EPTMission Mini Mafia - Page 51
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
27ninjabunnies
United States2486 Posts
| ||
|
27ninjabunnies
United States2486 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:14 27ninjabunnies wrote: I want to be the 100th post in thread! Mission Successful  | ||
|
Vivax
22251 Posts
On September 05 2014 14:19 kushm4sta wrote: batsnacks kitaman27 Tehpoofter mderg Damdred -revised list of possible scummers On September 05 2014 23:25 kushm4sta wrote: Read through dsmdred filter on and I'm finding it pretty townie with lots of content | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Also was going to ask, how can bats and I be top two scum reads. Are we pulling a double bus or do you think it's one or the other? | ||
|
3d12
United States100 Posts
Does anyone else find this suspicious? On September 05 2014 09:16 batsnacks wrote: Just so we're clear, I'm not actually voting someone right now. First of all, why the host warning? This screams mission to me, since I doubt bat would have been warned for changing his vote otherwise. At least, I'm pretty sure we can vote an unlimited number of times before deadline. And why the defensive clarification? Obviously, he ended his post "not actually voting someone," since his last vote was an unvote. Why specify this to the host, unless it had something to do with a quantification? Conclusion: batsnacks has a mission to vote X number of times today. Any explanation for this, bat? Any clarification from √(-1)? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
27ninjabunnies
United States2486 Posts
im so pro. | ||
|
3d12
United States100 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote: I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote: This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. | ||
|
3d12
United States100 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote: You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. How about in a scenario with potential death hanging over whether or not you fulfill your mission? I believe a mod would warn bat for trying to cheese his mission and complete it in one post. Without clarification from √(-1) though, it's impossible to tell. The way I see it, if this has nothing to do with a mission, √(-1) should clarify why bat was warned, since his behavior didn't seem outwardly worthy of a warning. If no clarification comes forth, I'm forced to believe it's to protect the integrity of the game, i.e. mission-related. Would you disagree? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:31 3d12 wrote: How about in a scenario with potential death hanging over whether or not you fulfill your mission? I believe a mod would warn bat for trying to cheese his mission and complete it in one post. Without clarification from √(-1) though, it's impossible to tell. The way I see it, if this has nothing to do with a mission, √(-1) should clarify why bat was warned, since his behavior didn't seem outwardly worthy of a warning. If no clarification comes forth, I'm forced to believe it's to protect the integrity of the game, i.e. mission-related. Would you disagree? That would be handled privately in my opinion. More likely, its in incredibly pain for a host to record 10 votes and unvotes on a voting history. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
3d12
United States100 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:32 kitaman27 wrote: That would be handled privately in my opinion. More likely, its in incredibly pain for a host to record 10 votes and unvotes on a voting history. So hitting CTRL+V 9 times is worth warning a player? I'll believe it when I hear it from the host. In the meantime, I suggest we keep a closer eye on bat. I was one of the ones who wrote off his intro post as nonsense, but his actions have gotten fishier lately, and that intro post keeps popping back into my mind like it's somehow relevant. You analyzed the intro post he posted and if I recall, you said there was a small section missing? Could you paste or link the missing section? If I have time over my lunch break, I'd like to poke into that a bit myself. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
3d12
United States100 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:38 kushm4sta wrote: 3d do you also think Jews did 911 This made me laugh harder than it probably should have. Thanks.  And no, I don't. Did that warning seem completely inconspicuous to you, kush? | ||
|
27ninjabunnies
United States2486 Posts
He's thinking outside of the box. Even though it's probably a stretch, I can see where he is coming from. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
@Damdred, When you return, I'd much rather hear a case or two from you than a back and forth with Vivax explaining why you are town. I'll likely wait till tomorrow to decide my preferred lynch. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:38 3d12 wrote: So hitting CTRL+V 9 times is worth warning a player? I'll believe it when I hear it from the host. In the meantime, I suggest we keep a closer eye on bat. I was one of the ones who wrote off his intro post as nonsense, but his actions have gotten fishier lately, and that intro post keeps popping back into my mind like it's somehow relevant. You analyzed the intro post he posted and if I recall, you said there was a small section missing? Could you paste or link the missing section? If I have time over my lunch break, I'd like to poke into that a bit myself. Don't get my wrong, I have bats in my top four red list, but there are better ways to argue that. Mainly his nonsense reads, the fact that he was incredibly satisfied where is vote was night one, he went into day two supporting a vote on me or obi, and then has dropped it since without explanation. Here is the missing passage, but I wouldn't waste too much time on it. + Show Spoiler + Nine in the third place means: No plain not followed by a slope. No going not followed by a return. He who remains persevering in danger Is without blame. Do not complain about this truth; Enjoy the good fortune you still possess. Everything on earth is subject to change. Prosperity is followed by decline: this is the eternal law on earth. Evil can indeed be held in check but not permanently abolished. It always returns. This conviction might induct melancholy, but it should not; it ought only to keep us from falling into illusion when good fortune comes to us. If we continue mindful of the danger, we remain persevering and make no mistakes. As long as a man's inner nature remains stronger and richer than anything offered by external fortune, as long as he remains inwardly superior to fate, fortune will not desert him. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 00:18 kitaman27 wrote: Also was going to ask, how can bats and I be top two scum reads. Are we pulling a double bus or do you think it's one or the other? Could you clarify kush? | ||
| ||
