|
On October 09 2014 03:23 Damdred wrote: So how are you reading loan mow obi? I know you didn't like how he used his vote but why not cop check him? Is he scummy or not to you
It hasn't changed. I've posted absolutely nothing to indicate that I've changed it at any point so I would think that my read on him is relatively similar to what it was.
|
On October 09 2014 03:22 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 03:21 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:15 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:05 Damdred wrote: snip Grack posted bad analysis and I changed my read. He went from "approaching a situation with reasonable doubt" to "this guy is scum because he didn't read my filter" which is bad analysis. There's no "non-reason" that I can see, so if you could elaborate on that point, that would be cool because I'm apparently not in the know. The rest of my lynch targets I have either talked over with Kelsier as of the past hour or so, or I've outright told you. My reason wasn't actually that you didn't read the thread but that you were complaining about nobody posting trying to progress the thread while not having read the thread - which I found fake and scummy Palmar didn't read the thread but I didn't care because he wasn't complaining about low content in the game. *Kind of like how mafia might show up after a lynch and complain that it was a bad lynch while having done nothing to try to change the lynch earlier, id nothing to get the lynch off of what you perceive to be his partner. Yes. Very scum. 10/10 Wat
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Plus, let me assure you, if it was possible for me to easily control the outcome of my RNG, I'd use it literally every game as scum and never tell anyone about it. Given that I use RNG pretty sparingly as scum (tather than all the damn time), you can infer that I haven't found some tactic that makes it gameable. Remember, I'm willing to forge rental agreements and take photos of houses and boxes and stuff in order to lie as scum; if I had the ability to abuse the RNG concept, I'd be doing it constantly. I've tried to think of a way, too, don't get me wrong-- it's just not possible.
|
On October 09 2014 03:25 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 03:22 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:21 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:15 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:05 Damdred wrote: snip Grack posted bad analysis and I changed my read. He went from "approaching a situation with reasonable doubt" to "this guy is scum because he didn't read my filter" which is bad analysis. There's no "non-reason" that I can see, so if you could elaborate on that point, that would be cool because I'm apparently not in the know. The rest of my lynch targets I have either talked over with Kelsier as of the past hour or so, or I've outright told you. My reason wasn't actually that you didn't read the thread but that you were complaining about nobody posting trying to progress the thread while not having read the thread - which I found fake and scummy Palmar didn't read the thread but I didn't care because he wasn't complaining about low content in the game. *Kind of like how mafia might show up after a lynch and complain that it was a bad lynch while having done nothing to try to change the lynch earlier, id nothing to get the lynch off of what you perceive to be his partner. Yes. Very scum. 10/10 Wat
You're accusing me of complaining about the lynch while doing nothing to change it.
I did nothing to divert the lynch off of scum.
Thus I am scum.
Qed.
|
On October 09 2014 03:27 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 03:25 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:22 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:21 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:15 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:05 Damdred wrote: snip Grack posted bad analysis and I changed my read. He went from "approaching a situation with reasonable doubt" to "this guy is scum because he didn't read my filter" which is bad analysis. There's no "non-reason" that I can see, so if you could elaborate on that point, that would be cool because I'm apparently not in the know. The rest of my lynch targets I have either talked over with Kelsier as of the past hour or so, or I've outright told you. My reason wasn't actually that you didn't read the thread but that you were complaining about nobody posting trying to progress the thread while not having read the thread - which I found fake and scummy Palmar didn't read the thread but I didn't care because he wasn't complaining about low content in the game. *Kind of like how mafia might show up after a lynch and complain that it was a bad lynch while having done nothing to try to change the lynch earlier, id nothing to get the lynch off of what you perceive to be his partner. Yes. Very scum. 10/10 Wat You're accusing me of complaining about the lynch while doing nothing to change it. I did nothing to divert the lynch off of scum. Thus I am scum. Qed. No I was making an analogy for my earlier statement
|
I'm actually not accusing you of anything right now
|
|
The only reason i keep asking obi is that i'm on my phone and its getting really hard to find anything and trying to filter dive so if you could link me to the post where your read is if i missed it it would be really appreciated so i could quit wasteing both of our times
|
On October 09 2014 03:31 Damdred wrote: The only reason i keep asking obi is that i'm on my phone and its getting really hard to find anything and trying to filter dive so if you could link me to the post where your read is if i missed it it would be really appreciated so i could quit wasteing both of our times
You already quoted and bolded it.
That was my read. It hasn't changed.
|
The thing I noticed about Lian is that he's withholding his vote on OO because of "principles." (????) Aside from harping on the BH shit which didn't mean anything, I don't like how he's arbitrarily holding out on voting for someone he perceives as scummy.
If you mean this, I have a few problems with it. Like whats your conclusion besides you do not like it based on his filter and everything else. And why would you seem surprised or against hat he deserves to get cop checked?
|
On October 09 2014 03:39 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +The thing I noticed about Lian is that he's withholding his vote on OO because of "principles." (????) Aside from harping on the BH shit which didn't mean anything, I don't like how he's arbitrarily holding out on voting for someone he perceives as scummy. If you mean this, I have a few problems with it. Like whats your conclusion besides you do not like it based on his filter and everything else. And why would you seem surprised or against hat he deserves to get cop checked?
I don't seem anything with him being cop checked. I think it's a good idea.
Really I don't know what you're doing because all I did was ask a question about Holyflare's reasoning, being that his current method of attack is to randomly drop names.
|
Right now obi I feel like you are half answering everything or just pointing people to go read your filter where most of everything is half answers or reads without many conclussions. I know your under a lot of pressure right now and my filter isn't any better, but you are dodging half of what i said still. And ok you did answer part of what I said and it was a misinterpretation by me
|
It's because I feel most of the answers to the questions you're asking can be found in my filter. I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about when you say that I'm not drawing conclusions because I feel as if my conclusions are fairly obvious by looking at the focus of my posts.
I'm sorry if I'm coming across as brash or rude or whatever, but that's just how I do things.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I wasn't lying when i said i think you're actually town btw obi
|
AWESOME.
I AM GOING TO GO PLAY STREET FIGHTER NOW. THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING LESS SUSPICIOUS OF ME.
|
On October 09 2014 03:12 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 03:08 Holyflare wrote:On October 09 2014 03:07 Damdred wrote:On October 09 2014 02:56 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 02:49 Damdred wrote: BH seems interested, and is actually doing things and pushing his lynch today. Normally when hes scum in almost every scum game i've seen or read, he makes excuses complains and only posts during the time hes not "busy". here he is the opposite he has been in the thread, has argued not complained and not made excuses for his absence plus he did lynch scum oo day one and put rng on him even before he made his entrance into the thread. You know BH doesn't choose who gets RNGed. That's kind of the whole point of RNG. Probably that point wasn't clear since I didn't talk much about it. I know that he doesn't choose who to rng, but as scum it would be safer for him to change who gets rng'd instead of someone who is their scum partner the rest of the meta case is the same i just shouldn't of put in that one part. he'd look scummy if he changed it because it's the same as he always does Couldn't BH manipulate it before he posted it though so that it did not come up a scum buddy? Though in tin hat land this woudl be amazing for him to get town cred for life
No
|
Wait BH might have a time machine so that last post isn't necessarily true
|
Its true bats you can never be sure those time machines are serious business....though thanks for the explanation bh.
I'm not sure what to make of obi right now, i think its probably in the best entrance of the thread to just ignore him and look elsewhere
|
Actually it is possible to game BH's system without a time machine. It's the same as using bots to post "combos" on high traffic websites like 4chan.
|
@hf what made you change your mind about lian?
|
|
|
|