posting this huge ass posts detailing the possibility of entire scumteams
Show nested quote +On April 20 2015 07:14 TheBloodyDwarf wrote:On April 20 2015 06:48 Trfel wrote:For anyone who doesn't know Bill Murray, he's quite famous.
This is a must read.
Wow, I have been banned several times on this website but damn, now there is name that I should look forward to when playing mafia. Such a legend.
+ Show Spoiler +/jk
Do I need to even need to stay this?
I still don't think this guy should be lynched, even when he's making fun of me. I feel like he is just a bored VT.
##vote: Scott31337IIoA, AtA, AtS, voting obvious bored townie
Scott has been giving any bit of off topic information, or even on topic information, without actually doing analysis. I will highlight this now:
Show nested quote +On April 19 2015 13:00 scott31337 wrote:On April 19 2015 11:18 Trfel wrote:
There is a typo in the link to scott31337's filter in the OP. There is an extra "3" in the link.
Thanks - now I'm Scott31333337. *facepalm*
Trfel's post looks like something he wrote up the day before and is not alignment indicative.
On April 19 2015 11:49 Trfel wrote:Hm, this game feels slow already. I thought my post would get things started, but I guess that wasn't good enough.
I find Bourneq to be the most suspicious so far.
On April 19 2015 11:00 Bourneq wrote:
Anybody wants to request a tone read from me? Ill give a more educated response than last game.
Actually I am going to sleep, its 4 am.
Bourneq asks if anyone wants to ask him for a tone read, because this is something that people asked him to do last game. And he knows that it's a townie thing to do. However, the interesting thing is that he asks if people want him to tone read someone or something. He doesn't seem inclined to do it himself. This suggests that he is more interested in appeasing others and not getting lynched than actually finding scum.
Furthermore, he says that he will sleep instead of scumhunting. But why would he leave the first sentence in if he is going to sleep after all? He left it in to gain town credit for being open to doing something towny (making a read).
On April 19 2015 11:21 Bourneq wrote:
Well im not tonereading that one. TL;DR
Then, someone in his previous game made a post. And Bourneq acknowledges it and says that he wasn't going to read it. Why does Bourneq feel a need to acknowledge my post? He already said that he's tired and he will be going to bed. His post doesn't help town in any way, but it makes him seem more involved in the game (which is false, since he didn't bother to toneread anyone at all).
I'll be heading out again for a while. Any thoughts?
When I first read this, I thought Bourneq was asking for tone reads on himself, which I did not understand since he only had one post. Reading your point of view, I do not know what tone reads he would give off - and then added the TLDR post - meh.
What do you think of the LS/Damdred exchange? I know LS can be intimidated - and avoiding questions intentionally is viewed as scummy.
Even in his most scumhunting sounding post, he chooses to word it as "is viewed as scummy" as opposed to "is scummy". His previous scumhunting analysis is a whopping "meh"... literally. He literally says that. What can we get out of someone saying "meh" ? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Show nested quote +On April 19 2015 14:27 scott31337 wrote:
I really don't have much at the moment - Damdred slight town - you as well -
I believe Shining is still upset about the case I made about him four months ago in LX.
Everyone else null ATM
his one town post, the above, even feels forced. he throws out a couple leans as bones to the town, and then goes on to finish it with the almighty "Everyone is null"
Yeah it's early in the game but this is different. This is him trying to coast through while having activity for the sake of activity without committing to any analysis whatsoever.
Show nested quote +On April 19 2015 14:37 scott31337 wrote:On April 19 2015 14:35 LeiNadk wrote:
Could someone explain to me precisely what a tone read is? From context, I'm assuming, it's something Bourne was asked to do last game and got mislynched for.
Sorry about all the questions. Should I direct these questions to coaches rather post them in the game?
I'll let one of the others answer the "tone read" question better then I can - but from the rules/first post, Do not talk about coaching in the game. just FYI
More IIoA. Bringing up a topic and not even answering it. He defers.
Show nested quote +On April 19 2015 14:44 scott31337 wrote:On April 19 2015 14:38 LeiNadk wrote:On April 19 2015 14:27 scott31337 wrote:
I really don't have much at the moment - Damdred slight town - you as well -
I believe Shining is still upset about the case I made about him four months ago in LX.
Everyone else null ATM
Could you elaborate on Damdred and Obi? Why town?
Obi and Damdred have been asking questions and offering their ideas and they feel honest to me so far.
From your message I assumed you have played IRL mafia before, correct?
There is the
TL Mafia Database that has information on others mafia games played on this site - if you want to look into peoples previous games.
When directly questioned comes up with a bullshit excuse based upon "he feels obi and damdred are town"
He then goes onto the worst of his IIoA and becomes a human library trying to throw a link out to get suspicion off himself.
He is feigning helpfulness as scum and this post also highlights my next talking point, his AtA.
AtA = appealing to authority. He is sucking up to what he views as the better players haha
he is also trying to butt in anytime the moderator is brought up
Show nested quote +On April 20 2015 08:47 scott31337 wrote:On April 20 2015 08:43 cakepie wrote:
Fashionably late, checking in after late a night out and sleeping in half the day -- wasn’t expecting the game to kick off in mere hours! Catching up. Feel free to address questions to me and I’ll get to them when I’m done reading up to speed.
What do you think of LightningStrike?
And a reads list would be nice as well.
in his most recent post with a forced question about someone he has had no discussion about or analysis of (asked towards cakepie about LightningStrike) this is there because CakePie has actually been shrugging off his scum aura and shining forth in the spotlight more. He has actually become a very helpful member of town. The reason Scott is doing this is scum motivated. He wants a list of reads from Cakepie to see whether or not he should be killing him tonight. If Scott himself is lower on that list, bam, the cake is a lie. There are other explanations here including his not understanding the meta of the thread, coaching, actual analysis etc but I feel like, given his earlier posting, he is using this as AtA and judging where cake stands on the issue for negative reasons.
Show nested quote +On April 20 2015 07:29 scott31337 wrote:What a night! Let me catch up in the thread -
TBD picked it up a little bit, but he's still on a tight leash for now.
## UnvoteOn April 20 2015 01:30 Bill Murray wrote:
PS I'm Vanilla Townie and we need a massclaim in all likelihood. If scum don't CC power roles we will likely have around a 60% chance to win
What the hell is this BM? This is a terrible idea and you know it.
BM roles scum like 80% of the time anyway, RNG gods love him.
On April 20 2015 06:48 Trfel wrote:For anyone who doesn't know Bill Murray, he's quite famous.
This is a must read.
That's an excellent read - although I have before - the whole banlist is worth a read too.
On April 20 2015 06:50 Damdred wrote:
Yeah this isn't going to be a fun game at all for me. Anyway my answers already there
Are you feeling okay - or? Sorry to hear that.
Looks like others went over BM's terrible idea already...
And here he appeals to statistics. He has the worst reaction of anyone to my trying to get some plan rolling. Town can't afford to have this sort of plan but people who are town are going to largely mull it over. Upon reading this I'm sure you all are thinking to yourself "well he's right" but in mafia it doesnt matter whether or not you are right it matters what you can get your friendly town to do with you. When someone is saying "BM rolls scum 80%" of the time to subconsciously fuck with you guys and get me lynched that's utter bullshit. Someone thats AtS along with AtA and IIoA needs to go
Lastly he was voting for TheBloodyDwarf who I completely disagree with him on. In fact I feel like he was trying to go for one of the most obvious vanilla town that is a village idiot and possibly a good mislynch
For all of those reasons I'm voting the 3rd filter I looked at, Scott.
##vote scott331331313