Mission Mini Mafia - Page 52
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
3d12
United States100 Posts
On September 06 2014 01:14 batsnacks wrote: ##vote: kushm4sta dis gon b gud | ||
27ninjabunnies
United States2486 Posts
On September 06 2014 01:14 batsnacks wrote: ##vote: kushm4sta Seriously! Doesn't this look like a guy who WANTS to be lynched. Everything he has done has irked me to no end | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 05 2014 12:44 Vivax wrote: So let me resume this: 1. Damdred dislikes mix posts but doesn't see his lurking as scummy, decides to not go after him at this point for being low hanging fruit and to look for other options. 2. Damdred decides to vote Mix for his posts and again emphasizes that it doesn't have to do with his lurking. 3. I ask where the sudden boost of confidence came from. 4. Now in retrospective it's cause Mix didn't want to fight back, which is just another way of saying that he didn't post, which is another way of saying that he lurked, which previously wasn't a concern in his vote, so it couldn't have given that confidence to Damdred. Your vote on Damdred is a vote on scum. not fighting back is not equivalent to lurking like you make it out to be | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:43 kitaman27 wrote: @Vivax, I think that's a pretty reasonable case again Damdred. Enough so that I'd consider lynching him. Even aside from the point about Mix, his filter is rather empty content wise. vivax's case on damdred is essentially one point: damdred changed his mind about miccan. Is there potential scum motivation behind this? Not really since there was no other viable lynch. Townies change their minds too. Damdred's filter is not rather empty content wise. He has an extremely high snr. He talks a lot about what he thinks and why. | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On September 06 2014 01:22 27ninjabunnies wrote: Seriously! Doesn't this look like a guy who WANTS to be lynched. Everything he has done has irked me to no end Do you want to lynch me because you think I'm scum or because I irk you? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On September 06 2014 01:52 kushm4sta wrote: batsnacks i think you;re scum but ofc im not certain. I did give some reasons behind my suspicion, though. Why do you think I'm scum? I'm not really sure yet. I was hoping that if I voted you you'd do something scummy and then I could just keep my vote there and relax. Nothing is ever that easy though is it? I think I am scum reading you because I don't think town!kush would be scum reading me right now. It is easier for me to believe that scum!kush wants to get rid of me because he feels like there is an opportunity. So maybe you can help me help you. What do I do to make you town read me, or at least scum read me for more satisfying reasons? Give me some hoops and I will try to jump. | ||
3d12
United States100 Posts
On September 05 2014 00:16 3d12 wrote: That was fun. For our next exercise in perception, I'd like you to analyze the motive behind this post. Not the content of the post itself, but I'd like you to explain to me why you think 27nb said this: Repeating my question to Vivax, for when he returns. I'd like you to provide a clearer perception of your view on bunnies. Quote any relevant posts, if not the above. | ||
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 05 2014 22:08 Vivax wrote: Not gonna bold stuff but it's information from these posts. Vivax are you just going to post everything I say but put no context with it? The first part was a question to 3d about his read on bats, the second post was talking about PLynching bat after two posts. And if I might point out, I said that scum bats in that post usually is much more formulaic and lo and behold by the time I get to my scum read, I have examples in the thread and examples out of game comparing his meta. Also about his first post being weird, just for reference in the thread I believe bats had been in the thread before I posted my scum read on him, and he ignored pretty much everything that was posted against him at that point. Vivax you are giving no room for anyones reads to evolve or include anything as their mind gets to it. You just want people to go this is what I think and never move from it, it seems. Peoples reads and thought processes evolve over time and it should become apparent in what they say in the thread if you are confused about the evolution you ask for an explanation and expect an answer. You aren't doing that you see a post that says x and then another post say y and you scream scum. I will get to kitmans post that I was asked to comment on now and get to a couple scum reads | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
##vote kush | ||
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 06 2014 02:30 Oatsmaster wrote: ##unvote ##vote kush Why vote on Kush again Oats? | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 05 2014 22:05 Vivax wrote: Would also lynch kush cause he has damdred among the possible scummers but didn't give a shit about the stuff I wrote on him so far. Very authentic scumread. Yeah I think we're both voting scum (just different ones atm) I think we should run them both up. | ||
3d12
United States100 Posts
On September 06 2014 02:30 Oatsmaster wrote: ##unvote ##vote kush Oats: Your vote was already on kush? Why vote again, especially without further reason? On a related note, sqrtofneg1, could we get a current vote tally? When you get a moment, of course. | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 05 2014 19:57 kushm4sta wrote: So poorer u disagree about batsnacks why ? Weird how I'm your top scum read due to inactivity, I do stuff, and then you don't even feel the need to comment on it. Its not about the activity its about how much I think you care about the game and you frankly don't seem to care. I thought at first you cared but now I'm just not seeing it like I have before. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2014 02:34 Tehpoofter wrote: Its not about the activity its about how much I think you care about the game and you frankly don't seem to care. I thought at first you cared but now I'm just not seeing it like I have before. that's a sketchy as fuck thing to base a read on. you aren't me. You don't truly know my current level of caring AND you don't know how business could affect my level of caring. | ||
| ||