VII Titanic Mini Mafia: I Have a Cunning Plan... - Page 15
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
liancourt
1563 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:49 liancourt wrote: who we lynching today? The objective RNG picked VA, which is a 30% chance of being scum which is pretty darned good for D1, so let's lynch VayneAuthority. | ||
liancourt
1563 Posts
| ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:48 liancourt wrote: rowan atkinson Although he is awesome, not sure it was him. | ||
liancourt
1563 Posts
| ||
liancourt
1563 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:51 Alakaslam wrote: Although he is awesome, not sure it was him. ricky gervais | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:49 liancourt wrote: will this be another over 200p game probably | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
| ||
liancourt
1563 Posts
my body is ready for 200p game, but my eyes are probably not | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
Sirius XM laugh USA radio. | ||
liancourt
1563 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:53 Alakaslam wrote: no dude it was someone with a very deep voice cumberpatch | ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:49 Blazinghand wrote: Well, objectively I'm choosing to scumread him because he got RNGed. Do you deny that he got RNGed? It was truly random and gives us a 30% chance to lynch scum, which is way better than any other case so far. The real question here is why aren't you voting VA yet BH, come on. Yes that was a reason, no I am not denying he got RNGed. But you stated another reason to objectively scumread him. My criticism is of the bolded: On February 14 2015 15:39 Blazinghand wrote: Interestingly, it looks like in addition to being objectively correct due to RNG, it is ALSO objectively correct to lynch VA because he has so little content. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/477800-vii-titanic-mini-mafia-i-have-a-cunning-plan?user=VayneAuthority He's clearly here but has not posted enough I am disputing your OTHER objective reason for scumreading him. On February 14 2015 15:47 Half the Sky wrote: So Blazinghand, D1 meta for Vayne is that he does jack all. We're less than 2h into the game. Further, you're objectively scumreading him for doing jack all, when it's his known meta? I had previously scumread him because compared to what he normally posts all of D1, which is jack all, I think in comparison, he was posting too much within the first few bits of the game here, though he's (reasonably) countering that it's because of the weird start time. | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
| ||
liancourt
1563 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:53 Alakaslam wrote: I just tried to find him on youtube I think he is older than that. Sirius XM laugh USA radio. gary oldman | ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:53 liancourt wrote: welp no voting thread gg my body is ready for 200p game, but my eyes are probably not Read OP - Breshke called me on it as well as I missed it. Vote in here. | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
Benedict Cumberbatch. I would recognize his voice immediately. Not him. | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
no I am serious DEEP deeep voice Deeper than Benedict | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 14 2015 15:54 Half the Sky wrote: BH, come on. Yes that was a reason, no I am not denying he got RNGed. But you stated another reason to objectively scumread him. My criticism is of the bolded: I am disputing your OTHER objective reason for scumreading him. Fine, let's say that reason is crap, he still has a 30% chance to flip scum, and RNG has never failed me, even once. Vote him. | ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
(Although will vote in the preferred/accepted format...) | ||
| ||